vimarsana.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For RT Worlds Apart 20240714 : vimarsana.com
Transcripts For RT Worlds Apart 20240714 : vimarsana.com
Transcripts For RT Worlds Apart 20240714
A const personalities mr moodys personality which has had a rule to play in what india has become in the last 5 years ive been screaming at the top of my lungs for the us by years that india is being let that literally its playing with fire and it will not be able to put this genie of extremism back in the bottle because once you allow people to become so extremist in this thought process in their action in their reaction then that becomes you so india is no more the secular shining rising india that we thought was possible and the prime minster were crimes from the moment and its a very different india and pakistan i think the process of the reintroduction of democracy and the
Political Parties
maturing has had a huge role to play in it and i think you saw the parliament acted in reacted to this crisis it was restrained it was considered it was debated the
Prime Minister
supremacy confound it very easy to take this posturing which was what the parliament and the. People to focus on wanted so its actually a reflection of changing society of behavior and changing national brodys for good countries its us visible to people like you. Know perhaps from this incident while im hard what is also visible to people like myself is that india is a democracy it is facing a major parliamentary election in may which may explain why
Prime Minister
modi may be more motivated to burnish his strongman image ive also heard people say that this could be something more long term this could be a change in indias a military strategy in becoming more assertive what do you think is more likely do you think its mostly political or do you think its indeed strategic. Look i think its a bit of both ok because we saw. In a rather stunned really election really right mr moody using the images of people who who passed away in the incident rate so it is bringing nationalism and the military right in the middle of politics ok thats one secondly again people like myself have been observing this since perhaps in the months since time where the deep establishment in india is becoming more and more powerful i remember the time when they wanted to solve the dispute and promised a moment singh was very keen to do so also but was held back by what i can call the deep establishment in the india so in some ways you know i even tweeted about it you see india and pakistan falling to very different trajectories we are moving of the form extremism into a moderate progressive hopefully a developing society and india is moving to words a very very belligerent aggressive extremist india and i was just a little bit perhaps disagree with you when you see this is only election related because the lynching of people the whole process of using we reap and pellet guns a state policy into smear and really very aggressive behavior towards muslims whether they were in mumbai or your push me or do you or anybody else this started as soon as by mr moody came into power well not that hard the pakistani government is also accused of major human rights abuses on its own territory so lets not paint it black and white but im more interested in the political angle of this whole skirmish because when the security and the sovereignty of a state i directly engage theres always pressure on latest to respond in a mass killer and symmachus way in order not to look weak and yet
Prime Minister
han went out of his way to stay conciliatory do you think his response where have been the same if he like his encounter. Were facing an important election no this is what you we really need to understand about
Pakistan Pakistan
has changed on that ground pakistan no more considered and the more city against india encouraging in the mostly among to its nationals against any one of its neighbors as good policy right this is where pakistan is very different than we than india right now because i think weve learned our lessons from history and therefore we dont wish this upon india also because if they go on this trajectory unfortunately they will not be able to be responsible players in this region this region has suffered for far too long because of this ongoing conflict between these 2 giants in the region you know if you look at any progress that the street and could potentially have made weve lost out ok i think we need to fight wars against poverty against giving education to our people giving help opportunities giving
Economic Opportunities
its really sad if in the neighborhood as large as india move towards this extremist belligerent aggressive nation because it doesnt do any good to any of its neighbors and least of all pakistan well i agree with you that the
Indian Response
was quite extraordinary because there were suicide attacks before but it was the 1st time that indian fighter jets crossed deep into pakistan since i think the and 971 into pakistan of what how much of a shoghi thing though is indian air raids were to the pakistani
Political Leadership
you know interestingly i think with
Prime Minister
mu the being in power for the last 5 years in india we in pakistan were prepared for anything which is unreasonable which could be avoided grabber and close to the election coming in march and we were we were quite mindful of the fact that any incident will be perhaps manufactured or created im not pointing any fingers over there but it will be used as an excuse to do something very irresponsible. Because the extent of the responsibility of this act and then the extent of the of the narrative shipping and the lies which have now been exposed internationally it has actually damaged indias credibility far more than the length and breadth of the selections so the very responsible people in india are perhaps now we can up to that realization and you know very responsible point voices from india also pointing out that we need to stop looking towards pakistan for indigenous problems because what has happened in push me the reaction of the kashmiri people is because of the very strong state terrorism or aggression which has been. Pointed towards them in the last 5 years now i dont want to go into a blame game right i dont want to say you do this we do that i want to see that these 2 countries are far too important for the region for their own people and for the world we need to really come to the negotiating table and really have uninterrupted and uninterrupted build i know because dialogue is the only we to really pick here of conflict long term this contract position of 2
