obstruct the due administration of justice. i don't think on its face these memos create that case. now, there may be other things. you've got papadopoulos. you've got flynn as cooperating witnesses. you have other documentary evidence. but on its face as the president who speaks as comey said in nonlinear terms, it's hard to figure out how you prove criminal intept on these documents. >> go ahead renaldo. >> i was going to say, don, just to be clear i do agree with michael that you couldn't certainly -- i've never had a criminal trial where i had one exhibit. i wouldn't suggest you put these memos in and comey's testimony and that would be it. there's a lot of other evidence out there that would be probative of this corrupt intent. stick around both of you. we've got lots more details to come about james comey's memos with president trump and what