Transcripts For FOXNEWSW Hannity 20240704 : vimarsana.com

FOXNEWSW Hannity July 4, 2024

And tonight, a new chapter in bidens illegal immigration s crisis. People from haiti. They are now appearing off the Coas Gration M Haitt of florida, Incg One Group on a Boat Stockede Gr with firearmous drugs. Governor ron desantis will join us to respond. But we begin with our top story out of Fulton County, georgia, ourtonight where disgraced antitrump District Attorney Fani Willisti Trum Haw turned the Atlanta Court system into nothing but a jokthe. Onigt now, today, the Superior Courtin judge in this case, scott mcafee, all but Accused Willis of lying, corruption and frankly, gross o this conduct. He slammed the, quote, financial of impropriety surrounding her illicit affair and comingling of finances with the outside counsel counse that she hired with hundreds of thousands of dollare hires of Taxpayer Funds to help prosecute. Of course, donals tod trump. And now he called her bizarre outburst during testimonyssiona unprofessional. He accused both willis and her lover, nathal n wade, of, quote, potential untruthfulness. The judge even stated that, quote, an odor of mendacityof remains. Other words, fannys motives and actions, as Fulton County d. A. To high heaven. He also rebuked fani willis for playing the race card duringe cd a recent speech designed to smear Donalduringd Trump and others for really exercising their legal rights. But of course, despite all the l misconduct that judge mcafee rulethed, that Fani Willis Is F and clear to continue her questl ,donald trump, so long as she cans her former or current 654,000 Lover Nathan Wade. That makes sense. Y wa right on cue. Earlier today, wade officially resigned. Offiit appears that Willis Thren Wade right under the bus. Naturally, the taxpayeder r is n georgia. They will not be receiving a refund. And finallrefundy, was will notg any legal consequences. Counseas one popular legal accot on onex pointed out, quote, judge mcafee rules that only one Potential Liar can prosecute rulee the case, but nt both Potential Liars. Now that make any sense . Cours of course not. But shes a democrat tryinge to prosecute donald trump. Pareny so i guess apparently shes probably Above The Law. Still, the media mob, they recognize this as a devasteda hitting blow. Mbarra fani willis is now embarrassing themss, making their case againg donald trump look petty and stupid, which it wasains the beginning and now lashing out. Watch this. This is such a huge body blow,. Almost a fatal blow to fani willis. I think the way ford fan is shes to voluntarily recuse herself. I dont know that She Hantarilys in her. The dea should consider recusing herself as well as thee case moves forward to allow it to do so cleanly. Langu all of this, especially this language from the judge, and were just giving the opinion right no judgengw. Im sure theres theres likely more. Its really a gift to former president trumt itp and his codefendants because theyre not only going to fight this case on the merits. Onlgointo fightthey fight it ii of public opinion. Optics here, not anyinio one of these statements by a judge would be a career ender for a Normal Prosecuto Star To T An On The Record finding that there are reasonable questions about whether you liedn th tha under oath. Ting that would be that would be devastating. And well see what the political effects will be. The bottom line, the d. Aliticali survives, but not without serious bruising, to use your analogy, sir. Si your ana now, even the Washington Post is calling the ruling a significant setbacean evee ww fani willis. The New York Times also openly worried about the cas yoe and the new series of inquiries from the georgia legislatureand sure. And, of course, the Judiciary Committee thats led by congressman jim. Now, chairman jordan recently threatened to hold Fani Willish Contempt if she failsto to produce subpoenaed document s by march of 28. Make no mistake, despite judge mcafees ruling today, there are still many questions, lots of doubts looming over fridays Desperatever Th Attempt to get donald trump ultimately. Why would anyone trust a dea credibly accused of lying and corruption . A personal rebuk accue, a judge as unprofessional, a Potential Liar tainted by aa cloud of financial misconduct and racial bias across victor, who is, above all else, a giant hypocrite. You might remember this because youre sitting with someone today areng that actually wants to make a difference because they deserve a d. Ays to. That wt have sex with his employees because they deserve a dayheir that wont put money in their own pocket. I certainly will not be choosing people today that work under me y pe. Let let me just say that those rules apply foryou b them, but not for fani willis. At the end of the day. R well, devout democrat fani willis brought a massive case with dozens of charges against trump and several other republicans. She then directed over 650,000 in georgia Taxpayer Funds. Again to her on and off again Lover Nathan Wade to help h prosecute the case. Now, wade did not have much w relevant experience, which is amazing, but was reportedly paid more than other outside counsels. And during their personal and professional relationship and partnership. Fani willis. Well, she went on those tripsd a and vacations with nathan wade, with the moneyti she was paying him. Well, the taxpayers were. And