Nuclear States
whose purpose is it serving it serves no one it just creates a lot of negativity within the region and keeps the region and these 2 countries from
Going Forward
while again the one version that i heard in the pakistani and
International Media
who is interested serving it at least initially were intended to serve the interest of their ruling party in india its too early to say conclusively have this point of time but do you think this incident will end up helping mr modis electoral chances or g. Think it will and hurting him look i saw a route which is report recently which clearly says that his. Numbers are
Getting Better
right after this rate and you see him in the electioneering process really using this as as an. As a powerful tool. It would be. The never know how elections turn out and we never know how politics play out because now in the last 23 days you see some sanity emerging by no means about the killing 300 people in pakistan when they did those have been completely debunked by
International Media
and
International Organizations
so its really going to be anyones game but obviously mr grimes to move the is trying very hard and its quite sure that this will assist him i can also see how it will assist him because in the last 5 years hes made a very ultra nationalist. Ultra stream sort of narrative shipping in india has now almost become very ingrained its dangerous for india as it. Is dangerous for pakistan now you mentioned before the role of the media and how differently they cheer countries in gauge the media because india almost immediately closed of this side of the suicide bombing attack whereas pakistan around the country invited media over to the side of the strikes to undermine the indian damage claims i wonder if this is perhaps an eel area of
Foreign Policy
or of diplomacy for pakistan in gauging the
International Public
opinion much more practically and by the use of not only traditional but also social media you know i dont think its about
Public Opinion
away i dont think its about how pakistan was able to you know do agre draw at a p. R. Handling i dont think its the handling exercise i think this is a changing reality exercise and i think because that was just able to engage of both the world through its changing reality and i think the importance of the state in the world depends on its credibility that now the credibility of india through this whole crisis and. How they managed it has actually been reduced to a very very new number simply for the fact that every claim that was made by the establishment by the military by the indian politicians by the indian media has actually been proven to be incorrect satellite imagery has proven the to be incorrect though everything that pakistan was seeing could be proven by exposing them to be a little on the ground and therefore pakistan was meche more keen to engage with national bindiya and
International Media
because what it was seeing could be corroborated by facts on the ground now this is a very dangerous situation because if a country feels if the people who are in power in that particular country in india for instance feel that they can for their own people into this ultra nationalistic you know jingoistic reaction by feeding them lies and then the media picks up those lies and multiplies the many times then what are you turning your population into and how are you expecting them to react to a neighbor like pakistan because then everything that happens in india is immediately put on pakistan short or this is a dangerous dangerous trend and for a country has the largest india aspiring to be a
Security Council
member to lose its credibility this march and to be using lies and manufactured events both in front of international for forget the
Media International
players and its own people i think its very very sad and i dont think this plays on well for anyone even pakistan should not be happy by in india which is choosing to exit in such a manner we dont want to embarrass them while madame hard we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay chant my. Join me every thursday on the alec simon show and ill be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business im showbusiness ill see you then. What do you do before you came here where you were before you came here whether you live well death row in many us
States Capital
punishment is still practiced convicted prisoners can spend years waiting for execution but most of the time the victims families they are very much in favor the
Death Penalty
there are some people that because of what they did have given up the right to live among us somebody even proven innocent up to years on death row and how many more exonerations is it going to take before we as a society realize that this is not working and we actually do something about. Who. The hell are going to. Look at it and. Welcome back to worlds apart bit in that red bunny heart pakistans former foreign minister and a member of the
National Assembly
met him hard while being. Current episode seems to be defused the initial premise for the attacks remains that it is militant groups which india considers terrorist which the
United Nations
