Morality vs constitutionality: The trend of High Court judges deciding cases based on personal beliefs

Many such orders are passed in cases involving sexual relationships, not just of same-sex couples, but also in cases of married and unmarried heterosexual couples.

Related Keywords

,High Court ,Constitutional Morality ,Social Morality ,Justice Pankaj Jain ,Punjab And Haryana High Court ,Allahabad High Court ,Onstitutionality And Morality ,Indian Jurisprudence ,Indian Courts ,Legal News ,Moral Policing ,Moral Policing Inside Courts ,Right To Life ,Right To Liberty ,Right To Choice Of Partner ,Supreme Court ,Supreme Court Of India ,Calcutta High Court ,Adolescent Love Cases ,Same Sex Couple Cases ,Cji Dy Chandrachud ,Justice Chandrachud ,Runaway Couple Cases ,Justice Alok Jain ,Justice Kuldeep Tiwari ,Bigamy ,Section 494 Ipc ,Live In Relationship With Subsisting Marriage ,Article 21 ,Right To Protection Of Life ,Avoid Marriage ,Justice Siddharth ,Live In Relationship India ,Live In Relationship And Law ,Justice Sangeeta Chandra ,Justice Narendra Kumar Johari ,Interfaith Marriage ,Interfaith Couples ,Madhya Pradesh High Court ,Justice Subodh Abhyankar ,Justice Shamim Ahmed ,Hadiya Case ,Justice Vipin Sanghi ,Dhanak For Humanity ,Shakti Vahini Vs Union Of India ,Trans Couples ,Lgbt Couples ,Rajeev Godara ,Live In Relationships ,