Publicly indicated discussion narrow view and rear yard variance. Our proposed continuance for variance to january 11, 2018. 744 harrison street, propose ed use authorization. Item four for case number 2014 at 89 roosevelt way. Discretionary review as proposed for continuance to march 1, 2018. Item five for case number 2015o18233 drp at shafter avenue. Discretionary review has been withdrawn. Commissioners, further under your regular calendar, item number 19, we have received a request for continuance. For case number 2017oo7658c. U. A. At 4522 rd street as we have received a request for continuance for case number 2016 at mission street. Commission use authorization. That is proposed to be continued indefinitely and i believe second week in december. What is that date . Second week in december is december 14. All right 678 that is the proposed date. Any Public Comment on the items proposed for continuance . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner fong. Move to continue the proposed items in addition to item 19 and 20. Second. Thank you, commissioners. On that motion then to continue items as proposed, commissioner fong . [roll call] so move. It passes unanimously 52. If the acting zoning administrative 50. Excuse me. 50. I apologize. If the Zoning Administrator could rule on item 2c. Continuing item 2c to the date proposed. Thank you. Commissioners, ill place this on your consent calendar. All matters here are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, staff or public so requests. In which the matter will be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this point and future hearing. Item six, case number 2016o42991 c. U. A. , commissioner use authorization. Item seven, 2 geneva avenue. Commissioner use authorization. Item eight, and 501 through 503 and 508 through 511, laguna street. Item nine at 123 west portal avenue, conditional use authorization and item 10, 1765 california street, conditional use authorization. I have no speaker cards. Ok. Thank you. Any members of the public who would like to comment on the consent items or pull frem the consent calendar . Seeing none, commissioner moore . Id like to ask item 10 to be pulled of con sent. I just have a few questions that i could not really discern from the staff report. Ok. Well hear that first on the regular calendar. Do i hear a motion . Oh, sorry. I make a motion that we approve the item from the consent calendar. Except for item 10. Except for item 10. Second. Thank you, commissioners. So, on that moex to approvement items under consent did you have a comment . Just a second. Ok. So, on that motion to approve items under consent, except item 10 , commissioner fong. [roll call] so moved. Commissioners, that motion passes 50. Commissioners, that will place us under commission matter, item 11. Consideration of Adoption Draft minutes for october 26, 2017 and november 2, 2017. Any Public Comment on the draft minutes . Sighing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners . Motion. Any motion . I make a motion that we approve the minutes. Second. Thank you. On that motion to approve or, excuse me, adopt the minutes for october 26 and november 2, 2017. [roll call] so moved. Commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 50. And places us on item 12 for commission comments, and questions. Commissioner moore . Id just like to ask the question when the department is going to distribute meeting material for our meeting at the end of november because many of us are going away for thanksgiving and it is kind of a little bit unclear when we will be receiving packages. Those packages are expected to be delivered to you wednesday before the thanksgiving holiday. And for those who are gone already, are they on the web when . They get posted on the web as soon as we deliver them to you. Ok. Thank you. Thats good. Appreciate it. Thank you. We can move on to the next item. Very good, commissioners that. Will place us on item 13 for the 2018 hearing schedule. Commissioners, i submitted to you a proposed 2018 Commission Hearing schedule. It includes all of your regular holidays and the summer hiatus in august. Generally speaking, you take or cancel 11 hearings every year. Occasionally you add one. Occasionally you subtract one. But on average, you ahead of time cancel 11. I would suggest considering Chinese New Year for the thursday, february 15. That hearing conveniently coincides with the president s day holiday that monday. You may consider easter for april 5. Yom kippur falls on september 20. You generally recognize rosh hashanah, not yom kippur, but it calls on that. And then in november, after thanksgiving, you have a fifth thursday so my suggestions would be to consider those, but i would strongly consider the Chinese New Year and the Easter Holidays to be included in your advanced hearing schedule. All right. Thank you. Lets see if there is any Public Comment on the schedule. Nope. Seeing none, commissioner moore . The only thing i would say is coming out of a rather sketchy calendar in november and december of this year, and then moving into a cancellation on the first thursday in january, we have three meetings in january, three meetings in february, the fifth meeting in march is canceled. All were going to do is get penalized one way or the other. It is going to haunt us no matter what we do. So it will be here until midnight or well spread out our meetings a little bit more evenly. And im in support of recognizing the holidays and then i would suggest that its not due lets not cancel the march meetings and pretend it is meetings rather than months and fifth thursdays. It just doesnt work. Right. Commissioner rich aerss . That means if we dont cancel the march meeting, were up