The vhhp and one of the projects here is going to be applying for that. Well be relying on the state for that support. Another piece of the pie is local capital. Thats why im here. Our sources include our Housing Trust fund, the 2015 general Obligation Bonds for Affordable Housing. We have inclusionary fees. In 2016 we passed proposition c and theres different sources of funds that all go in the pot and these projects will be eligible for some and well also in addition to capital were often in the position of providing direct rental assistance or federal government assistance. We had the operating support for homeless households and theres projectbased rental systems through Family Housing at hud and cpd and housing for persons with aids. I want to draw a picture for folks about all the things people are going to need to do to successfully implement the housing and the village it will take with our federal partners. And were getting most of our money from impact fees and inclusionary fees expected in an up market when theres a lot of market developments when people are building new office buildings. When its down youd expect that part of the pie to shrink the following year well expect more and then back down again and that reflects well have spend the bond money which is one time and also expecting the market to go down a little bit. I think thats an update. Our federal funding sin is influx and the tax plan passed affects San Francisco. We have had some of the most valuable tax credits in the country. People were giving us 1. 23 for one dollar in noncash forms. These days that same credit is probably worth in the low 90 cents and between before the tax bill we saw a major drop in value after the 2016 election because there was talk in charging parts of the tax bill. Now that its done we know what the value is and its another 3 to 4 the value we estimated when folks were thinking about the worstcase scenario. It means millions of additional dollars to provide the housing and will probably be split between local and state government. There was a brief moment in the negotiating for the bill when there was talk of eliminating taxes and bonds called private activity bonds. That was terrifying for us as we were trying to figure out how to go forward without the tool we expect to use here on Treasure Island and the rest of San Francisco. That made us feel vulnerable. It was an interesting and when they dont know the particular aspect of what we do and what the impact would be. On Affordable Housing in particular it was significant and we spent a lot of the fall trying to figure out how to keep the train moving and build the Affordable Housing we need the home and program has been building and the trend continues in the budget which still hasnt been approved this year. Theres no expectation it will get better. Because huds budget has mandatory expenses things like paying the rent where there are natural increases to the cost of electricity or running an Apartment Building as the budget increases the discretionary portion has to be reduced and their down to a small pot of things they control unless theyll be starting to cut peoples rent. We watched that closely. We advocate and thats the world we live in and weve foreseen interesting things happening in the state. Dont forget to vote in november. One was a document recording fee a portion will be going to homeless housing. But thats a study permanent stream of housing as money for housing and well fight about how it gets spent but its exciting it exists. The bond measure is where we excess our right to vote. Look for that. That has a total value of more than 4 billion. Not all would be applicable to Treasure Island but growing the pie for state funds we could compete for successfully would be phenomenal and were looking forward to. We are au few years out if it passes it will take another six months to put out the call for applicants and another year for the money to go out the door but the projects down the road could expect to be recipients of this state money. We couldnt get it soon enough. Theyre planning to revive older programs as the multiFamily Housing program. Theres a Transit Development program and the Treasure Island projects will qualify and maybe when improvements will be made we should be good for that. And the homeless theres a court action. Those are bond funds. The court has to make a decision how the money has to be spent and theyre expecting a decision in the late spring to put the call for the money out in the summer and the way they legislated is San Francisco may be able to compete to get our own pot of money. It will probably be in the 80 million to 90 million range under the general offices. And general approval and its exciting. Its pretty great. I didnt mention theres a project well be planning for and some changes with our local tax credit and prioritizing housing for the homeless through a special Needs Program they have. Also again, the states done work to consolidate their housing programs through the Tax Credit Community and Bond Committee and lending arm and granting arm. Thats been great to watch. Some challenges. One is cost. It costs a lot to build in San Francisco. Were very proud of the results of our work and it costs real money. In this case we have land so its not a challenge on Treasure Island but generally speaking the things you need to pay for before you build. There was a director to streamline the process of approves for buildings located