Crossings to make sure crossing those bikes manageable. And for people taking transit, more protected lanes and other strategies to make sure the bus moves faster. 2nd street is already under construction with sidewalks and protected bike lanes. The next one is fullsome and howard where improvements run all the way to 11th street. And the other projects will come over the next few years, recognizinging that unlike some of the benefits with the development project, lit take a few years to overall all the streets in the plan area. Is there a reason we dont have a list of priority projects as we did for the open space . I ill defer this question to sfmta. I feel like they internally are trying to work through all the streets. Maybe jamie from parks m. T. A. Could come speak to that. Fullsomehoward i know is the big one. Is it 2nd street to 11th . Jamie parks with sfmta. So with fullsomehoward, the street scape project is currently scoped from 3rd to 11th street. Were also, per your earlier comments, looking at 2nd and 3rd as well. Because the transbay area plan already goes to Second Street on both of those corridors. Yes. And then the earlier question about how we prioritize transportation projects, and we were ensuring that the prioritis are in the plan. In terms of prioritizing our work program, we do that typically through our Capital Improvement program, which is a fiveyear Program Updated every two years. Right now fullsome, howard, 6th and 5th are all are all in there from the central soma plan area. Were in the process of incorporating that area as well. Were constricted by prioritizing all streets at the same time by lack of resources and not wanting to have every single street if soma under construction at the same time as well. Were trying to balance that need with changes as quickly as possible but understanding the construction impacts. Actually, i i would not expect all of the to happen at the same time. Just as i wouldnt expect because the open space section had listed all of their prioritized open space needs that all of that would occur at the same time, either. It would just be nice to get a list similar to the open space list where we got where it listed jean friend and just so the community can get a sense of what sfmta is considering in how it is going to prioritize the funds, which will come in over a continuous period of time. A, not all the money is going toable there at the beginning of the plan, but we also know that we cant construct all of south of america at the same time. It will be helpful for the community to see a list of what sf inger ta is envisioning and would prioritize the 500 million for the plan. And this allows the community to give input to sfmta and how it would like to spend the transportation dollars and within that, there will be Capital Improvements to Public Transit and others. It is not just streetscape improvements and mid block crossings. Sure. Yeah. Definitely. That is something we can work with planning to put together. Great. Thank you very much. Ok. Our next topic is environmental sustainability and resilience. Creating an environmentally sustainable neighborhood is one of the linchpins of central soma plan. They are changing our approach to energy, water, waste, greenery and planning for known and unknown events such as earthquakes and climate change. Fortunately the city is at the cutting edge and developing requirements for energy efficiency, intelligent use of water and diverting waste from landfills. It builds on the requirements, filled in some of gaps and tries to push the envelope to transform this polluted industrial area. To do that, weve identified two Funding Sources, funding from the moolroos community development. It gives us better streets to handle storm water from climate change, 20 million toward greening and air Quality Improvements around the freeway, 10 million for over 20 acres of rooftop green as well as solar and 10 million for more common sense projects such as reusing storm water for street cleaning rather than using Drinking Water as we do today. [please stand by] weve been working with developers to try to help them find childcare as part of their projects. Next topic councillor tang i just had a quick question. Why is it that the funding for the school project, Capital Project will be citywide. If were accepting the density, shouldnt this money be dedicated to our neighborhoods . As not a representative of the School District that accepts the money, its a question that i can converse councillor tang is that something that we as a board can determine . I actually dont know. I saw this when i was reading the report 7 the weekend and i wasnt sure if it was dill delinea delineated or not and we want families to stay here, so my hope is that it can be dedicated in the region as it is with childcare. Childcare dollars will be focused in this neighborhood. The schools fee is charged by the school and goes to the school. We can have the conversation with the School District about their priorities, but councillor tang i wondered if it was required to be citywide. We can have that discussion. It can be dedicated back to the neighborhood with the childcare money. Councillor tang thank you. Yeah. The next topic is culture preservation about the buildings in the neighborhood and the people that fill them up. We have many Historic Building in central soma. We have the old mint, which is one of the most important, endangered buildings in the united states. There is also many important cultural sorry, important people in filipino and lgbtq and organizations that work on their behalf. We identified two Funding Sources, extension of Transferrable Developments rights program. The result is that wed have 20 million to funding rehabilitation of the old mint. Its one aspect, but can help to leverage