Transcripts For SFGTV Government Access Programming 20180204

I want to thank our friends at sfgov and linda wong is our clerk assisting with todays meeting. Madam clerk, any announcements . Please silence cell phones and complete speaker cards and documents to be submitted to the clerk. Items will be on the february 13th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Supervisor tang cone k you call item one . Calling item one. They will not have a contract done until june. This is a stop gap measure until the new bid and contract are in place. I believe we have mr. Vladimir ridicove. Good morning. This is the contract manager for Human Services agency. We respectfully request authorization to modify the contract with allied universal security for additional money and 1,983 for a total contract not to succeed 26,062,288 and extend the term. It provides unarmed security at 26 sites for Human Service agency and supportive and Homeless Housing department. Including the main building, Program Sites and shelters. The reason for the extension is hsa and hsh have been working with office of contract of administration to services. Due to the protocol of the procurement processes, they have a number of changes, splitting the two into two for each individual department. We need to extend it. I or john can answer the questions you have. Thank you. Thank you. Lets go to the budget legislative analyst for a report. Good morning. Yes, as the department said, theyre extending the contract for five months to complete an rfp process for a new vender. The budget is 3. 2 million which includes five months of Additional Security Services through june and two month contingency in case a new vender was not able to start on july 1st. We looked at the numbers and consider them to be reasonable. We have a technical amendment to the resolution which states that the increase is 3. 5 million and it should be 3. 2 million. We recommend amending the resolution to give the correct information and otherwise recommend approval. Supervisor cohen colleagues, comments or questions . Were going to open up for Public Comment. Ladies and gentlemen, Public Comment is open and youll have two minutes, youll hear a soft chime indicating 30 seconds remaining on the two minute time a lotment. If anyone wants to speak, please do so. Seeing no member of the public, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues, what would you like to do with the item . Supervisor stephanie . Make a motion [indiscernible] make a motion the budget legislative analyst to change the contract numbers from 3. 5 to 3. 2. Supervisor cohen okay. I would like to make a motion can you hear . Louder. Making a motion pursuant to the budget and legislative Analyst Report to change the numbers from 3. 5 to 3. 2. Second it. Supervisor cohen i take that without objection. Motion passes with a positive recommendation to the full board as amended. Item two. Resolution authorizing and approving the licence of a portion of the agreement equipment room at San Francisco General Hospital and at T Mobility National accounts at the Monthly Base Rent of 5,000 that shall be waived and providing enhanced Services Within building 25. Supervisor cohen this allows at t to install a cable at zuckerberg hospital. The floor is yours. Good morning. Here before you on this exciting item of a rack. But this is very important for zuckerberg General Hospital. We have had three items before this committee and the board in 2017 around the distributed antenna system, think of it as the hub of which providers can wheel their services to patrons and staff of the hospital. This fourth item on the list is with at t to allow them to provide enhanced Cellular Service within the new hospital. This is a licence agreement, a five year term. It has a base rent of 5,000 a month with an annual 3 inflater. However, as we have done with the other three agreements, two for messaging services and one for Cellular Services and would do for another perspective in negotiations with verizon, they would only provide service to the building and most importantly provide the service to our staff. We believe that is of tremendous value for the operations of the hospital. If that is not those conditions are not met, then the rate kicks in and they owe the amount of money pursuant to the licence agreement. The five Year Agreement has an annual renewal thereafter that can be terminated five years after the party. This is a licence that could continue for some time and that is our hope. The citys only obligation here is two fold, one, modest utility costs and pay the electricity, theres no way to submeter the electricity, about 3,000 a year. If we do early termination before the end of the five year term, theres a modest payment for some of the capital they have invested on the order of approximately 3,000 for dismantling the equipment. Thats all i have on this side of the item. Supervisor cohen thank you. Appreciate the presentation. Well go to the budget legislative analyst for their thoughts. This is the fourth sale licence that would be approved for San Francisco General Hospital, it was not competitively bid because more than one company can locate in the space. The rent of 5,000 per month and 60,000 a year is standard licence rent but will be waived during the time that at t is providing direct services to San Francisco general staff and patients and visitors. There are many costs associated but otherwise we recommend approval. Supervisor cohen thank you. Any questions or concerns colleagues . No . Well go to Public Comment at this time. Ladies and gentlemen Public Comment is open for item two. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues, is there a motion . Supervisor fewer. I make a motion to move it to the full board without changes. Supervisor cohen next item. For the purpose of executing purchase or sale or Lease Agreements to provide Homeless Services on caltran property for the people experiencing homelessness. Supervisor cohen okay, this is item three, the sponsors are mayor and sheehy. I dont know which mayor but nonetheless, the mayor. Im not sure where it originated. John updike is here. This is a simple resolution for the use of two caltran properties for the use of centers. Thank you. Thank you chair cohen, were keying up a brief presentation and we want to tell you whats going to be on the two properties. Ill begin while were loading. As you mentioned, a key property here involved are one at 5th and bryant, on ramp facility. And another facility at what we Call Division circle or van ness. This facilitates our execution of an expected Lease Agreement with caltran for each of the sites, individual Lease Agreements. While we anticipate the Lease Agreement terms to be within my current administrative Code Authority, theres a potential of some departures from that authority, such as the initial time frame. I have authority to sign a lease up to one year but not greater than one year. It would have to have renewals. Caltrans may require an additional term slightly longer than that. It would allow us to move further without further board authority. Under the current state legislation ab857 that enables caltrans to lease it to Homeless Services for 1 a month. I appreciate 12 a year in fiscal authority. Well take advantage of that under my Code Authority and i think emily wants to provide a little context in what is anticipated at the two locations. This is your first look at what were proposing to build. Supervisor cohen great. Thank you. Just to give you a Little Information about what were proposing to do on each of the caltrans sites, as you know, homelessness is an issue on many of the properties in our city for some time and i think this will allow us to address some of the pressing challenges. We have two proposed projects, fifth and circle and fifth and bryant. Both sites would focus on people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in the community. These are just some early images from public works about what would be built, the fifth and bryant site would be modular trailers on the site for the Navigation Center and similar to ones were using at the central water site. On Division Circle, this site would use temporary structure and would have facility for about 125 people. Again, with all the services and programs involved in the Navigation Centers we have used so far. Happy to answer more detailed questions you might have. Supervisor cohen i dont have necessarily a question but i just want the record to reflect that part of Construction Development costs will be totally 7. 9 million and that money is coming from the money that we were able to secure on the state level, correct . That will be used for Division Circle and 125 base shore. We have other funds for fifth and bryant. Supervisor cohen i see. Well go to the budget legislative analyst for thoughts. Yes, this legislation actually authorizes the director of real estate to negotiate with caltran oversights that can be used for purposes. Now, they have identified two specific sites here for purposes of the report. But my understanding is that somewhat Broader Authority in terms of being able to negotiate for other sites. We do talk about the costs of developing the Navigation Centers on this site on page 11 of our report. We identify 7. 9 million, you talked about the Funding Sources for that. There are operating costs combined for the two would be i believe on the front page, over 7 million a year. Our understanding in talking with the department that some of the monies are available in the current year budget but there would need to be funds made available in the 18 19 budget to complete this. These are self renewing leases. They could be for a number of years. Its not determined in terms of the actual lengths of leases at this time. We do recommend approving this resolution. Supervisor cohen were going to go to Public Comment seeing no colleagues with questions. Public comment is open on item three. Good afternoon supervisors. I did put in a comment card or a speaker card. Speaking as a voter and i just want to thank you for taking this up. Its a nobrainer. I just wanted to mention that it might be a good idea to help people by allowing them to design their own systems when possible and this might be an opportunity to allow people to design their own systems. Im going to send more details, comments later, i just wanted this to go on the record that its a good idea to empower people when possible and since this is opening up a new possibility, you might want to consider asking people how they want to live. Thank you. Supervisor cohen Public Comment is closed. A motion . Move with a positive recommendation to the full board. Can you send the item to the full board as Committee Report . Supervisor cohen not only with a positive recommendation but also a report. Item four please. Resolution for modification supervisor cohen sorry, items four and five together. Resolution approving modification two of the lease between American Airlines and the city for the recapture of certain land at plot 40 of the superbay hangar for parking at the San Francisco airport annual recent of 4. 