Legislation what are the mandates of the legislation on the horizon . Its to collect information on all stops made by officers and import the information to the department of justice. The bill requires that each state and local agency, Police Officers to report to the attorney general data on all stops as defined and conducted by the Police Officers and include that information including time, date, location and reason for the stop. The bill further requires the employees 1,000 or more Police Officers to issue its first report by april, 2019. Why does that bring me to this point . In april, 2018, the state department of justice will roll out training on how to collect this data and submit it to the state for the top eight agencies. Were talking about top agencies that we call wave one, Los Angeles Police department, Los Angeles County sheriffs, california highway patrol, San FranciscoPolice Officer were number five in the state. Riverside sheriffs office, san bernardino, and San Diego Police department. We just met with the state. In the ensuing time from the time we first met with them and to show them our models, we met and they showed us the Data Template that they will roll out. We knew there would be a lot of data collected. In San Francisco under 96a, we would collect 18 different attributes or information field. The state took ours, took los angeless, married them together, and there will be 41 fields of data points collected. Within the data points, theres subsequent opening up blocks of information about multiple identities in terms of nationalities and gender. If theres a perception that somebody wants to identify with multiple ethnicities or genders, thats captured in that way. So there are some challenges ahead of us in terms of what that looks like. When talking about the state system, theres a learning curve. The system we developed in San Francisco is not the same. Well have to learn that system. They have a computerbased, webbased application. We need to build it out. So there will be some bumpy roads in the coming months, not just for San Francisco, but for the top eight. And then as the progressive years roll out, smaller agencies will add on to this. Were like the information guinea pigs, if you will, the system, the collection, and then they will correct it. There will be corrective measures. One of the key components is, we have a quarterly reporting. And that data is ours. Under the 953 bill, the data belongs to the state. We set it up and they generate an annual report. They do a comparative analysis and thats supposed to be issued in july, 2019. With that, i will entertain questions. I just want to say that its very exciting to hear that the department is close to getting a contract with an institution that can take this data and show specifically what it means and we know without that, there can be no understanding of what the department is doing and certainly no reform. Can you give us a sense, is it months or i would say its a matter of months. Interestingly enough, the ripa board issued their first report january 1. Its online. One of the Board Members is dr. Jennifer everhart. We had been in extensiove conversations. Shes a rock star in her field. Trying to get her researchers, its been a long discussion, but she did help us to formulate the parameters of moving forward. I think in the short term, it will be coming very soon. And its an exciting time in terms of Data Collection and looking at a comparative picture between the top eight because its not defined by location. Its all over the state. I think it will be an interesting conversation proving forward. I applaud this commission. I think it requires a much more robust discussion in terms of how our collaborative partners are collecting data. The terminology equities, brilliant. I think we can develop a brilliant metric. I think i speak for my colleagues and the agency and saying that were very looking forward to be able to contribute to this work of reform that is so necessary for the community and the department and i know you have been doing a lot of work and the Police Commission has been doing an immense amount of work over the last year and a half, two years, and i think its now an opportunity for the Human Rights Commission to step in and become a partner with that. Absolutely. Thank you. I want to thank you for your leadership and support in this effort. Now that were no longer participating in the joint Terrorism Task force, what are some of the protocols or procedures when federal agencies and particularly the f. B. I. Asks for data . What data can the city give or not give which task force . Joint Terrorism Task force. Were not in contact with them. Now that were not, when theres a federal agency or f. B. I. Trying to get ahead of an immigrant or someone in the tenderloin, what is the process or protocol that the Police Department is undertaking . Were not in contact with them about those matters at all. If theres a criminal matter that the f. B. I. Is investigating, f. B. I. Its not their jurisdiction, but we continue to work with the f. B. I. On criminal cases. Okay. In terms of our relationship with immigration, there is none. Thank you. I want to thank you very much for the exciting description you have given us about whats coming down the pipeline. I just was kind of trying to wrap my head around when the data is collected. Is this daytoday policing. Is it happening at the station where someone is interviewing and reporting a crime . I wanted to see when at what point this data was coming in. Sure. Program that tracks traffic stops is done at the time that the officer makes contact with the individual or individuals. In the event that the officer has to leave, they have