enforcement agencies. >> what you are describing is evidence to back up what you said before that you believe the president has obstructed justice. you still believe that? >> well, there have been obstructions of justice, whether they are -- clearly, whether they are criminal obstruction is another question. but we have -- the special prosecutor is limited in scope. his job was limited in scope and limited to crimes. what congress has to do is look at a broader picture. we are in charge -- we have the responsibility of protecting the rule of law, of looking at obstructions of justice, abuses of power, at corruption, in order to protect the rule of law so that our democratic institutions are not greatly damaged by this president. >> on that very note, if robert mueller comes out in his report and suggests very strongly or states flt out that he agrees with you that the president obstructed justice or that the president may have committed some crime that doj guidelines don't allow to be indicted, will