Malnourished after being placed on the diet escaped jail time but are head of Community Service instead we break down the issues. Youre watching arent International Coming to you live from the russian capital where its just turned 7 pm welcome to the program. But a mere putin has ordered an analysis of the threat posed by a new u. S. Missile the weapon was recently tested just after washington pulled out of a treaty arms control treaty with moscow the russian president also ordered a symmetrical response to the weapon trying to have a story there you have a new all the latest developments and statements are in essence the new reality of the World Without the intermediate range Nuclear Forces treaty how murder by washington and moscow decades ago and eventually torn apart after an announcement by the u. S. President donald trump at the end of last year earlier this week the u. S. State department announced that the u. S. Successfully tested a new Cruise Missile that was preview. The outlawed by the terms of the i. N. F. Treaty plus even before that the u. S. Secretary of defense revealed that america was working on the deployment of new missiles to the asia pacific and the head of the pentagon made it clear that he wants that to happen asap now this friday the russian president as a result of that got together with the most senior russian officials that are in charge of security in this country and now hes saying that the american tests are nothing but a clear indication that washington pulled out of the treaty now because moscow was violating something russia believes that this was a well calculated plan to get their hands on tied the americans have orchestrated a Propaganda Campaign alleging violations by russia but its now clear this was just a smokescreen to hide washingtons own breaches of the treaty and its intention to leave it this all leaves 0 doubt about americas real intentions having got rid of the existing limits its now free to deploy previously forbid missiles anywhere in the world top american politicians say that you systems could be deployed 1st in the Asia Pacific Region but this affects our interests as well because it is situated near our borders over the last few months we kept hearing warnings from the russian capital that if here they realize that washington is rushing to develop or deploying new missiles now that they dont have to abide by the terms of the agreement moscow will do exactly the same and on friday mr putin made it clear that the russian take on this wont change and that moscow was ready to take all the necessary steps theres a new book and i mean. As you know weve never wanted and still dont want to get into an arms race which is expensive and destructive for a countrys economy all the latest weapons that weve been developing where response to americas unilateral pullout from the 2003 antiballistic missile treaty. We were forced to maintain the security of our people and our country we are doing the same and no doubt will keep on doing this in the future so once again the message from the russian government is they dont want to be dragged into this game but they are being forced to do it and the response from them will come quickly Nuclear Policy analyst maxwell down and believes without restraints on an arms race the world is heading down a very dangerous path the u. S. Is looking into different Sources Research into hypersonic blind vehicles not could be destabilizing because they can cross the. Already youre getting. New technology and the big dangerous and risky questions is is nobody know what this will mean in the future and what this will mean for future stability and what we really need is a dialogue between the u. S. And russia as a starting to bring the 2 sides together because it is in everybodys mutual interests to minimize the risk of a nuclear war i think whats important to realize with arms control treaties that put restraints on countries where heading into dangerous and uncharted territory. There comes a severe possibility this situation surrounding the collapse of the i. N. F. Treaty was addressed at the u. N. Security council where tensions flared russia and china called for Global Action to prevent a new arms race and rival powers blamed each other for the ongoing escalation. Do you realize that because of the u. S. Ambitions we are one step away from an arms race that cannot be controlled or regulated in any way the United States will not remain a party to a treaty that is deliberately violated by russia as if this depended only on us we would not reach this dangerous situation the United States is taking the necessary steps to address the threat posed by intermediate range Missile Forces being deployed in ever larger numbers by russia and china but you know what about you are you going to avoid responsibility for what is happening to future generations forgive you for this russias present actions are in line with a pattern of aggression that represents a clear threat to International Peace and security the Russian Federation is the sole responsibility for the reason demise of the. Images we do not understand by your responses to the americans you are returning to historical situation when missiles targeted european cities from different sites. Was a heated debate at the United NationsSecurity Council now the United States has recently withdrawn from the i. N. F. Treaty the intermediate range Nuclear Forces agreement and not only has the usa withdrawn from the treaty but the usa recently tested a missile that would have been a violation of that treaty