Queen's needs to stop defending its academic prowess through

Queen's needs to stop defending its academic prowess through privileged metrics


Supplied by Asbah Ahmad
I didn’t even read up to the “global impacts” part of the headline—I was just shocked we beat out schools like Cambridge and Princeton. After all, last fall, Principal Patrick Deane referred to Queen’s global academic rankings as “depressing.” 
Immediately, I investigated the background of the rankings we topped. The
Times Higher Education (
THE) Impact Rankings, run by the “esteemed”
THE publication, is a global ranking of universities based on their advancement of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 
Within minutes, I found glaring issues with the ranking’s methodology. 
Furthermore, how Queen’s advertised its rankings results seemed dodgy, peculiar, and even dishonest during the peak of the 2025 admissions cycle.

Related Keywords

Cambridge , Cambridgeshire , United Kingdom , Canada , Patrick Deane , Instagram , World University Rankings , Student Choice Initiative , United Nation Sustainable Development , Principal Patrick Deane , Times Higher Education , Impact Rankings , Queens Needs To Stop Defending Its Academic Prowess Through Privileged Metrics , He Journal , கேம்பிரிட்ஜ் , கேம்பிரிட்ஜ்ஷைர் , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , கனடா , பேட்ரிக் டீன் , இன்ஸ்தக்ராம் , உலகம் பல்கலைக்கழகம் தரவரிசை , மாணவர் தேர்வு முயற்சி , ஒன்றுபட்டது தேசம் நிலையான வளர்ச்சி , ப்ரிந்ஸிபல் பேட்ரிக் டீன் , முறை அதிக கல்வி , தாக்கம் தரவரிசை ,

© 2025 Vimarsana