For assault actions, kupinsky , the lyman direction, they. Refused to attack there, that is, it is not a separate one, it turns out, in principle, they are advancing, it is enough for them, unfortunately, to advance immediately on the same directions, well here of course the question is, how do they turn their Quantitative Advantage into a qualitative one, how do they plan operations in principle, so their Quantitative Advantage is quite often leveled off, well, but unfortunately, they have already accumulated, it turns out, what is the problem with them, what if now the Russian Federation is not even going to conduct any largescale mobilization, not because they have elections, they have a good tool for conducting largescale mobilization, covertly without political disturbances, simply by multiplying private military campaigns, well, with the method armoring, consider that all the more so, as everyone there expected that if the pmk, that the wagner pmk case would be accepted by the kremlin, that they would no longer use the tool of private military campaigns, they apparently made a narrower conclusion, it is not necessary to simply put putins cook, or someone from the family to manage such companies, and the tool itself is good , thats why they are still multiplying, accordingly, eh, now they are trying to estimate how many more bayonets they can transfer from the territory of the Russian Federation, well, thats a question open, obviously it can all be kept at the level of these 2030,000 for the time being, as for the stockpiles of weapons, unfortunately there are a lot of them, but in principle i constantly sit and listen, where do all these wonderful people think that the russians have not enough shells, they will not be able to maintain the intensity of the fire, or why all these wonderful people do not take into account that russia , unfortunately, still has a large enough stock of equipment at the storage bases, which will be enough for another year of such an intense war, well, in principle , it is very sad that these all the trends that actually took place in the summer of this year, that is, the ability to attract a largescale human resource, without political disturbances, a large stock of artillery shells and Armored Vehicles at storage bases, and what is more important, the russians are learning to improve the quality of artillery fire, so that they do not. Have to spend millions of shells to achieve the same the goals they are achieving now, so unfortunately, it is very bad that all these water potentials do not change in them, i would like to finally, well, something started to go negative so very clearly. Mr. Ivan, i will have in this context the question is about weapons, you say there are a lot of them, but what is their advantage compared to, for example, the western weapons that ukraine receives, i understand there is a conditional maneuver, but maybe western weapons are much better, but about the reason for example stable. Of the power and endurance of these weapons, which weapon has a higher priority, well, when we are talking about heavy weapons, tanks and so on, everything has a priority, you see, here in modern warfare, nothing can be singled out, because, well the russians have already realized that they are for, for example, supplementing tanks began to use the power of their artillery, well, the tanks in them work like selfpropelled guns , respectively, boru has the plague, and so i will simply question all these pathetic statements that the russians have few shells, but does anyone count tank shells . Well, you can count the caliber of 122 mm, 152 mm, and the tank caliber 120 mm, well, no one counted, plus, even if it turns out, there is no tank somewhere for support on the battlefield, you can use the bmp1 or, in general, the motiliga is equipped with a boznach, in the russians have already gone to the options of how to put automatic ones there honatomets vasilok on a prontransporterd shell, which even there is very poor in vitality, it literally unrolls it, but everything is fine, the russians were able to make a machine that drives and shoots, in principle, the main problem of russian weapons is that there are very, excuse me, a lot of them, i would say, sorry for the typo, because if the russians have 90 armored cars in storage warehouses, well, we did not receive all the possible deliveries known there, for this year, somewhere around 500 cars of the western standard are targeted, well, that is, there are somewhere around 350 bmp approximately these bradley and marauders, and plus wheeled Armored Vehicles, a striker, well, thats the main problem, the armament of the russians, because, well, for one of our strikers, they can deploy 10 drones, and even if we have enough drones to burn all these drones, well, thats it exactly they had these 10 matali, we no longer have them. Thank you, thank you, mr. Ivan, as always it is interesting to listen to your analysis of what is happening and how you in particular evaluate these statements that are being heard, ivan kyrychevskyi, an expert of defenspress, a guest of our broadcast, we talked about weapons and that the number of troops, which are currently russian, which are concentrated on the territory of ukraine. Lets continue on the air and an equally important topic, the second parliamentary summit of the crimean platform begins today in the czech republic. Almost 70 foreign delegations will take part in it. The speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of ukraine, ruslan stefanchuk, and the speaker of the chamber of deputies of the czech parliament, markjeta pekarova adamova, will chair the meeting. In addition to the summit itself, stefanchuk will have a number of bilateral meetings, it was reported earlier in kyiv. This is the second crimean parliamentary summit platforms. The previous one took place last year in croatia, and about fifty representatives of states and institutions were invited to it. As stefanchuk noted, this year facebook people will talk