We need the companies to take a moral stance or at least have some sort of responsibility to protect the women that utilize their app you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good news bad you need to take that into your own hands. 247 news live from the russian capital this is r. T. International from the team myself you know neil. Welcome we begin with breaking news from berlin where germany has announced its me 2 Russian Embassy employees persona non grata in connection to the murder of a Georgian National bach in august rochelles the night any state blank house call the expulsion substantiated lets go live now to berlin. Hi there are 2 Embassy Workers expelled how much more do we know about this story. Well you will if now we know that 2 members of the Russian Embassy will be expelled according to what berlin is saying and is linking their expulsion to the murder of the Georgian National back in august but ever since this happened the russians later in russia denied any involvement in the case but the prosecutor today said that they have sufficient evidence to indicate the mens death connecting that to the russian state or by chechnya and all means but lets go back a little bit ever since this murder happened in there back in august the media jumped all over it and it was but they were pretty much calling it screwball case 2. 0 the media really made this a big deal and without any evidence they just jumped on claiming that this has to do with the russian state or has to do with chechnya whats more interesting here is that the person who committed the crime of the murder last august was put on a terrorist and then he was taken off that terror list but initially was put on there because he was supposedly a threat to society but then after a short period he was taken off of the the it was god it was from such an origin and pretty much this person fought alongside with the sun mill in chechnya really known. Fighter who is known for his guerrilla pretty much missions against the Russian Forces in in the region of chechnya and now that is what we have so far of whats going on but as the time goes by and the hours go by i will be updating you with more information out of here from berlin or i bring this up there what is known at this stage of under those live in the german camp of planking. Right lets move all notes more world news to trump and pitchman saga has stepped up a gear in washington with the u. S. House Intelligence Committee delivering what some are calling a damning report it claims that the american president allegedly abused his office for personal gain or to skill up and has been examining the document in a little more detail. Well the report from the house Intelligence Committee democrats essentially alleges 2 things about donald trump 1st it alleges that he conditioned military aid to ukraine on an announcement that would have been beneficial to his Reelection Campaign and secondly it alleges that he obstructed the house of representatives impeachment inquiry investigation now adam schiff representing democrats came forward and painted a pretty grim pricks here of donald trump and his activities this is adam schiff this report chronicles a scheme by the president id states to coerce an ally ukraine that is at war with an adversary russia into doing the pleasure of the president s political dirty work and he was willing to sacrifice the National Security of the United States by withholding military aid and diplomatic recognition in the form of that white house meeting in order to get what he wanted now before departing the country on monday donald trump dismissed the allegations that were expected to be leveled in this report this is what donald trump said prior to leaving the country before the report was released by the radical. Democrats decide what im going to set up a year ago that what im going to do that was. One of the most important. Thing. For them to be doing. And putting the feet of the table which. I grew up with in a recent interview the ukrainian leaders the lenski also dismissed these allegations about president trumps behavior and interactions with him look i never talked to the president from the position of a quid pro quo thats not my thing i dont want us to look like bagus now many witnesses testified during the impeachment inquiry hearings but observers wondered if they really. He made a strong case that donald trump had been inappropriate in his dealings with ukraine this is some of the testimony that was heard there was no mention of withholding 8 on the call correct thats correct and there was no quid pro quo correct correct was there any reference to withholding aid you know there was not any reference to bribery no there was not any reference to quid pro quo no there was not you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with paddle. Now before this report was released on monday we had a report from the republicans that was released it was 123 pages long and it defended the actions of u. S. President donald trump saying that his dealings with ukraine had not been appropriate and had not violated the law fact that donald trump is out of the country celebrating the 70th anniversary of nato the North Atlantic Treaty Organization that many have pointed to the timing of the report as being somewhat suspicious however while some are looking at the report and saying it shows very very damning evidence against donald trump others are looking at the report and saying its simply a rehash of long discredited allegations different views from different sides of the political spectrum here in the United States where there are indeed many concerned about the papers veracity so we put the model for this question Florida Democratic party turton which sees on a conference by reports while media analyst lionel thinks a little meaning. What