>> well, to try to somehow disrupt the flow of information, the tipping off of witness in advance to what the question was going to be, and listening to -- you reading the questions, and i'm scanning them, it appears to me more that these are questions somebody wrote down after listening to someone else than necessarily the questions that were designed by the prosecutors. >> you think the wording is knots exact as they might be from a prosecutor? >> yes, i do. >> what makes you think that, just how the sentences are phrased? >> exactly. it's sort of mechanical. what did -- you know, it sounds like it could have come out of a discussion with the prosecutors. >> michael zeldin, as a former prosecutor, do you agree with that? >> well, i think these are not specific questions as you might