A very very Serious Business and that both the democrats and republicans want to tighten every you know you know as a as moving forward so whoever wins this election will want to impose some kind of sanctions some kind of penalties pressure the obsession obsessive hatred of russia and now that prevails in london and in washington is a very Serious Business and i think that. This is one of the issues that in a certain point thing out that this this really it does get into a very dangerous situation and so what hes saying is that. This dangerous situation is part and parcel that as alexander pointed out with this revisionist view of world war 2. According to which the nazis and the soviets jointly launched it and this was a European Parliament resolution this isnt something he story the story in quite just the pontificating way this is a recent resolution of the European Parliament joint aggression by the soviet in and you point out you know important facts to keep in mind and said no that wasnt right was in september like in 39 no one no one stopped england and france from invading joe met me my job was preoccupied with the ball and it was a nonaggression pact no one stopped you didnt do anything so if you started blaming the soviet union for that so it is pointing this out and saying this is bottom ponselle this. Or this most of the worlds this is over you know and then he moves on into the 2nd part of the article which is. Let us restore. The post world war 2 quarters. Hes used as the basis of it the permanent 5 members of the Security Council so you know those were those are the days when that was the ability in the world and they went overseas this is where we need to be moving now you know alex and also i mean if we can just look at present day politics we see the fragmentation in the weakening and the lack of mission of nato and im not i think this is one of the reasons why theyre changing this narrative because nato needs to have an enemy to justify its own existence and you know and we have poll after poll deeply in germany where the german public wants americans to leave 75 years after the fact they want them to start rebuilding but of course this is a switching major we have the neo cons in the entire political bipartisan consensus in Washington Well lets move them to poland which would be in violation of riemanns ending the cold war but again they just want International Law and that is really the basis of the article that hutto accompt about is the foundations of International Law it fell apart it fell apart before the 2nd world war and that is a wave of the footsteps of france and britain ok not the soviet union absolutely can i just point out that this idea of the city union and nazi germany being allergists to start the 2nd will again is a fringe theory in Academic Circles it is a fringe there are some people in the police it or wells are adults it amongst academics it remains a fringe there it. Is expressing what is still very much overwhelmingly the academic consensus but the parallels here is julie also and then very interesting is that after the 1st woman in the lead up to the eventual start of the 2nd world you see a extremely unfair system. Stoutish invests is very interesting and hes attacking the 1st started as far as i know from a Russian Point youve the entire this is when johnny being essentially constantly elite by the allies leading to very very common consequences now hes not saying i think you know that russia has been put in exactly the same way but what hes pointing to is the fragility of a system in which theyre all when it is self appointed when it see it as then mission to constantly beat up all the lose and such a system becomes deep young balanced and it becomes increasingly fragile and that way get things like nate continuing to this you a calling to all this you can say of an ending expansion of focusing all russia as aggressive states shes not by the way and. Make tensions in europe and in the worlds which really have substantially cools because as correctly points out all the great powers would you come to get us through Security CouncilUnited Nations system it would be perfectly possible to result problems. You know toward one of the things i took away from the article again and i suggest our viewers have a read through because its absolutely fascinating is that be the issue of sovereignty and protecting ones own defined National Interests ok in the end and what i find really interesting is that because during the cold war it was it was an ideological conflict with the cold war is over and so you want to bludgeon russia. Like it was the soviet union the soviet union has no ruling idea im sorry russia today has no ruling ideology ok so the parallels dont work anymore and so what putin is saying is that like the soviet union russia of today will defend its National Interest as it defines it its about sovereignty short. Yes and this is a very important point that the russians and putin and love are often made over and over again which is the United Nations charter in shrines the principle of National Serenity and that there is an equality between all nations no matter how small that they are sovereign and that there is no right on any on anyones part to bully other smaller nations and to tell them what how they should run their own best and so you know yes he indeed hes pointing this out as this kind of western regime change operations that prevailed over the last few decades is a violations of United Nations charter and again it goes back to his point that. You know in 1045 there were sensible leaders who created a you know you know for want of a better word new world order that respected National Serenity wrote the United Nations charter and created a balance of power system which was the United NationsSecurity Council that took into account