Transcripts For FOXNEWS Hannity 20240907 : vimarsana.com

Sean: welcome to hannity and big news from new york city. The sentencing of trump's bogus socalled hush money case, which was perfectly legal, an nda put together by a lawyer labeled as a business expense a misdemeanor statute of limitations expired that case that should be' indicated because of the supreme court immunity ruling has been delayed until after the election. We'll get reaction, alina habba will react to this as a big political win for donald trump. Plus aka associated paragraph today might as well be on the payroll of the harris campaign we'll show you the latest fake smear against jd vance in just a moment. But first one and only debate scheduled between trump and kamala harris is on tuesday. It will be in philadelphia. David muir, lindsey davis will moderate the debate for abc. Keep in mind this is a network that detests donald trump. We have shown you that over and over again. It is the same network whose ceo bob iger disney calls a notorious ex clinton aid george stephanopoulos an unbiased journalist. Really, well, mr. Iger, and i say this respectfully, here's a reminder of your journalist george stephanopoulos from his days as a devout clinton democratic staffer. Take a look. What is named? i can send you a fax of names addresses phone numbers of who you had an a fair with. Wouldn't make it true. It is completely. [bleep]. If you were on the radio and said bill clinton ton is the far of an illegitimate black child you would be laughed at and people would think you're crazy. I guarantee you if you do this you'll never work in democratic politics again. Sean: wow. That sounds kind of like a threat. Very same george stephanopoulos now touted as one of abc's most trusted news anchors when in reality, like so many in the media, he is nothing more than a radical left wing democratic talk show host. So should we really hold out any hope that abl will at least try and be fair? well, outgoing abc ceo bob iger, what kind of reputation do you want to leave behind? will your network, are you going to be fair? are you really going to show journalism, are you going to be neutral. Or will the reputation of abc news under the banner of disney live up to their reputation of, or forever be tarnished with extreme left wing media bias. I would assume, bob iger, that you want conservatives to patronize disney theme parks. The problem is he's a huge biden supporters and zero trump supporters are employed by the channel so maybe with the exception of previs so make it easy i want to help out abc and give them a little perspective and research. So here we are kamala harris nearly 50 days as a candidate and she has changed dramatically ever since becoming the presumptive nominee. Let's start with something very basic and simple. The beloved plastic straw which just changed her position in the last 24 hours. Take a look. We need to understand that leaders have to lead. Leaders have to lead. Plastic straws are a big thing right now. Yeah. Do you ban plastic straws? i think we should, yes. Sean: now the harris campaign aid is telling axios that kamala no longer supports banning your plastic straws but we have yet to hear directly from kamala on the subject. In fact we haven't heard a word from kamala about almost any of her flipping or flopping, and the list is quite long. Electric vehicle mandates, she's the one that supported them in 2019. Banning fracking? she said it many times, banning offshore drilling. She said that many times. Supporting a mandatory gun buy back program? i think we call that confiscation. Does she still support that or not? decriminalizing illegal immigration and offering free housing and healthcare and education, legal drivers licenses in minnesota from her running mate as well as free college education. Does she support the border wall. She mocked donald trump for the border wall and said he thinks a bunch of terrorists will be invading the country. That's exactly what has happened. We now have unvetted harris bind illegal immigrants known terror ties we don't know where they are and they won't tell us. Does she still want to eliminate ice or not. Does she still want reparations or not. Does she still support defund dismantle no bail laws reimagining the police or not. Does she still support the bill that she sponsored in the senate, medicare for all, $93 trillion? medicare for all would be universal healthcare, she sponsored the bill with bernie and it would eliminate all private health insurance. That is a basic question. Will abc ask it? the $93 trillion green new deal that would eliminate capitalism as we know it. She cosponsored that bill in the u. S. Senate. You know, federal job guaranties and federally guarantied healthy food and healthcare and day care and child care and pre care. I mean, the list goes on and on. Take a look. There's no question i'm in favor of banning fracking. Assault weapons that are already in circulation. What do you do about those. There are about approximately five million to your point greg we have to have a bye back program and i support a mandatory buy back program. If somebody crosses the border it is illegal and you would decriminalize it. I would not make it a crime punishable by jail it should be a civil enforcement issue but not criminal enforcement issue. His quest to build a vanity project called the wall, this is irresponsible. It's the height of irresponsibility. Should black people get reparations. I think there has to be some form of reparations and we can discuss what that is, but as president of the united states, i am prepared to get rid of the filibuster to pass a green new deal. You support the medicare for all bill. Correct. Initially response shalled by senator bernie sanders. Yes. I believe it will eliminate private insurance. So for people out there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it? listen the idea is everyone gets access to medical care and you don't have to go through the process of going through an insurance company, having them give you approval, going through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require. Who of us has not had that situation where you have to wait for approval and the doctor says well, i don't know if your insurance company's going to cover this. Let's eliminate all of that let's move on. Sean: anonymous campaign aides now say kamala suddenly no longer believes any of that. We saw a different story during kamala's one and only interview of the election, a whooping 15 minutes 30 seconds, 29 to be exact and she emphasized that her values have not changed and she said it over and over again. So, does harris still want to abandon the filibuster to pass the $93 trillion green new deal? will she decriminalize illegal immigration and give free housing, healthcare, education and a path to citizenship, nap city or not? does she stand by her tweet supporting a bail fund for the rioters and insurrectionists in the summer of 2020 or not. Does she