Has release applications that we all do in our own mental housing when we move in somewhere. So, theres several levels of making sure that people are prepared to move into housing at that point in their lives. And is there a process and plan that goes to some kind of incident would take place, what would happen with the second step to do, second, third, fourth,etc. Yeah. Of course there are house [inaudible] and i imagine they would be very similar to the other house lords that these organizations have and that im used to from c. H. P. We already have sites with them that i manage. So those are the usual households that we have in experience if you live in rental housing. Additionally in terms of subsidis that we provide, there are additional rules that are specific in order to keep those subsidies and that includes, for example, to be part of Certain Services such as third party rent payment. If there are incidents, the Property Management will address those and there is a due process again, im very repetitive here, the way that you would all have it in our own housing. Since there are support services on side, they will always be informed if there is any kind of incident, no matter what it is. And they will then from the Supportive Services side, they will then work with Property Management to address the issue, you know, from more of a social work point of view. So Property Management does their job but understands supportive housing. They understand it is happening in housing. So, does that yes. Ok. Anything else . No, i have some more questions but they may not be for you. Thank you. I really want to thank you for the presentation and i really want to thank David Elliott for what he said. Really highlighting a case study of someone who has gone through community partnership, whos gone back and mentored people. People with disabilities, i have a special place for them. When i was in grad school, i was alienated because i have a disabilities. When i went to israel, i asked why they didnt have a homeless situation and they said it is because they took care of their people and i feel like this project has an opportunity to take care of people. You know, these people are part of our community and they need help and they need resources and as it was said by one of other speakers, this could be a model that could be replicated throughout San Francisco. It was recently highlighted that we are the most expensive city to live in. I see families and people leaving every day. More Homeless People on the street. And also i have a cousin who has mental illness. He never got the Supportive Services. If he was to live in one of these developments and have the services and be able to be someone like David Elliott, it makes such an impact in his life. As well. And really making sure that were taking care of the people. They need some extra benefits. They need some support. They need help gettinging back on their feet and we cant turn our back on our homeless population. It is increasing every day and i think david is a great example of showing really what this Affordable Housing and these partnerships do for people. How they bring them back. How theyre able to give back to the development and also show people entering this development that are homeless and have mental needs, David Elliott, he is a case study to show this is what this partnership did. You can excel to be like him with these Supportive Services and think it is a great example. Id also like to recommend increasing the outreach and engagement with the community, making sure that you are going to all the developments, and meeting with all the communitybased organizations. Tabling at events, having partnerships at spark. Its right there. It would also be great, as these homeless families are moving in, to have some partnership with restaurants to maybe give something, a gift card or something to these families as theyre coming in to the community. Great. Thank you. Thank you, commissioner. I think a lot has been said about the project and, you know, whats been high lighted in terms of the concerns of the community. I think what ms. Woods talked about in terms of a Good Neighbor policy is definitely an important thing to do. And to continually communicate with neighbors. Mission bay has grown since i was a little kid and now there is a lot of folks there. And, you know, this has back theme, i think with some of the projects that have come before us a about folks not wanting certain people next to them. Were a big city in a little town and seven by seven square miles. People have to get used to having neighbors and there are some neighbors you may have that arent homeless or dont have issues of mental illness. You know . We have to live with each other. Where i live in the mission, we have a Navigation Center not too far from where i live. So we need to at least try providing services for folks because not doing anything and keep pushing them out is not going to work and it doesnt fly with many of us. So thank you in advance for making sure that the Development Partners create a Good Neighbor policy, communicate with the neighbors and communicate with your new neighbors. You know, the first neighbors were once new neighbors to others. So lets we have to be very aware of that. And we have to live as a community in the city. That is what makes us unique. So with that, may i have a motion so moved. Second. Madame secretary, please take role. Commission members, please announce your vote. Commissioner pimient, el. Yes. Commissioner rosales is absent. Commissioner singh . Vice chair bustos. Yes. Mr. Vice chair, the vote is 3 ayes, two absent. Great, thank you. Motion carries. Madame secretary, please call the next item. The next order of business, agenda item 5c, 5d, 5e and 5f. Will be presented together and acted on separately. 