That utilize their ads you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good and whos bad you need to take that into your own hands. International its wednesday the 4th of december life mobile new center kevin i would be for the next half hour with the update thanks for being with 1st then the trump impeachment saga steps up a gear in washington where the u. S. House Intelligence Committee has delivered a damning report detailing how trump allegedly abused his office for personal gain. And examine the document in more detail. Well the report from the house Intelligence Committee democrats essentially alleges 2 things about donald trump 1st it alleges that he conditioned military aid to ukraine on an announcement that would have been beneficial to his Reelection Campaign and secondly it alleges that he obstructed the house of representatives impeachment inquiry investigation now adam schiff representing democrats came forward and painted a pretty grim pricks here donald trump and his activities this is adam schiff this report chronicles a scheme by the president id states to coerce an ally ukraine that is at war with an adversary russia into doing the pleasure of the president s political dirty work and he was willing to sacrifice the National Security of the United States by withholding military aid and diplomatic recognition in the form of that white house meeting in order to get what he wanted now before departing the country on monday donald trump dismissed the allegations that were expected to be leveled in this report this is what donald trump said prior to leaving the country before the report was released by the radical. Democrat. What i. Set up a year ago when im going that was. One of the most important. Things. For them to be doing. Putting it at the end of the table with. A group in a recent interview the ukrainian leaders alinsky also dismissed these allegations about president trumps behavior and interactions with him look i never talked to the president from the position of a quid pro quo thats not my thing i dont want us to look like bagus now many witnesses testified during the impeachment inquiry hearings but observers wondered if they really. You made a strong case that donald trump had been inappropriate in his dealings with ukraine this is some of the testimony that was heard there was no mention of withholding aid on the call correct thats correct and there was no quid pro quo correct correct was there any reference to withholding aid you know there was not any reference to bribery no there was not any reference to quid pro quo no there was not you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with total. Now before this report was released on monday we had a report from the republicans that was released it was 123 pages long and it defended the actions of u. S. President donald trump saying that his dealings with ukraine had not been appropriate and had not violated the law fact that donald trump is out of the country celebrating the 70th anniversary of nato the North Atlantic Treaty Organization that many have pointed to the timing of the report as being somewhat suspicious however while some are looking at the report and saying it shows very very damning evidence against donald trump others are looking at the report and saying its simply a rehash of long discredited allegations different views from different sides of the political spectrum here in the United States. Reporting that will have said there are many concerns about the papers for us the book for example lets look at both sides one side to Florida Democratic party chair caesar says hes convinced by the report all the other media on this line thinks its called little meaning. What we have here is unprecedented and no one knows what it means because it Means Nothing why do we call it an impeachment inquiry because if it was an impeachment hearing or an impeachment proceeding the president would have been allowed to invite and to subpoena witnesses but since they didnt do that and didnt want him to do that they call that an impeachment inquiry and they have not changed one i ota from what they said when they began the inquiry that and i will paraphrase it the president used to his position. His authority under article 2 of the constitution for personal and or political benefits and the last time i checked every president since George Washington as done this this is not impeachable i do believe that the democratic report was factual and obviously the republican response was perhaps a fairy tale that people do want to read perhaps to put some went to bed specifically you have very different responses be on the lookout for this what we have to look at is different articles that are going to come out that will be pretty straightforward theres going to be an abuse of power because as you say in the quote he took his interests above the National Interest theres also going to be obstruction some as obstruction of congress not letting people cooperate. Before the fall in this to the governments facing a massive backlash after the release of a heavily redacted report on the fracking industry british authorities never intended to see the light today but nonetheless greenpeace won a lengthy legal battle with the government under the freedom of information act not that it was that productive out of 48. 00 pages 37. 