more funds. We also see that there would be 20 million to the transferrable rights and rehabilitate and maintain them. As far as funding and outcome for fiphilippinfilipino and lgb communities, well discuss that in a minute. And also the final bucket, job training. We have identified 20 million in a new impact fee set to the maximum amount possible and the result will be funding for facilities that serve the growing population in the neighborhood. So lets talk about emerging issues. The 70 million identified and have some up. The first, social programs to support Cultural Heritage and organizations on the ground doing great work in the neighborhood. I mentioned at our october 23 hearing that it may be potent l potentially possible to fund this work through our Community Facilities district. We need to explore the legal and policy ramifications, but the potential to do such things extends the program to the plan is personally very exciting. The second item is the need to increase Operation Maintenance parks and facilities, as well as rec park and others to identify the Funding Sources. The third is a need for neighborhood cleaning services, which identified to us from supervisor kims office. And well talk about prevailing wages. Weve been in conovversation wi organized labor on this and one option comes through the newly signed legislation of the state ab73, which allows cities to create sustainability districts if theyre paid for the construction work. We dont really fully understand that and will continue to work with people to see if its a viable option. That concludes my presentation. I look forward to everyones input and well be happy to answer your questions. Thank you. Councillor tang thank you. I have a few followup questions to the last portion of your presentation. And i know we have tim frye here to discuss historic preservation. But i want to go back to your slide on cultural preservation funding the 20 million through cfd and 20 million of tdr. Could you talk a little bit about what or how that revenue is limited and what it can be spent towards . Sure. Both buckets . Councillor tang yes. Weve identified it to go to the old mint. So the degree that the city is having a macro effort to understand how to fund and rehabilitate that building, heres one opportunity. The normal funding mechanism has been expended. So were looking to have new information in that direction. Councillor tang thats not my question. What is the cfd funds limited to . Its not limited to the old mint. What are the other uses . Oh, sure. Environmental sustainability and parks and complete streets and a lot of things. There is the opportunity, we think, to spin it on social programs as well. For most Historic Buildings, the sale of Transferrable Development rights is the main way to find funding. Were looking to cfd to fund that. If were expanding to social programs, we do believe cfd money can be spent on that, as i mentioned councillor tang when did the old mint sell their tdr. I couldnt tell you the year. Councillor tang was it a long time ago . Mid 2000s. 2009 or so. Councillor tang how much was the sale of that tdr worth . What was the value of that sale . I dont know, but i do know it was a low amount per square foot. I dont know the value. It maybe was 2 million. Councillor tang so they used that revenue to go back into the old mint already. If you are selling your tdr, you do it to plow that revenue back into the preservation of that building. Thats correct. The mint, my understanding, is they used it for fire safety upgrades and new security. They are required councillor tang i love california Historic Society and they will have a heart attack when i say this, 20 million, its a lot of money. And its a lot of money that is going towards a museum versus programming that will help a lot more people and i have a real hard time swallowing that much money being set aside for a museum that a lot of people will not access. I want to figure out how to make it whole, too, but in 2009, that revenue should have been utilized to upgrade the Historic Building. That was the appropriate use of that tdr sale. So i feel uncomfortable using 20 million of cfd funding to environmental sustainability. We have huge concerns about quality of air, which impacts all of our residents. We have huge concerns about if we have enough social programming and funds that can go to community services, and so the seismic uptick i dont feel comfortable with that set aside currently. And i certainly want to hear from other members of the community as well, but im not sure that thats going to have the biggest bang for its buck in terms of how the community will benefit from the building. Thats more of a comment, mr. Frye, less of a question. I guess im just i wasnt here in 2009. Its very unfortunate that the sale of the tdr was so low and didnt actually assist them in the seismic update. I want to make sure that that will happen, but im not sure if we want that through the central soma plan. The 20 million the additional 20 million of tdr that will be sold, how can that be spent . Is that limited to the buildings that are selling their tdrs . Theyre currently not allowed to sell their tdr. As you have noted, theyre required to spend that money on their own rehabilitation. It will be a new Funding Source for the neighborhood. Councillor tang thank you so much. I know that many members of the public are here. And so i did want to move to Public Comment and then i do have many more questions so i do want to appreciate our Department Members to be here to answer additional questions and im sure that questions will come up from members of the community. And i also want to recognize that along with many of our communitybased organizations and Affordable Housing organizations and labor thats in the room and i see members