Editorial: Once again, BCSO sheriff is fighting public accou

Editorial: Once again, BCSO sheriff is fighting public accountability » Albuquerque Journal


.......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..........
The first question asks a law enforcement officer if they have been the subject of an internal investigation involving dishonesty that resulted in resignation or termination. The second asks if they’ve been charged or convicted with a crime of dishonesty, such as fraud or perjury. Another asks whether the officer has had “a personal relationship with the defendant, civilian witnesses, the prosecutor, the defense attorney, or the assigned judge, or any previous professional dealings with any of those persons that could reasonably result in a bias for or against them.”
When you are vetting witnesses for a criminal case, that all seems reasonable. Justice is not served by having testimony from someone accused of destroying evidence or perjury.

Related Keywords

Mexico , Manuel Gonzales , Jennifer Burrill , Mexico Criminal Defense Lawyers Association , Albuquerque Police Department , Bernalillo County Sheriff Manuel , Internal Affairs , New Mexico Criminal Defense Lawyers Association , Sheriff Gonzales , மெக்ஸிகோ , மானுவல் காந்ஸாலஸ் , ஜெனிபர் பர்ரில் , மெக்ஸிகோ குற்றவாளி பாதுகாப்பு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் சங்கம் , அல்புகர்கி போலீஸ் துறை , பெர்னலிலோ கவுண்டி ஷெரிப் மானுவல் , உள் வாழ்க்கைத்தொழில்கள் , புதியது மெக்ஸிகோ குற்றவாளி பாதுகாப்பு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் சங்கம் , ஷெரிப் காந்ஸாலஸ் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana