The Petition was filed in Portage County Circuit Court. See Case Code: 30701. MREA alleges that certain guidance documents issued by PSCW are beyond the limits of its statutory authority. The organization further argues that the guidance documents will impede solar and other clean energy development. MREA first asserts in the Petition that the guidance documents have incorrectly asserted: . . . broad jurisdiction over privately owned solar panels located on customers’ roofs and connected behind the utility meter to provide a partial alternative to buying electricity from the utility. Those guidance documents incorrectly assert that private solar generation financed through a mechanism called “third-party financing” constitutes a “public utility” subject to regulation (and effective prohibition).