the ability to go back and modify or complete that record. Thats under 96a. As we look on the horizon for 953, because its a webbased application and we wont have the same protocols as the state, well be forced to either do data entry in our cars, of which only a portion of the cars have modems, or we have to go back to the station to do the 41field response. Well be working with the state as best we can to identify either fixing our application or getting them to roll out that application in the state. Those questions came up in sacramento. Is information is there a delay in the information from squad car versus back at the station . Is there a loss of information that takes place . Thats a legitimate question. If the data is captured, whether its pen and paper, we still carry pen and paper. If its in a notebook, it can be entered in. This generation of Police Officers are much, much more adept to texting and talking, so its not as cumbersome as you would think. Familiarity comes from reputation, right . So as we adjust to new templates, what it looks like and the language, it will be different because the state language in terms of demographics is completely different from our current mechanism. Thank you so much for that clarification. I was trying to picture it in the daytoday job of policing and how dynamic it is. Its interesting. Cable tv. Can you give us a snapshot of where the department is on cit training . Is everyone getting trained now and who is not getting trained . Yes, absolutely. Its continuing to evolve and roll out. As of a month ago, we had 819 officers currently trained. The goal is to have everybody trained. Cant take everyone off the streets and put them in the classroom. The timeline is by end of 2018 to have everybody trained, if not sooner. Can you give us a quick explanation of what you are doing regarding bias training, implicit as well as explicit bias that were dealing with . Sure. When we started to have discussions about biases and policing and our contact with communities of color, we started to work with the state, state department of justice, federal department of justice, and started to identify criteria for what that training looks like. There was a number of courses out there, whether it was implicit virus or procedural justice. We married those two courses together. We took the best parts of each and created a robust training program. We still have members continuing to go through. Our first effort was to put all of management there, because we wanted to ensure that management understood what their officers are expected to do and hold them to that. That continues to evolve. Thank you. Any other questions or comments from the commission . Thank you so much. Now its my pleasure to ask neva walker, director of coleman advocates, to come to the podium. Good evening. Good evening, director. Thank you. Madam chair, commissioners, and director davis, we thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight in your interest on Data Collection. Coleman continues to be invested in equity along with Data Analysis and especially impact of systematic change on individuals in the community. Im going to have kevin bogus, our political director speak, but before i do that, one quick thing. One of the early things that my mother taught me in elementary school, was the importance of understanding data. She told me, those that own the variables, control the story. So oftentimes, communities looking for data from departments, governments, and we get a story that sfusd or others are putting out for us. We need ourselves or independent bodies, to be able to read the variables ourselves. Get the raw data ourselves. And its only because we want to also share in the story and understanding exactly what is occurring to make sure that were getting closer to fixing the systems that are broken, that are challenging our families. And oftentimes, that becomes a hindrance. Kevin . Thank you, commissioners. And so i think for coleman and our work with families, data is a key, fundamental part of it and making sure that that data is something that is understood by people and used to change the outcomes that we see within the Public School system. Theres a lot of negative outcomes for students historically, so we want to be sure that whatever is happening is working to help solve the problems. I kind of broke my talking points into three key points around availability of data, accuracy of data, and being folks being able to ingest it. A lot of the data that we requested is not available because its not broken down in ways that are meaningful and helpful to identify the communities that are most negatively impacted. A lot of times that means that we cannot actually get answers to some of the most pertinent questions. There was a situation that we were in a meeting and wanted to know the population of special education students that were of africanamerican ethnicity or race. And we were not able to get that information, even though we know its one of the larger groups and most impacted in that. Weve had a lot of issues around accuracy. Weve requested data countless times before they had a good, computerized system and gave us 800 documents to sort and sift through to discuss whether its disproportionate suspensions towards africanamericans, and there was. We till have struggles knowing if its accurate and how do we balance that and have a culture of trust and how were bringing in the input of families and people being served by the system to see if theyre experiences really matches whats reported in the data. I know the School System talked about the School Climate survey they have. One of the disadvantages is that the students most negatively impacted are least