Pearlman, yes. Commissioner hyland, and missioner wolfram. Yes. And well mac sure she get conveyed to the Plan Commission an department. Is the Planning Commission the board and mayor . Board of supervisors and the mayor. Thank you. Commissioners items 10 a and b for 17 lbr. 479 castro street and kearny street. These are legacy business applications. Good afternoon, Desiree SmithPlanning Department staff. The eye tomorrows today are two legacy business applications, nominations submitted to the Planning Department on october 19th and ready why for your recommendation. While all applications were previously reviewed by the office of Small Business for completion prior to transmittal to the department. Your packet contain a draft resolution outlining the tradition as to the success of each business. The first application before su for cliff variety. A neighborhood hardaway and Variety Store founded in 1936. Its a familyowned store and it offers hardware, home goods, candy and other every day items for over 80 years. When the oldest son eriny joined the business he started the tradition of creating elaborate window displays especially during the holidays and designed a ribbon machine, two button machines and rolling ladders. Currently operated by fourth generation family member, cliff Variety Store serve oafers 700 people daily. The second application is for thomas restaurante serving north beach since 1971. Its roots date back to 1935. However, when it was called will you pleaseos. It was found it was called lupos they introduced pizza to San Francisco and perhaps the entire west coast. It became famous for the woodfire brick often. The long time chef took the new name. Under the new name, the restaurant continued to serve a i growing clientele and in 1973 it was sold so the krati family. They added a few family recipes to the menu but otherwise maintained the same decor as the previous owners. After the review, staff finds that both applicants met the criteria to qualify for the registry. Im happy to answer any questions and i believe some of the representatives may be here. Thank you, commissioners any questions . At this time well take Public Comment on this item. You have three minutes and there is a warning buzzer at 30 seconds before your time is up. Im terry aws rn bennett. Im the fifth generation at the Variety Store. It was started by my great great grandfather in 1936. Were an integral part of what the castro is today. We serve over 700 customers a day on a slow day and curing dug this time of year we look for 1500 customers. We are a destination for the castro. Thank you for tomasos, ive been going there for 50 years. I just couldnt be more thrilled to have a couple more wonder, wonder San Francisco businesses. Thank you. I agree wholeheartedly. I think cliffs is home to many of us. I treat it as home. A lot of questions, talking to folks, they go there, and tomasos, thank heaven that is still there at kearny and broadway, so i think its great we still have these before us. I will echo understatement. Cliffs variety is the best of the best and it is what 2 omasos is about, and it fills a different realm in the restaurant realm, so i also think these are two of the shining stars of our legacy business or will be of our legacy business registry, so i also wholeheartedly endorse both of these. Just more echos. I must say cliffs is definitely a legacy, and i walk by it every single day, so itll be more special even more. So do we have a motion . I so move that these two are accepted into the program. Second. Clerk thank you, commissioners. On that motion to adopt recommendations for approve of both legacy business applications. [ roll call. ] clerk so moved commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 60. So the question is how did tommy chins beat the person who was named beat the person who was named for the restaurant . Just a comment. It seems strange, thats all. Clerk commissioners, itll place us on item 11 for the waterfront usage plan. This is a usage presentation. Good afternoon, president and commissioners. Im the president of the staff for the preservation of San Francisco, and im just going to say a few things about our waterfront planning effort if i can get the mic to stay yeah. So we all know the waterfront has changed a lot since 1997, when the port adopted its front waterfront use plan. That change was precipitated by the embarcadero freeway, the embarcadero roadway and to the boulevard it is today, but less prevalent with the polici prevalent are the policies that the waterfront adopted that also contributed to this transformation. So part of this was the public growing understanding of preservation, of Historic Resources, and how that repaired to create and support public trust consistent waterfront development. The waterfront Land Use Plan also required that there be an alignment between the Land Use Plan of the port and the bay Conservation Development commission, and as part of that process of aligning those two planning documents, there was a whole awareness and Public Education process about Historic Resources that had never really happened with an agency that was really geared to recognizing natural resources, so we felt that that was really important, and it led to requirements in the plans that the port create if the port was serious about Historic Preservation that it create a Historic District, and we did, then, embark on the nomination process and create the embarcadero Historic District. That led to a new awareness about the stewardship responsibilities and also to