Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vim
well. even if there is some problem with the appointment. and, again, i don't think there is at all. jack smith is an inferior officer. it is clear under statutory authority in the constitution that he can be appointed by the attorney general of the united states. i think that is quite clear. but even if there was some other path, there is a doctrine that says when actions have been taken, such as this, we don't go back in and unravel that action because the appointment was unlawful. that is the doctrine that is excepted in law. you can move forward and you change things moving forward but you don't go back and unravel what has already been done. there are some the reasons why this is wrong. >> i would say, again, trying to be fair here and not allow my own biases to color how i see this, in the main, this judge has taken a bunch of