>> that wouldn't be available. to me. >> so obviously, he's admitting, director, that he doesn't know. but he says that everything from what he does know, this russian was an informant. if, do you think what they're saying about this person being an informant, the fbi owes answers? because it would change the timeline if it were true or do you think it's a distraction? >> well, you know, i don't know here, but it just seems to me, this is a bit of distraction because the sequence of events doesn't track. this would seem to me and again, i don't know the specifics here, but it would seem to be awfully premature even if the fbi were going to do this, way premature to do a set up as they seem to allege. that just doesn't track with me. >> all right, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thanks.