>> absolutely yes. i think it's political and he's entitled to say we shouldn't pass $19 billion of spending by unanimous consent. we should show up your vote. frankly it's not a bad political move. it'll give republicans u chance to grand stand a little bit, well, i will vote with this reservation, we need money to build the wall and they'll use that for their campaign videos. that's really what this is about. i think the congressman got handed a raw deal in the initial news cycle suggested that he was trying to block the bill. that's not true at all. he just wants a roll call vote. he wants democrats to be put on the record supporting this -- arthel: he also said he wanted money for the immigration situation. >> i don't think he will get that money. i don't think the president really is all that concerned about it right now. it will hurt them more to stonewall on disaster money than it would help them to stand their ground on immigration money. i'm not sure they'll get the immigration money in the long run more than the billion and a half that they got the last time around. white house seems