That they were wanting to push it the Commission Secretary recommended if we did continue in december that december 21st be the day but well deliberate so if you have concerns on dates nows the time to tell us. Well, thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Im lisa aubrey. Im with affordable divis. And it was proposed to a continuance to today which got unanimous approval from this commission. However, the item is not on todays agenda. Not even under the continuance calendar. Affordable divis has asked many time to be included in mote no notifications and here to ask again, please, how is the public going to follow when the process is not transparent . Since the agenda was not posted until the friday after thanksgiving we had to contact the planner for this project to find out the new date and he was unable to confirm the new date until this past monday. We request that the item be placed on the continuance calendar on december 14 so that proper notice can be given to neighbors to wish to provide Public Comment on 650 divisadero and want to know the captured study which is supposed to be conducted for it and fillmore and other districts upzoned for density. Has the Feasibility Study started . What is the scoping of this study . Will there be a scoping meeting . Will the Feasibility Study be completed in time to provide guidance . Will it be increased Affordable Housing for impending projects on divisaderro and its concerned with the housing imbalance in the pipeline. I have a chart here. The number of truly affordable units being entitled and built in San Francisco is unacceptable. The city is already way beyond its 2022 target for market rate housing. This is from the Planning Committee from the july report the dashboard. Thank you for your consideration, commissioners. Thank you very much. Do you want to share light on this not being on the continuance calendar . I cant because my advance calendar showed it was continued from september 28 and may have been proposed for continuance to todays date then actually on the date of the hearing continued further out. That is correct. Im looking at the minutes from the hearing now. At this hearing it was proposed for continuance november 30 but the committee took action to continue to december 14. It will be on our december 14 calendar. Whether we continue it then or hear it is where we continued it though staff recommended an original agenda and it be continued today. We continued it until december 14. So it will be on the new agenda then. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello commissioners. Im Veronica Ballen speaking on item 21. Ive been brought on to work with the applicants on Community Outreach and we need a little bit more time to make sure we met with everybody in the community that has question and concerns on this so we ask you continue it. Thank you. Thank you. Any additional Public Comment on the item be proposed for continuance . Seeing none, commissioner fong. I do apologise, i just received another request for continuance if you want to consider it. That is for item 15. Its the jackson street and a continuance to i think we should hear that one. The clerk thats fine. Commissioner thank you. So people know who may be here for that item it may be continued at least theres a request for it to be continued. Very good. Commissioner fong. Move to continue the item proposed in addition to items 14a, 14b and 21 to december 21. Second. Commissioners on the continue items as proposed including item 21 to december 31. Commissioner fong. [calling roll] the motion passes unanimously 70. And on the continuance of the variances items 4b and 5 are being continued to the regular variance hearing wednesday january 24 in rooms 408 and the hearings start at 9 30 a. M. And if you can continue item 14b to the date proposed of january 25. Correct. That will place you on your consent calendar. All matters under constitute and concept calendar considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and may be considered by a single roll call of the commission that will be a separate discussion unless a member of the commission or staff or public requests in which the matter will be removed from the consent calendar and considered at separate item for a future hearing. [reading case] consideration use authorization. I have no speaker cards. Thank you. Any members of the public that would like to request that item 6 or 7 be pulled from the consent calendar . Seen none, commissioners . Commissioner richards. I have seven. A motion on six . A motion to continue item 6. Approved, item 6. Second. Thank you commissioners on the motion to approve 6 under consent colors. [taking vote] so moved. The motion passes unanimously 70. Through the chair item 7. Would you like it heard after the two tight eps items for the benefit of the public well call 13 and 19 out of order on the regular calendar. Thats 267 gary and 29 Mission Street. That places us under commission matters. Consideration of draft minutes closed and regular meetings. I have no speaker cards. Any Public Comment on the draft minutes . Seen none Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. Second. Thank you. On the motion to adopt the minutes for the 16th. [taking vote] so moved. The motions passes unanimously 70 and places us on item nine, commission comments and questions. Commissioners . Commissioner moore. I believe that gas stations the equal locations throughout neighbourhoods is a critical policy issue. I like to see the department gives us an overview where gas stations are, how many there are and if any of those gas stationses are under consideration of closure. I think were getting into a critical numerical thing particularly at night when gas stations are quite far from those people who need gas at later hours it becomes often a difficult issue to find one. I like to put the issue of la lawn laundromats on the discussion. San francisco is