Our United States all lie in them. At least im religion and religious institutions. Particularly when the co opted by the state has become strategic and assets to west of the military power, which has shown itself to be quite aggressive, an expansionist it, and the actually part of the, the 21st century or anything, see a company on all the international this friday i do have you have a great start, see a weekend with back at the top of the out with the like to see that the, the bad. Hi everybody. Im at sanchez, and im here to tell you that after being a journalist and a news presenter for, for the Biggest Networks in the United States, its time for some context and for some truth telling. And then that vein, heres what were going to be talking about. Number one, why are soldiers now patrolling new york sub ways . What does that say . Number 2, china tells Us Tech Companies that out. Is it getting mad or is it getting even number 3 . Why is alana zillow and scott, the 1st lady of ukraine in case you didnt know snubbing 1st lady jo bidens invitation to sit with her at the state of the Union Address me. But heres the most interesting story. It has to do with a woman named victoria of newland, the queen of the neo cons. Shes stepping down. Who is she . Why shes so wealthy. And whats this going to mean for ukraine . Good questions. You bet. This is a direct impact the so if a picture is worth a 1000 words, then this one should be like an entire book, a book perhaps about the future of our country, the future of america. Look at this. And as youre looking at this picture, those members, theyre of the national guard, their soldiers, right . Essentially inside some of the same ones youve served in iraq and afghanistan. Those guys, those dials are now patrolling the subways of new york city. The optics of this, just think about it for a minute. The optics of the scene, bizarre to me anyway, because one of the things that i always kind of separated in my mind, maybe because im a gringo here and thats the way i think. The way i separated us from the rest of the countries in the world that ive visited, for example, throughout latin america, is that we dont seem to have a military presence in our daily lives here in the United States. We dont, right . Or at least thats what i always thought. I mean, and heres what i mean. Ive never been, for example, have you ever been on vacation to like the caribbean or the line america . I always found that when i went there, i thought it was always unsettling. When i went there on trips with my wife and with my kids to see these guys in these military fatigues holding a machine gun, you know, and they were like next to me and my wife and my kids. While we were sitting on the beach or outside of store, or even at a park, and it always made me made us question. Is there something going on here about why this guy sitting here with the machine gun, right . Ill save. Can this place be where were vacationing . If theres a guy next to us with the machine gun in the military for tags. How free is this place . I asked. Well, a, im what im wondering now should we be asking the same question about us here in the United States as we learned that a 1000 guards are being sent to patrol the subways 250 of them going to be straight troopers. Another 750. 00 of them are going to be National Guardsmen sitting there. The subway is as you come in and out and go to work why new york officials are saying that its for the turns to send the message to the potential bad guys. Right, the real reason, the some ways are just damn dangerous these days. Theyve already been 3 killings this year alone. Commuters are being attacked and recently, even a train conductor had a slight slashed. You know, how many people use in new york subways by the way . 3000000 people a day the United States has reportedly adding thousands of Chinese Companies to a trade blacklist later today. In total, around e Additional Companies could be added to the so called entity list, nearly all of them chinese. Did you hear that . Yeah, the all of them chinese, so that has been pretty much the big story here in the United States in the past 8 years or so. We heard it during the comp administration were hearing and now during the, by the ministration. The same is pretty simple. Go after and punish all chinese Tech Companies. Whats interesting about this story is, is ive told it over the years and written about it over the years. Us Tech Companies, our guys here have long been warning us that these china sanctions, these things that were doing in the chinese would end up hurting us or putting them in other words, right. The Tech Companies in the us. Well guess what . As its happened, del, International Business machines, cisco systems, theyre all getting kicked out of china as beijing games to let its own Companies Take over all tech operations by 2027. So why are the chinese doing this . Well, according to them, they apparently dont trust us. American tech giants had long drives in china as we provided them with tech tools. They provided us with cheap labor amount. China, reacting no doubt to the match the back and forth with washington over the last 7 or 8 years. Savage, driven to self sufficiency within the computer industry. Its operating systems and its Software Systems because it doesnt trust the Us Tech Companies any more. Can you say take that usually the wise of president s are exclusively engaged in peaceful affairs, education, human rights, equality, accessibility, and maybe you expected from me to speak on those topics. But how can i talk about them when an unprovoked and pro invasive terrorist war is being waged against . And my country of russia is destroying all the people that in case you couldnt figure it out for the records, is the 1st lady of ukraine speaking recently and ended at the invitation of nancy pelosi to the us congress or a congressional hearing or meeting. She was also invited to attend the state of the union by 1st lady joe biden, and they were going to be sitting together for all the world to see. But apparently mrs. Lensky has said that, as see aint doing it. She snubbing the us 1st lady snubbing the event, one of the why heres the story kind of gets weird. I mean, it reminds me of high school, pardon me for saying that. So shes not doing the invitation because she doesnt like the widow of to 10 critic alexi know volney. You cant make this stuff up right. But here it is. According to p. Uh, officially, now mrs. Sullen. Scott . Yes, thats how you pronounce her name. Its not zalinski cuz shes the wife team, whatever. Anyway, they say that when she heard that mrs. Not volley pronounced noble maya was also invited. She said, well, that im not going, im not going if shes going. And apparently, shes not going. Her reason look and its kind of complicated, but apparently it has to do with crimea. But despair you a headache, ill save you the explanation for some other time and perhaps some other show. Then theres missus newland thinks he can wait ukraine out and he thinks he can wait out all of us. We need to prove him wrong. That was under secretary of state victoria newland last month discussing tactics to stop russian president. What am i putting on the 2nd anniversary of the ukraine war . Now, just weeks later, the career diplomat to turn top political appointee is retiring. Here you go, secretary of state. Anthony blinked and has announced that his under secretary, victoria newland, i guess is number 2 or number 3 or whatever is stepping down. Maryland is an interventionist a. Do you know that means other words, she likes wars and she like sending our troops to go fight in worse. Shes also large in very large measure, responsible for the escalation of the war in ukraine. In fact, outside of us media, shes known worldwide, right . You wont hear about it here because our media doesnt report this for some reason because i dont know. They just dont want you to know the truth. But shes known throughout the world and media reports around the world have shown this. She was the person who directed the c. I a to start the coo and ukraine to push out the democratically elected president. Back in 2014. Did you know that you probably did. If youre watching me from somewhere else outside of washington, why didnt she want him out . By the way, why did you want that . Do the president at the time out . Because. Busy his ties to russia. Is it a tory, everyone hates russia . Its russia. I mean, with them and vigorous she h. Russia. Heres a smoking gun. Now that proves that she did exactly what her critics charged. That she was overheard by the way, in the planning of this cool of the dates in precise context of the recording and not known new to the us some precedent to ukraine. Jeffrey piets discuss which of the countries opposition leaders theyd like to see and government and they refer to getting the un involved. So that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and have the u. N. Help fluid. And you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think weve got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to gain altitude the russians. Ready will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. So there it is. Now heres what you need to know. I, i started this morning and last night doing a little bit of a day a gone now victoria new and i wanted to find out who is victoria, knew it. Right. This is the stuff that i think about victoria know, and thats relevant to her pro. So lensky stance, for example, she is a neo conservative to say the very least who also happens to be married to one of the most prolific neo conservatives, perhaps, and us for and. Busy the history, so his husband, part of her husband, pardon me, is a guy named bob kagan, along with dick cheney and build crystal great pairing. Huh. They actually together found to the neo conservative project back in 1997. They actually found it right. And then use that to push for the disastrous war. That was iraq. Heres something else. I think this is fascinating. I dont know. You might find it fascinating as well. Well, no one makes roughly a 180000. 00 a year. As a government employee, i looked it up, she said to be worth anywhere between 2. 00 to 8000000. 00 conservatively and the she works for the government for our government. She also has a long standing relationship with a private company that handles Foreign Government affairs. And that would be the Albright Stonebridge group. Look them up. It seems conflicted. Why . Because that those folks the, by the way, named after the former us secretary state Madeline AlbrightAlbright Stonebridge seems conflicted because they make their money handling complex diplomacy deals with countries all over the world. Which means they kind of get to choose who are the good guys who are the bad guys. They do deals with them. They get paid by them. What do you think . Sounds off a lot like theyre doing foreign policy. Now. This is what i want to dig into. So when we come back, when we come back, whats this mean for ukraine . When the, some would say architect of our ukraine policy, these out. Were going to be joined by that guy right there. See him. Thats Michael Maloof said hi michael, former pentagon official and george. Some wally wrote bombs, were peace natos who monetary of war on yugoslavia. And he is an advisor at the Global Policy institute and were coming right back. Do not go away. The, the, the release of come to the russian states never as tight as on the phone in the most sense, community, best of all sense and up the, in the 6595 must be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin, knew the machine for states on the rush to day and split our t supposed neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services for the question, did you say steven twist, which is the, lets talk about this because i think this is whole, this whole, the victoria know what the thing is fascinating. Were joined by Michael Maloof. As you know, Michael