Rules just last month eliminating a requirement that whistleblower complaints contained only direct, firsthand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing. If democrats have their way, this could all move very quickly, including more subpoenas this week. Hearings scheduled and a possible vote to impeach by november, chris. Chris kevin corke reporting from the white house, thanks for that. Joining us now, Stephen Miller, Senior Advisor to the president , welcome back to fox news sunday. Thanks for having me, chris. Chris lets start with the House Democratic subpoenas of the state department of a massive set of documents as well as five witnesses for this week. It will President Trump comply with the house subpoena . To stephen thats going to be between the president s attorneys, White House Counsels Office and the house committee. I have no news unfortunately to make on that issue but what i do want to say is that i think its unfortunate that the media continues to describe this individual is a whistleblower and honorific that this individual most certainly does not deserve. A partisan hit job does not make you a whistleblower just because you go through the whistleblower protection act. Chris well, first of all, how do you know that this is a partisan hit job, and how do you know that this is not a whistleblower in fact under dni, the department of National Intelligence rules well, you know what, lets go back to this, and were going to jump around a little bit because i didnt know you were going to go here. Here is the comment from the dni, the acting dni before congress, joe maguire, in his testimony this week, take a look. I believe that the whistleblower and the Inspector General have acted in good faith throughout. I have every reason to believe that they have done everything by the book and follow the law. Chris that is the director of National Intelligence, joe maguire, a lifetime servant of this country, a navy seal, he says that the whistleblower was acting in good faith and action by the book. On what basis do you say that this was a partisan hit job . Stephen first of all, if you read the sevenpage nancy drew novel for the whistleblower put together, it drips with condescension, righteous indignation and contempt for the president. Its also ludicrous on its face. It describes an elaborate coverup that also, by the way, the president discussed on sean hannity, april 25th. What kind of secret cover of are you also discussing on the airwaves of fox news . Furthermore, the Inspector General found evidence of political bias in the individual, which is not disputed by anybody chris wait a minute. He also both the director of National Intelligence and Inspector General said they also found his comments to be credible and a matter of urgent concern and they turned it over to the Justice Department, so despite all that, they thought that this was a credible a complaint. Stephen and they are wrong. Chris on whose basis . Stephen i work in the federal government now for nearly three years. I know at the deep state looks like. I know the difference between whistleblower and a deep state operative. This is a deep state operative, pure and simple. People who havent been in the federal government, who havent worked in the white house memo may not appreciate this but the situation as you have a group od bureaucrats who think that they need to take down this president. Ill attend interagency meetings where i know for certain fact if i dont buy the right people at the meeting will leak. If i dont say the right thing, it will go to the hill. If we propose a policy idea that they dont approve of, they will work with democratic appropriators to try to block it. If they lick this president s phone calls, the publisher hit pieces, they publish fake stories. Theyve been doing this continuously for nearly three years and their motives and their agenda is clear. This is about do you want a democracy in this country or do you want a deep state. Its a binary choice for the American People. Chris again, this person you are accusing them all the scum of the director of National Intelligence, joe maguire, a lifelong servant of this country said was actingn good faith and going by the book. Enough with the rhetoric, lets talk about some specific facts in this. Why did President Trump uses private attorney rudy giuliani, and as we just reported, to other private lawyers to try to dig up dirt from the Ukrainian Government on joe biden rather than going through his state department . Stephen first of all, and most imporantly, when we could talk about digging up dirt, its an interesting choice of words. One of two things is true, chris. Either the Ukrainian Government, or People Associated with it, possess a real and actual knowledge of corrupt dealings by the bide family, or they dont. If they do, is it not in the interest of all americans to know that is . Chris we are going to get to the bidens in a minute but i ask you a specific question, id like a specific answer. The president has the state department, hes got the cia, hes got the pentagon, hes got a number of other agencies. Why did he use three private lawyers to get information on biden from the Ukrainian Government rather than go through all of the agencies of his government . Stephen two different points. Chris how about answering my question . Stephen john durham, as you know chris wait a minute, john durham is investigating some a completely different. Im asking you a direct question, what are the president use private attorneys rather than go to the state department . If you dont know, thats an acceptable answer, but lets not