stand by saying the rioters won't stop shouldn't stop and we won't stop, or not? does she still support medicare for all, the elimination of all private healthcare or not? is she still proud of bidenomics, we call it bidenomics and we're proud of it. Do she support it or not. Does she still support defund reimagine ice and the police or not. Does she still want americans to have the courage to say radical islamic terrorism or illegal alien again or not. Does she still want attacks unrealized capitol gains and give americans the largest tax increase not only in american history but world history, or not. Does anyone believe she's changed her position on fracking or offshore drilling? because she lied to cnn and even cnn fact checked it. And her true beliefs, radicalism she just hired a far left preacher who openly preaches against individualism, aka capitalism, and even allegedly described america as a cult and blood thirsty imperial beast. Just hired this person. Are the campaign aides willing to lie and hide and go into the witness protection program to win an election and will bob iger's abc disney allow them to get a pass next week. What does harris really believe? what are her real policys? there is still nothing listed in terms of policy on her campaign website. Her stump speeches are long winded, feelgood platitudes about freedom and joy that are meaningless, and attacks on donald trump delivered from a prompter. The same words in every speech and a variety of fake accents depending on the crowd. Kamala wants to be elected president but she won't tell anybody what she really believes on anything? is that really okay with the socalled journalists at bob iger abc disney and their, quote, news department? democracy dies in darkness, right? even fake news cnn is baffled by some of kamala's nebulous positions. Take a look. There's really no greater symbol of trump's presidency than the wall and the way democrats were attacking him over the wall and his restrictive immigration policies so we looked at that ad and if you look at it that exact area of wall is in sauceby arizona and that was a portion of wall built by donald trump it was built in an area where there was not previous walls, actually pretty controversial when they were building it at the time. So just to see that, i mean, there are other she's using his wall that he built to say look at what i did. Sean: by the way at the dnc i was there, wasn't liked by many but i was there. Guess what? they had walls all over the place preventing people from getting in. And then you needed credentials, picture id. I had to show it four times to get to the studio where i needed to broadcast from. So kamala harris is now tack credit for a border wall built by donald trump after trashing and mocking that same border wall dozens of times? and now wants you all to believe she has always been in favor of a border wall? this is insane. So the question, is abc news disney, are they truly going to bring up these fundamental basic questions that america needs to know? kamala harris has played a massive role on the border crisis. In fact, she played a major role in all of the biden/harris administrations, many failures on the economy. There are failure in afghanistan. According to kamala she's always the last person in the room, you know, when these major policies and these decisions are being made, like 13 service members dying because of the disastrous withdraw from afghanistan. The socalled inflation reduction act, which was a massive, you know, actually a massive environmental spending bill, a bill that empowered the irs to go after service workers and their tips that caused inflation to go up. Don't take my word for it, here's joe biden this week saying the quiet part out loud. You know, i'm proud to announce that my, my investments, that through my investments, the most significant climate change law ever and by the way, it is a $369 billion bill. It's called the we should have named it what it was. But, at any rate sean: kamala harris cast the tie breaking vote in the senate to pass this phoney inflation reduction act. Make no mistakes, she owns inflation and america's struggling economy and every crime committed by every illegal immigrant in this country. Just la month job growth fell short of expectations yet get, just over 140,000 new jobs. By the way more jobs now created for illegal immigrants. And get this. These jobs filled by farmborn workers in the country and americans are losing jobs. By the way, abc/disney, they need to be very clear about one issue. Prices are not coming down, inflation continues to rise. Prices are up well over 20% under biden and harris. Gas price is up well over a dollar a gallon. No end in sight. Americans are suffering every time they go to the grocery store, every time they fill up their gas tank. They pay their electric bill. So is kamala harris, you know, she says on day one i'm going to deal with inflation and immigration. Day one was january 20, 2021. Not 2025. Here with reaction, fox news contributor, former speaker of the house newt gingrich. Am i wrong on anything i'm saying here? no. I think you may be a little bit more worried than i am. I don't think you're wrong. Sean: i didn't say i'm worried. Trump has to assume well, president trump has to assume he's going to go into a 21 match. Sean: 31. He'll be on one side okay. 31. And kamala and the news media will be on the other side and he just has to relax and decide, like one of those wrestling or ultimate fighting things, he has to beat all three of them. And if he will stay calm, pleasantly talk to the american people you know, reagan had a pretty good rule. He answered the question he wished you would ask. He didn't necessarily answer the question you asked. And i think that trump can take off from whatever they ask him and go to what he wants to talk about and just keep doing it for 90 minutes. He has the record, she doesn't. He has the programs, she doesn't. He has the personal knowledge. He knows kim jongun. He knows xi jinping. He knows putin. The gap between these two is between a serious professional and a fraud, and i think he's got to simply, calmly, allow the country to see that she couldn't possibly do the job. And i think that this debate is a great opportunity for him in that sense to communicate that. Sean: i think she her strategy is going to be twofold. I think she's well three fold. Duck, dodge weave and pretty much lie, number one. I think that she is going to try to anger donald trump and get him off his game. And i think kamala harris is going to just try and run out the clock and she's going to give a lot of rehearsed answers that don't answer any question. Good prediction? bad prediction? yeah, i think that's probably right. I mean, she's spending days memorizing and i like trump's answer the other night. By the way, you were great to hannity <\/a>and big news from new york city. The sentencing of trump's bogus socalled hush money case,<\/a> which was perfectly