about the deoccupation of crimea, further support for the restoration of ukraines territorial integrity. Ukraines path to the European Union and nato, as well as the implementation of president zelskyis peace formula. My colleague Sashko Shevchenko had a conversation the day before with the first deputy minister of Foreign Affairs of ukraine, emina dzheparova, about the relevance of the crimean platform in general now, considering that it is already the second year since the largescale invasion of ukraine by russia. Lets listen. I myself left the peninsula, this is my native land, and this feeling of helplessness then, yes, which we all had in the 14th year, it was included in this crimean platform, but the key thing is that we broadcast as a crimean lesson, it very simple, and i very often draw analogies of the world war here, when we have a number of European Countries that tried to reconcile with hitler and even conceded some territories, i am talking about the anschluss of austria, about the sudetenland, yes, it is in particular this land where you and i are conducting an interview, and we thought, we thought that hitler would be satisfied and stop his aggressive intentions, so the history of the Second World War clearly broadcasts to us that no, the aggressor cannot be stopped, more precisely, he can be stopped only by force, a similar story with putin , who entered crimea gently with the permission, lets say of the World Community, with the permission, and with the unwillingness of ukraine, yes, yes, to fight back donbas, and he thought the same way, invading, well, lets say fullscale aggression , which will also happen to him here, but this did not happen, therefore the World Community should learn the crimean lesson today, as we say flatly that no, there should be a clear formula for talking with the aggressor, and it is not about reconciliation, we had this rhetoric with the minsk process, yes, everyone danced around putin, looking for a language that he would hear, a leader that he would hear, but he demonstrates that he, im sorry, puts himself above all of humanity. Than international rules, laws, norms and so on, in fact, feeding their own there are 140 Million People there with their myths and visions and historical discourses, but it doesnt work, so the crimean platform has its own clear tasks, lets then really talk about scenarios like this, which in particular may be discussed and summits, i want to quote here, the telegram channel , the atezh organization, which calls itself a partisan movement in crimea, according to their reports, they also publish photos and videos, russia is building new fortifications on the territory of the peninsula, there in particular, we will also discuss this on our broadcasts, that they are not very strong and actually nature itself can destroy them, but what does this indicate in general and do you believe that real combat ground operations can begin on the territory of the peninsula. I believe that we should not rule out this scenario, just as we should not rule out diplomacy, we should be prepared for both possible tracks. Look, the Russian Federation from the very beginning, that is, in the 14th year, behaved according to the classic model of theft, well, such a scumbag, you know, they took away, for example, artifacts from the crimea, museum artifacts, the most valuable thing they took away, there is a deriban, today we see there, not only at the highest levels of the crimean socalled government, but when the people who are with this socalled government feel and understand that this is a temporary phenomenon, they act accordingly in such very brutal temporary steps. Just trying to have their own benefit and so on, that is, there are no Systemic Solutions , as far as im concerned, and this is also a sign that they also know that they are criminals, and accordingly it is temporary, because there is no dot around that, that crimea is theirs, yes, and they have been trying to sell it to the whole world since the 14th year, in various formats, investing huge, eternal funds, according to scenarios. Ukrainian, here is the main thing, look, here is the crimean platform, and it is also the property of this network, it had the task of convincing the world that ukraine itself should determine how it is going to occupy its territories inclusively. With crimea, and i think that since we even had comments from representatives, high representatives of the United States of america, who said, yes, ukraine itself determines the path deoccupation of crimea, and this path, since our context is now military, does not exclude military occupation, at the same time, we do not exclude diplomacy, well, global, for example, croatia, when it had its military history, several decades ago, twothirds they returned the territory to the military, or onethird of diplomacy, so actually we too, at least we should not limit ourselves to one or another scenario, the country is ready for various scenarios, we are ready. Maria mezyntseva, deputy head of the committee on integration of ukraine from of the European Union in the Verkhovna Rada of ukraine of the 9th convocation, joins our broadcast, i congratulate you, i sincerely congratulate you , glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, thank you for joining, with the last words of the deputy minister of Foreign Affairs of ukraine, i would like to start our conversation, i. E. After all, ukraine is ready for a diplomatic. Resolution of the actual way of returning crimea , provided that, for example, it is in better military positions or in what . Because the deputy minister said in an interview that such a way is also possible. Well, lets begin due to the fact that in january of this year , the European Court of human rights determined that the aggression began precisely from crimea in 2014. And there is a clarification of the Court Decisions that it was not even march at all, but the month of february, and therefore it is very important for us that we continue the military