considers terrorists operating in a pakistani territory do you think that could lead to the tensions flaring up again in the future look i hope the initial premise as it existed 10 years back has moved a long long way and it you might have the luxury to be able to ignore that i unfortunately did not have the luxury to simply for the reason that pakistan the last 10 years has for 70000 of its citizens to trying to find these very militant groups that the world claims we have done nothing about pakistan has lost 70028000 soldiers
Paramilitary Forces
fighting these very militant groups scoots the pakistan like india the state cannot do everything at the same time right now the premise of this particular attack being manufactured or planned or emanating from pakistani soil is entirely incorrect and it has almost been proven to be incorrect not to use anything that happens indigenously because of state policy because a state terrorism in kashmir as a tool to whip pakistan is obviously not fashionable or allowed or will hold because eventually all of us have to look internally boxers a country today by the way which is a change country were all confident enough to look internally at the fault lines that we had that were trying to correct were trying to protect minorities better were trying to protect the i. D. P. s the people who were displaced because of military action against militant groups in the fatah region which is now. And everywhere else and the fabric of our society has suffered because of that so this is to be told for a country which has suffered so much and frankly speaking not suffered for your sake or for the militancy or anyone else to think but for own sake we had to correct meaning of the mistakes that we made in the past and the last 10 years we have started the journey of corrected them rather quickly now i think in some ways this incident perhaps gives the world an opportunity to be able to look slightly more deeply. Into what pakistanis to do and not to judge pakistan by what it was during many many past 3 genes which were not democratic met them have speaking about this change pakistan dainton
Prime Minister
when he was. Responding to this just share of goodwill on the part of your country at the release of the pilot sat in a pretty straightforward and i would even say threatening way that this was this whole skirmish on the border was just a training practice and that quote the real thing is yet to come is there any point beyond which pakistan will not be able to maintain its conciliatory post chair look pakistan as a policy not by accident did 2 things ok but the son did not remain conciliatory to the extent of allowing india into its
International Borders
its territory and exit without there being a little you should be retaliated because we had the responsibility to protect ourselves a little bit you also sought to deescalate would they be a point when you will be much less motivated to do that this is exactly what im telling you so well let them nor that if you can do military adventurism we can all to do it on the side no i am very very concerned about the
Prime Minister
who can 1st of all use that type of language about talking about. You know military adventurism in the way that this was a
Pilot Project
you will see what will happen even get into your houses who are those who took him to get into anyones its his
International Borders
the
Security Council
doesnt the un charter doesnt
International Law
doesnt so what my my reaction to your specific question is that if there is result to military adventurism i think all of pakistan stands united behind its armed forces and i think our armed forces if anything have displayed that they dont need to make stories about what theyve achieved but be able to actually achieve did we do any chest thumping. Were going to 55. 00 to buy you know 5 to be in stone a capturing the pilot we actually turned the pilot into you and forgot to celebrate i wont buy it we dont that mean simply for that reason because we did not want to create this war hysteria you know we sent it by lit within 48 august back in to indian territory i think this is the difference in approach is that the 2 countries have it with you on the difference in their approaches but i think they were the kind of world that they believe in is not always in compliance with
International Law
or even african norms i mean there are a number of countries in the world that allow themselves the right to strike targets in somebody elses territory israel would be while the
United States
would be and the other if india precedes with these kind of approach in india is a much much stronger state than yours im asking you not as. A social commentator but as somebody who used to be in charge of these very very important decisions how much will be too much for pakistan because theres always a limit to everything in my country and you know from its recent experience you can see that sometimes when you are being pushed too strongly you will retaliate and respond them sometimes that responsibility not to somebody elses liking 1st before so far i think india being militarily but strongholds of course it is a much bigger country and it spends far much far far far more than pakistan don does on its military much as
International Opinion
completely in a different sort of direction ok so simple the simple answer to your not so simple question is that pakistan will not be in the military adventurism into its sovereign dead tree if that happens pakistan has not only the right but the responsibility these understand this you have the responsibility to react all of pakistan stands as one the parliament has made exactly the scene. This given the same direction in its resolution the national
Security Council
says exactly the same thing in its meetings with the executive the parliament and the people of the pakistan stand behind the armed forces because armed forces of popular have now acted very very responsibly and we know this isnt this is the
Political Parties<\/a> maturing has had a huge role to play in it and i think you saw the parliament acted in reacted to this crisis it was restrained it was considered it was debated the
