To set a goal of 33 of Affordable Housing in our new production. Under proposition k. To do this, requires a careful balance of both preservation and protection of our existing Affordable Housing which by and large are rentcontrolled units as well as planning for and producing new Affordable Housing. Whether it is through our on site inclusionary policy which we just amended the year, onsite acquisition or through our area plans. Today were holding this hearing and votings on the resolution because part of achieveling this affordable goal is to have accountability and monitor the efforts of city. The report is clear that while we have increased our overall Affordable Housing production since last year by 1. 6 , the reality is that over the last 10 years, for every three affordable units the city built, we lost two rent controlled units. As our housing rights advocates have stated, its three steps forward and two steps back, which can be incredibly frustrating and this is disconcerting because we only have an estimated 1. 6 of future entitled projects that are affordable in my district. In 2015, i worked alongside many of the tenant advocates that have come today to advocate for tenant eviction protection 2. 0, which since its passage, we have seen a twoyear decline in nofault evictions. From october 2013 to september 2015, there were 4304 evictions filed with the rent board. Compared to eder from october 2015 to 2017, where we saw reduction of 200 filed evictions. And the greatest increase seen in nofault evictions. Last year, i worked with president breed, supervisor p esskin and supervisor saifai on one of the largest reforms and amendments to our inclusionary housing ordinance, which added to our Housing Stock more onsite affordable units. Well continue our series of hearings on the soma plan which as you recall set a minimum of onethird as our affordability target. Again, part of the prop k intend and mandate. I want to appreciate the Mayors Office of housing and Community Developments work on their site Acquisition Strategies as this is an important prong in our protection efforts and look forward to hearing more about this. There are things that we can currently do now that will also help us immediately lower additional nofault and fraudulent nuisance evictions that our Community Leaders are considering at this time. One is the fullyfunded right to Legal Counsel that the tenant unit is advocating for and collecting signatures to put on the june 2017 2018 ballot. We can also support statewide efforts to repeal and also look at how we can impact Residential Vacancy and thank you to supervisor furor for leading the efforts and our advocacy in sacramento to repeal it. Much needed. Finally i want to recognize the Planning Department for its commitments to this important work in keepinging the public apprised of the citys progress toward achievinging the mayors housing balance goal and state mandated Housing Elements requirement. As this is an important way for us to achieve our goals making sure that were housing everyone as were housing multiple income brackets here in San Francisco. I want to first call up Annemarie Rogers from the Planning Department and then well be asking tara im sorry. From the Planning Department. And then we values kate hartley as well as robert colins from the rent board as well. Thank you, ms. Rogers. I dont know if there are anymore comments from members of this committee before we begin the presentation. Thank you, ms. Rogers. Thank you very much, supervisors. Im Annemarie Rogers from the Planning Department. Happy to be here in my new role as citywide director. Congratulations. Thank you very much. Im looking forward to coordinating our work most closely with this important body. When it comes to todays hearing, good data, of course, is critical to good decisionmaking. It will be a great deal of the departments energy. We regularly produce about half a dozen products on data just in relation to housing alone. Many of these products are mandated either by the state for the reno reports or the general plan, which mandates the Housing Inventory or by ordinance like todays housing balance. Other reports are voluntary and have become indeed much used like our quarterly housing typeline report. This takes a lot of staff time and resources, both financial and technical to produce the increasing amounts of and complexity of reports needed by the public and lake city. We typically have not been given more staffing or Financial Resources to secure data and produce the reports to meet these evolving needs. It is important not just to our pride as professionals but essential to decisionmakers that we published only data that we believed to be complete. So this means that we need to spend a great deal of time cleaning the raw data that we get to make sure it is accurate. The richest data product on housing that we produce is called our Housing Inventory. This year is the 50th anniversary of the Housing Inventory. So, were celebrating that important victory. Im sure you are all remembering 50 years ago today when it was created. In 1967. And watching consistent data sets over time is really important because it helps the city get context for todays changes. This report covers a broad array of housing data you can see from production to affordability levels for both sales and rental prices of new