the interests of the great powers which and their head hence the failure of the league of nations which didnt answer yes thats what hes insisting yeah we need to go back to that and at that time and he wants this out so that the leaders of the western powers always acknowledged a the sacrifices that the soviet union made well that they did the heavy lifting and that there was no symmetry between what the nazis did and what the u. S. s out it was and you had said its just you never accuse the u. S. S. R. Or be in aggressor rosell never did. And it had nothing to do with ideology if you look at the foundations of of the United Nations it didnt point out that it didnt focus on ideology it looked at the existence of sovereign states and how they would be as actors on the International State alex let me go back to you and finish up on this point one of the things i think is also interesting about the article is the the rule of law in International Institutions and we get this route this revision is theory that revisionist history thats coming out is it is sidestepping it wants to avoid these or even dissolve these institutions and and that is a political agenda and its a an agenda towards a gemini i would say what absolutely this what what the agenda me is is that you say that certain western palace where the ones that seem to hand at fulton won the 2nd world war you gentle gus the soviet union smelt full which is what mike baird you say that the soviets and the. Parson possible the same evil a law against the gas so you dandle adds you have completely deconstruct the International System as it was creates it after the 2nd. And you know you empower morally vice setting up through this get twisted version of history you morally a small number of states dictates against the rest which is the old i mean the day its. Out there is the end of segment by saying no birth to signaling its come to the history of a 2nd world war right gentlemen im going to jump in here were going to go to a short break and after that short break well continue our discussion and some real news. The world is driven by dreamers shaped by one percent of those but. No dares thinks. We dare to ask. Me such a belief so you need for good in each other than the men for us who want to. Make but on the but are going to do the book on the soul that is news to me just. Instead of moving. The emotion learning to be must do i feel still least stuck or your muscles in the course of your knee which resists and that of option is to slow. Or to go chill the church. Will settle into. Compassion and that. We think he minds be soldier to piss off the boot shes wearing. To church so she saw looks like the movie the apostle opinion was in the book and on your luggage on the shore still in the summer watching the police force send us all to. Join me every thursday on the alex salmond show and ill be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business im show business ill see you then. 54 jets and more than 1300 military personnel are headed to air force base in alaska where is that to say come on ill show you whats the reason for any type of enhanced u. S. Military presence in this area russia. What is it suddenly about the South China Sea that makes it so that it 11000000000 barrels of oil. Take a look at this map who really owns what kind of says no it belongs to us india says no we claim that that belongs to us both of these countries have Nuclear Weapons capabilities there is reason for concern so thats why were going to drill down on the story for you today right here on the news with rick sanchez where you know as we always like to say we do believe by golly its time to do news again. Welcome at across town where all things are considered im peter about remind you discussing some real. Ok let me go back to george and budapest well john bolton has put himself in the news actually but you very much liked and i really like an article that came kind of with the oh everybody in washington hates john bolton and this up that if i was a republican say hes disgruntled while democrats think hes just trying to sell books and trump calls him a sick puppy or he still laughing all the banco there is a bit of a trap be up there and its questionable right now hes going to be able to earn the garden of the profits from this book that why anyone would read is a mystery to me go ahead george. Yes there is a county yet it could be that bolton will be tied up in the courts because the judge suggested. That bolton did in fact review classified information and didnt really go through all the proper vetting procedures of the white house so there are there are grounds for. Ministrations lawsuit against bolton so that so thats a problem for. The conventional wisdom is that oh this wont affect anyone. Voting habits because those who hate trump will vote against from those like trump will vote for trump i think i do think that this does damage trump because trump hyun bold no one forced him to do it and when he hired him there were many people you know what the hell is he doing you think youre doing all 3 of us. If anyone opposes the agenda that trump ran on in 2016 is john bolton and of course as soon as bolton arrived in the white house he needless other pursuing his agenda regime change war against everyone. You know it israel 1st everything that reflects a known peace on the Korean Peninsula you know thats right exactly so this really does raise questions of very serious questions about trumps judgment and that goes extends to all of his appointments if ever ever when hes going to have it walks away from him full of hatred for him well of course they were because they full of hate that his agenda but hes the one who opposed them you never opposed it you never appointed anyone who would actually believe in his agenda and would try to implement