legal, an nda put together by a lawyer labeled as a business expense <\/a>a misdemeanor statute <\/a>of limitations expired that case that should be' indicated because of the supreme court immunity ruling <\/a>has been delayed until after the election. We'll get reaction, alina habba will react to this as a big political win for donald trump. Plus aka associated paragraph today <\/a>might as well be on the payroll of the harris campaign we'll show you the latest fake smear <\/a>against jd vance <\/a>in just a moment. But first one and only debate scheduled between trump and kamala harris is on tuesday. It will be in philadelphia. David muir,<\/a> lindsey davis <\/a>will moderate the debate for abc. Keep in mind this is a network that detests donald trump. We have shown you that over and over again. It is the same network whose ceo bob iger disney <\/a>calls a notorious ex clinton aid george <\/a>stephanopoulos an unbiased journalist. Really, well, mr. Iger, and i say this respectfully, here's a reminder of your journalist george <\/a>stephanopoulos from his days as a devout clinton democratic staffer. Take a look.<\/a> What is named? i can send you a fax of names addresses phone <\/a>numbers of who you had an a fair with. Wouldn't make it true. It is completely. [bleep]. If you were on the radio and said bill clinton ton <\/a>is the far of an illegitimate black child you would be laughed at and people would think you're crazy. I guarantee you if you do this you'll never work in democratic politics again. Sean: wow. That sounds kind of like a threat. Very same george stephanopoulos now touted as one of abc's most trusted news anchors <\/a>when in reality, like so many in the media, he is nothing more than a radical left wing <\/a>democratic talk show host.<\/a> So should we really hold out any hope that abl will at least try and be fair? well, outgoing abc ceo bob <\/a>iger, what kind of reputation do you want to leave behind? will your network, are you going to be fair? are you really going to show journalism, are you going to be neutral. Or will the reputation of abc news <\/a>under the banner of disney live up to their reputation of,<\/a> or forever be tarnished with extreme left wing <\/a>media bias. I would assume, bob iger, that you want conservatives to patronize disney theme parks.<\/a> The problem is he's a huge biden supporters and zero trump supporters are employed by the channel so maybe with the exception of previs so make it easy i want to help out abc and give them a little perspective and research.<\/a> So here we are kamala harris nearly 50 days as a candidate and she has changed dramatically ever since becoming the presumptive nominee. Let's start with something very basic and simple. The beloved plastic straw <\/a>which just changed her position in the last 24 hours. Take a look.<\/a> We need to understand that leaders have to lead. Leaders have to lead. Plastic straws are a big thing right now. Yeah. Do you ban plastic straws? i think we should, yes. Sean: now the harris campaign aid <\/a>is telling axios that kamala no longer supports banning your plastic straws but we have yet to hear directly from kamala on the subject. In fact we haven't heard a word from kamala about almost any of her flipping or flopping,<\/a> and the list is quite long. Electric vehicle <\/a>mandates, she's the one that supported them in 2019. Banning fracking? she said it many times, banning offshore drilling.<\/a> She said that many times. Supporting a mandatory gun buy <\/a>back program? i think we call that confiscation. Does she still support that or not? decriminalizing illegal immigration and offering free housing and healthcare and education,<\/a> legal drivers licenses <\/a>in minnesota from her running mate <\/a>as well as free college education.<\/a> Does she support the border wall. She mocked donald trump for the border wall and said he thinks a bunch of terrorists will be invading the country. That's exactly what has happened. We now have unvetted harris bind illegal immigrants known terror ties we don't know where they are and they won't tell us. Does she still want to eliminate ice or not. Does she still want reparations or not. Does she still support defund dismantle no bail laws <\/a>reimagining the police or not. Does she still support the bill that she sponsored in the senate, medicare for all, $93 trillion? medicare for all <\/a>would be universal healthcare, she sponsored the bill with bernie <\/a>and it would eliminate all private health insurance.<\/a> That is a basic question. Will abc ask it? the $93 trillion green new deal <\/a>that would eliminate capitalism as we know it. She cosponsored that bill in the u. S. Senate. You know, federal job guaranties <\/a>and federally guarantied healthy food and healthcare <\/a>and day care and child <\/a>care and pre care.<\/a> I mean, the list goes on and on. Take a look.<\/a> There's no question i'm in favor of banning fracking.<\/a> Assault weapons <\/a>that are already in circulation. What do you do about those. There are about approximately five million <\/a>to your point greg <\/a>we have to have a bye back program <\/a>and i support a mandatory buy back program. If somebody crosses the border it is illegal and you would decriminalize it. I would not make it a crime punishable by jail it should be a civil enforcement issue <\/a>but not criminal enforcement issue. His quest to build a vanity project <\/a>called the wall, this is irresponsible. It's the height of irresponsibility. Should black people get reparations. I think there has to be some form of reparations and we can discuss what that is, but as president of the united states,<\/a> i am prepared to get rid of the filibuster to pass a green new deal. You support the medicare for all <\/a>bill. Correct. Initially response shalled by senator bernie sanders.<\/a> Yes. I believe it will eliminate private insurance. So for people out there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it? listen the idea is everyone gets access to medical care and you don't have to go through the process of going through an insurance company,<\/a> having them give you approval, going through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require. Who of us has not had that situation where you have to wait for approval and the doctor says well, i don't know if your insurance company's going to cover this. Let's eliminate all of that let's move on. Sean: anonymous campaign aides <\/a>now say kamala suddenly no longer believes any of that. We saw <\/a>a different story during kamala's one and only interview of the election, a whooping 15 minutes 30 seconds, 29 to be exact and she emphasized that her values have not changed and she said it over and over again. So, does harris still want to abandon the filibuster to pass the $93 trillion green new deal? will she decriminalize illegal immigration and give free housing, healthcare, education and a path to citizenship, nap city <\/a>or not? does she stand by her tweet