Twice. So we do need this Grant Program and hopefully it i mean im not even sure that this is going to help my business actually. Its right on folsom and 17th. Hopefully it will, and hopefully a longterm solution can be found, like sammy said. Increasing the pipe size along folsom street, particularly when there are more residents in the mission. Theres New Buildings going up all the time and i dont really see any increase in the sewer system capacity that we so desperately need. So im here to reiterate, thanks for the grant money and hopefully a permanent solution can be found. Thanks. Thank you. No further comments from the public, any further comments . Yes. I would like to request i mean, i have been on this commission for seven years now and i have heard a lot of flooding stories about 17th and folsom. I know there has been work and all kinds of possibilities looked at and i have followed the Affordable Housing and what has happened within the city family to really take care of that property on the corner . That piece i think is heading in the right direction, but i just have not really heard about what the solutions are, that are going to address these ongoing Flooding Issues at 17th and folsom. So i would like to request that we have a presentation from the puc on what we can do to solve this problem permanently, and for the longrun . And whether that is potentially part of the related to the storm watered or separate and what its going to take to resolve this issue . I think we need to give you a history of what happened at 17th and folsom its a lowlaying area in San Francisco and also, all of the projects that have been approved by the puc over time, have been built in that area and some of the solutions that were talking about as we move forward in time the issue on the sewer capacity is not there is an efficient sewer capacity with dry weather, but its when it rains. The storms are getting more intense with more runoff and frying trying to combine our programs to take on that peak flow. So when you say you want the permanent solution, we have lots of ideas and lots of proposals, but we havent landed anywhere yet. We can present that to you. Thank you. Any other comments . If i could add to commissioner vietors questions, i would be interested to see what the Health Repercussions are. I grew up near the river and it would overflow on the sewers as well. It was clean enough that we could swim there it, which i know sounds disgusting, but would i like to know more about the impact of any overflow sewage . If that sits anywhere for a period of time, does it have a Health Effect only the community . We can give you percentages of what we call sanitary overflow and there are some issues, regulations how you can reuse that water and under what conditions . So we have costed that out as well and we can present that as part of the discussion on 17th and folsom. So you understand all of the different facets of what were trying to solve at this point. Would you also mind including where the housing and park project is and the timeline for that buildout . We can contact the Mayors Office on housing and the department to find out what the timeline is. Thank you. Make i have a motion, please . I will make the motion. Second. All those in favor . Aye. Opposed . The motion carries next item, please. Item 13, approve 2015 updates cwarea Community Choice aggregation Implementation Plan and authorize the general manager to file the updated Implementation Plan with the California PublicUtilities Commission for certification. Good afternoon, commissioners, barbara hale. I have the action item and i have thestants updates on how were doing with the clean power sf implementation schedule and our key mile stones. Sfgovtv, if i could have the overhead screen, please . The laptop . You will notice that in terms of updates, on june 30th we hads a very successful conversation with many stakeholders discussing our Program Marketing and communications plan. The communicates staff from the puc presented some ideas and got a lot of good, helpful feedback from the stakeholders who came. Were going continue to have those sorts of stakeholder sessions. We havent scheduled our next one yet. Our focus right now is on getting our requests for offer for supply together. So that we can make our next milestone on the schedule here, that early august activity. Today is the day when july 14th, when we will be talking with you about our Implementation Plan and that is the action item. The other thing that you see as a change here on our implementation schedule and milestones is to roflect the fact that we will be presenting risk analysis when we come to you in september for approval of the supply contracts that we hope to execute to support the program. Commissioner moran, you have mentioned that a number of times and i thought it was worth making a note of when we expect that to happen in the schedule. It could happen before this date. But it wont happen after. We will definitely come to you with a risk analysis prior to asking you to authorize execution of those contracts. Thank you. Excuse me, with that risk analysis, would you mind also pulling any data that other ccas, particularly marin might have around the risk analysis work that they have done . Certainly. Thank you. Now we have three operating Community Choice aggregation Implementation Plan, marin, sonoma and the city of lancaster and well talk to them. We have regular con necticut tact with them. So the action item is before you seek yours approval to update our Community Choice