vimarsana.com

Card image cap


Share This -
x
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court recently disapproved the practice of prolonging litigation by focusing on miscellaneous applications filed by parties, instead of deciding the main issue.
"
The entire controversy would have come to at rest, if the Tribunal would have taken a little precaution to decide the main case rather than dealing with the miscellaneous applications time and again," a Bench of
Chief Justice Pankaj Mithal and
Justice Sindhu Sharma was constrained to observe with reference to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu.
The remarks were made while hearing a writ petition filed by the UT Administration against stay on the order for transfer of the Respondent, working as Consultant Radiology, SMGS, Jammu.

Related Keywords

Jammu , Jammu And Kashmir , India , Abhinav Sharma , Justice Pankaj Mithal , Aseem Sawhney , Justice Sindhu Sharma , Abhimanyu Sharma , Ut Administration , Supreme Court , Union Territory , Education Department , Division Bench , High Court , Chief Justice Pankaj Mithal , Central Administrative , Consultant Radiology , Financial Commissioner , Medical Education Department , Advocate Abhinav Sharma , Advocate Abhimanyu Sharma , ஜம்மு , ஜம்மு மற்றும் காஷ்மீர் , இந்தியா , நீதி பங்கஜ் மிதல் , அசீம் சவ்னேய் , நீதி சிந்து ஷர்மா , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , தொழிற்சங்கம் பிரதேசம் , கல்வி துறை , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் , உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , தலைமை நீதி பங்கஜ் மிதல் , ஆலோசகர் கதிரியக்கவியல் , நிதி ஆணையர் , மருத்துவ கல்வி துறை ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.