units and with specific info on completed projects. And well talk more during the presentation about the importance of this context. Now as new flavors of data are desired, the most efficient approach is to augment or adjust our existing reporting instruments. And here the Housing Inventory plays the most flexible and longstanding housing reporting product. I understand that part of todays hearing is to consider adjusting these reporting frameworks. Heres a couple of thoughts on that. First with regards to frequency. Its important to be cognizant of the frequency and the granularity of available data. Typically reporting more frequently than on an annual basis, it is hard to get good data. Even when you could get new data thats refreshed that often, when you look at these shorter increments, it can be just reporting seasonal variation or some ideosyncratic noise so it is hard to get an a understanding of what the real trends are unless you are looking at the bigger picture. Also, its important to note that some of the data sources have one to two years of lags in availability of data. Like i believe possibly some of the day that were trying to get. And we should consider number two, the data sources and availability of resource. Some of the data that we use in our reports is made is originated with other city agencies and in some cases we may need to acquire or data from thirdparty sources, including those that may not be available in formats that lead us ready for analyzization. This is a great opportunities to talk about broader trends and we hope to highlight the data in the context of policy which you might which to set. I wanted to be here personally as a new citywide director to reinforce the importance of this work and this bodys reception to the work. And for our presentation, first youll hear as the supervisor said from teresa ohaida on the housing report. Thank you. Have. Thank you very much. Good afternoon, supervisors. My name is teresa ohaida, principle planner with the citywide policy planning section. Im here to talk about the housing balance report. This is only for your information and no action is required. But first i would like to acknowledge the presence of kate hartley, director of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development. Amy chan, whos also representing the Mayors Office of housing and rob college, director of the rent board. What is the housing balance report . In april of 2015, the board of supervisors approved ordinance 5315 to add section 103 to the planning code. This new section directs the Planning Department to monitor and report on the balance between new market rate housing and new Affordable Housing reduction. The housing balance is the proportion of all Affordable Housing units to the total number of net new Housing Units. Over a 10year housing balance reporting, i will be reporting on the third report which was submitted to you in late may and covers the period from the First Quarter of 2007. To quarter 4 2016. This will be the third presentation under housing balance before the board of supervisors mandated. So why a housing balance . One stated goal of the ordinance is to ensure the data is meeting Affordable Housing targets citywide and within neighborhoods informs the approval process for new housing development. Just to remind the commissioners, here separate housing affordable production targets cited on the man da itsz and each have its own monitoring and reporting requirements. The housing balance report gives context to these different passing production goals. The Housing Elements mandated by the state to be updated periodically sets a production goal of about 8,000 net new units built between 2015 and 2022. This is commonly called rena or Regional Housing needs allocation goals. 57 will be affordable to lose and moderate income households. This means about 16, 333 units built are substantially rehabilitated in eight years. The Planning Department submits an annual report in the citys progress in meeting this goal to the state department of housing and Community Development. The Planning Department also prepares a Quarterly Report to the Planning Commission based on the same production goals called the pipelineboard. Proposition k, passed by San Francisco voters in 2014, set a goal that 33 of 3,000 net new units be affordable. This is about 9900 units. This is the goal that the housing balance report will be aiming for. So what is the 10year historic Affordable Housing trend . If we are just to look at new Housing Production, net new Affordable Housing made up 23 or just under a quarter of net new Housing Units built in the last 10 years, id like to add that this is about the proportion that has been more or less consistent in the last two decades or more. The housing balance calculation, however, looks beyond new Housing Production. In addition to new Housing Production t housing balance calculation also looks at rehabilitation completed and the small sites program, Public Housing placements completed can. Rad stands for rental assistance demonstration. Essentially older Public Housing projects. Entitled and permitted affordable units minus units removed from protected status. Essentially these controlled unites moved from the rental market through ellis act, demolition, and owner movein evictions. This is collectively called net Affordable