talk about john durham, who was investigating the trump speech of their two issues chris why did he do it . Stephen i understand. I understand that you have your question, i have my answer. Theres two issues that were brought up a phone call chris its a nonanswer at this point. Stephen there were two issues brought up in the phone call. One was ukrainian knowledge about the nature of the collusion investigation that is inflicted so much pain and damage on our country. My point is that the attorney general has appointed somebody from the Justice Department to look into that issue. Then theres the additional matter of ukrainian corruption, which giuliani, among others, are looking at. And it is proper and natural for frankly anybody concerned about the future of ukraine and the United States to want to know information about corrupt dealings. What i find astonishing, chris, is that the people that are so enraged about an effort to find any true and actual knowledge of foreign crook dealings related to ukraine are the same ones who have been using the foreign produced dossier by a british spy to put this country through unending political turmoil. Spirit im asking question as to why im simply asking you a question as to why the president didnt use his government. If you apparently are not going to answer that, i will ask another question. Why did the president decide to withhold 391 million in military aid to ukraine last july . That had been approved by congress . Stephen the president has been clear and consistent on this issue, not merely for the time is been in office, his whole time as a candidate and frankly decades before that. Chris i simply asking why in july did they decide to withhold the aid . Stephen the problem of burden sharing in ukraine and with our nato allies, hes been clear and consistent on this issue. Plus the matter of ukrainian corruption. For reasons i cannot fathom, the media, which is ordinarily interested in sunshine and transparency above all else, is remarkably unserious about the information ukraine possesses about the corruption of the previous at administration chris okay, but lets just make this point. In may, as part of a regular interagency process, in may, two months before he withheld the aid, the pentagon certified to congress certified, a formal process certified to congress after a rigorous process and after consultation with the state department that ukraine had made dramatic progress in fighting corruption and that the aid should be released. Why did the president , if the argument is corruption, why did the president go against his own pentagon and his own state department . Stephen chris, i dont understand how you can ask aske question while at the same time admonishing the president or wanting to get to the bottom of perhaps one of the biggest Corruption Scandals concerning ukraine in the last few years chris are not admonishing anybody, absently asking why did he i mean this is with a due respect, this is an exercise in obfuscation. Why did the president go against his own pentagon and state department . Stephen theres a tone of judgment in all of your questions, so yes, you are admonishing chris thats judgment on your part. Stephen i cant speak to every midlevel and low level bureaucrat in the u. S. Government chris this is the deputy secretary of defense. What you considered john brood a minyan in the state department . In a pentagon . Stephen its the president his job and sworn duty to safeguard taxpayer dollars and the United States governments foreign policy. Getting to the bottom of a Corruption Scandal in ukraine is in the American National interest if you want to understand why that complaint is so obviously politically biased, when he says that the president is threatening National Security by trying to expose corruption when he says, or she, that the president is hurting National Security by trying to get to the bottom of a gigantic scandal that nobody has on earth, the president is the whistleblower here. The president of the United States is the whistleblower in this individual is a saboteur trying to undermine a democratically elected government. Chris saboteur, is he a spy . Is a committing treason . Stephen i do not know chris the president said that, you kn. Stephen the president correctly pointed out that the behavior of this individual is close to a spy. I dont know who the individual is, all i know is at some point, chris, we have to focus the real scandal, which is three years of deep state sabotage. Chris im going to talk about a different scandal and youll be very happy that im headed a tear. The president says the real story is the corruption by Vice President biden and his son hunter biden, who was on the board of the Ukrainian Energy company. How, specifically im going to give you one minute uninterrupted how specifically to the bidens break the law in ukraine . Stephen the burisma company, as you know, was under investigation. It has a ukrainian oligarch behind it who was under investigation. We know that there was severe concerning the Obama Administration of the time about biden being appointed as the lead on ukrainian policy and his son getting a lucrative 50,000 a month deal with the company. The sun had no experience in the legal issues chris how did you break the law . Stephen knew nothing about ukrainian law and nothing about natural gas, the issue of the heart of the company. The biden men threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid unless the prosecutor was fired. Chris you realize that also the International Monetary fund, almost every other government in the west was also asking for