in maybe neighbourhoods wood construction two and three stories where its impossible to ask occupants or residents or owners to put washing machines on upper floors because the structure of the buildings are not built to accommodate washing machines and dryers. Id like to get an equal distribution where those facilities are. We do not have to make policy out of it but id like to get an overview of where Critical Infrastructure in the city is that is built the way it is not the way we want it to be. Thank you. Well add those action items. Commissioner richards. I think along the same lines of commissioner richards. Commissioner moore. Your off. Along the same line of commissioner moore i remember the planning process where we had all the gas stations in the upper market pretty much on every corner like a suburban neighbourhood and someone from the neighborhood said what happens when theyll go away and i said youre crazy therell still be cars and gas stations and weve seen this over and over week after week month after month. We started with 79 gas stations when i starting on the commission. I dont foe how many we have left 40, 50 or 60 but i think it not only becomes an issue of a city with the Services Required to keep the city functions but becomes for me a social equity issue because now there are times im driving in somebody elses neighborhood and stopping where theres still a gas station and its not fair. And same with laundromat. I pull it because we have another one going out of business and i too share commissioner moores concern not everybody can afford to get up and down the steps or have somebody do their laundry for them in the neighborhood. Im worried as well about laundromats and id add a weird one to the list, Funeral Homes. You cant drive your car, you cant clean your clothes and you cant die apparently in this city is where were going because pretty soon well have no more Funeral Homes either and ill get that out there. Interestingly enough along the same lines while we were on break tuesday november 21, there was an article in the front page of the chronicle about retail space and whats happening with retail spaces. Its not all doom and gloom. Some places have a thriving environment like valencia street and theres place wheres theres dieing retail environments or some that throw me back to 2008 and 2009 when we were in the midst of a deep recession, my neighborhood, castro and upper market reminds me of that. But it talks about in the article ways to fill the spaces up and its not all lets get rid of the new urbanism. Theres a few success cases like equity and theres one on show place square another at popo potrero and we have heavy lists now but next time working with the president or chair these are things we need to bring to the forefront and make decisions on and figure out what we want to do with these in the city. Thank you, commissioner fong. While when he have a goal of having no fossil fuel vehicles in the city at some point, it will be a little while and if we can make sure we have gas stations to get us topped of until we get to that point and were a tourist city and many come into San Francisco with fossil fuel cars and chasing them to other neighborhoods looking for gas can be maybe not the best thing. So i think we want an accounting of where we are now and how many more we plan to lose in a five, sevenyear outlook on that is. Commissioner richards. One other factor. Theres another article in the examiner on charging stations and it shows cars sold new electric and San Francisco ranked almost last at 3 . We still have 97 of cars that are hybrid or not electric being sold. Commissioner johnson. I was going to say the same thing. We can hopefully discuss this. I think gas stations will likely be change their purpose just like a lot of the parking spots and parking structures we have residential and stand alone and its part of the transformation to San Francisco. It may not be about getting rid of them but shrinking them and finding out the future purpose. The clerk if theres nothing else we can move to item 10, directors announcement. No new announcements. The clerk item 11 board of appeals. There was no Historic Preservation hearing yesterday. Good afternoon managers and Planning Department. First on the Land Use Committee agenda was the planning code and zoning map amendments for 1629 market street. The Commission Voted to approve the items october 19 of this year and people spoke in support of the project or in Public Comment. The committee forwarded the project to the full board with a positive recommendation and last was a balanced housing report sponsored by supervisor kim and it was introduced as the new director and emphasized good data is critical to good policy making and there was a report by district and there was information presented on housing cost trends overtime and across the city and described the Overall Economic trends and impact on housing costs. Other comments mostly provided by tenants and tenant advocates on the needs for stronger protects ins housing affordability. Supervisors peskin and fewer asked for variations so the existing equation. Supervisor fewer asks for rental rates as in the site of berkeley and they accepted the report and filed the hearing. At the board this week the planning Code Amendment for the district passed the second read and the landmark designation for 2731 to folsom street passed the their read and had an environmental appeal hearing on the hairball intersection improvement project. Its an area where cesar chavez and bayshore and changes it to bridges and ramps linking it with highway 101. Sfmta is working on a project on bay view boulevard with striping for bicycle lanes and two loading zones and the i am preliminariation of implementation of the lane and there was an [please stand by] amendment that would increase that to 1,000 feet. This amendment did fail, though, on a 65 vote and the board