had it still been in effect many are viewing this as an escalation of a potential new arms race between russia and the United States now when the representative of the United States spoke to the Security Council they accused russia of being responsible for the agreements demise this is the us representative here today because the Russian Federation preferred a world in which the United States continued to fulfill its i. N. F. Treaty obligations while the Russian Federation did not weve heard a narrative today that the United States had itself been in violation of the i. N. F. Treaty because of our recent flight test which used the m k 41 launcher that is also found in our aid. The sure Missile Defense system this is categorically false now russia emphasize that its concerns about the m. K. 41 launcher have been proven to be indeed correct and that this launcher could easily be tested in transformed into the tomahawk missiles that were recently tested by the United States and those missiles do indeed violate the treaty now russia which had been accused of having violated the i. N. F. Treaty had repeatedly requested that inspectors come to russia and see if indeed these allegations from u. S. Leaders were true however the United Nations and the United States ignored their requests to defend themselves against these allegations of violating the i. N. F. Treaty russia asked for dialogue around the issue and this dialogue was ignored heres some of what we heard from the russian representative. In accusing russia the United States and the countries that grunt alone with its are ignoring facts and common sense we proposed a closed door meeting to look at time misato of this and give full information to convince them that we did not violate the treaty but they refused we cannot understand the arguments from the u. S. But we do want to save the treaty china was also subject to us allegations that the Security CouncilUnited States accused china of boosting its military arsenal as well china responded that it was not correct for the United States to withdraw from the treating and blaming china for their decision was not honest or correct either this is the chinese representative addressing the Security Council with the i. N. F. Treaty is of great importance to not only the u. S. And russia but its a global peace and security is an accent to which use china as an excuse for leaving the treaty china rejects the baseless accusations from the u. S. Now the i. M. F. Treaty was signed in 1987 it was a key moment in the deescalation and ultimate end of the cold war but. In the United States and the soviet union and the recent decision of the United States to withdraw from that treaty as many concerned about the potential for a new Nuclear Arms Race now many hoped that meeting could be the opening of dialogue toward restoring some kind of treaty regarding intermediate range Nuclear Forces missiles and such and wherever while a lot of accusations were exchanged no real consensus seems to have existed among the countries represented at the un Security Council. Conservative activists in the us are celebrating after a court agreed to reconsider a censorship case against Facebook Google twitter and apple thats bringing the lawsuit accuse the tech giants of bias and of suppressing content from the conservative and of the political spectrum controversial right wing activist laura lunar is leading the case with a group called freedom watch shes previously been banned from all kinds of Online Platforms from twitter and facebook to pay pal and a lawsuit also alleges the 4 tech giants violated the 1st amendment and he wes antimonopoly laws there have been a growing number of leaks and testimonies from those who work for big tag alleging anticonservative bias. Even out blacklist where is someone thats right it goes to show that there are conservative theyll be blacklisted between Different Companies and different teams. That really need to change i see google executives go to congress and say that its not going to be that it is not political and im just so sure thats not true theyre telling people that oh they dont they dont have any blacklist this is all you know they dont have any political ideology they dont have any political bias but its really clear that they do the current legal consensus is that tech giants are allowed to moderate the content which appears on their sites or through their apps and they have denied any censorship. Do you discriminate more on philosophy like anti conservative versus pro liberal no or policies in our rhythms dont take a look consideration any affiliation philosophy were viewpoint there is absolutely no directive in any of the changes that we make to have a bias in anything that we do we use a robust methodology to reflect what is being said about any given topic or any particular time and we try to do it object to leave using a set of rubrics certainly if this happened to her this is happened to a lot of people and its high time that the big tech giants were challenge to hunt this theres a confusion i think because americans love free speech and we love private property so we love for example when its a company and we say well that company has a right to do anything it wants to but there comes a point where its almost like a public utility because they have such a monopoly on communication in general especially in terms of social media so some of these giants that really do have control. Theyve changed the game you can only come to one conclusion when it seems to only happen against conservatives