that prosecutor to be fired and that in fact, in fact, there was no investigation going on of burisma, the name of the company at that time. Stephen i dont know that to be true. Chris it is true. Stephen i know what people have said but the reality is that why is the media so obsessed with every single aspect of this investigation but they dont want to uncover the potential corrupt dealings of hunter biden and his father . Chris i have one less question to ask you and i do want to put this on stephen while thornton about china . Chris here is the prosecutor general of ukraine for three years, including the period during which President Trump spoke with president zelensky in july of 2019. Here he is this week. Take a look. I dont know any violation of ukrainian law once again, ukrainian law, by biden and biden jr. Chris he was the prosecutor general at the time the president called the ukrainian president says joe biden and his son did nothing wrong. Chris if youre going to use them as a witness you have to also analogies made incredibly damning allegations against ukraine and the government involving the origins of the 2016 russian collusion experience e. If youre going to use a witness you have to take all of it are none of it. You cant pick and choose, its not a buffet. Chris okay, but i guess the point is if he is clearly saying those things about ukraine and the 2016 election, hes not carrying water for joe biden, he says joe biden you cant pick or choose either. Stephen im not. Chris your saying we agree with him on this but we dont on the other. Welcome to the buffet. Stephen im saying an investigation is urgently needed when you look at the pattern of facts but the single most important point is this. The American People in 2016 said we want in a completely new direction for our country. They elected new lawmakers and they elected a new president to deliver that direction. Hes the the sole elected person in the executive branch. Chris thats not true. It got the Vice President as well. Stephen yes. The all executive power is vested in the president but there are deep state operatives who for three years have done nothing but try to leak, undermine, hurt, and harm the ability of this president to institute this change. Do we want to be governed by an unelected bureaucracy or by a democratically elected president . Is the sole issue facing the American People. Chris the only point i would make it, and i have to move on, is that in 2018, the American People elected democratic house, so they are a coequal branch of government. Stephen, thank you, thanks for your time, always good to talk with you. Up next, we will ask House Democratic leader where they are headed on possible impeachment of President Trump. Congressman and chair of the democratic caucus, Hakeem Jeffries, joins us next. As a Small Business owner, the one thing you learn pretty quickly, is that theres a lot to learn. Grow with google is here to help you with turning ideas into action. Putting your business on the map, connecting with customers, and getting the skills to use new tools. So, in case youre looking, weve t all the ways we can help in one place. Free training, tools, and Small Business resources are now available at google. Com grow [music plays throughout le lack of afro recipe for love] whoaahoooo oo yeahhh aa aa aye ive got so much love to give ive got so much more to give, baby this is a moment you plan for. To start your retirement plan, find an advisor at massmutual. Com [sfx mnemonic] without it, i cannot write my name. I was diagnosed with parkinsons. I had to retire from law enforcement. It was devastating. One of my medications is three thousand dollars per month. Prescription drugs do not work if you cannot afford them. For sixty years, aarp has been fighting for people like larry. And we wont stop. Join us in fighting for whats right. With truecar, to sell just enter your license plate and see your cars value in real time. Sports package and low mileage . Nice. Within minutes, youll have a true cash offer, and you can head to a dealership and get paid, today, right now. Chris House Democrats have now fast tracked the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, issuing a subpoena to secretary of state mike pompeo with promises of more to come. Joining us now, congressman Hakeem Jeffries of new york, chair of the House Democratic caucus and a member of the judiciary committee, congressman, welcome back to fox news sunday. Representative jeffries good morning, thanks for having me on. Chris lets start with that subpoena of the state department documents and witnesses. If President Trump refuses to comply with that subpoena, is that an Impeachable Offense . Representative jeffries we hope that the administration will cooperate. That certainly hasnt been the case uptodate, though there is some reason to believe that moving forward, given the seriousness of these allegations, that we will see cooperation from secretary pompeo. We are going to follow the facts, we are going to follow the law, we will be guided by the constitution and we will unearth the truth for the American People, which relates to the fact that the president has betrayed his oath of office. Hes engaged in serious wrongdoing here. He pressured a Foreign Government to target an american citizen for political gain. That is classic abuse of power which undermines our National Security. This is a serious as it gets. Chris to press my point, in previous cases, i certainly know in the nixon case that one of the things that the house impeached nixon for was failure to cooperate, he was in contempt of congress. It was failu