5c. Approving the report to the board of supervisors on the amendments to the redevelopment plan for the mission bays redevelopment project to remove an approximately. 3 acre portion of sea wall lot 337 known as p20 from the redevelopment plan area and authorizing the transmittal of the report to the board of supervisors, Mission Bay South redevelopment project area. Discussion and action, resolution number 392017. 5d, approvinging the amendments to the redevelopment plan for the Mission Bay South redevelopment project. To remove a. 3 acre portion of sea wall lot 337 known as p20, and adopting Environmental Review findings pursuant to the California Environmental quality act. Recommending adoption of the redevelopment plan amendments, by the board of supervise source and submitting the recommendation, including the redevelopment plan amendments to the board of supervisors. Mission bay south discussion and action resolution number 402017, 5e, approving the sixth amendment to the Mission Bay South owner participation agreement to remove a. 3 acre portion of sea wall lot 337. Known as p20. Mission bay south project area, discussion and action resolution number 412017. 5f, approving amendments to the Mission Bay South design for development to remove a. 3 acre portion of sea wall lot 337 known as p20, the Mission Bay South project area, discussion and action resolution number 422017. Madame director . Thank you. Commissioners, this is an item before you, the four items really approving ago report to the board of supervisor as well as amendments to related documents with an action to remove the. 3 acre of land within mission bay. Actions were taken previously at the Planning Commission with the promise and we also have representatives from the port of San Francisco from economic workforce development. And with that, ill have mark luskin, the project manager, do an overview of the subject matter. Good afternoon, vice chair, commissioners. Im project manager for mission bay. As we said, the item before you is an amendment to remove the 20 from the Mission Bay South redevelopment plan. The requested items to discuss will be approving a report to the board of supervisors on the amendment to the redevelopment plan, adopting review plans and approving amendment to the redevelopment plan. Proving the sixth amendment to the Mission Bay South o. P. A. And approving amendments to the Mission Bay South design for development. My presentation we will go through the site information and talk about the p20. The Mission Bay South open space. The Mission Project and the mission bay c. A. C. And then the general plan consistency. See here not too well on this map, but up on the chart is a small little red line and that is what the. 3 of an acre p20 is on the edge of Mission Bay South line. It is. 30 of an acre site that is currently owned by the support if you remove it from the plan area. It was originally planned as a buffer between the mission Bay Developments and the industrial uses going on so now that there are no longer industrial uses we dont think that there is a need for the buffer area. Mission bay opens space, there is a requirement in the plan that there is approximately 41 acres of open space, which includes eight acres of open space within the ucsp campus by removing p20 and we have 33 acres within Mission Bay South plus the eight acres that are still in the ucsf campus. A quick overview of the Mission Project. That will be a 28acre mixed use project. That will bring eight acres of new parks and open space. 1500 homes of which 40 will be affordable to families with 45 to 150 a. M. I. , 1. 3 million square feet of office space and 250,000 of neighborhoods serving retail and restaurants. To discuss with me today is adam vandewater and the port of San Francisco is Phil Williamson and from the San Francisco giants is franwell and rosco maps. Last month on september 14, the plan amendments were presented to the mission bay c. A. C. And it was unanimously recommended that the Commission Approved plan amendments in related documents. And adoption a motion 2007and 20019, approving findings that the plan amendments are consistent with the general plan policy. Also findings that seqa was in accordance and no further Environmental Review is required. The next steps if adopted and approved by the commission, will go before the board of services and consider the adoption of the amendments on december 12 and then it will go the o. P. A. Amendment will go before the Oversight Board on january 22. That is the presentation. If you have any questions, myself and our team are available. Thank you. Madame secretary, do we have speaker cards on this item . Yes. I have three speaker cards. Ok. Call them. Corinne woods. I am the chair of the c. A. C. And incidentally member of the port Central WaterfrontAdvisory Group so ive not only worked on mission bay for many years but ive been working on the sea wall project for the port for many years. And i just dont get why its taken this long. As does everything in mission bay. To move this forward. It has been in the plans for a long time. Both the mission bay side and the port side knew it made sense. To not have this stupid little skinny park on the north side of the street and separated from the rest of mission bay. I urge you to approve these. Thank you. Next speaker. Ace washington. I was a little frustrated