Prime Minister<\/a> supremacy confound it very easy to take this posturing which was what the parliament and the. People to focus on wanted so its actually a reflection of changing society of behavior and changing national brodys for good countries its us visible to people like you. Know perhaps from this incident while im hard what is also visible to people like myself is that india is a democracy it is facing a major parliamentary election in may which may explain why
Prime Minister<\/a> modi may be more motivated to burnish his strongman image ive also heard people say that this could be something more long term this could be a change in indias a military strategy in becoming more assertive what do you think is more likely do you think its mostly political or do you think its indeed strategic. Look i think its a bit of both ok because we saw. In a rather stunned really election really right mr moody using the images of people who who passed away in the incident rate so it is bringing nationalism and the military right in the middle of politics ok thats one secondly again people like myself have been observing this since perhaps in the months since time where the deep establishment in india is becoming more and more powerful i remember the time when they wanted to solve the dispute and promised a moment singh was very keen to do so also but was held back by what i can call the deep establishment in the india so in some ways you know i even tweeted about it you see india and pakistan falling to very different trajectories we are moving of the form extremism into a moderate progressive hopefully a developing society and india is moving to words a very very belligerent aggressive extremist india and i was just a little bit perhaps disagree with you when you see this is only election related because the lynching of people the whole process of using we reap and pellet guns a state policy into smear and really very aggressive behavior towards muslims whether they were in mumbai or your push me or do you or anybody else this started as soon as by mr moody came into power well not that hard the pakistani government is also accused of major human rights abuses on its own territory so lets not paint it black and white but im more interested in the political angle of this whole skirmish because when the security and the sovereignty of a state i directly engage theres always pressure on latest to respond in a mass killer and symmachus way in order not to look weak and yet
Prime Minister<\/a> han went out of his way to stay conciliatory do you think his response where have been the same if he like his encounter. Were facing an important election no this is what you we really need to understand about
Pakistan Pakistan<\/a> has changed on that ground pakistan no more considered and the more city against india encouraging in the mostly among to its nationals against any one of its neighbors as good policy right this is where pakistan is very different than we than india right now because i think weve learned our lessons from history and therefore we dont wish this upon india also because if they go on this trajectory unfortunately they will not be able to be responsible players in this region this region has suffered for far too long because of this ongoing conflict between these 2 giants in the region you know if you look at any progress that the street and could potentially have made weve lost out ok i think we need to fight wars against poverty against giving education to our people giving help opportunities giving
Economic Opportunities<\/a> its really sad if in the neighborhood as large as india move towards this extremist belligerent aggressive nation because it doesnt do any good to any of its neighbors and least of all pakistan well i agree with you that the
Indian Response<\/a> was quite extraordinary because there were suicide attacks before but it was the 1st time that indian fighter jets crossed deep into pakistan since i think the and 971 into pakistan of what how much of a shoghi thing though is indian air raids were to the pakistani
Political Leadership<\/a> you know interestingly i think with
Prime Minister<\/a> mu the being in power for the last 5 years in india we in pakistan were prepared for anything which is unreasonable which could be avoided grabber and close to the election coming in march and we were we were quite mindful of the fact that any incident will be perhaps manufactured or created im not pointing any fingers over there but it will be used as an excuse to do something very irresponsible. Because the extent of the responsibility of this act and then the extent of the of the narrative shipping and the lies which have now been exposed internationally it has actually damaged indias credibility far more than the length and breadth of the selections so the very responsible people in india are perhaps now we can up to that realization and you know very responsible point voices from india also pointing out that we need to stop looking towards pakistan for indigenous problems because what has happened in push me the reaction of the kashmiri people is because of the very strong state terrorism or aggression which has been. Pointed towards them in the last 5 years now i dont want to go into a blame game right i dont want to say you do this we do that i want to see that these 2 countries are far too important for the region for their own people and for the world we need to really come to the negotiating table and really have uninterrupted and uninterrupted build i know because dialogue is the only we to really pick here of conflict long term this contract position of 2
Nuclear States<\/a> whose purpose is it serving it serves no one it just creates a lot of negativity within the region and keeps the region and these 2 countries from
Going Forward<\/a> while again the one version that i heard in the pakistani and
International Media<\/a> who is interested serving it at least initially were intended to serve the interest of their ruling party in india its too early to say conclusively have this point of time but do you think this incident will end up helping mr modis electoral chances or g. Think it will and hurting him look i saw a route which is report recently which clearly says that his. Numbers are