likely to take that survey and most engaged and frustrated with the district are not the ones filling out the survey. Lastly, accessibility. For us to get access to fundamental data and understand what is going on with students, we have to do a Public Information request to request that data. When we did it last year, it took us over three months to get that data from the district six months to get that data from the district and we had to pay over 600 for that data. So thats not readily accessible for families. A lot of stuff we want to know is the intersection between the Different Services and departments that serve families and a lot of data is not shared together collectively. So the School District doesnt know it. The department of Public Health doesnt know whats happening. So were not able to get Accurate Information about the number of students arrested because that doesnt live in the School District. Its with the Police Department. For us, we feel that families need this Cross Section of information and matching peoples experiences and theres not a bunch of barriers for folks to get the information. Whatever we can do to push for equity and metrics around that and standards to hold city departments, the School District, and all the actors in the city. Were really concerned about Charter Schools and the lack of sharing. They have a very foundational role as an educational institution, but they dont even meet the requirements that are enough for the School District to point out. So to figure out how it takes to go beyond city departments and everything that affects the lives of the families in the city of San Francisco. Thank you. So it seems like if we had Something LikeRamsey County has, open access to data required to be collected, that would be of great use. And having that collected across different fields and areas and comparable to make a useful analysis to deal with the inequity and institutional racism that we have here in San Francisco. And the other thing that i would add, who is holding the folks accountable and where is the oversight . We work more closely with sfusd, but you can say this about any of the departments there is limitations to what is shared. For us, we have a resolution around suspensions along with a police mou that is clear about how police should be conducting themselves as well as suspensions for our students. Even though they know what data should be collected and reported out every year, its a catandmouse chase, and thats why we end up having to use a public request document because were not getting the bare minimum oftentimes in a timely fashion. You just shared with us tonight some of the things that would be helpful for the community and dealing with the issues that our children face. And so, of course, you know that we always want to know if you have specific suggestions about things that you share them constantly and make sure that were hearing what youre saying. Thank you. Commissioner ellington has a question. Real quick. Hows it going . Commissioner. Havent seen you in a while. I would just and i know well go through a series of these meetings and talk more deeply about data, but i would like to invite coleman back to give a full presentation on some of the innovative measures you are using and what you are doing with the data and specifically speaking about the data thats not available. Its a shame that it takes three months to get six, thats right, data and then you have to pay 600 for it on top of that. A lot of this stuff, im sure, through casual stories and the work that you do, you know whats going on. How do you take the data and prioritize it into what you then advocate for . I think for us in a lot of ways, its matching the story that we see in the data and trying to uncover what isnt there and matching it from the stories from our members, parents, students in the school that are having reallife experiences that are not always captured in the data. For us, a big part of it is, were doing surveys and focus groups at school sites and trying to gather as much of that information. Another part for us thats foundational is, how are we educating as a School Community about what data exists and what it means and what it doesnt mean. So we can have a real serious conversation about what needs to happen at the school from an informed position. Sfusds graduation is close to 90 , high 80s. If you look at really particular populations like latino and africanamericans, its closer to 60 to 70 , which tells a different story about whats going on. And we understand why the School District would want to lift their successes, but for us, we need to shine a light on what is not successful, so we can address them and not from a standpoint of, we have experts that well bring in to fix our problems how will we embed the community in crafting the solutions and using a feedback process to make sure that were moving forward and solving things versus spinning our wheels. Thank you so much. Thanks. This so weve reached the conclusion of our scheduled speakers, but we do have several people from City Government here in San Francisco and oakland that i want to bring up for Public Comment first, so we get them on the record. Id like to invite deana rocha, advisor to the mayor. We didnt get you on the agenda, but im so glad that you are here. Thank you, commissioners. I just want to say, thank you, its an honor to stand before you. Many of you do so much amazing work and thank you for leading the charge about trying to create better Data Collection in our city. I want to quickly give you a context. Mayor ed lee had a direction and vision. And i want to emphasize that our criminal justice forum, which is our Public Safety departments, chief and d