anybody the hospital employs is an agent of that hospital and, therefore, as a result -- megyn: why wouldn't they sue the yoon on-- union? you say to yourself but for the striking purses, would ms. ming be alive? mercedes, won't there be some clever lawyer who would say nurses' union's in many? >> absolutely. especially since the primary nurse for this particular patient was one of the individuals that was striking. they absolutely can make that type of argument, carve that in to bring her in. >> but, ultimately, she had an obligation to the union and to her patients. and let's be clear about this, they were not only striking for individual benefits, but they were striking because of cuts in patient services that they viewed as very valuable to their mission as nurses that they were performing on behalf of the hospital. megyn: do you think there should be some rule that nurses sort of like air traffic controllers that they cannot strike, that this is such an important industry and job, you just can't make your point this way?