Of oleksandr, does biden now have a chance to avoid a Court Verdict before the elections, well , you know, it is very possible dont forget, we are talking about four processes here, not just one, they are at Different Levels of seriousness, those related to his behavior in your tony and in georges state are the most serious and they have just started talking about it there. So what do you understand when it all starts, when, when it ends . No one knows. I read recently that in such Court Processes , on average, they last for about 18 to 18 months to about 15 to 18 months, because there is always one side of ours. Requires another one too well, they are stretching for quite a long time , well, imagine what will happen with one or all of those processes that have just begun, it is very possible that there will be verdicts either for or against trump right at the beginning, and maybe even in the middle of 2025 this means that he will have the opportunity to make such a persecuted dissident, he somehow sometimes well, they constantly play. He constantly emphasizes that this is not a case against him, but against america and against the people who support him, this is, first of all, the fact itself , as well as the processes it can even help him a lot until now, you know. Every time you start some new processes , his ratings are suitable and going up. If it is at all possible that this will continue in the future. And there is also a possibility. Imagine this, this is a nightmare scenario, lets assume trump will become the president , most people believe that this will not happen, but the hrok thought the same thing, and in that he can become the president , and in a few weeks after the inauguration, at the beginning of the 25th year, they may come to court, there may be court decisions, and in which he will be guilty and what then what then even to make the president a criminal uh, and this of course also has a bad effect on the ukrainian issue, because during the campaign that has already started and which continues until november next year , ukraine will become an important topic, biden supports the democrats support, at least for this political reason, trump under the republicans against or at least to a certain extent labor and that they will do it in order to represent ukraine in some bad light, the democrats will defend themselves on the one hand, it will be good for ukraine because it will finally be on the front lines of the lakes on the other side as you can imagine truths and critics will emphasize one and only one thing is not so counteroffensive did it succeed or fail it is too difficult for the average american they will rather to play on the topic that ukraine is one of the most corrupt states in the world and that it was like that, is like that, and will be like that, then why should we defend the corruption of ukrainian oligarchs , politicians, etc. , and here is a very important moment for ukraine. First of all, it must prove that it is fighting corruption and then the second is to settle your pr, to convince people that the situation is really changing, maybe not so quickly , maybe not so radically, maybe not as much as it is desirable, but it is changing that ukraine is moving in a dash, an interesting phenomenon. By the way, in ukraine, if a politician is against the more crimes are discovered, his rating falls, and in the states it turns out in the case of trump, his rating only increases. You understand it simply , how politicized the American Society is, people who support trump are approximately 1520 of the population, maybe even a little more, they absolutely do not trust any institutions the existing establishment , either among the snakes or in washington or in the government, there was no debt, they absolutely do not care for them, and well, it is hard to imagine how they do not trust, who at the same time were interpreting any step that would be taken by this and the staff against trump condemned and criticized wrote, but they said something, it is always antiasked as a fan of some kind of hatred, if only because what is wrong with them, what is wrong with those leftwing liberals or what to call them, that it is completely impossible to work with them, that they are washing trump, that they want to persecute him so that they they hate people who support trump and so on. Well, of course, the same can be said about people on the leftliberal side of the liberal side of the mind. Little danger for america, because if trump wins, his people will come to power, if trump plays, people will watch him , it is possible to repeat the capture of the capitol. Yes , there is absolutely such a risk. The political scientist of the professor at the address of the university of the United States was with us as a means of communication, now we will have a break, after which he will join the air in italy , portnikova will comment on the most important events of the week, when he is bothered by an allergic runny noses, they want to go to the humor resort for daily prevention and complex treatment of allergic rhinitis, there are 20 discounts on humor spray in pharmacies. Traveller, bam and savings. And what do you think about lacalut fix . And the price is good, the right choice for my pension , the new cream for extrastrong fixation of dentures and healthy gums, so your choice is fix , meet the new product, it is profitable, the package is 70 g , turn it on, it is good, when everything is as you want, click and now youre in control of the game watch and youre in a tv show what we need google turn on hundreds of channels in thousands of movies and sports im back i missed you only not combispasm go combispasm the power that tames your pain the most important events events that are happening right now and affect our lives of course news feed informs about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening , it is necessary to understand antin borkovskyi and the invitation