supporting a bail fund <\/a>for the rioters and insurrectionists in the summer of 2020 or not. Does she stand by saying the rioters won't stop shouldn't stop and we won't stop, or not? does she still support medicare for all, the elimination of all private healthcare or not? is she still proud of bidenomics, we call it bidenomics and we're proud of it. Do she support it or not. Does she still support defund reimagine <\/a>ice and the police or not. Does she still want americans to have the courage to say radical islamic terrorism or illegal alien again or not. Does she still want attacks unrealized capitol gains <\/a>and give americans the largest tax increase <\/a>not only in american history but world <\/a>history, or not. Does anyone believe she's changed her position on fracking or offshore drilling? because she lied to cnn and even cnn fact <\/a>checked it. And her true beliefs, radicalism she just hired a far left preacher who openly preaches against individualism, aka capitalism,<\/a> and even allegedly described america as a cult and blood thirsty imperial beast.<\/a> Just hired this person. Are the campaign aides <\/a>willing to lie and hide and go into the witness protection program <\/a>to win an election and will bob iger's abc disney allow them to get a pass next week. What does harris really believe? what are her real policys? there is still nothing listed in terms of policy on her campaign website.<\/a> Her stump speeches <\/a>are long winded, feelgood platitudes about freedom and joy <\/a>that are meaningless, and attacks on donald trump delivered from a prompter. The same words in every speech and a variety of fake accents depending on the crowd. Kamala wants to be elected president but she won't tell anybody what she really believes on anything? is that really okay with the socalled journalists at bob iger abc <\/a>disney and their, quote, news department? democracy dies in darkness,<\/a> right? even fake news cnn <\/a>is baffled by some of kamala's nebulous positions. Take a look.<\/a> There's really no greater symbol of trump's presidency than the wall <\/a>and the way <\/a>democrats were attacking him over the wall <\/a>and his restrictive immigration policies <\/a>so we looked at that ad and if you look at it that exact area of wall is in sauceby arizona <\/a>and that was a portion of wall built by donald trump it was built in an area where there was not previous walls, actually pretty controversial when they were building it at the time. So just to see that, i mean, there are other she's using his wall that he built to say look at what i did. Sean: by the way <\/a>at the dnc i was there, wasn't liked by many but i was there. Guess what? they had walls all over the place preventing people from getting in. And then you needed credentials, picture id.<\/a> I had to show it four times to get to the studio where i needed to broadcast from. So kamala harris is now tack credit <\/a>for a border wall built <\/a>by donald trump after trashing and mocking that same border wall dozens <\/a>of times? and now wants you all to believe she has always been in favor of a border wall? this is insane. So the question, is abc news <\/a>disney, are they truly going to bring up these fundamental basic questions that america needs to know? kamala harris has played a massive role on the border crisis.<\/a> In fact, she played a major role in all of the biden\/harris administrations, many failures on the economy. There are failure in afghanistan. According to kamala she's always the last person in the room, you know, when these major policies and these decisions are being made, like 13 service members dying because of the disastrous withdraw from afghanistan. The socalled inflation reduction act, which was a massive, you know, actually a massive environmental spending bill,<\/a> a bill that empowered the irs to go after service workers and their tips that caused inflation to go up. Don't take my word for it, here's joe biden <\/a>this week saying the quiet part out loud. You know, i'm proud to announce that my, my investments, that through my investments, the most significant climate change law ever <\/a>and by the way, it is a $369 billion bill. It's called the we should have named it what it was. But, at any rate sean: kamala harris cast the tie breaking vote <\/a>in the senate to pass this phoney inflation reduction act.<\/a> Make no mistakes, she owns inflation and america's struggling economy and every crime committed by every illegal immigrant in this country. Just la <\/a>month job growth <\/a>fell short of expectations yet get, just over 140,000 new jobs. By the way <\/a>more jobs now created for illegal immigrants. And get this. These jobs filled by farmborn workers in the country and americans are losing jobs. By the way, abc\/disney, they need to be very clear about one issue. Prices are not coming down, inflation continues to rise. Prices are up well over 20% under biden and harris. Gas price <\/a>is up well over a dollar a gallon.<\/a> No end in sight.<\/a> Americans are suffering every time they go to the grocery store,<\/a> every time they fill up their gas tank.<\/a> They pay their electric bill.<\/a> So is kamala harris, you know, she says on day one i'm going to deal with inflation and immigration. Day one <\/a>was january 20, 2021. Not 2025. Here with reaction, fox news contributor,<\/a> former speaker of the house newt gingrich.<\/a> Am i wrong on anything i'm saying here? no. I think you may be a little bit more worried than i am. I don't think you're wrong. Sean: i didn't say i'm worried. Trump has to assume well, president trump has to assume he's going to go into a 21 match. Sean: 31. He'll be on one side okay. 31. And kamala and the news media <\/a>will be on the other side and he just has to relax and decide, like one of those wrestling or ultimate fighting things, he has to beat all three of them. And if he will stay calm, pleasantly talk to the american people you know, reagan had a pretty good rule. He answered the question he wished you would ask. He didn't necessarily answer the question you asked. And i think that trump can take off from whatever they ask him and go to what he wants to talk about and just keep doing it for 90 minutes. He has the record, she doesn't. He has the programs, she doesn't. He has the personal knowledge. He knows kim jongun. He knows xi jinping.<\/a> He knows putin. The gap between these two is between a serious professional and a fraud, and i think he's got to simply, calmly, allow the country to see that she couldn't possibly do the job. And i think that this debate is a great opportunity for him in that sense to communicate that. Sean: i think she her strategy is going to be twofold. I think she's well three fold. Duck, dodge weave and pretty much lie, number one. I think that she is going to try to anger donald trump and get him off his game. And i think kamala harris is going to just try and run out <\/a>the clock and she's going to give a lot of rehearsed answers that don't answer any question. Good prediction? bad prediction? yeah, i think that's probably right. I mean, she's spending days memorizing and i like trump's answer the other night. By the way, you were great in harrisburg <\/a>where you know i grew up and the farm building <\/a>is just an amazing building. That was a great town hall meeting <\/a>you did. I really thought it went very, very well. Sean: thank you. Trump, trump if he relaxes he actually has a pretty easy job. She's going to come in all fired up.