conservative "the washington times." he then accepted an offer from the website to run his column there, the breitbart website, the column rife with plagiarism. rand paul publicly admitted he doesn't write anything attributed to him. he simply approves what his senate staff writes for him. he just approves the stuff that his book writers write for him. rand paul doesn't have to worry about being dropped by breitbart news even after more examples of his use of plagiarism were revealed by buzzfeed who has been diligently prosecuting the rand paul cases for a week now. breitbart, a fringe right-wing website that has no problem welcoming the work of plagiarists while "the washington times" is still trying to play by ape more established set of journalistic rules including the old-fashioned one about