Getting Better<\/a> right after this rate and you see him in the electioneering process really using this as as an. As a powerful tool. It would be. The never know how elections turn out and we never know how politics play out because now in the last 23 days you see some sanity emerging by no means about the killing 300 people in pakistan when they did those have been completely debunked by
International Media<\/a> and
International Organizations<\/a> so its really going to be anyones game but obviously mr grimes to move the is trying very hard and its quite sure that this will assist him i can also see how it will assist him because in the last 5 years hes made a very ultra nationalist. Ultra stream sort of narrative shipping in india has now almost become very ingrained its dangerous for india as it. Is dangerous for pakistan now you mentioned before the role of the media and how differently they cheer countries in gauge the media because india almost immediately closed of this side of the suicide bombing attack whereas pakistan around the country invited media over to the side of the strikes to undermine the indian damage claims i wonder if this is perhaps an eel area of
Foreign Policy<\/a> or of diplomacy for pakistan in gauging the
International Public<\/a> opinion much more practically and by the use of not only traditional but also social media you know i dont think its about
Public Opinion<\/a> away i dont think its about how pakistan was able to you know do agre draw at a p. R. Handling i dont think its the handling exercise i think this is a changing reality exercise and i think because that was just able to engage of both the world through its changing reality and i think the importance of the state in the world depends on its credibility that now the credibility of india through this whole crisis and. How they managed it has actually been reduced to a very very new number simply for the fact that every claim that was made by the establishment by the military by the indian politicians by the indian media has actually been proven to be incorrect satellite imagery has proven the to be incorrect though everything that pakistan was seeing could be proven by exposing them to be a little on the ground and therefore pakistan was meche more keen to engage with national bindiya and
International Media<\/a> because what it was seeing could be corroborated by facts on the ground now this is a very dangerous situation because if a country feels if the people who are in power in that particular country in india for instance feel that they can for their own people into this ultra nationalistic you know jingoistic reaction by feeding them lies and then the media picks up those lies and multiplies the many times then what are you turning your population into and how are you expecting them to react to a neighbor like pakistan because then everything that happens in india is immediately put on pakistan short or this is a dangerous dangerous trend and for a country has the largest india aspiring to be a
Security Council<\/a> member to lose its credibility this march and to be using lies and manufactured events both in front of international for forget the
Media International<\/a> players and its own people i think its very very sad and i dont think this plays on well for anyone even pakistan should not be happy by in india which is choosing to exit in such a manner we dont want to embarrass them while madame hard we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay chant my. Join me every thursday on the alec simon show and ill be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business im showbusiness ill see you then. What do you do before you came here where you were before you came here whether you live well death row in many us
States Capital<\/a> punishment is still practiced convicted prisoners can spend years waiting for execution but most of the time the victims families they are very much in favor the
Death Penalty<\/a> there are some people that because of what they did have given up the right to live among us somebody even proven innocent up to years on death row and how many more exonerations is it going to take before we as a society realize that this is not working and we actually do something about. Who. The hell are going to. Look at it and. Welcome back to worlds apart bit in that red bunny heart pakistans former foreign minister and a member of the
National Assembly<\/a> met him hard while being. Current episode seems to be defused the initial premise for the attacks remains that it is militant groups which india considers terrorist which the
United Nations<\/a> considers terrorists operating in a pakistani territory do you think that could lead to the tensions flaring up again in the future look i hope the initial premise as it existed 10 years back has moved a long long way and it you might have the luxury to be able to ignore that i unfortunately did not have the luxury to simply for the reason that pakistan the last 10 years has for 70000 of its citizens to trying to find these very militant groups that the world claims we have done nothing about pakistan has lost 70028000 soldiers