apparently she financiallynl from that relationship. And yet fani Willis Believest she has done absolutely nothing wrong. She trul nothiny believes she is Above The Law that the Justice System in Blu Ande Blue States is corr and biased beyond belief, as stands now, no republican or conservative will ever get a trl fair trial in these jurisdictions, Especialln Theset anybody with the last name trump. This is nothing but a Kangaroo Court with political motives. It is rotting our Justice System within. Here to respond, she is the cohost of the hit show theit five, judge jeanine pirro. Judge. All right. Lets get your overall he fiv take here. And we also i know you cant you make this up right now. Youre making me sean cant e this up. But you do have one other concept, legal concept we gotpon to look at. And thats the Fruit Of The Poisonous Tree here. Trees meanwhat does this mean t the evidence gathered by nathan wadeevby, though, they have to throw that out . Well, you know, you canha certainly make that argument. But remember who the judge is. This is but whoa judge of precd that i told you didnt have the Spinspine To Hold Fani Willis in contempt when she started runninfanig the courtroom, poing her finger at him and telling wasntdy that she on trial. So this judge,tria who is two ws away from this next election and doesnt want to upset any of his constituents makes a decision that is absurd. If wade is in a Situation Wheree he was so dishonest that he lied about the Relationshit Thp that theyve got to cut him from the case, why isnt danny being in the case . I mean, that is an absolut . Ee bt bottom line question. S this is a case that is mired in scandal and is mired in, a as the judge said, an odor of mendacity, dishonesty and lies. And fo or the judge to come out and say, you know, i dont know if this is an actual Conflict Of Interest, we still got the judge bar and we got thisstt state Investigative Commission foivr that can look into this. Judge, you were the one who sati on the evidentiary hearing. You were the one who were supposed to make the decision about what witnesses wha were lt and what witnesses were telling the truth. Witnesses are that wadeyfrien ,the boyfriend, he hes gotd, g to go because he is not capable, of telling the truth. He lied about the same thing. She lied hbout about, and she confirmed his lies. But he goes and she doesnt. Look, this speech she made at the church, sean, is enough. That is race baiting. As a d. A. , i would be canned iet for making a speech like that, basically saying that a defendan bt, that im prosecutig is a racist and that is enoughff to get her off. But this judge doesnt have votes to get hi s m on to get her off the case. It leaves it up to her. And for anybodg ity who has anyo doubt shes not going to lead this case. She could care Lea Thi Less Thas is gone. Vacagot five vacations or six vacations in five months. And the judge said, wellive mon cant be sure how much money really passed. But there wasnt enough evidence. Judge, i know youre new decihis, but your job is to decide the facts, decide the evidence. Who liede who , what the money t was. And you cant then turn around and say, you know, its kinddt n of to tell. And also this guy, terrence bradley, whos als the boyfrien lawyer, he said in an affidavit they absolutely started job h the affair before the job. He takes the stand. And whatse the word he was inconsistent. His demeanor was unusual. He unresponsive. Sten and he said i couldnt make a conclusion. T de judge, you can make a conclusion by drawing in thehe fact that there is this inconsistency. There is this guilty demeanor, t there is this lack of responsiveness to something thats an absolute sworn statement. But this judge doesntudge doe the spine. In the end, the people tryingavt this case, sean, are goingo to be trying a case that they know is a mess the two of them lied and theyre trying to try donald trump for lyingg and offering false statements. And i got to tell you,d offerisn you know, who wins in this case . The prosecutor with the case . Ien d off the case, thats a win for her. Win yguy doesnt know his wa around the courtroom. Hes never even tried a felony case, let alone a Ricotroom Hene judge. Let me ask you, because i look upon Friends Of Mineme Ti in georgia told me this guy, because of the reelection, that hes going to becausef e sd that they predicted that hed split the baby, which is he pretty much did. But he also poisoned the well but against her in an appeal. Its hard to imagine one party created an appearancebu of conflict, but not willis. So the logic of the judge ins tg his unwillingness to go the full step, i think its he has set her up now to be outse of this case as well. Time will tell if im proven right,s ll but i see it that waw what doe will you. R no well, well see whether or not when app the appeal takes place, whether the certainly the case is nowr certai the the Appellate Division or whatever. Ap pellatthe second level is callee in the state of georgia has a lot of decisions o to make. K i think that in the end, this fact finding what little theretl is, is enough to get her off. Is one no one can explain whye,n she has to go, but she it whenn shes the one who benefited from the moneyhe and the money that he made. 650,000. Now, i was the d. A. For 30 years. I was an assistant d. A. And the electe wasd d. A. Three times. You dont pay anybody 350,000 o whos