<\/a> She will have memorized tons of stuff because that's what they're doing, taking days off so she can memorize all this stuff and i think that i think he ought to always call her vicepresident partly because it is her title and partly because it takes her back to biden. I think he ought to deal with her with great respect and no matter what she says to him, he ought to just come back calmly and steadily and communicate what the facts are and what reality is. It wouldn't hurt him occasionally to say to her, is that what your coaches suggest you should say? because she doesn't the truth is, she doesn't know a great deal. She hasn't done a great deal. She's never been in an executive office <\/a>of any kind. I just did a podcast 360 <\/a>with ben webber <\/a>former congressman of minnesota pointing out walz <\/a>actually has been a governor. Walz is the guy who will try to drive a radical left wing <\/a>program. She's never had an executive job <\/a>of any kind. So i think that the president has a huge advantage here. She's totally wrong on the issues.<\/a> She's going to be in pennsylvania where she's losing the state because she's anti fracking, and that's hundreds of thousands of jobs in western pennsylvania.<\/a> Her radical values are totally unacceptable to the middle of the state. And i think, even in the africanamerican community now, there's a sense that the policies aren't working, that the pain is too great. People don't want to, you know, one statistic, the price of beef went up 26% since biden and harris <\/a>got in office. So you really had to pay 26% more on labor day <\/a>to get hamburgers. Now, everyday working americans <\/a>understand that. They're living it. They're trying to find a way to make sure that they can afford it and i think the president should be very comfortable. He wins on programs because he's much closer to the american people. He wins on performance because things were dramatically better when he was president and he wins on mature adult knowledge <\/a>because he's actually done all this, he actually knows people around the world, he knows people in the business community.<\/a> He's made decisions his whole life and i think the gap will if he does not take the bait, and i think you're exactly right, her number one <\/a>goal is going to be get him angry, get him flustered and have him blow up somehow. If he doesn't take that debate that bait, then he is going to be almost automatically in a strong position to communicate how big the gap is. And on almost every issue, the country's closer to donald trump than they are on the kamala harris. Sean: great advice. Newt gingrich, thank you sir. Joining us now is former presidential candidate himself, vivek ramaswamy. Let's get your take. Let's assume for a minute that abc disney is not going to do their job, and there's so many unanswered questions as i outlined. Let's assume that. What should donald trump's strategy be? look, on that first assumption, shun, assume heading into the cnn debate abc <\/a>is in a position to be as obviously biassed as they have been may cause them to correct and run a fair debate. That's what i'm rooting for. Nonetheless regardless how they handle it, i think donald trump has the advantage here where he has offered detailed policy proposals <\/a>in a way that kamala harris has not. And in the same way he ran against biden as a cog in the machine,<\/a> that's what kamala harris is as well. She's not quite an ideallog, she's another cog in a broader system and we're running against that system. One thing i want to caution against is exactly what happened in june. What i expect is donald trump will once again run circles around kamala harris just as he did with joe biden <\/a>in that last debate. The question is, is that going to be good for us in winning this election or not? because last time around it was the catalyst for something drastic happening afterwards which is in that case swapping <\/a>out joe biden <\/a>as the nominee and i think if kamala harris really does tank in this debate and i think there's a dean chance <\/a>that happens, i think there are strange things that could happen between now and november, because the democrats, they have been playing this in some ways one step ahead. Sean: you're suggesting that we may live through another change in candidates if she doesn't have a good debate? no, i don't think it's going to be a change in the candidates tballots have already been printed but i do think that we have a machine that we're up against that has demonstrated that it is going to go to great measures to defeat donald trump. You trace this back over the last year and a half. You've got prosecutions. You've got civil cases, crash judicial attempts to remove him from the ballot. They told us joe biden <\/a>was definitively going to be the nominee then negotiated for the earliest presidential debate in u. S. History because they 54 there would be a good chance biden <\/a>would under perform and once they did they swamped him out. We have to learn from this and know they have many more tricks under their sleeve. The two scenarios is kamala harris overperforms,<\/a> i don't expect that to appear that or what i do expect to happen is for donald trump to seriously defeat her in this debate as he did last time around but don't expect that be to be the end <\/a>of the election, i think there's more up their sleeves. Sean: vivek ramaswamy great to see you as always. Coming up the sentenceing the <\/a>has been delayed in donald trump's hearing until after the election. We check in with donald trump's legal spokesperson alina habba <\/a>when we continue. Voya provides tools that help you make the right investment and benefit <\/a>choices. So you can reach today's financial goals and look forward to a more confident future. Voya, well planned,<\/a> well invested,<\/a> well protected. Patronize, patronize when did i call leaffilter? when i saw my gutters overflowing onto my porch. Leaffilter is a permanent gutter solution,<\/a> so, you never have to worry about costly damage from clogged gutters again. It's the easiest call you can make. Call 833. Leaf. Filter today,<\/a> or visit leaffilter. Com. Welcome to fox news live,<\/a> i'm kevin corke in washington.<\/a> A pakistani man living in canada accused of mroth a <\/a>terror attack in new york city <\/a>is in custody tonight.