with bridge, but that is over with so im back down to level. My Blood Pressure is down. All right. Thats good. But im still around. And were here talking about mission bay so im calming down so you can can make it loud and clear. Even to the mission bay c. A. C. And they talking about the ive been around 21 years and the creation, when you say i was a little boy when they got mission bay together. Again, i reiterate, we think african americans, black, negroes, whatever you want to call us, there should be something at mission bay to illustrate there was a black man was involved, that was hired as a consultant that can tell us before all these other billionaires took over. Ok . So what im saying, im a historian. They call me everything, but dont call me late for dinner. Ive been here before all yall was here except for singh, but i was here before he was here. I came when there was hell hell was here. He gave us black folks hell. Here we are 2017 and im 63 years old. I got kids and kids and my grandson got kids so im paw paw. You may look like ace just flew in from space. I got a structure. I got family. My family my daughter, when you have a daughter who married a rich white man were talking about dont mess with me. Im on the floor. Mission bay. Yall must stop. If i have to file a lawsuit on everything to stop it all thats developed will be mad at yall. Whats his name, Governor Brown came in and dropped all that money in bayview. Housing. Millions but i dont hear nobody talk about no blacks. You talk about homeless. You talk about latinos with the immigration. Nobody talking about our migration and you wonder why im all sad and mad and got a surgery in my damn head. 25 years i been coming to this agency along with housing authority. But god had to do it. He broke down housing authority. He broke down yall you call ocii and the mayor has to pay 25 million a year for yall to exist so you can have a mission bay, so you can have all these other developments. They dont know. I know. Because my name is ace. Ha ha. And im on the case. But im gettinging sick and tired of coming up here. When i had yall come to the philmore, which we we wiped off the map theres no mention about the philmore. You did us and kick us like they do at Hunters Point. Same way. You got people coming up hooer and asking for for your support. The same thing that happened in the philmore . I call it phil no more. Its going to ham over there in the southeast. Where yall people think you have peace. Thank you, mr. My name is ace and i aint through. Thank you. Oscar james. Exciting when i come up here. Thank you again. My name is oscar james and im in support of this particular project. But i have a serious problem and i dont know if it is going to relate to this. If i have to go to item six on it. But a young man named edward jones tried to open a full court down on 4th street and i think mr. James we have to talk about this particular item. Oh, item six . No, this is item 5a through 5f. I support this particular item. But i do want to speak on when we get to that, absolutely. And the director of the c. A. C. Pac. I would like her to stay so she can hear what i have to say. Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Mr. Vice chair, i have no more speaker cards. Any others wishing to speak on this item that have not filled out a card . Hearing none and seeing none, im closing Public Comment and now turning to my fellow commissioners for any questions or comments. Mr. Singh . No. I move it. Ok. We have a motion. Do we have a second . We have a second. Madame chair, please take roll. Do these individually correct. For item c, 5c, commission members, please announce your vote when i call your name. Commissioner pimientel. Yes. Commissioner row salless is absen. Commissioner singh . Yes. Vice chair busto . Yes. Madame chair is absent. Mr. Vice chair, the vote is three ayes, two absent. Thank you. Motion carries. Item 5d, commission members, announce your vote when i call your name. The motion carries. For item e. Announce your name. Commissioner pimientel. Yes. Commissioner singh . Yes. Vice chair bustos. Yes. Mr. Vice chair t vote is three ayes, two absent. Motion carries. For family 5f, commissioner pimientel. And a continuing disclosure certificate and approval of docs ments and actions theres project areas and. Good afternoon commissioners, this item you see in the various versions of this item this is the final action of the commission for the approval of the sureance and sale of bonds for the 2007 series d and e and. Good afternoon vicechair, commissioners, director. My name is john daigle im senior financial analist for the ocii. So Commission Item 5g our resolution 43, 2017 is the final action necessary to allow the issueance of two series of refunding bonds and series 2017 and d and taxable bonds and 201s and stepping back for a minute there are two entries involved in this technically theres the commission and then theres the commission basically as the Financing Authority and the reason the Financing Authority is involved is the issueer of the bonds that are being refund ed and prior to dis solution we needed the Financing Authority in order to combine various project areas in to a single bond issue and so now that were refunding the bonds we need the Financing Authority to take action as well as the commission the d bonds are taxable and thats the refunding of five outstanding bonds, the 2017e bonds are tax exempt and its refunding two outstanding bonds and for 2017d the par amount of the ponds will be 118 million and noted before refunds five outstanding bonds an