experts soberly assess the events , analyze them by modeling our near future every saturday at 1 00 p. M. With a repeat at 10 00 p. M. Studio event with Anton Borkovsky naispresso museum territory of Terror Jewish ghetto of lviv was transformed by the soviet occupiers into a prison with which the path went to the shaft a better example of symbiosis of two totalitarian regimes could not be found nazis to destroy the Jewish Population of the city from this place there was only one way to the death camps the bolsheviks used this experience to send their prisoners, their enemies of the people, to the death camps in golovy, and today modern ukraine is attacking the regime that became the heir to both of these totalitarian dictatorships of both of these misogynistic practices the road to auschwitz the road to the goal leads to the deer every day every hour every minute we receive a large amount of information what is really happening at the front what are the losses of personnel and equipment on the field of soldiers how does the International Community evaluate our successes and what is moscow lying from the news stream that are coming from nowhere , we single out the most important from closely monitoring whether there will be weapons for ukraine and what and what the russian occupiers are whispering about behind the backs of the news commanders. The results of the week are a review of only important events, events with the weight of credibility this is analytics, fact checking, professional comments, much more today about what is important in simple language, available to all viewers. Welcome to the studio, iryna koval. And this is the results of the week on the espresso tv channel, the news , the results of the week, every saturday at 9 00 p. M. Political club, i m angelika sezonenko and Vitaly Portnikov is joining us via video link, i m glad to see you, mr. Vitaly, im sad here without you , everyone, you see it, you always allow us to make Real Television and its wonderful so lets discuss, it was an interesting week full of not only events, but more various kinds of statements, we start with a scandalous statement from the chief of staff of the secretary general of the alliance, stian jensen , that ukraine can allegedly cede territory to russia in exchange for membership in nato , and vitaly remembers i think that one of these options was expressed as a certain concern that we might be inclined to do this. However , the newspaper allegedly writes that even other diplomats from the alliance were shocked. Why did he even allow himself to make such a statement . What do you think . Do you think it was, well, first of all, at the beginning of our conversation, i want to express my sincere condolences to all our viewers in chernihiv, who are experiencing such a tragic day today , and this tragic day once again reminds us that ukraine must become a member of the north Atlantic Union, that the safety of ukrainian citizens depends primarily on will ukraine receive a reliable umbrella from other countries of the civilized world, otherwise we must be aware that missile attacks on ukrainian territory will continue even if the armed forces of ukraine manage to enter state borders of our country and restore the territorial integrity of ukraine. It seems to me that everyone perfectly understands that the territorial integrity of security will lead to the decline and tragedy of the ukrainian state, to the lack of investment in blocked ports and missing air space, and no one wants this because ukraine, after military actions in the end the end will come to an end, no matter what happens. It must be a country capable of development until the restoration of this entire ruin into which our country was turned by the russian occupier, and here the question arises and how what there may be a formula, and it seems to me that the formula for joining ukraine to nato must firstly correspond to the National Interests of ukraine and secondly to correspond to International Law. An integral part of the territory of ukraine, no one except the Russian Federation itself and some countries that try to sing along to Vladimir Putin are considered angelica that this territory is the territory of russia therefore, the question arises, what does it mean to give up if ukraine gives up its own territories from the point of view of International Law . Thus, ukraine becomes an ally of the Russian Federation to the allies of the aggressor, she says yes , International Law can be changed , the territorial integrity of the country can be changed, and not when we are talking about some kind of separatism about there is some desire to create an independent state, we see such a situation. They occur in International Law , and then when one state simply occupies the territory of another and demands from another state for this state to recognize this, putin very often refers to donbas when he talks about crimea, he refers to the experience of kosovo. You see , the west has already decided that kosovo can be an independent state. Why ca nt i . The un, which recorded that the republic of serbia carried out a genocide on the territory of kosovo, is a completely different story albanians live in kosovo and albanians live in albania, and of course it would be completely natural to unite the two albanian states into one. But the International Community said no. You dont even want to live with the serbs, but albania cannot annex the territory of serbia, and we will not help albania here, even if it expressed such a desire, and nobody in albania ever said that it should be done, they said that the kosovars have the right to property, sovereignty to protect its rights, but albania has never expressed a desire to annex this territory simply because there, approximately 95 percent of the population there are albanians, and russia annexes territory with a predominantly ukrainian population, it is worth reminding that kherson, zaporizhzhia, luhansk, and donetsk regions of ukraine are regions with a predominantly ukrainian population in the autonomous republic of crimea. Russians were indeed the ethnic majority, but the autonomy of this territory was related to the rights of the crimean tatar people. It was restored by the decision of the presidium of the Verkhovna Rada of the soviet union, crimean tatar autonomy and here is a miracle. The kyiv federation made a decision on the annexation of the region. No one asked anything special besides that immediately after the annexation of this territory, which is still called the republic in russia, terrible repressions against Indigenous Peoples began, so the question arises, what did the head of the secretary of the ato have in mind then, he already knows exactly what International Law is. I think that we have encountered a rather strange situation when a person is not yet a public politician , he expresses some opinions, as he is used to discussing them with his colleagues at work , without even realizing that it can have such a resonance. It has been a long time, but not many people know about this city in the south of norway. The small city is very pleasant, very cozy, but not like it is in the center of international attention. There they hold a conference on security on various issues, as they do in the summer, a huge number of european cities, and of course norwegians can go to this conference. To invite norwegians who hold High International positions there has already been jenstont well, because norwegians in the summer , as well as those who hold international positions, they come home, they relax there , the beautiful climate of norway in the summer is wonderful, you you know, its just one of the best places in europe. And if its going to be global warming, angelika , after the war, you and i will go to southern norway, because there wont be anywhere else to go to rest normally , its objectively cold, bad weather there is not bad there its good there, somewhere around 2324, 25 in the summer. Well, its just that if you go out more, the norwegian catalog is generally pleasant in the summer, if you remember what winter is like in norway. And heres a person who relaxed to plant at this conference, shares some thoughts. Well, we think that this is some kind of signal. And this rather, it is not a signal, it is a sign of relaxation and forgets that we all live in a glass house, here we are now talking to you and thinking that if we Say Something in ukrainian, no one will even know about a country, and then our colleagues from the site will decipher it they will make news, and someone with google translator will translate this news from ukrainian to swahili, conditionally speaking, and there will be a scandal in some country that we did not even think about, that they will Pay Attention to our words there, and we do not even work with you in nato imagine that we know vitaly and this is a diplomat of course this is a diplomat i think that this is not a very correctly expressed opinion, but i would , if i formulated it in such a context, i would say that, so ukraine will join nato in any case this is very important if she frees her territory, she joins nato, if she doesnt free her territory , she also joins nato, why . Because we dont want this war to repeat itself, and this is by the way, when the secretary general arrived in arendal in a million hundredths, he basically said that we have to be with ukraine both in grief and in joy. I think this is a very important moment because i always say listen, be with the winner, it doesnt take a great mind, Everyone Wants to be with the winner, and you try to be close to the one who fails this is a true friend. And when , lets say, earlier, the secretary general of nato said that joining nato as a condition for ukraine should be its victory , i didnt like it. I am for the victory of ukraine. I believe that ukraine should win in this exhausting struggle with the Russian Federation how long it took to achieve this victory but i believe that joining nato is not connected with victory but with security and that the north Atlantic Union should make a decision on the euroatlantic integration of ukraine in case of any development of events in the russianukrainian war, war is a complicated history in the war, there may be negotiations in the war, there may be, there may be parasky, but there must be a constant not directly related to the war, it is the euroatlantic integration of ukraine , without this euroatlantic integration , the citizens of ukraine should not hope for security in the 20s, three years of our millennium, this must be clearly understood, this must be understood, and i did not see a tragedy in these words and in the fact that, sir, i later justified myself and in the fact that you and the secretary general of nato spoke, i saw the main trend that in brussels are beginning to realize that there is no need to connect the euroatlantic integration of ukraine and ukraines victory in the war , these should be parallel processes, but integration and european mr. Vitalyu supposedly somehow look faster because it does not include security in the component and you said about safety is the most important part of your marriage. You know, you compared aa vow, and above, and in joy, so an oath, and above, and in joy, only when an official marriage. And with us, with nato, unfortunately, it is not even civil yet , but i hope that we can we can count on the fact that in washington we will at least receive an invitation to the alliance, if we receive an invitation to the alliance, this is the road to some security guarantees , Real Security guarantees from the United States, from other nato countries that have i believe that arsenes Nuclear Weapons by the way, joining nato is much more shortterm, and i would say that it is a priority thing than the negotiations of the European Union to the European Union, as a rule , 1015 years pass from the be