<\/a> Authorities say he actually planned a mass shooting <\/a>at a jewish center in brooklyn on october the 7th <\/a>of this year. That is, of course, the oneyear anniversary <\/a>of the hamas attack <\/a>that killed more than a thousand <\/a>people in israel. Attorney general merrick garland <\/a>says the man aimed to kill as many jewish people as possible the boeing starliner capsule <\/a>on its way back to earth after undocking from the international space station <\/a>today. It's expected to land around midnight eastern time at the white sands space harbor <\/a>in new mexico.<\/a> But, due to technical issues,<\/a> nasa decided to leave astronauts butch wilmore <\/a>and sunny williams <\/a>behind. They'll have to wait until february next year to make their return home.<\/a> I'm kevin corke. Now back to hannity. sean: all right. As we mentioned at the top of the show tonight,<\/a> we have major breaking news <\/a>out of new york city <\/a>where, well, very abusively biassed judge juan mer <\/a>seaned announced the sentencing of former president trump has been postponed until after the election in november. Trump has been awaiting sentencing for months after getting convicted on these 34 counts of falsifying business records <\/a>in what was one of the most clear, obvious witch hunts <\/a>at all times and featuring a conflicted judge, a jury pool <\/a>drawn from one of the most liberal parts of the country and, of course, a completely madeup crime using a novel legal theory specifically designed just to get trump convicted. Anyway here with more is trump campaign <\/a>senior legal advisor and spokesperson <\/a>alina habba is with a. Alina this case is probably the most egregious. In new york this would be a misdemeanor case.<\/a> The statute of limitations had run out. So they come up with this creative novel idea that this very abusively bias judge <\/a>goes along with, that somehow turns it into multiple felonies. They packed felony upon felony, and they bring this case to court under a theory that had never been used before, and here we are and then we have a supreme court decision <\/a>on immunity, which would mandate this judge vacate that verdict considering evidence presented to that jury was from the time when donald trump was doing his official duties as president. But, yet, the judge is not going to consider that or is he really considering it but doesn't want to tell us until after the election? your guess is as good as mine is, sean. The reality of the situation is, this case never should have been brought, ssj vance <\/a>passed on it sos <\/a>did alvin bragg <\/a>but then donald trump decided to run for office and we're here. Judge mer <\/a>channed's opinion is still flawed because of one thing. Like you said, the supreme court, which is the highest court in this country, a country based on the constitution, separation of powers,<\/a> we have that implace for a reason. They said that a president is immune and that's all presidents, not just president trump, from these types of political or any frankly prosecution, persecution, civilly or criminally. And the fact that he is kicking the can down the road, while it's appreciated because he doesn't want to appear to be doing what i and you have called election interference, which is what it is, is great. However this case should be frankly dismissed. There was testimony on this case at the time of trial from people that were sitting in the oval from the president's team, evidence that should never have been brought in under this supreme court decision. So hitting the can down the road i appreciate but quite honestly sean, this should be vacated in its entirety. Sean: it should be. I mean, was there not evidence presented, for example, hope hicks <\/a>testimony would be one example but weren't there multiple examples of evidence presented to the jury that should that would fall under the supreme court decision <\/a>on immunity that should not have been allowed into evidence, which would cause merchand to vacate that verdict wouldn't it? absolutely and not only multiple witnesses brought from the administration while he was in office but president <\/a>trump himself was sitting at the oval in the resolute desk <\/a>while this was happening. The acts they claim, the pay back <\/a>by an attorney for an nda, was during the time that president trump was in the oval. The entire case is flawed. It is past the statute of limitations. It was purely brought for political reasons, we know this. And when you bring doj officials onto the da's office in a state court <\/a>for felonies, it's a joke. There's so much wrong with this case, it should be completely admonished. The judge should be admonished in my opinion for not recusing, number one, for not dismissing and for continuing to waste taxpayer dollars.<\/a> This is a joke and atrocity <\/a>to the american people and the city of new york is seeing it. That's why they have crime and that's why people are fleeing. Sean: i totally agree. We had another court case <\/a>this week and i want to get into that, and this had to do with the dc case <\/a>and the special prosecute in this case who,<\/a> by the way, the legitimacy of the appointment of this prosecutor is in question as we saw down in florida, the entire case was thrown out by judge eileen cannon.<\/a> I think that would be applicable here. But the prosecutor refiles the case and the judge this week then goes on to say, okay, well, we're not going to try the case before the election because they don't have time with all the motions that will be going forward but they're going to allow this weaponized doj <\/a>to put out prejudicial information against donald trump that will not be refuted, it will not be sworn testimony as a means again of impacting an election while the vote is going on. What happened to the 60, 90 day rule <\/a>of practice of the doj in the past? is that dead, gone and buried? it's unbelievable and you're right jack smith <\/a>has been ridiculed and completely taken back from having any authority as we know. Now they've appealed that but there's no decision on that. And as you said, this is the issue, sean. We can say that trials will get kicked back, decisions on sentencing gets kicked back but we have to hold accountable the people here influencing an election because that is what it is. They want to bring up appeals, bring up rehash old news <\/a>that is frankly fake news and we have to, as the american people, try and sift through that. That is election interference <\/a>at its finest, it's improper and we don't get a chance to go to trial and rebut it and show the american people what a joke this is. But it will come to november 5th,<\/a> i think the american people are getting it they're sick of it and they they want to hear about policy they don't want lawfare anymore. Sean: alina habba we appreciate it. Coming up kamala harris continues to dodge the press the state mob media <\/a>allowing this to happen. Plus you won't believe how the media smeared j. D. Vance and then they had to retract it. Straight ahead. sean: all right, the democratic party and their friends