in major project areas and Treasure Island is one and that has promise for helping the whole island achieve what its trying to achieve and part of and inclusive of streamlining should speed it up and make it smoother. Very excited thats available to Treasure Island. And Construction Costs affects the overall costs. Weve looked to reduce the cost. One is factorybuilt housing its called modular. A couple benefits you get from building in the factory is shorter time frame and that builds money in things like insurance and construction loan interests. It takes less time. Time is money. Its quite quantifiable and related to the building and it allows to work multiple shifts. It allows to have more quality control. You dont have people up ten stories working on boxes that are more safe and weve thought how to incorporate it should we get the consensus from the community that thats the way to go. Theres been interesting developments in the industry with how easy it is to get the modules to a location. Thats one of the things weve been looking at. If theres nothing else you have heard today is mocd is committed to the success and achievement of Affordable House at Treasure Island. Well be investing a lot of money and time in helping everyone achieve that. Its worth saying and showing up and making the commitment to you already in the resolution that was passed to establish the infrastructure and person it person we are tremendously committed to being your Financing Partner to the achieve the affordable units. I wanted to make sure you hear that. Theres a lot of progress behind the scenes. We are kicking off the first one and thats a nice milestone. Theres environmental work going on. The team will be applying for the housing program. You only get one shot a year. You have to be ready. They then decide and everyone scrambles and theyre working hard to be ready. And then on the other theres ongoing discussions what the program will be. Then well make our loan to that team as well. Lastly i want to conclude my presentation with things that have happened in the past couple years what we call dahlia the citys flower its also an acronym. It is our housing portal. Its a onestop shop for someone looking for Affordable Housing can find out what the opportunities are if the house has been sponsored by the city. I put the link in here. If theres anyone in the room who represents organizations. And id encourage folks to send people there. That has everything except for Home Ownership opportunities which is one click away. Its a big achievement for us. Were behind the times with technology but here we are with dahlia. By the time Treasure Island is built it will be old hat. Im hopeful people have questions. Thank you for the report. Much of which we already know but is good to get an overview of the program i was president of a project and what a great way to take leftover freeway ramps to incorporate into Affordable House. Though it took two decades to do. We are so blessed in San Francisco to have great architects who understand Affordable House and made the type of housing we build in San Francisco to be wonderfully designed and fit in the neighborhoods. Were also blessed with providers to help do it well. With Treasure Island the challenges are so great. The tax credits have decreased and theyre not what they were before. We have to put in additional subsidies to make up for the gap. Theres almost no federal funds left its from what we get from hud and other federal programs. The state is a brighter spot and many have been on the bandwagon for Housing Initiatives and were successful last year legislatively to get more dollars to local cities. Even 4 billion which is what well estimate that to be in a state that is as needy as california when you pred it over the state, the amount San Francisco will get is quite small and not enough for what we need. The value in overall housing policy and why we need to concentrate on Treasure Island is because we have the land. Its so difficult to get land because we know how land costs have gone through the roof. Its difficult to find land to make the project feasible and we have the land and commitment to do 2,000 units of Affordable House. It seems to me we can increase housing on the sites we hold and so it teams to me we should target the projects if only we can get the financing resources available. Id like to work with you and if theres not a way ive been asking the nonprofits to do and the city and our staff here to to look at the projects coming up not as individual projects but theres efficiencies if youre going to build 2,000 units of housing. The first three sites, is there not a way to have efficiencies in designs and operations that can being looked at where we pull resources. Perhaps its negotiating in advance the fee paid to general contractors or an insurance policy backed up by the city to be used by the Nonprofit Developers on Treasure Island. Perhaps special subsidy programs for the projects. Theres a list of things that can be looked at. And i would ask your office work with us to think of ways in which we might be able to get those resources and use them more efficiently. For one thing San Francisco, the cost of building an Affordable Housing unit in San Francisco is so much higher than the rest of the bay area. Theres certain ordinances we want to support but we have to look at them and see how much cost it adds to the overall construction and design costs and is there not a way to make