>> this may not be parallel. remember the way they said, how anita hill was some how a product of liberal white guys. really not, testifying, based upon what she had been through. what the chief justice or justice clarence thomas, somehow she was put up. this is the same kind of language. she is in the race not because she wants to run, barack obama and harry reid want her to be in the race. she is their pawn. he talks about, stuff, coal, he is putting her in the pawn position. then he has her talking as a child saying -- she's been practicing party politics since she learned to talk. in other word, sort of a mini-me of all the people that mitch doesn't like. that's going to hurt him? or is that just smart, old school politics, minimize the woman's independence, say she is not the right person, and that will work with men.