in the media mob <\/a>are covering for kamala harris. It's pretty much a disgrace and she continues to be in the witness protection program, dodging questions from the press. It has now been a whooping 47 days since joe biden <\/a>dropped out of the race and endorsed the vicepresideshe's yet to hold a press conference. Won't do a gaggle. She did one interview, spoke for 16 minutes and 29 seconds. But, of course, one member of the new york times editorial board <\/a>comes rushing to her defense calling it, quote, a little silly for journalists to hold her to the same standard as donald trump. Really? take a look. It's important to hold all candidates accountable. It's just that, when you do that, it does sometimes sound a little silly, because, given the breadth of what the vicepresident is offering the american people there is no comparison with donald trump. Right. Sean: of course liberal joe would agree with that. Meanwhile the ap is facing a backlash tonight <\/a>after they published a grossly misleading headline falsely claiming that j. D. Vance dismissed school shootings <\/a>as just a fact of life. They have since deleted the post on x <\/a>and updated the headline but not before it was viewed by millions and used by the harris campaign to trash j. D. Vance. Meanwhile the rules have been set and next tuesday, president trump, as we have been discussing, and kamala, they will square off in the abc disney presidential debate. So, will the george stephanopoulos network <\/a><\/a>be fair? i'm doubtful. Here with reaction fox news <\/a>contributor charlie hurt <\/a>joe concha tammy bruce. Tammy start <\/a>with you, let's get your take on next week, i don't think abc\/disney is capable of being fair. I gave a whole list of unanswered questions we have and i don't see them getting to those questions. No. And, look, the good news is, donald trump has done so many debates remember those 17 competitors during the primaries for '16, and the debate after debate after debate. He knows what he's doing. He knows also, it's not just that the media's not fair, the world is not fair. The democrats are not fair. The terrorists are not fair. This is the man who has the experience. He understands it. He is ready. He's not going to be blind sided but this is why republicans tend to be better politicians, better governors, better presidents. Because they're challenged and they have to make sure that they can get their point across. What makes you sloppy and a witness in the witness protection program <\/a>makes you unable to expect the unexpected, to deal with it properly, to answer questions, to own what it is you stand for. This is where real leaders come through is when you're challenged. Now, of course, again, i know it's not fair, but this is what our world has handed all of us.<\/a> Look at the world biden and harris <\/a>have given us. My god. It's not fair that people have to skip meals and not have the right protein on the table at the end <\/a>of the night or have to split up whether or not you can drive your kid to work, to school, or you to work, because of the price of gas. Or if you don't know what the future's going to hold. And during covid, not being able to see your dying loved ones in a hospital. It is the government, it is the system that is unfair. Donald trump <\/a>is the solution, and he knows it and we know it and i think the american people are going to see that on tuesday. Sean: okay. I like what newt said earlier and i do believe, joe concha, she will be super rehearsed and well scripted, however that can tend to back fire in and of itself. And i like what newt said about, well, reagan would answer the question they wished they would ask and i think that has to be donald trump going into that debate and he doesn't really have to stay to their script. He can bring up the questions on his own. Yep, it's called pivoting and he can even allot his time to ask kamala harris questions <\/a>that he may want answered when it comes to fracking, when it comes to the border, when it comes to crime and you listed all the flip flops, the switcheroos we saw before. This is true. When he's done with his time he can say maybe you can ask the vicepresident that, ask the moderators to ask it, i don't know. He can control the conversation. I think this means something sean because, in boxing, sparring means a lot before you go into a heavy weight fight <\/a>and when you consider kamala harris hasn't held a single press conference since she ran for president five months and eight months ago, no press conference as a vicepresident, no press conference as the 2024 nominee, overall donald trump and j. <\/a>D. Vance have done nearly 40 interviews in the past month. Kamala harris has done one, which was the rhetorical version of a hot stone massage <\/a>provided by cnn and dana <\/a>bash and she even needed her emotional support animal <\/a>next to her tim walz <\/a>in what looked like a parent teacher conference.<\/a> Now she's going to get into the ring with donald trump for 90 minutes without her new best friend <\/a>mr. Teleprompter because when she speaks ex temp <\/a>rainiously enter the human chernobyl.<\/a> Here's where we are at that time whole hide and seek campaign will not serve her well when she tries to defend all the flip flops <\/a>she's done on every major issue. As we sit here, because voting in pennsylvania starts september 16th.<\/a> They still don't have any policy positions <\/a>on their campaign westbound it. Greg: joy ain't a strategy sean it's not a policy and in kamala harris's case it's as real as a $9 bill and i think that gets exposed next tuesday night.<\/a> Sean: is her campaign afraid charlie? is that why she's in the witness protection program <\/a>and do you foresee this to be a 3 on 1 on tuesday? oh, i think without a doubt it will be 3 on 1. And, yes, i think the only explanation you can have for why they are keeping her away from the press and keeping her from doing just even little brief asides outside the plane before she goes flying around the country, is because they don't know what she's going to say. And, ironically, i think that that kind of is almost an advantage for the trump campaign <\/a>because then the trump campaign <\/a>can run all of the, you know, use all of the endless miles of footage of all the other stupid things she said over the course of her entire career and just go with that if she doesn't want to give us anything new. I think that she's going to perform better than a lot of people expect next week. The great thing about donald trump though in a debate is, he knows who he is, he knows what he thinks, he knows what he wants, he knows what his strategy is, he knows what his plans are and is not afraid to share them with people. And when you compare that to kamala harris, kamala harris, even if she does better than we expect, she's going to be there's no way she can lay out her vision that doesn't collide with all the other things she's ever said in the past. So however she comes