00 were totally blacked out what remains of the one secret document shows a concerted plan to develop a positive image for the controversial gas Extraction Method among the general public. The conservatives have taken money from Oil Executives dress the rise of communities and enabled Franken Companies to threaten their local environment the fact they have tried to counter the sob by rejecting pages of critical information for the illustrates this governments contempt for the public this is the conservatives idea of being open about their field fracking experiment forced to release their report theyve heavily censored it. These heavily redacted government reports shows reference to secret plans to run the processional complain just by the weight of Scientific Evidence and stress of Public Opinion against fracking i dread to think what we havent been allowed to see. Him or fight against fracking in the u. K. Is a professor and co. They high tech god knows what sticking out of the grounds that earns some people cash and literally shakes other peoples homes those other people for years have been teaming up with green activists to win a war against fracking and bread from. Areas from believable if you can believe. In finally last month came the victory at least for the timing the controversial method of shale gas extraction was banned in the u. K. Under the Prime Minister who once called it glorious news for humanity and now that it seems there is no more need to come out and protest the Cabinet Office has at the last released a secret report on the fracking industry despite these lines on the paper no parts of this report shows appendices is to be released under the freedom of information act so you want to rate something that the activists were trying to get a glance at for almost 2 years theres a little problem heres what it looks like from the 48 pages seen by the guardian 37 are entirely blacked out and only one the very front is left uncensored so if youre still keen to get to know about the skeletons in the industries closet good luck why would so much stuff remain hidden looking at this black wall of redacted pages people will be wondering why theres so little the government is willing to reveal about fracking and so much it wants to hide if ministers have really dropped their support for this polluting industry why not publish this report in full and come clean about whats been going on behind closed doors. For years still though theres enough to scratch your heads over after reading the uncensored bits in there heres the gist of a few ideas there are issues with the fracking industrys progress the main one is public opposition to fracking it needs to be dealt with the government should develop a pro shale narrative and spread the word the department for energy and Climate Change is already undertaken crucial work on communications to increase public acceptability of shale for example creation of objective information Material Development of pro Show National and regional merits of shall champions and among other useful moves that whitehall needs to take is finding ways to speed up planning in response to operators concerns which is also sometimes an obstacle planning times need to be shortened and process needs to be predictable which also makes you wonder why would the guys in charge ban fracking at all in such a document there are always going to be sensitive parts that are embarrassing to the government that are sensitive that could harm you know the industry potentially in the future or that could show the government being too cooperative with industry that might show motives. That are the public would not see in a good light its to protect their their image and to protect their ability to move forward and continue to do what they think they need to do for the nation which is different from what they tell the public of course because they tell the public whatever narrative suits them in terms of getting elected and so on but typically its for domestic political reasons that you would ban it theres no other reason that i can think of depending on how things develop geopolitically there might be a big impetus to develop u. K. Shale and in which case theyll want to do. As quickly as possible watching out International Face of being with us is exactly 12 past the hour if youre watching the clock this wednesday next popular free dating apps such as tinder and others owned by the company much group seems are not protecting the users from sex offenders on their platforms the investigations for the investigators took a look at more than 150. 00 incidents of Sexual Assault over the last decade they found that the majority of victims were women who had met their attackers through match ups in fact in 10 percent of cases it seems theyre theyd much with men who had already been accused or convicted of sex crimes much grouchos of 40 percent of the most popular up says they do conduct background checks on their members but only on paid accounts further the Company Claims that they do not agree with the investigations results the implication that we nor bugs such offenders on our side and dont fight to keep them off is as outrageous as it is falls as Technology Evolves we will continue to aggressively deploy new tools to eradicate bad actors including users of our Free Products where we are not able to obtain sufficient and reliable information to make meaningful bank ground checks possible to go to conversations heated up then charge it more as a spectator journalist and resurface and womens rights advocate. The match group is a 1000000000. 