them more efficient. Id like the Nonprofit Developers involved id like to come up with a list of efficiencies. Ways in which to fast track the local ordinance need to be looked at which perhaps can be streamlined but basically a list of things we can reduce the Construction Costs so theres less to put in as a subsidy because its already too much. Rest assured were looking at these things. I know youre working in concert with the Nonprofit Developers and our staff to come up with that program. Id like to open it up to other directors. Linda. Commissioner thank you for coming here today. I think its a matter of time because weve been anticipating getting to know you and working with you a long time now. For the record we have people who have developed housing for decades and were active in the community. We advocated for housing to chinatown to San Francisco. Your predecessor, mr. Lee, no relation to mayor lee, was considered one of the foremost housing directors in the state of california and mayor lee was the first mayor out of the gate in the state of california and set up the successful agency and began rolling up his sleeves to stabilize housing and create bond measures and the rest is history. Youre welcome here and we want to establish the relationship. At the end of the day, Treasure Island, well be working with you and fulfilling obligations. Your predecessor worked on many sites. And some projects today are a great testament. When you look at San Francisco budget and were only spending 220 and thanks to mayor lee with the special bond measure its a disgrace about the measures. I foresee the situation will improve and again citing mayor lees legacy he was instrumental because again, San Francisco is leading the state and because of the efforts now we have leaders in San Francisco to push that. One of the things we know the state needs to advocate pore more leadership we only have 2 of the state grant but with all the bills in place now, but its still not enough because well have to be creative locally to see how we can extract and we have the capabilities to work with you to make sure Treasure Island doesnt fall through the crack. And use influence to move it forward. One thing we mentioned and we know is about the cost of housing and also the entitlement. You were correct. San francisco is very hard to build even with the scarcity of land and i think its a foregone conclusion as a member of the community were pushing modular housing. Its no longer where we have concerted efforts thats the trend everyone is looking at. How can we put that on the joint board in San Francisco. The discussion is not only going to be limit to us here but to the community. You need to help us to know modular shougs what modular housing is what is needed and use us to push the discussion. Thats the bottom line. Its Wishful Thinking to think we have the deficit and the limited use of funding and the modular housing shows other places in the world are going to that way. When i look at your pie chart you mention mentioned the impact fees its a substantial amount but whats the projection. What are the challenges that can make that because if that impact fees maybe you can site what you for see and how we can be helpful. I will do my best to answer that question but im not the director of mocd im representing kate hartley our esteemed director. It is with great difficulty we have an accurate predictor of the impact fees because of the way in which the legislation needs and the way the money comes to the city. In general terms we do expect significant fees to come in this fiscal year and next fiscal year and thats because the Planning Department does tracking and look at the projects that have submitted planning applications and have a sense of whos planning and who needs to do environment Environmental Assessment and who will get to the payment of the money. What we see trend wise is were at big numbers now. This year and next year and then then there are assumptions made on what will happen about the economy in general and wed expect theres fewer inclusionary fees. And inclusionary fees were incredibly lucky to have the best inclusionary laws in the country in San Francisco. One of the challenges of the rules are about the timing of the money and how to predict when its coming in. Yes. At some point, kay needs to come here to to be on the same page. Lastly i have a question for how were managing. I know we have all kinds of documents but i think it will in instrumental if we can have an excel sheet format. It would be great in march to know how many of the households weve have oneonone with and on one spread sheet. That could be posted at the end of the day on were website and the supported documents would be there for people to review. Its such a significant aspect of the development and given the known issues we have to deal with so its important to look at that and translate to that point. I know you collected on the house of tida. Thank you again for your presence here today and ask your director wed like the discussion and were passionate about the modular housing and any assistance to find creative ways for Treasure Island. I will do that, thank you. Thank you, linda. Sharon. Thank you for the presentation. I found it helpful to get the recent history on how tax reform has impacted the funding. Im not familiar. I have a question on how the pads work. Would the individual Affordable Housing developers be responsible for bond financing or can mocd