to 16 weeks in a row . [counting] speak up, please that means we are up to 16 meetings in a row all the way up through may 31. Well, if we take the Easter Holiday 12 meetings in a row. If you take Chinese New Years on february 15 and then the Easter Holiday in april. It would make a lot of sense to keep the 5th thursday this march. The suggestion is add back the 29th, cancel the 5th of april and february 15 for Chinese New Year. Yes. So, add back march 29. Yes. But cancel back the 15th of february and april 5. Right. And keep Everything Else as proposed. So were not canceling september 20 for yom kippur and not canceling november 29 as a fifth thursday. I think for now thats fine. We can always add that. The calendar already had six hold holidays and you considered one, two, three, four for your consideration. And were down to seven, six 10 on here. There were four holiday cancellations and then three summer hiatus cancellations and then there were two fifth thursdays. But all together, this would account for about 11 cancellations now, which is on average on par for your average every year. And the suggestion was do not continue to meet february 15. No. Cancel february 15, cancel april 5. Ok. Commissioner . I would respectfully request that we cancel yom kippur. I already bought plane tickets for the 29th so i wont be here. Because the school holiday. So that would mean two meetings that id be out and i just respectfully request that maybe im the only person who observes. That would still make 11 ok. So commissioner is requesting that we cancel the 20th. It would be cancellation on february 15, add back march 29, cancel april 5 and cancel september 20 is whats different from the calendar being proposed. Do we need a motion on that . Yes, plea. And then november. Well keep it for now and cancel it if need be. Ok. There any motion . Commissioner richards . Motion to adopt the calendar with thursday, february 15 as a holiday, april 5 as a holiday or day off, yom kippur, september 20 and adding back a meeting on 29th of march. And november 29. Its already on there. November 29th. Regular meeting. Ok. Second. Thank you, commissioners. If there is nothing further, shall i call that question on that motion, then, commissioners to adopt the proposed 2018 calendar and just to be explicit, canceling february 15, restoring the march 29 hearing, canceling april 5, canceling september 20th and keeping november 29 as a regular hearing on that motion. Commissioner fong . [roll call] so moved, commissioners. That motion passes unanimously 60. Thank you. Commissioners, other places under department matters, i have 14 directors announcements. Thank you. I just wanted to call your attention to the resilient by design, the competition that is under way. Regionally. Yesterday the teams released the 10 teams released their conceptable ideas for a number of sites across the bay and those sites are on the website, under resilientbydesign. Org and they are accepting Public Comments for the next two weeks on those sites and on those ideas until december 1. At that point, there is a committee that is going to go through a process of matching teams with particular locations in the bay area and that will happen by the middle of december and then those designs will move forward and are due may 1. So, i encourage you to look at the website, to check out the idea that there was some pretty interesting stuff that came up as you might imagine and we could submit your comments anytime until december 1. Thank you. That concludes my presentation. Thank you. Item 15 review past event at the boyder of supervisors, board of appeals and the Historic Preservation commission. Good afternoon. Aaron starr, manager of legislative affairs for the Planning Department. First on agenda this week was a landmark designation for 2731 to 2735 fullsome street known as the dougrahn house designed in the beauxart style and it is a fine example of residential beauarts architecture. Staff president designated to the committee and answered questions from the committee members. Supervisor peskin then asked to be added as a sponsor and then the Committee Vote unanimously to extend the designation. The pier 70 project passed its second read. The landmark designation for 1399 mcallister street also passed its second read. The planning code and zoning map amendment for the Transit Center special sign district, sponsored by supervisor kim passed its first read. And also on the agenda was the appeal of the category exemption for a project located at 20 nobles avenue. Im sorry, noble alley. The project has a long and complicated permit history dating back to the 1990s. It was not focused on ceqa, instead appeared toable a proxy for settling disagreements between neighbors. There was a motion to extend the item for three months to resolve the issues but failed to receive a majority vote. Ultimately the board agreed with staff by upholding the environmental determination and rejecting the appeal by a 63 vote. And lastly, which youre all probably wait, for, ill discuss the cannabis regulations that were heard at the land use committee, the rules committee and the full board this week and the previous weeks. After a total of Six Committee hearings, three at land use, three at the board and between four and five and six hours each where i theseder same Public Comment over and over again [laughter] i understand how you feel on the m. C. D. Hearings, its been very hard to keep track of all the various amendments that have been going through. So, im going to do my best. Some of these may not be completely up to date, but i have checked with the City Attorney and i believe this is the most Accurate Information i have thus far. First the ordinance was split