thinking about how we would rehabilitate the historic piers, and particularly about the tools available to us now that the property was listed on the national register, primarily looking at the 20 federal rehabilitation tax credit. And then, also, through the planning process and working with the bay Conservation Development commission and the state lands, having to achieve a delicate balance of commercial uses with retail and maritime that could satisfy the public trust requirements and also provide public benefits, open space, and Public Access to the bay. So that has been sort of our model moving forward. Weve accomplished some significant projects, but the projects take a really long time. I would say six to ten years on average, and the ports resources dont really have that much time, given the advances state of deterioration and the deterioration as it advances just exponentially, the costs increase for the work that needs to be done. So even with the historic tax credits, these projects are challenging and in many cases economically infeasible. So in addition, weve also studied the seawall. The seawall is also sort of the foundation for the Historic District, connecting all the piers, three miles in length, and we now have the engineering information, and we know that its vulnerable to a major seismic event, and so that has to be addressed. In addition, Sea Level Rise, another new challenge that has arisen since the creation of the waterfront Land Use Plan also has to be addressed. And these two threats together have created questions about the longterm development of the waterfront and whether or not our model can still work in terms of these projects. So the waterfront Land Use Plan seeks to address these challenges by providing policy guidance rather than identifying specific solutions. And to support this effort, we convened a waterfront Land Use Plan working group. Commissioners hyland and johnck, we were fortunate to have them in that group. One of the first processes we did was background studies, and in the area of Historic Resources, we did a report on histor Historic Resources and stewardship, and we presented that report to the group, along with other areas where theres preservation embedded in other topic areas like land use and resiliency and transportation. We also did modelling of the economic feasiblity of projects with different land uses to see if they could support rehabilitation of historic piers, so this together with the general understanding we need to create a more resilient quarter front to require the adoptation of the Historic District in ways that are unknown to us today. And because of that, we felt that it was important that we identify the Public Values that we should bring to the effort. As a result, we we developed with the committee seven Guiding Principles that affirm the publics value and the priorities for the waterfront. For Historic Preservation, the historic principles clearly state the high value and the ports cultural significance. The Guiding Principles will then be used or have been used to help guide the sub committees in their work to develop recommendations in the areas of land use, resiliency and transportation. Also, i think its worth pointing out that of particular note is the contribution from your commissioners in the area of making sure that we included aspirational goals in our process, and that those goals, although aspirational, still be accountable to the realities that we face today. So that we thank commissioner hyland and jounck for advocating on behalf of that approach. So i think ill stop there, but i did want to introduce diane oshima, Deputy Director for planning and environment. Shes lead planning staff on the effort, and also was the staff that led this the land use sub committee. Also with me is ann cook. She she shes principal planner with the port, and she did some work with me on that sub committee. And just in talking about the tax credits, i wanted to pass forward a fact sheet just Information Exchange that we need to set as the foundation for the different alternatives and solution options that well be looking at over the next couple of years. So theres a lot of first year, year and a half that well be doing a lot of data collection, that the team that andrew is a part of will be working with the port onto inform them, very manically, the development of alternative scenarios for seawall improvements and at somewhere in that realm, well be having to contemplate how it is that addressing Sea Level Rise and ongoing need for resilience planning. So thats the shortest answer to a really mindbending question. If you spend any time just starting to think about it, it starts going in multiple different directions. But its a conversation that the more that we can own the fact that this conversations coming along, even though we may not understand all the details, i think that creates a more Receptive Community for us to really be creative about whats in the best interests of the city that balances the Public Values and enjoyment that people have and associate with the San Francisco waterfront while making it the infrastructure of the 21st century that it needs to be. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Commissioner hyland . Commissioner hyland thank you diane and mark for coming today, and for all the work that youve put into this site. I think its been two years now going on two . More than two . I thought it was a good point in the process to kind of bring the commission into the conversation. Commissioner jounck and i have been giving kind of very general updates over the last few months, two years, and thought we would spend a little time so that you all understood what was happening. The port assembled the working group, spent the first few months establishing the working foundation, bringing the working group up to speed on all the different pieces and the background and the information, and then, we went into sub committees, and we divided it into three areas. Land use, waterfront, and resiliency, and i must say the land use had the greatest dialogue, and we came back together as a working group not long ago, a month or two ago, and it appeared that, from my perspective that the we needed to elevate the conversation across the three sub committees and try to bring it out of the silo and try to integrate all of the work that weve been doing, and so weve been very vocal as tryit tryin continue that conversation. Were in phase two or part two or whatever part two, and its going to go into part three which is a long Public Outreach and Engagement Process that will then evolve into what the document will ultimately get published as. Not only does it need to be aspirationial, but it needs to be holistic, and thats what weve been trying to interject into this whole process, and the waterfront and the port is a whole cultural legacy of our city, and the individual pieces of it that are identified as historic elements are just a piece, just smaller elements of that, and weve been trying to broaden the conversation out of those specific elements into a more holistic across the silos kind of approach so were not just talking about the Historic District or the historic bulkheads on the pier or trying to figure out some of our transportation issues. All the various things that are happening. And the seawall is actually a very important element. It is a characterdefining feature of the waterfront or the embarcadero Historic District, and although i realize it needs to happen, we need to make sure that its preserved as a characterfinding feature, that focus itself is actually quite myopic, and whatever results of that happen, we need to bring that conversation out and up and into a more holistic were going to get a great seismic solution for the seawall, i have no doubt. What are the unintended results of that . I dont know. How can our twpgs solutioransp solutions be merged with the solutions for the seawall, so i just wanted to take this time to bring you all up to speed on where were at. Thank the staff for coming and participating. Its been an amazing process, and they have done a great job at bringing together all the and believe me, there are 35 disparate voices from sticks to land use to whatnot, right . So i would encourage you to read the draft reports from the committees, and you know, get familiar with whats happening and if theres any questions, well invite staff or the port staff back to give us other updates along the way. But if theres anything that commissioner jounck and i can provide any of you, updates, specifics, let us know. Thank you. Commissioners, any other comments or questions . At this time well take Public Comment on this item. If theres any member of the public who wishes to speak on comment on this item . Seeing none, well close public com. I want to thank ann and mark for coming today. Great. I think that is our final item, so the hearing is good afternoon, everybody, and welcome to city haul. My name is london breed. Im president of the San Francisco board of supervisors, and i represent district 5, the amazing district that houses the incredible 3rd Baptist Church, which we plan to make official landmarking status today. Arent we excited . I just want to say one, praise god, right . Praise god, thank you for being here, thank you for supporting this ceremony. We are honored here to have the mayor here to perform the ceremony who will speak in just a little bit, but i want to thank my colleague, aaron pes k kin for sponsoring this legislation, and thank you for supervise cohen for joining us here today, as well as our city administrator, naomi kelley. This is a wonderful day today. Im so excited. Remember when we celebrated with reverend brown and lady jane brown at the celebration with bill clinton, and i told you we would make this happen, and we made it happen, and look how quickly we made it happen . Well, i didnt have a choiz because reverend brown was calling me every single day, every day fighting for this community, every day fighting for this community, and one thing i want to say about 3rd Baptist Church, which is my church, my home, thank you for welcoming me. Thank you for continuing to a beacon of light in this community, who need a place of sanctuarn, who need a place to call home, who need a place to feel welcome. 3rd baptist has been doing this longer than almost any other place in San Francisco. It is an unappreciated institution because of its advocacy for being on the front line for anything related to challenges with our community, the displacement of our community, the issues with our children in the public schools. Every single occasion when there has been an issue in the city and county of San Francisco related to our community, 3rd baptist is at the front lines, trying to make sure we speak truth to power and we change the city for the better, and so it is only fitting that we come here today in city hall, and we celebrate our community, our accomplishments, and all that we have done to make San Francisco a better place, but more importantly, we leave a Lasting Legacy with the changes in San F