Housing stock for the purposes of this report. This Affordable Housing stock is seen as a proportion of net new housing built and entitled net new units. These figures are all for the 10year reporting period. This presentation covers the second the first half balance report so the period covering the first part of 2016. The Affordable Housing stock totaled 8480 units. This net Affordable Housing stock over 36538 units is about 33 . This is the citywide cumulative housing balance over a 10year period. The ordinance also requires that the housing balance be calculated by board of supervisor districts and by planning districts. The housing balance for the board of supervisor districts range from negative 206 and in the district to. 74 in district five. The negative balances are due to larger numbers of units removed from protected status relative to the net new affordable units built and the net new housing bill overall. Districts five, six, seven, eight, nine and 10 have positive housing balance while the rest could we just i just had go back . No. No. I just wanted to ask a couple of questions. Two slides previous to this. So, my first question is, you talk about what our Affordable Housing goals under rena and proposition k are for 2020 or 2022. But could you tell us where you fared at least prop k wasnt in place at that point. But how we fared in our Housing Elements rena goals for 2007 through 2017 . I actually have the numbers in my notes but i dont have it right now. But can you provide them by the end of the presentation . Oh, yeah. I think it is helpful for us to know how weve actually met our rena Housing Element goals. I will be i will do that. For the years that we actually but going back to the slide. That we have in front of us. So in terms of removal from protective status. Do we have any sense of how these units are removed . Generally what the large patterns are. These are units removed from protected status. They are rent controlled units removed from the rental market through the ellis act. These are demolitions. I know that. But do you have a sense of the breakdown . We do have to breakdown in the report. Ok. It is not part of the presentation. Im afraid that i did not bring my copy of the report. I just think its important. We all have access to the report. Its mostly o. M. I. Could you present that at the end of the presentation, too . Since its in the report. I think it is important as we talk about this usual issue for all of this to be out for the public to understand as well. So, why are we losing housing, right . Because we for example, we look at supervisor tang at the negative 205 but she isnt losing the most units. Its actually, according to this, this is actually district eight that has lost the most units from protected status at 655. And i think it is just important for this board to understand if you are going to counter loss of protected units, what is that were losing it to. What is the breakdown amongst these categories. That is why i asked that question. I will be able to provide that after do you want to jump in . Thank you. If you have that data by districts also, i think that would be very helpful. Yes. This next slide shows the distribution by planning districts as required by the ordinance. These districts, by the way, are consistent with the boundaries used in the annual Housing Inventory reports. Again, theres a range of balances between the planning districts with the outter sunset which is roughly the same geography as district four. And bruno heights with 85 and the Western Addition. The ordinance also requires a projected housing balance. Essential lynette new Affordable Housing units proportion of net new units in projects that have received entitlements and have yet to receive Building Permits. The slide provides the projected housing balance well it shows that the projected housing balance is at 16 . This is about the same as in the previous 10year reporting period. Again, this is provided at the district and planning district levels. Could you go back to the 508 units that are t. D. B. Does that mean that they either become low or moderate . We dont know what the affordability is yet. Right. I assume youre countinging the first three in the total of affordable units. You are saying the 508 will either end up in the low or moderate categoris . That is correct. The housing balance ordinance specifis that three Major Projects have been entitled but do not yet have Building Permits not included in the projected housing balance, that is until a unit of until facing of these projects move to applying for and receiving Building Permits. All together, the remaining faces of these projects will provide about 22,000 net new units of which 22 will be affordable. Also not included in the projected housing balance are projects currently under review. For about 18600 units under review of which just under 10 are in, 100 Affordable Housing projects. Another 100 market rate protons would roughly 11 thousand units will be subject to the citys housing requirement. That could mean about 1400 new affordable units if built on site. The second phase of the rad program has been included this year, representing over 2,000 units in 14 projects. I will now talk about miscellaneous housing balance matters. The housing balance is by annual reporting period. Reporting schedule as stipulated in