Google v Oracle: a closer look at the dissent : vimarsana.co

Google v Oracle: a closer look at the dissent


Google v Oracle: a closer look at the dissent
16-04-2021
27-05-2015
As the fallout over SCOTUS’ ruling in Google v Oracle continues, Michael Graif of Mintz unpacks the blistering dissent to the landmark decision.
While copyright holders and challengers alike are still digesting the consequences of the US Supreme Court’s expansive view of fair use in
Google v Oracle (2021), it bears noting that the court was not unanimous in its decision.
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, wrote a blistering 18-page dissent, rebuking the majority for basing its decision on what the dissent felt was a non-existent distinction between the “declaring code” and the “implementing code” that was “wholly inconsistent with the substantial protection Congress gave to computer code”.

Related Keywords

Justice Samuel Alito , Justice Clarence Thomas , Us Supreme Court , Clarence Thomas , Google , Oracle , Copyright Infringement , Pi , Ndroid , Java Se , Amazon , Icensing , Fair Use , நீதி சாமுவேல் அளிதோ , நீதி தெளிவு தாமஸ் , எங்களுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , தெளிவு தாமஸ் , கூகிள் , கள் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , பி ,

© 2025 Vimarsana