00 company theres no reason why they couldnt allocate just a small portion of their revenue to screen the people on their ab just so that theres just a smaller since of increased safety its a precaution its a measure but its deserved if they appear if theyre suddenly saying that we want in order to join the service we want to perform background checks on everyone who joins 1st of all that would kill the business and they know it theres a moral responsibility on these companies that are making billions of dollars 1700000000 dollars from women looking for love to say oh you know what its too expensive for us to do a little bit to protect you nobodys going to want to join these apps with these kind of if theyre doing that theyre being this invasive of background checks with that said people maybe shouldnt be on them especially women and not only are these dangerous for women but its destroying women so just give up the dating apps if you dont perform your own background checks in your own time with your own money get off were not going to restrict women from using the internet because there are predators we do desire for these companies to at least take the step into the right direction why do you want to put that kind of power on these monolithic Tech Companies and up saying that you know ban women from dating apps im simply saying you shouldnt rely on this and you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good and whos bad you need to take that into your own hands so if you meet someone do a background check before you get for you go out on a date if they work in tandem with the courts to get the names at least of the 1st and last names in the location of where these people are and perhaps create some type of monitor of their internet thats a step in the right direction its going to be a mess i think no matter what and theres always going to be people who perhaps squeak through or dont get picked up who then commit assaults and crimes get a gun ladies. Protect yourselves and we dont and by the way these incidences are obviously extremely rare and you know by and large the vast majority of men are not sexual predators one woman is enough we need the companies to take a moral stance or at least have some sort of responsibility to protect the women that utilize their ad and then what happens you know its its never going to be a perfect system coming up a touch of the birthday blues from event that is supposed to inspire unity 70th bus sees allies fall out and protests on the streets of london just one of the stories weve got few but. Up until recently politics were about policy preferences and ways to implement them that is not the case today your political views are now what define you as a person and there is a moral dimension bias against those who are not politically correct is the last acceptable form of discrimination this is the end of politics. My feeling with this world its what now is were so confused. Here for and this certain generation thats controlling all the Politics Around the world still when that generation dies off and children are brought on this new movie are less materialistic dont really care about these things dont even want automobiles want to live by the side job want to ride a bicycle this movement is global and its going the world is going to has to go in this direction and its going to change. Again this is r. T. So as mentioned before the break nato continues to market 70th anniversary with the heads of its Member States convening in london for a 2nd day now for the military alliances summit with many big names there of course the cameras and actually rolling here are some of the highlights 1st off from day one of this high profile gathering thats all some pretty bizarre exchanges at times between the leaders. Our. Food. Is your breakfast president tom. It also sold was a good breakfast. Without. Salt sold such as. A puzzle is paid by the artist like to sell. You if you like. This is where you were politician was for her and she was a. Major still doing what hes been doing for the past 30 years desperately trying to find a role for itself and its clear that europe security interests cannot be served by a military alliance that just keeps expanding and expanding and thereby threatening the security of the very Member States that make those that oppose the defending heel was matt brown sounding rather tromp the end i mean he was saying look i mean we all have our own countries 1st we have to see whats in our interest its clearly in the europeans interest to think of a European Security idea and you would have thought trump you know you know the make america great. The america 1st guy he sees on this the say yeah youre right you know we should all look after our interests but instead he sounded like kind of a cynic. Major you know how dare you call anything you wish america is going to later when they knew. All sorts of terrible things well as you can see there are split screen nonetheless all quite outside to the big birthday already marred by protests in the british capital with more expected later today demonstrators be venting their anger over nato forcing its members to raise the defense spending to the detriment of the countrys economy. We are here because we want to protest the nato summit because for example the nato is forcing its Member States to increase their Defense Budget for my country for example belgium it means doubling Defense Budgets while we are asked to have an austerity policy in the same time they are trying to using this money to transform armies into intervention armies we have seen what this means in libya or in afghanistan this to realizing countries and sold another important issue is the confrontation policy to towards russia which is exactly creating this kind of bomb strace so there are many many issues why we have to oppose nato thats why we are here if hypothetically tomorrow nato ceased to exist would not create perhaps a security vacuum a security problem in europe that would lead to war instability this is an old argument done by the conservatives a little word i dont think so what we need is a new Security Architecture what i say to the security quality want to bloody war start this is what hopes. To secure. Touched on the story yesterday more it today now for you slovakia may be joining the trend of restoring National Gold reserves in a bid to avoid a Global Economic crisis it comes as countries across Eastern Europe are trying to shake off the dependency on the u. S. Dollar by a report rating yellow metal has done quarter reports. Its a 21st century gold