Sentencing Law and Policy: "Innocence in the Shadow of COVID

Sentencing Law and Policy: "Innocence in the Shadow of COVID-19: Plea Decision Making During a Pandemic"


"Innocence in the Shadow of COVID-19: Plea Decision Making During a Pandemic"
The title of this post is the title of this new article by Miko Wilford, David Zimmerman, Shi Yan, and Kelly Sutherland published in the
Over 95% of criminal convictions in the United States are the result of guilty pleas.  Consequently, it is critical that we ensure the process of pleading guilty is as free of coercion as possible.  Yet, research has indicated that incarcerating defendants to await trial could have an undue influence on their decision to plead guilty.  The current research employed a novel computer simulation to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on plea decision making among the innocent and the guilty when faced with potential pretrial detention.  While presenting COVID-related information to participants increased both true and false guilty pleas, further analyses indicated that concerns about COVID-19 weighed more heavily on the innocent than the guilty.  These findings illustrate the negative impact a pandemic could have in combination with a system of pleas that often allows prosecutors to provide defendants with just one guaranteed respite from jail — a guilty plea.

Related Keywords

United States , Shiyan , Miko Wilford , David Zimmerman , Kelly Sutherland , Plea Decision Making During , Experimental Psychology , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , டேவிட் ஸிம்மர்மந் , கெல்லி சதர்லேண்ட் , சோதனை உளவியல் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana