“They saw Mr Salmond, cross examined, precisely denying that the alleged behaviour happened. “The jury saw and heard prosecution witnesses under cross examination. “The jury’s conclusion, with a majority of women on it, was to acquit Mr Salmond. “If as the First Minister states the jury’s verdict means that the complaints they had before them in evidence did in fact happen, then the only logical conclusion you can draw from her words is that the jury was wrong in its verdict - 13 times. “Those were weasel words employed by the First Minister, and any reasonable person would draw more than an inference from them that the jury was wrong.