his agenda so he does it is down to trump and his judgment yet you know and thats one of the things i find interesting that the boltons behavior you know urson running his book and get. Doing it to the public its very much his style of breaking the rules flaunting the laws if when he did it as a Foreign Policy adviser during his long and checkered career hes doing in his own personal life the rules dont apply to me thats what it gets down to you and thats you and thats what you can disarm him so him that way his Foreign Policy is that we do what we want to do and everyone else has the follow International Law because we dont have to he is truly an exceptional person out of the is a man without one of the people who doesnt like him is the judge of the case made it very clear that he disapproves strongly of mr boltons and precisely that reason but that is needed consistent perhaps an o. Boltons career hes an extraordinarily good tool bureaucratic in fights at ease sat many will in many places in International Institutions at the head of the International AtomicEnergy Commission the head of the el organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons all sorts of many places of polands fall of john bolton a few about a year ago it was rate on the north Korean Embassy and i think spain portugal and bolton was why they didnt relate to people in that region cultural sea just wasnt only to secure our viewers know that that was when trump was going to meet with king. Just to sabotage that we dont have the evidence but its a very interesting coincidence that i think we would all agree here you know you george whats really interesting is how bolton is playing his cards because now hes the darling of the resistance and it just shows how the the political political thinking is to short circuit short circuited itself because bolton is one of them is one of the most agreed. Its neocons out there and now you have the left in racing him only because hes taking a swipe at the big bad orange man in the white house i mean that it shows an enormous amount of a lack of. Intellectual and moral integrity i would say. Well because theres a lack of integrity of it but it is ironic that leave liberal democrat media complex is actually now has embraced the bolt on the agenda. They have had though they hatred for putin and russia that bolton espouse us thats right actually the democrats media consensus hatred towards china thats also pretty much the i mean this biden is attacking trump for being too soft on china for cow traveling to china so again bolton is not outside the consensus there. A korea he trumpets been repeatedly attacked for what has been actually a sensible policy at the end it into a secret process known with north korea and the nuclear isolation of the current bill is your trump has been repeatedly attacked by the democrats on that so you know he put the bold agenda is actually the socalled liberal media agenda it is or it is surprising that theres a younger is right you know that. There is there is trump you know couch im going to the dictator. You know its interesting going back to the title and politico alex everyone in washington hates john bolton but everybody in washington except for one boltons world view him as a really quite amazing if hes it is extraordinary and we just just its its i mean the breaking point of parent leap between something bold the final straw was the trial didnt start a war was in front the general gratz a supposedly fought rats rossmore with iran is they mean kids hell get a great. Frat and yes they are supporting john bolton. In this quarrel its very very strange every vote ultimately in the just decision in. Washington always seems to be the other choice between wall and peace use of poles wall over the piece which is of course well bolton once you said it because multan doesnt believe in International Agreements he doesnt believe in helms control even lease the word of the United States should be decisive in every circumstance and he considers that the United States has the rights to enforce its news by full set that has an agenda for wool which everybody in washington ultimately accepts its very strange and frankly very very dangerous you know in georgia i the legacy of bolton is that is what we heard during the impeachment process is interagency policy consensus ok that is his ultimate legacy and its really quite interesting if you look at bolton is any hes long been associated with the g. O. P. He was bastards the united youve never confirmed by the senate again you know kind of breaking the rules going around but it whats interesting is that. He has left this behind this interagency policy consensus and it is just a failure from beginning to end and what its done also is to destroy any kind of state crowd in terms of diplomacy there is no need for a secretary of state anymore for example who had. No there isnt there the bolton worldview if which is that there should be no diplomacy no negotiations the United States should just simply issue diktats ultimatum to countries and it should countries fail to meet those ultimatum then the United States has to resort to force that is the bolton view and when you think of the attacks trump from from the socalled liberal media and the rest they are attacks on the things the trump actually is quite sensible about i mean theres plenty of things to criticize trump on that if they attack him book well the things that he does have a sense of look so theres no no real attacks on trump for walking away from the i. N. F. Treaty. Because the know it no attacks trump for assassination of the leader of iran the general sort of money earlier this year. But the very things when he says well i think we should. Improve relations with russia that gets attacked well i think nato is simply a museum piece why why on earth we