kept these 600foot distance. The second Sticking Point was the definition of sensitive uses. In particular, whether or not it should include can child care facility. Supervisor tang made a motion to include child care facilities also in response to constituents. This amendment failed on a 65 vote and the board ended up not including those uses as sensitive. This also means that recreational buildings that primarily serve those 18 and under is no longer considered a tiff use. The 300foot anticlustering provision and this council decided to vote on the orbit option in its place. While there seemed to be support at the board, the inability to map the orbit option and that it was an untested tool put it out of favor. In the end t board voted to increase it to 600 feet from 300 feet. The final Sticking Point was whether certain districts in the city could impose limits on the amount of cannabis retailers in m. C. D. S, also known as carve outs. Supervisors at one point proposed carve outs in their districts. Supervisors tang and yee proposed to add their carve outs to the final amendments but those amendments failed. And the motions to remove supervisor safaus carve outs which puts a limit of three m. C. D. S in the outter excelsior mission m. C. D. At one point, applied to all of district 11. This motion passed 65 vote which effectively removed all carve outs from the ordinance. There were two other amendments of note, both made by supervisor p esskin. The first was an amendment to require 3 12 notification for all cannabis retailers regardless of the Zoning District. This motion passed unanimously. This means that all cannabis retailers even if theyre in downtown will be required to do 312 notification. The last and most pertinent amendment was a provision added to the planning code that would allow existing m. C. D. S to sell adult cannabis on the day its effective, which looks like january 5, 2018. This is only a temporary authorization for m. C. D. S wishing to convert to cannabis retail. M. C. D. S wishing to convert to can permanently would have to file a change of use application, subject to 312 notification. These businesses are not subject to any location businesses but most conform to the 1,000foot rule and there is no mandatory d. R. Or c. R. Hearing. Some of them will be d. R. d by the public. M. C. D. S have until march 31, 2018 to apply for a change of use authorization and the temporary permit only lasts until the end of 2018. So around 8 30 on tuesday, after three land use hearings and two board hearings, not to mention countless Staff Meetings and outreach meetings, the board made its final vote on the cannabis uses, establishing land use regulations and establishing the power of office of cannabis, the requirements for cannabis businesses and perhaps most significantly an equity program. The board was working on the nam vote. However, it only achieved a 101 vote. And that concludes my remarks. Thank you. The board of appeals did not meet last week or this, but will be back next week. All right. Any questions . Nope. Very good, commission. That will place us under general Public Comment. At this time, members of the public address the commission that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. Each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. I will ask those people standing in front of the doorway to please find a seat. In order to remain in the room t sheriffs have alerted us that you must find a seat. Ill see if i cant accommodate for an overflow room. But you cant block the door. It causes a fire hazard. Thank you. Thank you. I have a number of speaker cards for general Public Comment. If i call your name, you can line up on the screen side of the room and approach in any order. Georgia, laura, lisa, daniel and laura. Good afternoon, commissioners. On october 12, you passed the residential flat policy and i want to thank you for that. And i think it is a good thing you did. I stumbled on this for sale in the caliente quatro between 24th and 25th. It was two units. Its now one. It is selling for 1 million can i have the overhead, please . This is my thank you. But im going somewhere so you can see there. Heres the foreplan. Theres no egress from the street. Its got a refrigerator in the basement its the most egregious one ive ever seen of any of these. Its good you do i. I dont know how it got its c. F. C. , but that is problem between the disconnect maybe between building and planning. When it was at the p. I. C. , the staff said yes to keeping 75 and that didnt happen. So, hopefully these things will be fixed up. And actually its not that far away, which is also in the caliente quatro and 20room s. R. O. With 11 small retail for sale for 11 million more. I dont know if theyre connected, but you have to think if someone decides to make 4 million on a single home illegally converting it, god know what is they can do with a 20room s. R. O. The other thing on the r. E. T. Next week, there is a lat. There is a lot of lastminute confusion on that and neighborhood concern over the demolition pushing it into next year. Ive always felt, and i hope ive made clear that i think tantamount to demolition is not a bad thing. Overhead, please. You do have the ability to do that. To change the numerical criteria. Even if you change the ands to ors, you could do. That i made a little handout for you. Here it is. 10 copies. Thank you very much. See you next week. Ok. Thank you. Youre welcome. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. My name is laura fingleserma. Im a member of indy action. I have been following the residential expansion threshold closely, provided detail policy feedback and shared my frustration with fellow u. N. B. S. One of them, Mission Residents authored an oped in the examiner that is required reading. To stop monster homes, legalize apartments. I brought copies for you and well use the rest of my time and share these words. T