at the land use hearing. One version is referred as the skinny version and the other is refered to as the bulky version. The skinny version removes most of the special carveouts that they added to the ordinance in the first land use hearing while the bulky version keeps most of those in. The skinny version was recommended to the board without recommendation and the bulky version remains in committee, allowing the board to pick different amendments to place into the skinny version at the full board. Regionally the land use Committee Voted to increase the 600foot buffer around schools to 1,000 feet, which this commission recommended. The committee at one point also considered adding the 1,000foot buffer around child care facilities, adding child care facilities that the buffer would have all but eliminated the green zone in the city. Since then and through various amendments, the 1,000foot buffer around schools has been brought back down to 600 feet in the skinny version and the child Care Provision has been eliminated in both versions. Also originally the orbit option was added to the ordinance which, again, this commission did recommend. However, currently the version that was before the board on tuesday, the orbit option was replaced with a straight 600foot anticlustering provision. Rather than the 300 feet originally in the ordinance is up to 600 feet. The Landuse Committee added the mc1 districts to the green zone and this is something that you recommended. And also with those version, there is a finding that directs the Planning Commission to [inaudible] m. C. D. S and cannabis retailers when reviewing amly indications. Both version of the ordinance have a limit of three m. C. D. S or cannabis retailers in any in the excelsior mission in m. C. D. This previously extended to all of district 11. The bulky version also has a requirement that m. C. D. S converting to cannabis tailers in the four outer sunset m. C. D. S, the ocean avenue m. C. D. , the west portal m. C. D. Must seek mandatory v. D. R. To do so. The bulky version has only one cannabis dispensary or establishment in the sacramento street, n. C. S. District and supervisorual district two and west portal m. C. D. And has a limit of two such establishments. At this weeks full board hearing, the board voted to continue the item to november 28 on a 91 vote with supervisor peskin voting no and supervisor cullen absent. This was done to allow more time to consider the proposed amendments. There was a proposed amendment by supervisor sheehy that would have allowed the sale of adult use cannabis on january 1 for existing m. C. D. S on a temporary basis until they got their final land use designation and permanent permit for the office of cannabis. And then to push off the other land use decisions for a few more weeks. Ultimately this recommendation was withdrawn by supervisor sheehy. So tend result of that San Francisco will not have regulations for adultuse cannabis in San Francisco for january 1, 2018. The earliest the law could take effect would be on january 6 if the mayor signs the ordinance one day after the board adopts it. And that is all the information i have on that. But im happy to questions. To answer questions. Thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners. Acting senior preservation planner with the department. Im here in place of tim to file a report on the actions of the Historic Preservation commission yesterday. The commission heard three certificates of appropriateness, recommended approval for the addition of Cliffs Variety and tomasos Ristorante Italiano to the business registry and heard an informational item from the waterfront on the land use plan. In addition, they heard a permit to alter case. This projects proposal is to restore and partially replace 75 street facing windows. The permit was submitted as a minor permit to alter and request for hearing was filed by sue hester on august 28 who raised concerns about the potential loss of the existing 41 s. R. O. Units at the property, which have been vacant since 2013. During the hearing yesterday, the h. P. C. Heard Public Comment from 11 members of the public as well as ms. Hester, the Tenderloin Neighborhood Development corporation, hospitality house and the senior and senior and disabilities action. Expressing concerns regarding lawn construction history of the hotel, past legal action against Property Owner and the potential loss of s. R. O. Units at the property. Because the permit did not address the use of the property, which is an issue beyond the per view of the h. P. C. And because the permit would lead to the inhabitability of the building, it would improve to alter. In their remarks, the h. B. C. Directed staff to make the Planning Commission, mayor and board of supervisors aware of the Public Comments and the h. P. C. s concerns about these issues. It is our understanding that a request for discretionary review will be filed against the permit and heard then before this commission in the coming months. And that the h. P. C. Will provide a statement to this commission, the board of supervisors and the mayor regarding their concerns about the Affordable Housing at the property. There are three approved permits from 2013 to 2014 for interior tenant improvements, but no permit has been filed for change of use. It would trigger a conditional use authorization for both the remove alt of Affordable Housing units and for hotel use and per chapter 41 of the code, one of the units would be required at an alternative location. That concludes my presentation. Thank you. Thank you. Commissioners, there is a board of appeals report from the Zoning Administrator. Ill apologize in advance for it does appear to be lengthy. Last week, the b