It is very late for us and you the raising tierlt of the boats resonates with me look at this project and see a lot of benefits an enormous amount of benefits at par or under the central selma agreement by the mayors staff he support this project i know that forest city is a project i respect some of the benefits are the fees saepgsz at par or higher i appreciate the care on the way i remember sitting up here saying why not Dot Department of Human Resources and here it was chosen that surprise me overwhelm glad about that the Affordable Housing 33 percent is real housing balance for district 6 is above 27 percent were going to be creating 37 percent and remaining it that makes that he feel good north of sud wont be the last kwhern doing 55 octavia and berkley site i said thereby accounting process why carve this out it was a large lot and it worked i think the open space that allows us to provide make sense some of the concerns i do have in terms of the effects ill kites the sid as an example we have heard from the neighborhood the affordability we created the open house for the lgbt and market octavia on 55 laguna site and now we find that is not a available for the Lgbt Community how to insure that local residents get a apprehensive for housing if in their displaced locally i mentioned in the last hearing about the displacement and this i dont think so what displacement little the i realize the ted egon report is coming out i usehis for the shadowy bresht forest city working with us we got on the Mission Street a great Environmental Review analysis id like to see an Impact Analysis so if you can take into account that and see at least someone looked at this this is American People initiation that is the start of a conversation foot a. M. An actual prevail hufr of the project i dont have the benefit of dir but im sure theres an analysis under and to the folks in the neighborhoods innovate a code compliant there is in the dir well look at if a medias times i think i like that what the gentleman said dont be afraid of height in exchange for the right lot we received some communication today from mr. Boskovich on the traffic impact aim to work with the gentleman on a simulation of the impacts i have to telling us there are some many people that spoke about so many things it is hard to focus im overwhelmed i asked that last time if you can come up with the lady with the glasses in the last right now so i met with the project sponsor and how did you reach out to the neighborhoods she told us will the access and the cam folks indeed your invited to the table can you tell me how that went. If youre seeing the presentation weve gone introduce the presentation but in regards to raising little initials of heights and shadows and traffic all those are dismissed they wrote a it down and weve not heard about it today is the first time we got to see what the project is is going to look like we were hoping the informational hearing i had too weeks ago would have no more details more details than before we asks numerous times for a traffic study and shadow study we get to toy. Would you be illegal to meet with the committee. Were meeting with them next week to talk about the initials thats why this initiation is moovd there is still a communication to have with the developer. Dont more and have heard communication that the youth can you tell you. The youth and family stone was creates by the a process cam brought immigrants and low income families into the neighborhood to talk about the difference needs the difference things in order to live in the neighborhood as many of you may know it is by the downtown was not thought of as a neighborhood more of a gateway right to tourists and other things we had this discussion with the residents all those things that 5 m are accommodating are they know weve brought that the residents had brought up they never said they would want all this in exchange for height they said to keep the characteristic of the neighborhood because he want tour make sure it is seen as a neighborhoods not a downtown. This will bring up with the burning one last question eave heard respect the diversity the filipino communities tell me can that looks like. Theres a filipino district we worked in the eastern neighborhood and we actually want to make sure that it encompass the whole neighborhood not only identifies the institution that talks about the filipino communities but also addresses the socioimpact that is happening in the community we dont want japan town theres not a lot of japanese we want to make sure ear or our culture is not not preserved but proud to be proud to stay in the south of market and i brought up the ted egon analysis i would like you to look at and be part of public file. Thank you. Can i ask one question, please. I unheard of heard today Brooklyn Task force about brooklyn can you telling you tell you what you understand that to mean. I think so it was a large project and it had a higher level of support ability and probably opinions but that was you know forest city a Large Company when it stafrltd it was not parts of that by a history. Do you think it turns out to be a success. It is one of the first middleincome housing buildings built there now theres a unprecedented amount of Affordable Housing in new york a rocky process. I guess one last comment i know my fellow commissioner commissioner antonini is on vacation i am going to an vacation for the eir and the project approval will be absent overwhelming so ill ask for a toom toomey temper schek. Commissioner johnson. Advertised late ill keep it short that is one of the elaborate developments in new york city with next to the arena i dont know if it works as a met for but for the 5 m but a large prestige for the city and sxhunts community under a couple of quick things i think this project is great 6 or 7 or 8 years ive heard about it before i was on the commission increase a lot of work the only thing ill focus on i know you want to get to a decision in my eyes code compliant means number one, the communities benefits rights eave heard a lot but people focusing on there is workforce and money for Betsey Carmichael and Affordable Housing and senior hours and affordable units onsite and all sorts of things in a Development Agreement the city as recourse you dont get even a much smaller project so everybody has heard in terms of getting the communities benefits we cannot get with other projects ive supportive of this project i have no puric comment on the september 10th date but commissioner richards we looked at the thing i read it page to page im not on vacation ill be working everyday and spend a lot of time open rec and park. Commissioner antonini. Thank you a couple of comments briefly ill make a motion what was considered to be a dense Downtown Neighborhood is maturing executive i take walks around rincon hill and transbay almost every night people are walking dogs and Steering Wheel children there are loot residents and a lot more and a lot of businesses so just because you have a project that will create a lot more residents and businesses explicit mean Public School cant say be a flabdz and executive of not only there but new people but be a true city neighborhoods it is and the other good thing sue hester said everything is focused think downtown but youll have a central subway that brings people in from third street and Market Street right in if area and peep from chinatown and vufb from chinatown and Fishermans Wharf on the subway so an ideal place ill move to initiate that general plan amendment and im and i memorable to the dates whatever the commissioners feel last week third or the 17 is the date maybe ill ask mr. Rich ken if i could come up for a second is it possible to get rec and park on the 17 instead of the third i believe that is that is a question for jonas or your staff i dont want to opine on that officially ive heard the rec and park is amenable on the 17 Supervisor Scott Wiener mr. Richie the commission emigrate the letter from the Advisory Committee theyre asking rec and park to give us additional time they payroll have innovate had the exchange with rec and park are you aware of letter. Not that im aware of and that came in at 11 oclock something we should acknowledge the attention you might want to read it and see the names of people asking for that and can. Commissioner wu. I will keep is short to building on other commissioner comments i want to see a commissioner hillis asked for this i guess the sorts of topological of heights Los Angeles Mission and hoourdz all the quasi to van ness and the embarcadero or something smaller for fifth from market it caltrans to eave mediator talk about clustering height and transit i want to see how that plays out you may want to do an additional versus polk but supportive of the idea of getting more clarity that the retail and that is important for being neighborhood serving and any use sized limitations on retail i havent taken this close of a look at the da can we lock in the incomes for the Affordable Housing and the da does it it specific that is going towards 50 percent email or anything like that . With the office of Economic Workforce Development the da locates in those does that do that separately for the 3 types of Affordable Housing. Yes. 50 percent ami period of Time Opportunity be it is 50 percent and some of it is designated at thirty percent and seniors is thirty percent. All peddled out in the development. Development. Thank you thats it. Ill eave a capture of comments ive supportive of the general plan today but as commissioner richards said this is the beginning and openly a page and hopefully more dweekz and poobls of adoption i find is interesting kwoon gentleman i agree this is a gay project but can be better and hopefully through the process there we finest i capture of things ill share the diversity of the neighborhoods feel compassion for the people and not insure what the project sponsor can ults do for them but with the mergers there are opportunities to be creative with that ive shared with the staff one of my concerns it is incredible the amount of communities benefits dwiefdz of dwiefdz from that but want to make sure the buildings will be around for one or two hundred years not just to take care of groups to get the project through that is a difference kind of thought but this will, arena for a long time and benefits as well i do support the continues dialog about the filipino heritage district under our communities and again not exactly sure what the ask is empty the courage we i picked up on the guarantee of seniors being able to move into that building so overwhelm cancerous im sure there is a direct answer of how that lottery or whatever the system will work that folks move indemnities existing area i absolutely agree that as transit rich area maybe the best weve been pushing this transit for criteria it is the best to live in San Francisco without a car so im totally supportive in that sense and supportive of admission today commissioner moore. I like to see the youth and the Filipino Community come in line with Everything Else a Community Benefit as explicit and clear as the artist derivative in the project i think this particular sxhunts being part of location needs to think capitol hill and there will be the ones effects by it i like the project ive been contrary youve been designed and the aspects are very, very good and thoughtfully worked through with a level of detail we often dont see in the last couple of years eave expressed as being concerns to me the particular the unanswered finality of the vice mayor plan mr. Woods gave an interesting presentation about the value you sxach passive what is happening in that area that Value Capture has a 3 dimensional film nun of us have seen this he want this to be a integral parts as a collective largescale planning i dont like piecemeal planning didnt leak it which i was in school and i dislike it even more when i have to decide on a special district thats my on this lack of preference for about this arrangement im prepared to supports this project after making the points one other thing i look at the chronicle building and appreciate the explanation more as a space keeping rather than storage i want to emphasize the word keeping he hope he can see a true commitment not a tall forms into a Tall Building by its large size sooner or later will inspire someone in the future to say lets put highrise we know how to structurally do that i need to see a commitment that is about place keeping afternoon a defenders opportunity site one thing i have expressed this to the team that this particular project was as large not explained height on the office tower a taking 85 percent the prop m allocation that worries me in light of the fact wear punished here and there and at other commissioner mooefgz for the allocation of office space thats standing in the room reject a big elephant that raises very very difficult questions id like to tie that back mr. Rich to the Unanswered Questions about the Value Capture to be explained questions on the central selma plan. Commissioner richards. Just one quick question for mr. Rich any thing about the preferential treatment for people that have been demand from the neighborhood. No direct mention weve heard that loud and clear im aware as many of you may know there is legislation starting to go through the process in the building to change. The rules its been the rule with the sole exception of 55 laguna im not sure how that was constructed by the rule you cannot do neighborhood apprehensive all sfoolgz need equal breach im aware of the legislation moving through i apologize i dont know the details i do not know if youre staff do but i object to both reach out to you separately and come back and how it distracts with the project Supervisor Scott Wiener and mr. Rich a question whats the proposed take down in terms of realizing this project as a whole what is the commitment of the developer to side all projects rather than farther them out to those. Im going to turn it over to this is consistently of 3 parcels in 3 existing buildings the way the entitlements structure and Development Agreement are constructed tareable to take them down in any order no obligation to you know to do them all and the Public Benefits are structured to make sure we have the com rat amount of benefits and each building as i mentioned question front ends the hours this is unlikely this is a impact project but even if the last building were not taken down well get the heirs benefit from the representative does that answer your question. If it does we dont have a way to create and hole were basically primarily building on parking lots and were dotting all the is and crossing all the ts in a manner that is innovate as disruptive as this project were having a major demolition and not seeing anything. This structure blake every agreements interest there are communities benefits that go along with the development we dont say i must build everything we dont entirely control. Commissioner antonini. So my motion is going to be initiate general plan amendments and ill suggest an informational hearing on the thirds to answer the questions race by the public as well as the commissioners and schedule a final action if we can coordinate that with repla rec park on september 18th. A there is a motion and a second to do you want the to initiate the general plan and setting the hearings for september for informational presentation and september 17th if we can coordinate with the rec and Park Commission for that dates shall i call that question. So on that motion to do you want the resolution for september 3rd and accepts 17 commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore no commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 6 to one with commissioner moore voting against. Yeah got it investigated commissioners that place you well, i want to give 30 seconds to clear the room well take a very short break regular hearing for thursday, august 6, 2015, commissioners, we left off under our regular calendar before we continue the Commission Given the late hour and closing of the garage it closes at manipulated theyve proposing to continue item 16 and 17 under the question of cleared up the carrot will be the first on september 3rd by moving the 5 m out to 17 and like to light to items 13 and 14 to those items been continued we dont expect any of those items to be heard before 112101 Mission Street will take a significant amount of time i dont know if the pardons are here for fittings gerald area hearing my understanding the commission will be shutting down before midnight because thats not have access to the garage to get their vehicles. 16 and 17 pushed to september 3rd more than linkage a veto by the commission but the discretionary review calendar looks like it is going to get continued and soliciting any interest in the partnerships project sponsors to continue voluntarily it is a bit of a gamble whether or not we get to it before midnight. We are asking if you would like to voluntarily continue items 13 or 14. Just to understand theyre not going to call it after midnight if we get it that point. It would be continued until september 3rd at the beginning of calendar. I believe this was not our tension obviously we want to hear it by midnight the public Decision Mak