we have here is unprecedented and no one knows what it means because it Means Nothing why do we call it an impeachment inquiry because if it was an impeachment hearing or an impeachment proceeding the president would have been allowed to invite to subpoena witnesses but since they didnt do that and didnt want him to. Do that they called it an impeachment inquiry and they have not changed one eye over from what they said when they began the inquiry that and i will paraphrase it the president used to his position his authority under article 2 of the constitution for personal and or political benefits and the last time i checked every president since George Washington has done this this is not impeachable i do believe that the democratic report was factual and obviously the republican response was perhaps a fairy tale that people do want to read perhaps to put someone to bed specifically you have very different responses be on the lookout for this one we have to look at is different order was given that are going to come out that will be pretty straightforward theres going to be an abuse of power because as you say in the quote he took his interests above the National Interest theres also going to be obstruction some is obstruction of congress not letting people cooperate. Story thats got a lot of people talking today popular free dating such as tinder and indeed others owned by the company much group are not protecting their users from sex offenders on their platforms a new investigation has claimed the probe took a look at more than 150. 00 incidents of Sexual Assault over the past decade its fallen the majority of victims were women who met their attackers through match ups in 10 percent of cases they were heard with men who have already been accused or convicted all of sex crimes. Well much group which owns over 40 of the most popular up ses they do conduct background checks on their members but only for paid occurrence furthermore the Company Claims that they do not agree with the investigations result. The implication that we know about such offenders on our side and dont fight to keep them off is as outrageous as it is falls as Technology Evolves we will continue to aggressively deploy new tools to eradicate bad actors including users of our Free Products where we are not able to obtain sufficient and reliable information to make meaningful bang ground checks possible. Chadwick a spectator magazine journalist and re severson womens rights of the kuta gave us their thoughts on dating platforms of their screening policy. The match group is a 1000000000. 00 company theres no reason why they couldnt allocate just a small portion of their revenue to screen the people on their ab just so that there is just a smaller since of increased safety its a precaution its a measure but its deserved if they appear if theyre suddenly saying that we want in order to join the service we want to perform background checks on everyone who joins 1st of all that would kill the business and they know it theres a moral responsibility on these companies that are making billions of dollars 1700000000 dollars from women looking for love to say oh you know what its too expensive for us to do a little bit to protect you nobodys going to want to join these apps with these kind of 1 if theyre doing that theyre being this invasive of background checks with that said people maybe shouldnt be on them especially women and not only are these dangerous for women but its destroying women so just get all the dating apps if you dont perform your own background checks in your own time with your own money get off were not going to restrict women from using the internet because there are predators we do desire for these companies to at least take the step into the right direction why do you want to put that kind of power on these monolithic Tech Companies and up saying you know ban women from dating apps im simply saying you shouldnt rely on this and you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good and whos bad you need to take that into your own hands so if you meet someone do a background check before you do good for you go out on a date if they work in tandem with the courts to get the names at least of the 1st and last names in the location of where these people are and perhaps create some type of monitor of their internet thats a step in the right direction its going to be a mess. Yes i think no matter what and theres always going to be people who perhaps squeak through or dont get picked up who then commit assaults and crimes get a gun ladies protect yourselves and we dont live and by the way these incidences are obviously extremely rare and you know by and large the vast majority of men are not sexual predators one woman is enough we need the companies to take a moral stance or at least have some sort of responsibility to protect the women that utilize their app and then what happens you know its its never going to be a perfect system 30 minutes after the hour we are back in moments with more world news this wednesday stay close. Up until recently politics were about policy preferences and ways to implement them that is not the case today your political views are now what define you as a person and there is a moral dimension bias against those who are not politically correct is the last acceptable form of discrimination this is the end of politics. All the yes the euro and the dollar they all refer to each other and theyre all going deeper and deeper into debt so theres no basic there or there theres no theres no way to measure the dead against something that is could be considered money remember j. P. Morgan said only gold is money Everything Else is credit or debt ok so without that theres no way to measure that debt and theres no at the moment you know my my view is that this is leading to a neo