direction, not only the diplomatic one, because for the restoration of the territorial independence of ukraine it is very important crimean peninsula. And er, this is also today within the framework of what we propose in one of the peace points of president zelenskyis plan, this is responsibility, responsibility begins at the highest level of power, this is the military and Political Leadership of the Russian Federation, this is putin, shoigu, lavrov and approximately 2030 other people who planned, gave instructions, made these criminal, lets say, plans to seize ukraine, starting precisely from crimea, here are the shots of last years summit, this is mrs. Palosi, who showed a picture of children, of crimean children, and by the way, the topic of children will definitely be discussed on the crimean. Platform yesterday at the working dinner, we heard from the speaker of the parliament and from the president paul, the president of the czech republic, and from other colleagues, that the subject of the return of deported ukrainian children, including children from the crimean peninsula, should become a priority for us, and we will also promote our idea of creating support for the crimean platform, the socalled deputy associations of the crimean platform in every foreign parliament, we have already done it in at least 15 parliaments of the world, and in the future, we will also have a working, working document that promotes the deportation of the Crimean Tatars as illegal illegal action and the crime of genocide of the 40s of the last century, for this we will have the text of this document, and of course we will be able to accept it as we did , for example, like a historical recognition of justice, justice, ours, regarding the genocide of the ukrainian people that took place during the 30s, and hungry, ms. Maria, i deliberately did not visit you, because that was my next question about the tasks you set yourself at this summit, at this meeting, but going back to my previous question, how often those , who arrived, you said, there was already a working dinner, obviously there was already a certain amount of communication with colleagues from other parliaments, how often is this call to the fact that the crimean issue should be resolved. Ukraine should still use diplomatic means, despite the fact that there is support from various states and it is ukraine that must determine how it will take back the occupied peninsula, how often these proposals and objections are also rejected. I dont know, there are some attempts to persuade, attempts to explain that it will be better this way and so on, on the part of politicians who influence the geopolitical map of the world as a whole, the fact is that everyone has long agreed that crimea should be returned not only by diplomatic means, and we have all seen the work, the successful work of foreign weapons, our nato partners, throughout i can say that the reactions are only positive when we have the success of the operation, which is carried out by gormo, the ministry of defense, and the Defense Forces in general, involving all methods and methods. Another question will concern those representatives of the parliaments of the world, who for for example, it is unexpected for you. Before this summit, before this platform, we understand that the ukrainian issue, in particular the issue of the return of crimea, is not so acute, for example, there for representatives of the global south, as conventionally for representatives of the European Union, who, from the first days of the largescale war, supported ukraine with their shoulder, i dont know for you which politicians, states, parliaments of the world joined the summit, perhaps most unexpectedly or you expected them to do it, but there was an understanding that this could also not happen, well, look, i dont know yet. The entire full list, we met only yesterday evening, and i can confirm that it is indeed more than 60 speakers, we even joked yesterday that with such a composition we can make a very important decision, this is almost a third of the world, which is gathering in support of ukrainian crimea, the territorial integrity , the territorial value of the independence of ukraine, so now we are waiting for the start of. Which i am already a little late, if you allow, i will go there to report to you in more detail about the unexpected accessions, but i i think that the crimean topic, it was always more understandable, there were the First International reactions to the resolution, it is very important that we included this issue in the last parie resolution in a separate paragraph in the topic of maintaining peace in ukraine, benches on ukrainian terms and permanent, and the stability of security in europe, that is why we did not forget to remind about crimea , including on the territory of parye. Thank you for joining us, we will let you go, maria mezyntseva, deputy chair of the committee on integration of ukraine with the European Union in to the Verkhovna Rada of ukraine of the 9th convocation, peoples deputy of ukraine, guest of our broadcast. We talked about the meeting, actually within the framework of the crimean platform, parliamentary, international, which will take place. Today in the czech republic. Over 13,000 invincibility points have already been deployed in ukraine. And closer to winter, their number will increase said the Prime Minister of ukraine denys shmehal recently. And from now on, you can see the nearest such point on the interactive map of udia, plan a route to it and see what services you can get at this point to whoever comes there. The ministry of digital policy reported that it will soon be possible to view photopunk as well. And leave your feedback. According to the government, the largest number of points have been deployed in kyiv and the dnipropetrovsk and kharkiv regions, each point of invincibility must be equipped with a generator and starlink and provided with fuel. About two to five more points will start their work after comp