in general and and i think that this flies in the face of of our free speech and you know that for most of us in america we could agree that our 1st amendment speech right is critical to everything that is freedom and most of us would wish that some of these tech giants would go along with that. This picture you see behind me a british Prime MinisterBoris Johnson putting his foot on a table during breaks at talks in paris has drawn much criticism online but many users didnt see the whole video which suggests the french president seemed to joke that a table could be used as a footstool but the pair then sharing a laugh over it. Rude and embarrassing imagine if micron put his food on the table and Buckingham Palace were not a slope take your foot of the table man arrogance uncivilized the updated version of donald trump dont love this pseudo boorish antics fool or distract you he doesnt act like this because he has no class but because hes off and for the class that can afford to act as if they had none some even suggested micron had tricked johnson to make it 4 out of him or that its a display of alpha male body language a french newspaper operation even real a story explaining its not an insulting incident but rather a joke british radio host and columnist john gantt thinks the accusations against the u. K. Prime minister are ridiculous Boris Johnson is what you call a rock star politician hes the only politician apart from trump whos knowing known by one name is boris and thats what he was like when he was the mayor of london a dozen gay got democratically elected twice hes the man who got stuck on a zip wire which would have actually left him suspended in the air which would have killed most politicians career but people go oh its boris so his style is very hands on his style is optimistic Boris Johnson is trying to deliver what the british people want and the british people at the moment are with Borish Johnson we dont necessarily want another slick politician like cameron no thank you to attack boris at the moment for having his foot on a table when the president of france has actually explained it was an insult to me just seems ridiculous i think the media need to grow up big and parents whose newborn child was left severely malnourished by their strict dietary choices avoid a jail sentence or break that story down with our guests after the break. You know worlds big partners through a lot and conspiracy its time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that Mainstream Media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smart we need to stop slamming the door. And shouting past each other its time for Critical Thinking its time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks. Make this manufacture consent to public wealth. When the ruling classes protect themselves. With the famous merry go round listen to the one percent. We can all middle of the room sick. To leave. The. Room. Welcome back i begin couple from australia whose child was found to be seriously malnourished after being placed on a big and died have escaped jail after a judge handed them 300 hours Community Service instead according to police the baby was severely severely underweight after being placed on a vegan diet from birth eating only oats and sparse vege she weighed less than 5 kilograms suffered from major problems with her bones and was hardly able to move doctors said she had only developed as much as a 3 month old and had no teeth because of a lack of necessary vitamins the parents face huge criticism for not thinking of the consequences of their actions. The founder of apparently discharge hes not parental responsibility to take charge by providing the necessities of my causing a danger of serious injury is undoubtedly very serious conduct particularly where the child is very young and hes unable to independently care for himself or herself and only one putting fact that there is no greater responsibility and that by a parent to his or her char to care for the child to nurture the child and protect the child from any or injury caring for the go was caring for a very young baby she couldnt sit up she couldnt speak any words she couldnt feed so hold a bottle she couldnt play was to spend the day in who called trolling back and forth she couldnt roll over all the way. This case raised the question of whether it is appropriate to use vegan diets for small children despite the protests some experts including those in the American Academy of pediatrics think it is acceptable and can actually be good for children however not all agree with them on that were now joined by judy more registered dietitian and attrition a special izing in child nutrition and Patrick Holden the founding director of the Sustainable Food trust and dairy farmer to talk about this further i do want to start with one question for both of you judy if we can hear from you 1st what do you think about the sentence that was handed down to these parents was it enough especially given that theyve actually pleaded guilty. I cant comment on that i know that some parents sayings because they really believe theyre doing the right think of their children and its very sad when this sort of case comes to light and a child suffers in that way. I can say with that sentence was appropriate. And patrick your thoughts on that. I dont say well i dont know nothing about the case you go to some compassion tools that as if they thought they were doing the right saying i think theres a huge amount of confusion all over the world at the moment well the right thin