aggregation Implementation Plan filed with the California PublicUtilities Commission. That plan, the existence of that plan and your support of it is a required step for all perspectives ccas under the California Law that allows Community Choice aggregation programs to operate in the state. We initially filed our Community Choice aggregation plan in march of 2010 and received certification from the california puc in may of 2010. So we have been certified since then. We did update that plan last in 2012 to incorporate some privacy customer privacy rule changes that the california puc implemented. And now were before you with changes to that plan that i will summarize, that reflect the changes that we have discussed on the program design. Specifically that the program, the clean power sf program will lead with affordability. That the program will offer two products to launch. Default product, that will be up to 50 renewable. With an optional premium product that will be 100 renewable at a price that is competitive with pg es green tariff program. The Commission Adopted not to exceed rates, and Rate Methodology is described in the new Implementation Plan and power Enterprise Staff will take on a larger role is one of the changes and finally, the fact that we have issued a new rfp in may of 2015 to solicit bids for our program billing and Customer Care services. So that is a quick summary of the changes that this Implementation Plan includes as it goes before the california puc, with your approval. The action item itself asks that you approve the plan and the statement of intent and authorize our general manager to file that updated Implementation Plan with the california puc for certification. The california puc process is by statute is to take 6090 days. Now there were some cleanup and corrections to the Implementation Plan from the version that was published by the secretary on our website. The corrections affect five pages, which have been distributed to you. And a complete, corrected copy is included in the binder, on the table here for the public. To summarize those corrections quickly, on page 3, the introduction clarifies that the default or light green product that our clean power sf program will provide includes a greater amount of Renewable Energy than is currently available from pg e under its standard product offering. On page 4, we have added a new summary section, highlighting the changes since the last ip, since the last Implementation Plan, the last changes i reviewed with you. Pages 67, we added headings to improve the readability of the document and page 28 we clarify that in the unanticipated event of program termination, notice will be provided and the added language is subject to any applicable restrictions. So that brings you uptodate on the changes in the Implementation Plan and the steps that we propose moving forward with. I would be happy to take any questions as i seek your support for moving forward. Thank you. Does any of this change the timeline . No, it does not. Commissioners, questions . Just have one question that is somewhat related, that you note about if you wouldnt mind addressing that, what the cpuc is doing with electricity rates . Yes, sorry. I forget to address that question. Yes, so you may have been reading in the newspaper recently, the California PublicUtilities Commission is making some rated structure changes for residential customers and those are rate changes that affect pg es customers. The changes that the cpuc, the california puc will compress pg es fourtiered Residential Rate structure into two tiers over next few years. This will increase the total cost of electricity to lowusage customers, and it will reduce the cost to highusage customers. It wont really have an impact on clean power sf and the rates the not to exceed rates that you adopted. The new rate structure that has been adopted by the california puc for pg e, redistributes costs between transmission and distribution functions, from highusage tiers to the lowerusage tiers. The clean power sf program competes with pg es generation component of the rate, not the transmission and distribution component. So that generation rate was flattened several years ago for residential customers, which means that these customers pay the same rate for generation, regardless of how much they use. So the rate compression that the california puc adopted affects transmission and distribution costs, not generation, and the clean power sf program competes with the generation component of the pg e supply of the pg e bill. So we dont expect the adoption of these changes to pg es rates to affect the clean power sf program or its competitiveness or require a change in the not to exceed rates that you have already adopted. If were if the customer is responsible for paying the pg e portion wont that portion of their rate go up . Yes, it will, but its not going to affect our costs or the rates that we charge. So the component of service will be responsible for, which is only the supply portion, the generation component of the rates. So the effects that were talking about on pg es residential customers, that increase in transmission and distribution costs for lowusage customers, and the decrease for the highusage customers, that is going to happen to them, whether they are receiving their supply from pg e, or they are receiving their supply from us. So we dont have anything to do with it . We dont have anything to do with it, but its going to affect our ratepayers, both cca and pg e. Its going to affect san franciscans low users will seize