Maloof is a former pentagon official, and were also going to be joined, as i told you about just a little bit earlier by your to some. Well, a welcome gentleman michael. I begin with you and im thinking to myself here. If i am zelinski sitting in care of and im wondering, so newland is out. Wait, thats my go thats. Thats my go to person in the u. S. Government, thats the one who helped me in 2014. What must see be thinking right now. Hes probably seeing the handwriting on the wall hes. I think this is a signal that its over and that has offensive, if you call it that me is not working, its and its a and hes having to retreat. Well, its interesting because that actually makes me think, can there be a ukraine policy without victoria new . And it seems like one hand goes with the other. No. Well, its out of her. Its out of us hands at this point its, its becoming, its not only not only the russians taking the eastern part button, you have countries such as poland, lithuania, these other countries that have historical ties to west ukraine. It is. And the reason why she was just so imbedded in ukraine is that her family came from what was the czars russia, which is today west ukraine. So its kind of like a part, it would be like new and making sure the United States attacks cuba. Yeah. But its like a family came from 2 of them. Yeah, that story. Exactly. Its like a family to good place. It all is person, lets. Uh, lets go to georgia somali of is your is, you know, is, is moment right or are, or does the ukraine policy hedge on her and is the fact that shes out. Lets say that its going to be tough goings now for zalinski and his group. And im not sure about that. I think that the United States as a european is they are absolutely wedded to this policy of youre basically trying to inflict the feet on russia it through you. Great. I dont think it depends on victoria you. Then she obviously has been a, a central thing up in the ukraine policy right from the beginning, you know, actually going back even to the 19 ninetys. However, i dont think us policy hangs on that. And even the noises that were getting a uh, from your up with my crown saying that there are no limits. There are no red lines in our supports for uh, ukraine. And then you know, the, the british what the rating, the germans with them for being in suspension. Please sell us and support in your brain. I think were a long, long way from any, any policy of abandoning events. But i but, but heres where i think my goal is right. Uh if, if we, if, if we had done the deal that was proposed a year ago or so with ukraine is the landscape. What is that . Ill take that deal. Let the russians take that part of the country and, and were good, were good. Lets let, lets just finish this. If he had taken it, then he would have lost a heck of a lot less than hes losing now. So it just seems incrementally like its certainly not going in his direction. Wouldnt you argue . You know, thats absolutely right. I think um ukraine made the softest, absolutely catastrophic decision in listening to bars. Johnson and through bars. Johnson, the, to the americans are sticking with that policy that just shows up to be determined, the british, the americans, and they do up to use your grain to inflict a defeat on russia. Because lets remember that deal that was on the table and its them both was not at all favorable to rush. It was actually very favorable to rush within the premium. Negotiate before amazed at the concessions the russians were making. But nonetheless, they rejected that deal because they thought they sold this opportunity ready to screw russia over so absolutely. So lets get to the thinking that deals for that doesnt mean that the, the burden of americans and nature are abandoning as low as i knew it was. Okay, good. Well, you guys are somebody disagreement on that . And ill accept that by the way. Interestingly enough, as i recall, a lot of my putting told my friend tucker carlson, that he was willing to consider that deal and probably wouldve taken that deal back then. Which is interesting looking at it. Now if you know, if, if he in fact whatever not, we dont know. Thats a part of history. Now michael, back to you. I am bothered, i dont know if you listen to my intro, but i am bothered. What i this all bright Stonebridge Group that apparently she has worked for apparently shes a big to do. There is always blinking ins or a bunch of people in the bottom administration. When i read about this outfit, it sounds to me like they do like foreign policy, rather like a shadow government, if you will. In foreign policy, you have to comp, pickering, also who belongs to, i mean you have a lot of, admittedly, some real, a rhino republicans who work, who are, are, are part of that establishment. Mm hm. And so theyre, theyre sort of a, a government and waiting, and they advise on who will, who will not be a good candidate the way long. They all, they had to wait for, it was for binding to get elected. Because as soon as they got elected, he took all of them from that company, right. And then put them into his, the state department, the state department. Right now theres, there seems like theres some folly in that for me. I mean, why we make it because theyre because theyre a part of the company. That means they do deals with these. What other methods over the republicans do it, they pull them out of out of heritage and, and, and other uh, think tank submitted it. It would have conflict if it seems to me, isnt it . Well, it might be conflict, but thats the way it is in washington. And so, and so you can then make an argument that the reason we do the things we do, lets just pick you crank of we happen to be talking about. I dont want to pick too much. Are you . Great . So in, in many ways, the reason were doing ukraine is because these guys, when they were, and those Companies Already had a standing policy or, or deals that they had done with you, great in the government. But not only that, but now the