Wasnt according to plans . Yes. Why are these things happening . Im flabbergasted that this person can keep stamping plans and falsifying documents. I think that would be you can add that the staff can certainly add that to the information we get. Commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson i would like to support not a sixmonth continuance. It needs to be shorter. We need answers from the Building Department and hear this project and decide. I would say last week in february, february 28. 2 1 2 months from now. Commissioner richards lets stick with three months. Commissioner moore . Commissioner moore we can continue and the architect can tell us if or the staff. So theres an amended motion. Seconder is okay with march 15 . On the motion then to continue the matter to march 15 with direction from the commission. Commissioner fong aye. Commissioner johnson aye. Commissioner moore aye. Commissioner koppel aye. Commissioner melger aye. Commissioner richards aye. President hillis aye. That passes unanimously. Item 15 at 1233 polk was continued. Item 16, 2017007658cua at 4522 3rd street. Please note that after hearing it was continued to now. Commissioners johnson and koppel. You were absent. Have you reviewed the materials . Yes. And it was continued to december 14, 2017. I believe there is an agreement in place, but well hear from the project sponsor. This is a second hearing. So well go 4 minute project sponsor and 2 minute Public Comment . Very good. Ok. Good afternoon, commissioners. Linda ajellohoagland. The Planning Commission continued the case, directing the sponsor to work with urban ed academy and members of the community to develop mutually agreeable conditions. The project was continued to november 16 at which time it was continued to december 14. Over the last several weeks, the project sponsor and Community Members and representatives from urban ed academy have been meeting to work on conditions of approval to mitigate concerns of the Future School and community as it relates to the sale of alcohol at save more market. Earlier this week, supplemental conditions of approval were sent out, developed and agreed upon by both parties. Per conversation with the City Attorney, staff recommends a change to one of the conditions, noted as 12a. The first condition is security. 11a, shall install and maintain Exterior Lighting to illuminate the entry and sidewalk area extending to the curb for the length of the building frontage. B, shall install and maintain security cameras on the exterior of the property sufficient for monitoring and recording activities on the sidewalk for the length of the building street frontage. 12a, interior floorplan. Project sponsor shall not display alcohol within 15 feet of the store entry so the alcohol products are not visible from the street. Pursuant to the guide lines of Healthy Retail sf programs, not more than 15 of floor sales dedicated to alcohol sales. C, not more than 95 shall be dedicated to the display of healthy products. A revised draft motion has been prepared. It does not include the latest condition modification to 12a, but will be after this hearing, if so approved. This concludes staff presentation and im available to answer any questions. The project sponsor is available to answer any questions. Thank you. Thank you. Project sponsor . Thank you, president hillis and, linda. I appreciate staff support. Its taken a lot of time and effort on their part. And i appreciate their followthrough. I would like to ask mr mr. Sarigucchi from urban ed academy to join me if he could. And i am i was asked by reverend walker, who couldnt stay today, to pass on his support for our agreement and these conditions and his best wishes for the success of both enterprises of the Joseph Family market and urban ed academy. Unless you have questions, i dont want to take much of the commissions time except for mr. Saragucci to add his comments. Thank you. We did take some time, took a long time, but we had the time to talk about what we could do together to make this a Harmonious Union on the 4500 block there of 3rd street. We also had a chance on december 6 to hear from other Community Members in front of the cacc and they shared their recommendation for approval upon passage or adoption of the supplemental conditions we agreed upon. I think were in a good place. I think there were some things that were not ameanable to both sides, but i dont think you will always have a Perfect Union on those things and this is as close as weve gotten. So we appreciate your time and patience and letting us get to an agreement. Thank you. And i would like to add that we put out word to our Community Supporters and, as you know, there are many. They all attended the cac meeting last wednesday night. When let them know that we were asking for there not to be Public Comment today. We didnt want to flood the hearing. I know there are some members of the community that have come that may want to make a brief comment and i just ask them to keep their comments brief. We appreciate your attention to this matter, commissioners, and we hope you will support the motion as its now drafted. Thank you. So well open it up to Public Comment. I have a couple of speaker cards. Vanessa banks, doris vincent, and rhonda pitts. You can speak in any order. Come on up. Good evening, Planning Commission. Im speaking on behalf of the store. Im vanessa banks. I have been living in bayview for 47 years. And i should be there another 47 years. But i dont like that San Francisco does to us is they help who they want to help. If we sanctuary help everybody this store has been in our community for so long, its devastating to learn theyre going through all this. Were going to talk about alcohol and licensing, thats like stereotyping. Every corner in bayview has an alcohol store. Its like, be realistic. They have a family theyre trying to feed and they also support and help the community. This is my first time getting involved with this. I will stick with this, but i hope as a Planning Commission yall understand their store is about the safest store in the community. They have 24hour from the time they open, theres security, until they close, theres security there. They dont let people hang out in front of their stores and its not fair to call it on alcohol. Im sure everybody drinks wine and beer. Its not fair. Do the right thing. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Im doris stinson. Ive been a resident of bayview for 51 years. Im on edot, Economic Development for third street. I will not repeat what the young lady says because everything she said is true. Its more than a store. Its like a mission. Whatever a person needs if they cant get it from the bank or family members, theyre treated like family. I hope that you will make sure that what you have before you today is approved. I want to say that i support both. I also support the urban academy, but not at 45 third street because were trying to Development Economic for third street, having more Service Organizations now than commercial. The vacant buildings and what is there now, we need to keep as commercial. I support both. Theyre both needed. Thank you, ms. Vincent. Next speaker, please. Hello. Im ronde stevens. I have some attachments for you guys that ive prepared. I originally got involved because im very Close Friends with the Joseph Family and i just wanted to point out some of the egregious lies and im happy that they have come to an agreement, but the problem is, originally it wasnt sent to you guys clear and there were several questions that you guys asked of the urban academy that were simply not true. First of all, their business will not be on third street. It will be on la salle. So they wont even be there, okay . Their business has always been lit and always had security cameras, for the last 10 years. So its not really something they have negotiated with. And a bigger thing is the egregious fallout from this manufactured opposition that has caused two veteran Police Officers with more than 50 years of experience between them and a Longtime Love and respected of the community to be placed under administrative review because of this investigation because someone in the opposition called the Police Department and said they were unhappy with the Police Actually fading what they felt was the truth. I honestly believe that the sfpd and those that are socalled trying to support the community would be more comfortable with building relationships versus separating them. All in all, i wanted to say my attachment states that mr. Fong asked him a specific question if he intended to erase a liquor store. Theres a blog entry in there where his words were, their mission was it erase a liquor store and replace it for educational purposes. You have to be honest when you are presenting you dont have to put somebody down to build yourself up. Thank you, maam. I want to be in good communication within the community. Thank you. Thank you. Is there any additional public testimony on this item . Good evening. First, my condolences to the mayor lee family. I support save more and the Joseph Family. Weve known them for over 40 years and theyve been nothing but great to the community. As far as alcohol theyre talking about, theyre not the only store in that area that sells alcohol. Theres a store across the street that has alcohol. Theres a store up the street. They were speaking earlier. That store has always been secure. They never let no one hang out around their store, side of their store, front of their store. Ive been shopping there for over 40 years. So im speaking and support the Joseph Family and the save more mart. Thank you. Any add usual Public Comment . It would be helpful if folks can line up on the screen side of the room, so we can move through it. Line up on the screen side over here. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Im the father of the of my son that owns the store. Ive been in the community for 50 years. I lived in the community for 12 years. I lived on kirkman. I came here when i was 17 years old. I would like to stay in the community, part of the community. And do what i can do to head the community and i have raised three kids. We got used and abused by the landlord that we had the property deals from for 20 years. And we have shown how we got abused from him. We were given the highest rent in the whole area over 20 years. I want you to look very carefully. I have kids and i dont want that to be taken out of my grandchildrens. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Commissioners. Im chris fleming. There is a problem in the bayview and the reason that wear gathered here today and you are having this hearing is because this is a restricted alcohol district, and its restricted alcohol district because in the general plan it was determined that the concentration of liquor stores, as everybody has said, and i dont disagree with that, as there is one on every corner, its unhealthy for the bayview. Its unhealthy. Thats what your general plan says. So in making a determination today on your restricted district here on the future of the save more market, you have to take into account that this is an unhealthy business because theyve been defined as much by your general plan. How do you address that . You have two alternatives. One, you can reduce alcohol sales saying there will be no alcohol sales at the location and it seems that some progress has been made. But this is an opportunity for you and perhaps part of your legacy, to monitor and to look at hue how you can reduce the alcohol sales in the bayview, because thats part of your plan. In closing, i commend the team for putting a proposal together that both sides can agree on i thank the bayview cic to bringing the parties together. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Im alexis mathis. Im speaking on behalf of save more. Ive been in the community all my life and im at a loss for words here not understanding why theyre going through this with an alcohol license when im in the Community Daily and alcohol is not the problem for youth or kids on the street. Theyre worried about prescription drugs, not alcohol. I dont understand this. All theyre guilty of as a store is being too generous, too good. Thats what happens when you are too nice, you get ran over. Thats all i have to say. I dont want to talk about i can get on the owner of the building and things i see about the building. Its not even fit for kids or anybody to go in there right now. So thats a whole another issue. The only thing that the store is guilty of is being too generous. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Next speaker, please. Hello. Im gary constantine, retired San Francisco p. D. Ive known the Joseph Family since the late 80s. They used to have a store at haight and pierce. And even back then, i dont remember their business being a problem in any way in terms of police issues. And then they moved to 3rd and la salle and i worked out in the bayview Hunters Point area for about 10 years. Same thing. Theyre honest, hardworking, straightup people. If theres going to be a Police Problem out there or problem that police had to take care of, i would know about it. And weve been friends for a long time. And i just know them as straightup people. Whatever theyre going to tell you, if i believe it, im hoping that you guys will believe it. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Im the owner of save more i apologize. Your opportunity to speak was under the project sponsors time. Oh. But the commissioners may have questions for you later. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello, again. I met with you guys before. Since the stores been closed, ive been living in the community all my life, but that corner has been dark since theyve been closed and have to move and im well known in my neighborhood, but i dont even feel safe on my own street going home from work because its so dark right there and so much stuff going on. And then i hear something about health codes or something about it being unhealthy, but the store has been open for 20 years and nothing has been stopped or said until now so i dont understand what is going on about the health and why it was allowed to run for so long if it was unhealthy for so long. Thank you. Thank you. Maam, we cannot take additional testimony. I want to make a statement, if i can. You already spoke, though, right . Yeah. Can i . Unfortunately, that was your time during that period. But you can submit additional information. You should have letters from me. We do. Any additional public testimony . Seeing none, well close Public Comment. I dont think well have good conditions of approval to ensure that it will be a healthy market that will not just be a liquor store selling potato chips. Looking at conditions 11 and 12 for security and interior floorplan. Im satisfied this will be a net addition of the neighborhood and i move to approve. Second. Commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson i was the commissioner standing on a soapbox at the last hearing and thats because the restricted alcohol district was intended to reduce the number of Stores Selling primarily alcohol sales and didnt want to close any doubt preemptively. So the idea was if any closed or needed to move, there would be a hearing to determine if that was a good idea with the idea that overall it, you want to reduce that number. Theres a Clear Strategy for how they would transition to not primarily selling liquor. That was my main concern. It wasnt with the family or proprietors or neighborhood or anyone that showed up to support the store. Presentation of the plans showed that it would primarily be selling liquor. And the update to the format were all verbal promises. That seemed very vague with no specifics and no dates. And i wasnt comfortable with that and i felt that approving the project would be antithesis to the restricted alcohol use district. So i do feel that im glad that the people were able to come together and come to some resolution. It appears theres more specificity in terms of location and how they transition their floorplan to not primarily selling liquor, which was my only concern, not the family, not anything else. So i believe that in the motion, item 12, that showed the agreement itself was not in the written packet. Can the staff repeat that real quick. Certainly, amended motion given to you this evening does have the supplemental, but doesnt reflect the changes that save made per the City Attorneys consultation. Please stand by regulatory processes that apply to cigarettes and will apply to cannabis, so we thought that it would be better to keep that condition simple; that these other regulatory processes would take care of marijuana and cannabis if this was ever an issue. Thank you. All right. Do i have a motion and a second and just to clarify, the motion is reflected further revised. Further revised. Very good, commissioners. Then there is a motion that has been seconded to approve this matter with conditions as reflected in the amended motion and amended by the larnguage read into the motion by staff. [ roll call. ] clerk so moved commissioners. That motion passes unanimously. Thank you, thank you. The commission will take the Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday, december 14, 2017. I will remind members of the public that the commission does not tolerate any outbursts of any kind, so please silence any cell phones during these proceedings. We left off item 17, 793 south vanness street. This is a conditional use authorization. Good afternoon, commissio