not, correct? >> either you believe the sworn testimony of three individuals or rather the statements they have delivered under penalty of felony and judge brett kavanaugh or you believe this dr. ford's account. i agree that you can't square the two of them. but it is very clear that judge brett kavanaugh's a clear. it's consistent. his calendars do provide some circumstanti circumstantial evidence of his account. three individuals have given sworn statements under penalty of felony, including a lifelong friend of dr. ford's all say their recollections are consistent with judge brett kavanaugh. >> you say they have all given sworn testimony. if the judge feels the facts are on his side, why did he refuse to support a new fbi background check? >> so i think there is a few misnomers about what the fbi background process is and isn't. i want your viewers to understand this because i don't