this fits right into that picture. here we have the president knows that general flynn lied to the fbi, committed a crime, and he is pressuring the fbi not to investigate general flynn, not to pursue the russia investigation, and then when james comey won't do that, james comey gets fired, that's obstruction of justice, and this argument that his lawyer, mr. dowd is making, is absolutely absurd that the president is somehow above the law, and cannot obstruct justice. that's just as bad an argument as the argument that president trump was making, that the president can't have a conflict of interest. we don't have a king, we don't have a dictator, he's not above the law. nixon tried that argument, and he got booted for it, i think that's where trump may have to go as well. >> let me say, obviously, you were a special prosecutor during watergate, what do you make of this argument john dowd is trying to make. he is the chief law enforcement officer citing article two of