6 million to be effective on the first day following board approval. And item five modification two of the lease between United Airline and certain land of plot 40 at superbay hangar for the parking at the San Francisco International Airport and adjust annual rent to commence on the first day of the month following board approvals. Supervisor cohen we have two resolutions for lease modifications for the hangar space used by american and United Airlines. The Square Footage is being leased and will be diminished to make space for Construction Contractors so they can park while working on airport improvements and saving the rental space every where else. We have Kathy Widener with us to share her thoughts. Thank you Kathy Widener with the San Francisco International Airport. Chair cohen summarized what is essentially a swath of space in modifying two existing leases with american and United Airlines for the airport to recapture some space for staging and contractor employee parking at plot 40 of the superbay hangar at the airport. Under the proposed modifications, American Airlines will give 1. 19 acres of land and united with 1. 48 acres of land in exchange for 1. 2 acres, a portion of which was part of the original american lease. This is all being done to support construction activities at the airport. We will make use of the recaptured space for parking opportunities for Construction Contractor employees, otherwise the airport would have to pay for off parking for those contractor employees. The modifications will reduce the rent paid by american and united, but we believe the cost savings associated with using the recaptured space for construction parking is estimated at about a Million Dollars a year over the next four years. That would exceed anything we would lose in the rental costs. The Budget Analyst Office has recommended approval but im happy to answer questions you might have. Supervisor cohen i see no questions right now. Well go to the budget analyst. Yes, in sort of following up on what was said, the actual revenue loss to the airport for reducing the leases with united and american is about 386,000 over the remaining terms of the leases. Our understanding based on information provided by the airport, the loss in revenue is off set by savings in terms of Construction Contracting of about a Million Dollars a year and we recommend approval. Supervisor cohen that savings is a little over a Million Dollars, is that correct . Yes. Supervisor cohen i have a question miss widener, this is a temporary loss, correct . Until construction is completed and then back to the same lease . I dont believe theres a contemplation that we would go back and the airlines would take back the space, although for the next four years, things may change, but my understanding is this is space that the airport desired and the airlines dont particularly use, so i dont believe theres any plan to go back. Well definitely use the space for something else. We would be able to make it available to other airlines or other tenants at the airport who wanted parking for employees. There would be rental there would be revenue coming back at the end of the lease. Supervisor cohen thats good to hear. Thats where my concern is. We change the lease to make reasonable accommodations so people can park to continue with the expansion, no problem. Once our construction work is done, my question is, im not looking to continue to have operate with a loss of revenue. So youre saying there will be future opportunities to recover that. We are very land constraint at the airport and we leverage any opportunity for Available Space. It wont at the end of the term, if the airlines dont want it back as part of a lease modification, we could use it for parking for other tenants. Supervisor cohen for the record, how long is the lease . You mean the supervisor cohen the modification. I believe you, the board of supervisors approved the original leases for united and american at the superbay. I believe it was a 10year term and it was about i want to say five years ago. So its very possible at the end of the four years we will be coming back to you with new leases at the superbay anyway at which point we could make better use of the space once the construction is over. Supervisor cohen when do you anticipate construction to be over . Its four years is how long the Construction Company will use this Available Space for staging and employee parking. Supervisor cohen has construction begun . Not yet. We definitely have construction at the airport but whats contemplated here before you has not started. Supervisor cohen when do you anticipate that starting . Soon. My understanding is that as soon as this is approved, its the first of the following month that everything will begin. Supervisor cohen thats my understanding, too. Thank you. Were going to