Paramilitary Forces<\/a> fighting these very militant groups scoots the pakistan like india the state cannot do everything at the same time right now the premise of this particular attack being manufactured or planned or emanating from pakistani soil is entirely incorrect and it has almost been proven to be incorrect not to use anything that happens indigenously because of state policy because a state terrorism in kashmir as a tool to whip pakistan is obviously not fashionable or allowed or will hold because eventually all of us have to look internally boxers a country today by the way which is a change country were all confident enough to look internally at the fault lines that we had that were trying to correct were trying to protect minorities better were trying to protect the i. D. P. s the people who were displaced because of military action against militant groups in the fatah region which is now. And everywhere else and the fabric of our society has suffered because of that so this is to be told for a country which has suffered so much and frankly speaking not suffered for your sake or for the militancy or anyone else to think but for own sake we had to correct meaning of the mistakes that we made in the past and the last 10 years we have started the journey of corrected them rather quickly now i think in some ways this incident perhaps gives the world an opportunity to be able to look slightly more deeply. Into what pakistanis to do and not to judge pakistan by what it was during many many past 3 genes which were not democratic met them have speaking about this change pakistan dainton
Prime Minister<\/a> when he was. Responding to this just share of goodwill on the part of your country at the release of the pilot sat in a pretty straightforward and i would even say threatening way that this was this whole skirmish on the border was just a training practice and that quote the real thing is yet to come is there any point beyond which pakistan will not be able to maintain its conciliatory post chair look pakistan as a policy not by accident did 2 things ok but the son did not remain conciliatory to the extent of allowing india into its
International Borders<\/a> its territory and exit without there being a little you should be retaliated because we had the responsibility to protect ourselves a little bit you also sought to deescalate would they be a point when you will be much less motivated to do that this is exactly what im telling you so well let them nor that if you can do military adventurism we can all to do it on the side no i am very very concerned about the
Prime Minister<\/a> who can 1st of all use that type of language about talking about. You know military adventurism in the way that this was a
Pilot Project<\/a> you will see what will happen even get into your houses who are those who took him to get into anyones its his
International Borders<\/a> the
Security Council<\/a> doesnt the un charter doesnt
International Law<\/a> doesnt so what my my reaction to your specific question is that if there is result to military adventurism i think all of pakistan stands united behind its armed forces and i think our armed forces if anything have displayed that they dont need to make stories about what theyve achieved but be able to actually achieve did we do any chest thumping. Were going to 55. 00 to buy you know 5 to be in stone a capturing the pilot we actually turned the pilot into you and forgot to celebrate i wont buy it we dont that mean simply for that reason because we did not want to create this war hysteria you know we sent it by lit within 48 august back in to indian territory i think this is the difference in approach is that the 2 countries have it with you on the difference in their approaches but i think they were the kind of world that they believe in is not always in compliance with
International Law<\/a> or even african norms i mean there are a number of countries in the world that allow themselves the right to strike targets in somebody elses territory israel would be while the
United States<\/a> would be and the other if india precedes with these kind of approach in india is a much much stronger state than yours im asking you not as. A social commentator but as somebody who used to be in charge of these very very important decisions how much will be too much for pakistan because theres always a limit to everything in my country and you know from its recent experience you can see that sometimes when you are being pushed too strongly you will retaliate and respond them sometimes that responsibility not to somebody elses liking 1st before so far i think india being militarily but strongholds of course it is a much bigger country and it spends far much far far far more than pakistan don does on its military much as
International Opinion<\/a> completely in a different sort of direction ok so simple the simple answer to your not so simple question is that pakistan will not be in the military adventurism into its sovereign dead tree if that happens pakistan has not only the right but the responsibility these understand this you have the responsibility to react all of pakistan stands as one the parliament has made exactly the scene. This given the same direction in its resolution the national
Security Council<\/a> says exactly the same thing in its meetings with the executive the parliament and the people of the pakistan stand behind the armed forces because armed forces of popular have now acted very very responsibly and we know this isnt this is the
United Nations<\/a> against belligerence i can assure you this episode has put pakistan i think strongly bonet pakistan together and i think its probably too many pakistanis that pakistan stands together as a united front pakistan is a far stronger an issue and its much bigger an issue that were talking about one of the most militarized regions in the world with a very very high security presence and i think its a valid question how would a young local man and were talking about a man in his twentys who is believed to be this initial suicide bomb attack how would he be able to source 750 pounds of explosives to carry it out one that being the interest of pakistan to find out and dont you think that your country should be perhaps a little bit more forthcoming in offering its assistance to to deal with this major terrorist issue in the indian controlled kashmir look i think we have been more than forthcoming to the extent that the indian media and the indian politicians have used it as pakistan coming to its knees wanting to negotiate asking us over evil him but they will actually not so this is all a narrative shipping and i think pakistan has said at every forum from every level that