of our filipino districts as well. So, mr. Chair, if we can, i would like to open it up for Public Comment at this time. Lets do it. So well open up item 3 for Public Comment. If you want to line up. First speaker, please. And i know that, mario, you have to get out of here in 18 minutes. Go ahead and do that. Go ahead, maam. Im emma stewart. Ive been a sustainability professional in the bay area and have a ph. D. From stanford in the area and Sustainability Program at auto desk. As we can all attest in the age of trump, action and innovation to protect our quality of life and life support systems of the planet must take place at the city and state level. Indeed, San Francisco has been a model for other cities in california and california has been a model for other states. Both are looked to by others around the world to understand whats next. Its paramount that we commit the funds necessary to turn central soma to a laboratory within a laboratory within a laboratory. San francisco has a plan of setting ambitious targets and meeting them. Few other cities i have worked for can claim that. Its not just about being a role model, but about creating tangible things. The proposed living room would generate 7. 3 million in net present value stemming from 75 years of enhanced recreational, bio diversity and carbon. If thats only one of the 13 sustainability and resiliency objectives, imagine what the plan is worth in its entirety. Many of the objectives are mutual and reinforcing with other goals like investments and creating safer transportation stops. Both our ambition prowess will be on display this september. The eyes of the world are on the sustainability goals set by this committee. Thank you it. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, supervisors. Im mario yadidia, Hotel Workers local 2. Our union has been following the central soma plan for some kind and we have growing concerns about the jobs that will be created. At the moment, there are eight Hotel Projects lined up to take advantage of the soma upzoning, but not one of them has signed on to commitments ensuring that workers will have a right to organize, that these jobs will be good ones. Its being sold as a boon for jobs in San Francisco. Were not short of jobs here. Were short living wage jobs that support working people. Its important that planning get right the mix of uses in central soma. Unless Hotel Developers change course about the jobs proposing, we think it would be a mistake to loosen the tourist restrictions on tourist hotels. Thank you, mario. Next speaker. Hi, supervisors, jane wile, again. I live in central soma. To reiterate a couple of key points. The central soma plan has three strategies accommodate growth, provide Public Benefits and respect and enhance the neighborhood character. Given the desirability of land, there is demand of building heights only seen in downtown, which come with benefits, but at the expense of what makes the neighborhood great. Its character. Central soma should not be like downtown. Go 5 states offer an abundance of park and rec spaces from an area that suffers from a shortage of parks relative to the number of residents. 170 million generated is designated for park and rec space. The tenderloin and 6th street is the densest part with low income families and seniors with practically no open space. Weve been begging for something small like a 1 2acre park and were always told there is no money. I support the 30 million to improve what we do have but wasnt to see something allocated to something in the central because we keep circling this area. The parks proposed at 5th and bryant and 11th are way too far from the people that live there now and need it. We dont want to see 80 going to pope st. Thats the responsibility of the developers. The Developers Need to carry their part. Thank you, ms. Wile. Next speaker, please. Mr. Lance berg. Councillor tang and if we can allow people to finish their sentences. Sure. Thank you. Supervisors, im lance bergmann, representing the San FranciscoElectrical Contractors association. Glad to see this plan moving forward and glad to see you giving it the attention it deserves. Wanted to second the statements made by mario earlier about job quality and as we fast forward that we keep in mind the men and women who are going to be building it as well as staffing it and operating it. And to that point, i wanted to just speak a little bit more to mr. Wartheims discussion of prevailing wages. What i want to make sure that you all here understand is that prevailing wages is not just about wage levels. Its really a package of policies to not only provide construction workers with livable wages and protect them from competition, but its a suite of policies to promote sustainable construction couriers and stabilize the industry. Where it comes in and is valuable, is within the discussions of ab73. It gives us a roadmap for incorporating those standards into plan areas and really allowing us to take a much more active role in creating equitable infill in our communities. Theres a lot of promise in the soma plan. The ballot measure thats been discussed in the media, i think, adds to that. And we look forward to working with our soma partners and everyone else and yourselves and the Planning Department. Thank you. Good afternoon, supervisors. Im carla lavell, west bay Filipino Service center and the we are soma coalition. We work with over 80 youth and families daily in soma. 100 of our youth and families live in soma. The project is in the youth and family zone and i want to make sure that the existing community that lives, works, plays and goes to school in soma is prioritized. The plan brings much opportunity, but unless its planned with community in mind can displace and hinder the community. We need to be sure that we have