feudalism poor you have just a few private equity firms owing 98 percent of all the assets and everyone else is a living as serfs on the road heading back to the dark ages. Hello again one of the u. S. President s personal lawyers is set to address the International Criminal court in the hague this wouldnt say hes seeking to thwart an attempt by prosecutors to open a formal investigation into alleged war crimes committed by American Forces in afghanistan in 20034 who were not shown to penske. Trumps personal lawyer has gone to the i. C. C. In the hague to try and go look at ted. Opened up a war Crimes Investigation just scrutinize the alleged actions over u. S. Soldiers in afghanistan against taliban detainees back in 20032004 now tremseh moya says the key is that to defend the interests of u. S. Military personnel who she says sacrificed everything for their country but he wouldnt boy groups say that if the Court Rejects this appeal to open up this investigation then the impunity will never end without the International CriminalCourt Justice in afghanistan is an empty slogan the never ending impunity in afghanistan shows why the i. C. C. As a court of last resort is so desperately needed there have been no serious efforts to prosecute perpetrators responsible for work crimes or crimes against humanity in afghanistan an i. C. C. Investigation could be the 1st step in writing this wrong and hopefully bring the people of afghanistan some much needed justice and accountability well donald trump has made no bones about his views about the i. C. C. Previously denouncing it as board unaccountable and having prosecutorial power as hes even made moves to paulton soldiers whove already been found guilty of war crimes. Well this is of course an appeal hearing because the i. C. C. Had previously rejected. The idea of opening up that investigation into alleged war crimes hearing will last 3 days and of course well be bringing you all the twists and turns here at r. T. Ok lets move to the u. K. Where the government there is facing a massive backlash after the release of a heavily redacted report on the fracking industry british authorities never intended it to see the light of day but greenpeace won a lengthy legal battle with the government under the freedom of information on all of the 48. 00 pages 37. 00 were totally blacked out and what remains of the one secret document shows a concerted plan to develop a positive image for the controversial gas Extraction Method amongst the general public. The conservatives have taken money from Oil Executives the rise of communities and enabled frightening companies to threaten their local environment the fact they have tried to cover the sub by rejecting pages of critical information for the illustrates this governments contempt for the public this is the conservatives idea of being open about franken experiment forced to release their report theyve heavily censored. These heavily redacted government report shows reference to secret plans to run the prussians complain despite the weight of Scientific Evidence and stress of Public Opinion against franken i dread to think what we havent been allowed to see well with more on the fight against fracking in the u. K. They high tech god knows what sticking out of the grounds that earns some people cash and literally shakes other peoples homes those other people for years have been teaming up with green activists to win a war against fracking in broad. Areas to believe the voters you can believe. And finally last month came the victory at least for the timing the controversial method of shale gas extraction was banned in the u. K. Under the Prime Minister who once called it glorious news for humanity and now that it seems there is no more need to come out and protest the Cabinet Office has at the last released a secret report on the fracking industry despite these lines on the paper no parts of this report is appendices is to be released under the freedom of information act so you want to read something that the activists were trying to get a glance at for almost 2 years theres a little problem heres what it looks like from the 48 pages seen by the guardian 37 are entirely blacked out and only one the very front is left uncensored so if youre still keen to get to know about the skeletons in the industries closet good luck why would so much stuff remain hidden looking at this black wall of redacted pages people will be wondering why theres so little the government is willing to reveal about fracking and so much it wants to hide if ministers have really dropped their support for this polluting industry why not publish this report in full and come clean about whats been going on behind closed doors. For years still though theres enough to scratch your heads over after reading the uncensored bits in there heres the gist of a few ideas there are issues with the fracking industries progress the main one is public opposition to fracking it needs to be dealt with the government should develop a pro shale narrative and spread the word the department for energy and Climate Change is already undertaken crucial work on communications to increase public acceptability of shale for example creation of objective information Material Development approach Show National and regional merits of shall champions and among other useful moves that whitehall needs to take is finding ways to speed up planning in response to operators concerns which is also sometimes an obstacle planning times need to be shortened and process needs to be predictable which also makes you wonder why would the guys in charge ban fracking at all in such a document there are always going to be sensitive parts that are embarrassing to the government that are sensitive that could harm you know the industry potentially in the future or that could show the governme