peace we would like to assist you in this give us some credible evidence we would like to move with you we want to fight not to fight terrorism we want to discuss terrorism with you because we all have different versions of who is a state terrorist and who isnt right so look on this particular incident this particular incident the intelligence that one has heard so far and im not in government i dont have access to in the end. Religions percy but from what i have heard from credible sources is that the mood in push me because of what you can only quote. Really high handed behavior when major listen and you will say im going too much into details if a major of the military of india puts a fish meat in front of his jeep and takes him out and allows him to be stoned and he becomes a decree to men this is telling you what india has done in that country in that region if there is anyone within that area to a pakistan who has assisted who has help we are not supportive of anyone who assists while its anywhere be it inside our borders or outside thats a change but the stand that the world is perhaps taking too long to accept because you are judging us by a previous repetition the not being able to understand that in the last 1015 years pakistan has changed direction and pakistan has credibly strongly with monthly falling trying to completely d. You know human it extremism from all parts of our society now let me ask you one now one more question about an important player in the region which is the
United States<\/a> i have heard some x. Parents claim that this indian pakistani issue didnt dissolve on its own that the
Trump Administration<\/a> in gauged in some quote quiet diplomacy behind the scenes which with this white house is hard to believe both when it comes to the word quiet and when it comes to the war diplomacy what are you hearing in islamabad is that true ok so again i need to remind you i am not in government so i do not know exactly what and where but from what i know and from what i see starting from president from calling it a calling attractive news coming in from the subcontinent after this conflict you know after this crisis erupted which is obviously indication that the americans were playing a role and then he went on to also say that we are try. To speak to both parties and we are hearing attractive new thought he was obviously for talking about american role in trying to diffuse the situation beyond that also we also hear that 60 pompey are also played a role so look when 2 nuclear stand eyeball to eyeball then of course the world would choose to try and deescalate the situation i thought the world could have chosen to do it earlier we should not have reached this point but its important that we understand that we have been very restrained we have been constrained we have been very very careful and all of that but. With a country as large and as military a military really sort of robust or or villain lets say because i dont know about this is that hasnt shown much but. As india to be as aggressive and as belligerent in this mindset coming all the way up from the
Prime Minister<\/a> to the smallest media house in india and meeting to the rest of the population is a very dangerous trend and i met them high e. S. C. s even trying to say throughout this interview countries change pakistan has changed significantly so can india not only here for the worse but also for the better so lets hope that they may elections perhaps a bill and make it a little bit last bit later on but we have to leave it there its always a pleasure talking to you thank you very much for being so generous with your time that you to be bankers are here is to keep this conversation going in our social media pages and i hope to see you again same place same time here on worlds apart. Good with the suitable to sleep for. Myself or something and this is their. Role is going to say the course of business with them must be so it will. This is with. A lot of fellows on the bus not all because i am. On. The case in that book i know and that nobody else to look at the minute bodies can blow its most of its own smoke the show such as the fluid souls that. You were born you must. Live. In a world of big partisan new things lot and conspiracy its time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that
Mainstream Media<\/a> refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the bad and shouting past each other its time for
Critical Thinking<\/a> its time to fight. For the middle for the troops the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks. In his community there are people who believe that its ok to sell for x. Food on my table its really hard there are no jobs and you see that ive got kids and ask and as a parent. I can come up with lots of arguments and theres a lot of conflict in the game between the 2 teams most of the conflict i would say revolves around money and most of them money is made. Close one on each of those he knows each other is good because the state of california alone makes 6000000000. 00 a year of prison complexes you get some 20 year life where. You dont care anymore nobody cares about you so you dont care mind anything. Of. The stories that shaped the week 2 russian pilots pull off in the export
Emergency Landing<\/a> to save their passengers and crews lives after their plane suffers double engine failure during takeoff. The death of the disgraced financier
Geoffrey Epstein<\/a> is ruled out as a suicide but the tycoons that moyers say theyre not satisfied with the conclusion and intended to carry out their own investigation. And hong kongs antigovernment protest movement rumbles on with people in the hundreds of thousands demanding reforms while others rally in support of the authority","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia903006.us.archive.org\/21\/items\/RT_20190818_223000_Worlds_Apart\/RT_20190818_223000_Worlds_Apart.thumbs\/RT_20190818_223000_Worlds_Apart_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240716T12:35:10+00:00"}