never tried a felony case. This is corrupt from the get go. All right, judge pirro, you catch her every day, of course,ean you on the five. Why are you making me laugh . Yo because its actually humorous when you actually look at the ruling. You cank att make it because you cant make this stuff up. You really cant. Its like out of au re Spy Nover A Judicial Novel that you couldnt even make up. Y join all right. Joining us now with more reaction, Fox News Contributor gregg us tiong jarrett and Harvard Lawhar professor Alan Dershowitz is wit h us. Professor, start with you tonight. Odor of mendacit of y. T your lets get your take overallll on the case and the lack of logic or the lack of the application to both fani willisn and nathan wade. That should have at least been Consistentn D have because theye both involved in it. Look, theres no odor here. There is perjury on the witness stand, without a doubt. And there are people in prison, people on death row on lower levels of evidence than this. What the judge tried to do t is be solomoriedn and split the baby and the baby died. This is a terribleit, terrible opinion. On the one hand, he says, i have reasonable basithnds for wondering if the testimony is truthful. Then he proceedserin, credit it and believe it when it comes backhether she paid the money back, whether or not they had the affair. All of that kind of thing. S this case belongs in front of a justice or a anan attorney general or a District Attorney for a criminal prosecution. There was perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and conspiracy to commit perjury. S no this is not a close case. There was, of course a reale Conflict Of Interest. No. Maybe the prosecution didnt begirealt aybe then in order toh of these two people. But alonr ofg the way, decisions were made which enrich themh and which may very wellwell have impacted on the rights of defendants. Judge should have dismissed her. Consiss the whole office, and seriously considered dismissing the case. Nk and i think the lawyers for trump, if they can, should try to take an Interlocutory Appeal or a mandamus, some kind a Anur Immediate Appeal to the next level court. Ify don they dont, they will l have a good issue on appeal. Ife they lose the. If they if they are convicted, this case is a disaster. And this judge just didnt have the couragethis of, convi his convictions. He knew that they lied, but he just didnns hthat thet the gutt directly. Hes running for reelection. Gon and the georgia governor, brian kemp, launched a State Commissionor with the power to remove rogue and incompetent prosecutors just lik e her whichgine are which i imagine would happen here. En lets get your take, Gregg Jarrett well, the decision makes no sense, quite obviouslye ,because the judge found that both willis and wade engaged thd in improper conducte that merits Removal Forirm Th the appearance of impropriety. Thats the standard. But he als o found that together they committed the exactbehaviou same behavior. So both of them are Guiltysog Of Disqualify being conduct under the law. And yet he orders that onlyef one of them must leave the case. How is that remotelym must lea . Willis not which suggests, sean, that this is a purely political ruling from the bench. Urely politii think its a cravs decision to throw. Bonnie willis a lifeline to keep the case against trump going, because if she e goes, then under georgia rules of procedure, the entire indictment gets yanked from the d. A. s office. Willis getst to stay. But i dont know how in the world she survives this politically i dont know how she survivesy the myriadof of other investigations into alleged wrongdoing or in fact, her upcoming election. This judge condemned willis for playing the race card in her church speech. Judge jeanine is right. That thats disqualification by itself. He openly admits i that the casa has, as you point out, the odor of mendacityd ou. That means its dishonest. And yet he refuses to fix it. His only remedy is is partial. Thats no remedy at all. A le look, lets be clear. What really happened here. B lets be clear what really happened here. The judge started oue Clear Whae Conclusion that he was not going to get rid of her, Tod Thenot He had to wiggle his way around to find a basis for being able to condemn her because he saw it all with his own eyes. R Bein Ondemnbut in a way that didnt t in her leaving, it was a verysut oriented, but he felt bad h about it. So we had to condeme n her a say some things about her. But bottom line is, he made up h his mind right in the beginning. He was not going to disqualify her. Everything elso e was a variable. That was the constant. But let me ask you both this s questioneat. N th but was the judge it did Poison The Well against her, especially on appeal. Its hard to imagine one party created the conflict har and benefited from this and not the other. Thr on of allegedi woul perjury. I would agree with your wir. Sis, professo then you have the whole issue of the fruit of the poison tree. What about gregg . What about all the evidence that was accumulatedut . Doesnt by the way, does not now be have to be dismissed . Well, you know, Fruit Of The Poisonous Tree generally is evidence obtained illegally cannot be used here. Its more of corrupt behavior that creates the appearance of impropriety and actual impropriety itself. The judge refuseimproprid to fi, you kno

© 2025 Vimarsana