SC tears into anti-terror law's biggest gaps with Calida still on sideline May 4, 2021 9:35 PM PHT If petitioners had to battle the often-used justification of national security, government lawyers were finally put under the heat to defend the anti-terror law's biggest constitutional gaps, courtesy of the junior justices of the Supreme Court who took the first turns of interpellations on Tuesday, May 4. Associate Justice Rosmari Carandang opened the government interpellation last week, by tradition as she is the member-in-charge, but during Day 6 on Tuesday, the Supreme Court reversed the sequence so the most junior began first. Justice Jhosep Lopez, who asked petitioners two months ago whether "right to privacy must give way in order to curb threats of terrorism," came out swinging in asking solicitors general about the loopholes of the law's most contentious provisions.