out of this thing, she's going to come out as this flip flopping chameleon <\/a>that can't be trust order anything and donald <\/a>trump will be the same guy that ran four years ago and eight years ago and the same guy that everybody has known for 20 years. He's still talking the same way about the same issues and people know who he is. Sean: i think, you know what? definitely going to be mustsee tv, that's for sure and probably the last time we'll see them together. I don't foresee a second debate, i really don't. Which is sad. The american people have a right to know where a candidate stands <\/a>and i think this is wearing on people. We'll see. Abc\/disney, bob iger, hello, it's your company. Maybe he doesn't want conservatives at his theme parks, i don't know. We'll see if they're fair. All right thank you all. Appreciate it. When we come back, you won't believe why former new york city <\/a>mayor bill de blasio <\/a>is back in the headlines and earlier this week kamala <\/a>caught seemingly faking a phone call to avoid the press in only the way <\/a>that jimmy failla <\/a>can do it. He will react straight ahead. introducing the second chance offer <\/a>from betmgm. What'd he say? if you bet on a player to score the first touchdown and instead he scores the second? boom! you get your money back <\/a>in cash. Straight cash? second chance, you heard? what if my guy fumbles,<\/a> and some other guy scores first? second chance. What if you need a second chance <\/a>to land on the field? this offer only applies to touchdowns. You alright? i hurt my spleen! get the second chance offer <\/a>from betmgm. The sportsbook born in vegas.<\/a> sean: all right, phoney kamala harris called out this week for holding her phone up <\/a>to her ear to avoid the press while she had wired head phones <\/a>in. Apparently there was nothing on the phone indicating a phone call. Here with reaction, he has the perfect reaction, the host of the hit show fox news <\/a>saturday night jimmy failla. If you're not going to do press conferences <\/a>or interviews or gaggles or talk to the media and you're going to be in the witness protection program, even if you have earphones on and let me put a phone up <\/a>to the ear phone,<\/a> which would render it impossible to hear. Yeah. Sean: what do you make of that? again, this is progress because at least she's talking to somebody. It's just not a reporter. Sean: she's not talking to them, that's the point. She's faking it. I get it. This is the funniest thing <\/a>about it, okay? everything about her is fake. You know how they were faking these phone calls <\/a>to tim walz <\/a>where she would call walz on speaker phone <\/a>and they would pretend they were talking on the phone? it's all fake, man. I know you're in on the joke i just hope everybody watching at home kind <\/a>of gets it, okay? this is a woman who should be debating herself on tuesday night.<\/a> That's what trump should be doing. He should just be playing kamala policy a <\/a>followed by kamala policy b <\/a>and i assume if she was on the phone with somebody they would be telling her what policy c <\/a>is now. It's absurd, man. Sean: i've never in my whole life witnessed anything like this. You're right. And then there was the other phone remember the phone call, oh, this is barack and michelle <\/a>obama. Oh, hi guys.<\/a> How are you? and, sean, running back, this is why you know they're dumb and again i do mean this, like kamala is where, a oc goes to feel smart, okay? she is not a smart woman. Okay? because smart people are aware of optics. And what i mean by is that, everyone watching at home knows the most annoying thing you can do in public is call someone on speaker phone. This is a campaign that has repeatedly filmed itself calling people on speaker phone. Not smart stuff, sean. Not smart stuff. Sean: it's the only way that i talk is on speaker phone. When i get a call i want the whole world to hear and i put it on tv. No, you don't. Ha ha. Good for you. Sean: when you think harris campaign can't get any weirder, and they are weird, think againment you have former new york mayor bill de blasio <\/a>posting a really hard to watch video of him eating pizza with coconut on it in some bizarre attempt to promote an event for kamala. Take a look.<\/a> Sean: how did that man ever become mayor? although the current mayor everybody <\/a>around him is getting raided by the fbi so i have no idea what's going on there this. Definitely went better than the time he picked up the groundhog. At least the slice of pizza lived. Sean: good point. And this is progress for de blasio. This is progress for him because the last time he filmed a pizza video <\/a>he ate it with a fork and knife <\/a>and he caught hell all over twitter for that if you remember. But one point i want to make, sean, is, he's doing this tow promote an event. It's an zoom event called paizans <\/a>for kamala and all these are on zoom which shows you the little enthusiasm for the campaign. People don't even like her enough to leave the house and go to a rally. Do you want to support kamala? only if i can do it from my couch. It's sad, man, but this is where we're at. Sean: you know, i don't miss anything about new york. You can have new york. You're a former taxi cab driver <\/a>in new york. Except maybe a really good slice of pizza. Thank you. I'll mail you one. I'll mail you one down. Sean: okay, deal. We appreciate it, jimmy failla <\/a>we'll be watching tomorrow night.<\/a> More hannity straight ahead. (tony hawk) i still love to surf, snowboard, and of course, skate, so i take qunol magnesium <\/a>to support my muscle and bone health.<\/a> Qunol's highabsorption magnesium glycinate <\/a>helps me get the full benefits of magnesium. Qunol. The brand i trust. [dog bark] [dog whining] is your dog telling you they may have allergic itch? apoquel is the #1 treatment for allergic itch. . . That veterinarians have trusted for over 15 million <\/a>dogs. . . And it starts working in just 4 hours! do not use in dogs with serious infections. . . May cause worsening of existing parasitic skin infestations.<\/a> . . Or preexisting cancers. . . And serious infections. New neoplasias <\/a>have been observed. Do not use in dogs less than 12 months old. Ask your vet for apoquel. Now available in a tasty chewable.<\/a> [ ] sean: quite unfortunately, that's all the time we have left this evening. As always, thank you for being with us. Thank you for making the show possible. We hope you will set your dvr, so you never miss a episode of hannity. For news all the time, fox. Com, and hannity. Com. Greg gutfeld <\/a>is standing by to make you smile in friday night.<\/a> Next week, debate week.<\/a> Have a great weekend. [ ]","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia800100.us.archive.org\/20\/items\/FOXNEWSW_20240907_010000_Hannity\/FOXNEWSW_20240907_010000_Hannity.thumbs\/FOXNEWSW_20240907_010000_Hannity_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240907T12:35:10+00:00"}