see their rates go up and high users will see their rates go down, which is crazy. Any other comment, commissioners . Any Public Comments . I dont have any cards. Jason creed, executive officer for lafco i want to [eurg ] you to approve this. So the nowline is in your hands so i dont want to encourage to you do that and i want to address one of the things commisioner vietor you mentioned about the pg e rate structure changing. I do agree with you and agree with agm hale it doesnt impact the rate structure were talking about. One of the negative impacts of that occurring across the board not just for ccas, a lot of time you go to the tier users, paying a lot more and do energyefficiency work. It can go for higher or more expensive products that they can utilize to reduce their usage and do behind the meter solar. Adu you have reduced that down a little bit and make it left cost competitive for solar and behind the meter efficiency work to occur. Once again, that is a problem that will be seen by cca and pg e customers and doesnt directly impact cca, but if one of our bools is to did a lot of energy offense behind the meter type of work, there could be a small negative impact. Tier 5 customers in the city, last time i saw the numbers were 5 of the load. You are not talking about a lot of customers that this would impact. So i think its something to be paying attention to. There is also a state legislative bill by Assembly Member tinge, ab 1110, could have have negative impacts on how Greenhouse Gas get reported. Some of the behind meter solar rooftop may not be counted as Greenhouse Gasfree. I know the puc has some discussions with Assembly Member tinges office and that is another area were going to potentially see changes at the statelevel that we need to keep our eyes on that could have a negative impact on ccas and how we can go out and market and advertise programs that were trying to do that are good, clean, Green Program and because someone is trying to monkey with the definitions, all of a sudden solar no longer becomes a green product somehow. So to keep in the back of our mind as we move forward how these could potentially impact us later on. Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners. Eric brooks, San Francisco green party local grassroots organization. Our city and cocoordinator of San FranciscoSan Francisco clean energy advocates. First i want to just touch on what commissioner vietor and jason just spoke about and that is that there are impacts to clean power sf. To the rate changes. Because as to amplify what director freidsaid, if we offer a much cleaner project product and were offering incentives for businesses to get energyefficiency and rooftop solar as part of the program; and suddenly suddenly their wasting of the energy has been less expensive, they have much less incentive to go with clean sf and that is a factor also regardless of the fact that its transmission and distribution where the excess charges are going. That is going to affect both Community Choice and pg e customers. We have got to really make sure that the staff studies and aware of dynamic of when we start rolling in customers, are they going to get a rate hit . That they think is coming from clean power sf . So we need to Pay Attention to that and be careful about how where we enroll customers and look at what is happening with the rates around that as well. To the item itself, its a little behind. So its good to see that its moving forward. I just want to speak to the timeline. It looks like the timeline is still hitting final approvals at the end of october, just before the election. And as we now know, there are going to be at least two ballot measures regarding clean power sf, and clean Energy Reporting on the ballot. And if we want to avoid being caught in a firestorm around those ballot measures that affect our ability to enroll customers and educate people, we need to get this timeline continued to push forward to be accelerated to make sure that all of the approvals are done by the end of october and no later. Because otherwise, then were in that election session, where pg e is going to be spending millions of dollars to attack this program by using that election as sort of a manipulative device. And we need to be prepared for that. So lets just make sure that the schedule keeps running. And the last thing is we do need we met with staff, and we do need commissioners to help us get the buildout planning going. And so anything that you can do to encourage staff to get separate stakeholder process going, to really get all of the agencies, like Workforce Development and San Francisco environment and yourselves, et cetera, involved in planning the buildout, as much as possible. While taking into account ceqa issues. We need to get that ball rolling so we can show labor what is going to come from this and we can guaranty labor gets what we have been promising. Thanks. Hi. Thank you. President caen and commissioners, jed olson from 350 San Francisco. Definitely obviously support your approval of this document. Its really great to be able to be here at this milestone day with you all. And hopefully these other few decreasing number of milestones on this chart will be happening on time or even early, and with we can keep ringing in the good times. I want to point out we were at the puc commenting on their rates and your Public Comment is much better. Thank you very much. Everybody is talking did the news like its happening on january 1st, but this is not happening for years. It was just preparing the groundwork fo