Having an IPS Doesn't Necessarily Increase Plan Sponsor Liab

Having an IPS Doesn't Necessarily Increase Plan Sponsor Liability


Having an IPS Doesn’t Necessarily Increase Plan Sponsor Liability
A properly drafted investment policy statement can offer guidelines and protection for plan sponsors—if it is followed.
Reported by
Retirement plan sponsors aren’t required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to have an investment policy statement (IPS), but it is considered a prudent practice.
However, Bruce Ashton, a partner in the Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Group, says he’s heard some plan sponsors say they don’t want an IPS because it will increase their liability. “I don’t think that’s true,” he says. “The issue is what’s in the IPS and whether plan fiduciaries are following it. For example, if the IPS has a policy in it that is not a prudent process and it gets followed, that could increase liability significantly. Likewise, if it prescribes an array of prudent processes and fiduciaries don’t follow them, it can increase liability.”

Related Keywords

Natascha George , Jim Phillips , Bruce Ashton , Compensation Practice Group , Compensation Group At Goodwin , Faegre Drinker Biddle Reath , District Court , Employee Retirement Income Security Act , Faegre Drinker Biddle , Executive Compensation Practice Group , Executive Compensation Group , Retirement Resources , ஜிம் பிலிப்ஸ் , காயங்கள் ஆஷ்டன் , இழப்பீடு ப்ர்யாக்டீஸ் குழு , இழப்பீடு குழு இல் குட்வின் , மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் , ஊழியர் ஓய்வு வருமானம் பாதுகாப்பு நாடகம் , நிர்வாகி இழப்பீடு ப்ர்யாக்டீஸ் குழு , நிர்வாகி இழப்பீடு குழு , ஓய்வு வளங்கள் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana