Lease agreement between mercy housing and south of market childcare that describes a order and preference of occupants for Childcare Center first going to concern of livering in transbay 6 and 7. The second preference is to people in the transbay redevelopment project area, south of Market Redevelopment area or the zip codes 94103, 6 and 7. The third is for children of families with a parent working in transbay. In any case, at least half the total number of children should be from low to moderate income families. There are about 40 children will be accommodated and the fees are subsidized good afternoon. My name is [inaudible] the enrollment will be, we anticipate that well be able to get license for 40 to 50 children. I might guesstimate 45 children. Half are from low income families, state subsidize contracts that will provide and cal works contracts and other contracts the city [inaudible] well serve infant, toddlers and preschool aged children and the other 50 percent are private families do you know how many childcare facilities there rin the vicinity . I know you are running several. We have 2 facilities one on folsom we are licensed for 90 children. 60 percent are low income and the rest are private families and then we have another facility on [inaudible] all most 90 percent of the children at that site are subdized low income. How many . 48. You have 3 facilities. This is our third facility. In mission bay we have a couple of them. [inaudible] on king street. The Mission Housing development and the is a childcare operator and there is the family, the 3 family spots accommodates 12 at mercys 24 street development. Ucsf also operators a childcare operator and there are other proposed within commercial developments including the proposed Head Quarters on blocks 26, 27 youll see in the fall and potentially killrow development on block 40 on 16th and owen street. I think there one in candle stick there is one existing that is adjacent to the als griffith Housing Development that will be relocated, yes these are the ones we operate. I believe there is also a childcare facility in hills plaza. Yes, there is one. You know the waitic list in just south of market is long. In one of the sites there are 500 on the waiting list. [inaudible] did you say 5 thousand . 5 thousand, yes. We are talking toddlers. Infant and toddlers are limited in San Francisco because the cost is very high so that is why we are very excited about it project. It isnt just Affordable Housing it is affordable childcare. I have a feeling we will be able to get license for 48 children so they create 48 slots that are really needed. I also believe transit sent r has childcare facility and the sit affof office through early care and education, thank you so much, city wide coordinating body because Many Developers pay a childcare fee and it is the coordination that happens through that office to provide the construction there is the Financial Plan that has to be put together in place for the operating. For new childcare facilities they run through that office. Thank you for all the work that you do and for mercy for incorporating childcare. The number is just staggering. Yes. Wow. I would go for childcare versus parking. It is a negotiating point. I heard from a couple frents moving to east bay because is is for housing and childcare issues. Thank you very much for all the work you do and mercy too. The childcare facility looks like to will be fun. You can be a child again. Okay, so i think no more questions. There is a motion by commissioner mondejar. And there will be a second by commissioner sing. Before we take a vote i want to recognize the spectacular accomplishments and performance on the sbe program. Kudos. Please call the roll this is for agenda item 5 c, revisions to the scumatic design for transbay block 7. Commission members please announce your vote when i call your name. Commissioner mondejar, yes. Commissioner sing, yes. Commissioner booustoes is absent. Madam chair rosales. I have 3 ayes and one absent. The next is for agenda item number 5 d, authorizing a permanent loan. Commission members announce your vote bh i call your mondejar, yes, commissioner sing, yes. Commissioner rosales. I have 3 ayes and one absent. Motion sudopted. Please call the next item. The next item is 5 o, 8erizing pursuant to transbay Implementation Agreement a fairs amendment to the memorandum of understanding what the city and county of San Francisco acting through department of public works to increase funding for the transbay folsom street Improvement Project in an addition amounts not to exceed 345, 861 for a total not to exceed 829, 253, 00 transbay redevelopment project area discussion and action resolution number 522015. Madam director. Thank you madam secretary. Commissioners there is a item in transbay as part of our support for building neighborhood infrastructure to support the dense housing and mixed Income Housing and the commercial development component. We also have a charge to facilitate the open space and streetscape improvements so this contract is building out that complete neighborhood and propose to extaepd our contract with department of public work tooz move into the the next phase of work for the folsom street improvements which are critical for providing that neighborhood infrastructure. With that i would like to ask kevin mat sooda to walk you through the proposed contract amendment thank you exectev director bohe, president rosales and directors. This item is to approve the First Amendment to the memorandum of understanding with the San Francisco department of public works transbay folsom street Improvement Project. The mou incorporates a scope of work of transbay folsom Street Project agreement which divided into 2 phases of work. The phase one scope of work provides Design Review services 350 percent documents, [inaudible] conceptual designs for Traffic Signals and approval for the project designed by ocii through its contract with [inaudible] Landscape Architects or cmg. Sfpw entered into the Transportation Agency and San FranciscoPublic Utilities to assist in the project. Both scopes of work for phase 1 and 2 are addressed in the mou, to date only phase 1 cost of 483, 662, 00 is contracted with sfdpw. Currently the project team completed nearly all the phase one scope of work including the 50 percent construction documents thus requiring a First Amendment to the mou to begin work on phase 2 related work. Phase 2 covers 100 percent construction documentation bedding and contracting suvss, construction manage lt inspection and acceptance services. To main the project schedule and properly sequence to thwork, ocii is breaking out phase 2 into 3 subphases. Subphase 2 a, 2 b and 2 c. Subphase 2 a provides the funding to complete the necessary work from 50 percent construction documentation to 100 percent construction documentation or permit submission. Scope of work for subphase 2 b include the necessary work to bid and contract the project and anticipated to be brought back to the commission for consideration in october of this year. Subphase 2 c, scope of work covers the Construction Cost and that is anticipated to be brought back it the commission in the First Quarter of 2016. This slide shows the project limits starting at the top left hand corner is second and folsom street and the project extends 6 city blocks easterly towards spear street. Development block 1, 8 and block 9 of transbay front this project, they will be required to provide all of the public improvements while at this project we meet at the newly constructed curb lines that will be installed. This is a perspective view that shows some of the gardens and streetscape with colored concrete granite accent pieces, new trees, [inaudible] and construction at the rain gardens. For subphase 2 a, the scope of work required to be performed includes taking the traffic signal dephrines and finish it to completion to 100 percent construction documents. Private property investigations into the presence of subside walk basements because that information is snood from a survey of the different Building Permit applications at the site. Item 3 is the Public Outreach regarding the construction of the project and that is on top of the cac meetings that we conduct and the outreach redevelopment has. Pub lrk works also has a outreach process. Item 4 is Community Benefit district coordination regarding items that will be maintained by city, city departments and the cbd itself. 5 is application and permit fees for removing and planting new trees, driveways, side walk legislation and improve. Permit fees and item 6 is project cost to oversee all the suba work. The cost is 310, 861. 00. In addition there is a need for sfmta livable streets to review the drawings and have approval coordination offunds are needed for livable streets section to review documents, draft required legislation to the board and presents the project to multiple city wide committees. The cost for this item is an additional 35 thousand dollars that was not originally considered in the mou. Combined with subphase 2 a required funding of 310, 861, the aggregate total cost of the First Amendment is 345, 861. Ocii desires to have sfdpd to perform the work through the First Amendment and increase the professional service fee tooz include 345, 861 in addition to [inaudible] overall total aggregate amount of 829, 523, 00. Expenditures for the transbay folsom street streetscape are recognized in the [inaudible] staff will include project expenditures for the next period in sufficient funds are available to continue with the First Amendment. Approval of the First Amendment to the mou with dpw allows the completion of feasibility and planning studies for portionoffs the streetscape open space plan and related community outreach. These activities will have no result and Significant Impact on the physical environment and exempt from sequa. So, that concludes the staff presentation. We have 2 representatives from San Francisco department of public works, oscar g and marsy cumacho. Thank you. Do we have any speaker cards . No. Okay. I can ask. Do we have any comments for items 5 from the public . Moved by commissioner singh commissioner members please announce your vote when i call your name. Commissioner mondejar, yes. Commissioner singh, yes. Madam chair rosales, yes. I have 3 ayes and one absent the resolution is adopted. Thank you. Please call the next item. The next item is 5 f, conditionally authorizing the exectev director to enter into a Grant Agreement with the city and county of San Francisco acting through the department of public works for up to 450 thousand in tax exempt bod proceed for palou avenue streetscape and jening street Plaza Capital impruchbments consistent with recognize obligation schedule item 387. Subject to approval by the ovsite board and department of finance. Bay view hunters opinion redevelopment, discussion and action rez solution 532015 commissioners there is one notable relief mechanism that is enacted in disaleutian law and that is the ability to expend pretwonet 11 bond proceeds. We do have the ability to transfer those bond proceeds to the city and county of San Francisco for projects that are consistent with the bond cuv nns and you have seen a number of these previously authorized in the south affmarket area and the bay view and we are nearing the second to last of the bond proceeds. Now all we have left is the tax exempt housing bond proceeds after this for your consideration so through a great deal of Due Diligence the staff worked with the city through department of public works to come up with a program for the proceeds in the bay view Hunters Point redevelopment. I would like to ask [inaudible] with ocii staff to walk you through the proposal and the process. Good afternoon commissioners and executive director. As director bohe stated earlier this year there are several items that have compl before you related to the the access bond proceeds sfr iimeer here to seek authorization to enter into Grant Agreement acting through department of public works for up to 450 thousand dollars in tax exempt bond proceeds for palou avenue streetscape and jening street Plaza Capital improvements within bay view Hunters Point redevelopment area. Back in february i was here before you for a portion of bay view bond proceeds. We estimate we have 896 thousand bay view bond proceeds in february i came before you with a Grant Agreement with the office of economic and Work Force Development for third street pedestrian improvements as well as sf shines in the amount of 446 thousand so today im here for the balance of that so that we can expand our bond proceed in a manner that is consist wnt the work we have done previously in bay view Hunters Point. All of the Capital Improvements we are proposal reflect the previous work we have done with other city agencies as well as with other community stakeholders. This was a exciting opportunity when we were seeking and frying to find projects that were shoveal ready and had Community Feedback and in line with the preechbious redevelopment plan and talking with community steakholders and other city departments, the department of public works was in the midst of streetscape improvement plans which is in the project boundary and in the process of houstic Community Meetings where they were looking at repaving, adding traffic [inaudible] and several other butte fiication elements and possibility for public arts as well as additional bull bout squz planting of street trees. As part of that community process, dpw came forward saying there is a interesting project at theert insection and i have exhibits dpw staff walk ed through with you is jen asian jenings and [inaudible] improving it so it would not be a area of flight. So, with that, i think i would like to start our presentation. With me today we have marshy cumacho from department of public work squz oscar g and well start this presentation which is the intent of the Grant Agreement to cover several Capital Improvements that we will go through in the slide presentation that relate to improvements along palou avenue or additional improvements along jenings plaza concept that came out through Community Feedback. Good afternoon. The first slide i would like to show is half of the Streetscape Project that rubs from third street to [inaudible] which is a gate to the Hunters Point shipyard. The star represents theened of jenings which turned out to be a right of way owned by public works. This slide shows just a detailwhat happened, we had a couple Community Meetings, we had 3 and at the very First Community meeting the community said there is a couple locations on palou where we would love pizazz or something as people drive through they say this is wonder ifal. One of the areas they selected at the other end of palou there is a mini park so that was a area the community targeted. The other end pow lieu by chris gate, they gave addresses of 2 properties which as you go down palou in the orange it was a public works right of way and the one next to it is a long skinny parcel owned by the School District. So, at theright now they are just si cyclone fenced. At jenings when you turn around there is a wonderful view of the bay. Jenings go down and you are like you are in a room. We told the community we would try to find out who ownathize lots or they can go forward or with it that it wouldnt necessarily be part of the Streetscape Project and we found out that our director was excited about when we talked to him and said is this really a right of way and not a private lot. Then the next Community Meeting we told the community our findings and what we did is told them about the 2 lots and they gave us ideasat that meeting which fsh the second meeting they gave ideas of a amtheater or farmers market, childrens playground or combination of uses. We talked a little about that and this was a Informal Design workshot but we didnt want to talk about it to be much because we didnt know if was reality. The other interesting thing is in thearial you can see right about thenow the lot is blue, but above that is elevated i think it is George WashingtonCarver School a