To me. As a former beacon student, i had many, many different Staff Members continue to invest their time in me, treat me like a little brother and even like a cousin. However they wanted to do me, but though, sometimes i was being rude, sometimes i was an obnoxious student, they still loved on me. And i decided that, ok, i have to go ahead and give back. I never thought i would be in this position im in now, but im honored to give them what was given to me. To hear were going to be receiving 377 million over the next five years, to invest in our children, the youth and their families . It literally touches my heart. Because now i know for a fact that San Francisco is definitely invested in our young people. And want to see them grow. Its a beautiful into beautiful young adult. So again, i would love to give honor to everyone else in the rightful places and i thank you guys. Me, myself, having two children, a son and daughter, i know that their futures are going to be very successful if they have a place like San Francisco that cares for their children and families. Thank you, guys. [applause] thank you dante. I want to acknowledge that our public defender just arrived. Thank you. So that concludes our very exciting announcement. For our Nonprofit Agency ins agencies in the crowd and some behind me, well be releasing the reward announcement later, 1 00 today. So check your emails. And youll be pleasantly surprised. Thank you so much. Going morning. Today is wednesday, february 14th, 2018. This is a special meeting of the building inspection commission. I would like to remind everyone to please turnoff all electronic devices. The first item on the agenda is roll call. roll call . Commissioner clinch is excused and we have a quorum. The next item is item two, discussion and possible action on the proposed budgeted of the department of Building Inspections for fiscal years 20182019 and 20192020. Before item two. I did receive a phone call from nicole kidman, presenting item three and cannot make it due to illness. I respect that we continue that. Nicole wheaten. Nicole elliott. Thank you. Forgive me. I am going to catch a lot of heat for that. Nicole kidman will be at the next meeting. I will catch heat for that. Number three is so a discussion of possible action. We are going to move that to the next Commission Meeting if there is no objection from anybody. I hope she feels better. That is nicole, not kidman. Would staff like to come up regarding the budget . Good morning. I am dan kushner from the finance services division. Deputy madison is out of the office this morning. I will give the second budget presentation. This should be fairly short since there are minimum updates presented at the last meeting. I will get to the actual numbers. No updates to the proposed 1819 and 1920 revenues. They all stay the same. There are some minor adjust mets to the 1819 and 1920 expenditures in professional services and services by other departments. Those are minor updates. We are waiting to hear back from the state attorney to see if we need to make adjustments to the budget for legal services. That adjustment would be online item called services by the department. Any questions . Commissioner walker, please. What specifically does that reflect . Does that recalculate the agreements between other departments . Right, right. Shoveling money around. The net was like a negative 50,000. Then once we approve here it goes to the Mayors Office and they make make adjustments. Do we hear it again after that or will you let us know if there are adjustments made not the next meetings but the meeting after the process goes through . I think so. I think the Deputy Director madison would correct that. As a reminder as the budget moves towards final adoption there could be additional changes by the Mayors Office or the board of supervisors. It would be great to be notified of that. Sometimes we are and sometimes we arent. That would be great. Thank you very much. That is pretty much it. No other questions, then we need to take a vote. We need a motion. I make a motion we approve the fy1819 and 1920 budget for the department of the building inspection as presented. Second. Any Public Comment on the budget . Okay. Seeing none, i will do the roll call vote. President mccarthy. Yes. Vice president walker. Yes. Commissioner gilman. Yes. Commissioner constance. Yes. Commissioner lee. Yes. Commissioner war shall. Yes. That carries and the budget is approved. Item three is continued to the next meeting. The next item is item four add adjournment. Motion to adjourn. Second. All in favor. We are now adjourned at 9 21 a. M. Thank you for everyone coming out. Supervisor peskin good morning. Welcome to the Transportation Authority meeting for tuesday 13th 2018. Alberto, could you call the roll please. roll call supervisor peskin could you please call the next item . Item two, an information item citizens advisory report. Good morning chair peskin and vice chair tang and members of the Transportation Authority. I will be presenting the report today. Starting with item five on the agenda, approval for allocation of appropriation of propk funds, but there were concerns about the lack of lighting on bayshore, cesar chavez, potreto and if the project budget could be increased. There was discussion about the muni tracks that fit the market being in Poor Condition and the bart grades presenting a hazard as well that inquires course coordination with bart to remedy. With regard to item 6, the approval of the expenditure for clean air program, in particular appreciate the c02 reduction even though its not criteria for the chief sca. A major item of discussion related to an item that may be coming before you at your upcoming february 27th meeting, the quint gerald connection road. There was concern over the lack of communication of the Pacific Railway right of way land to be the proposed road in the bayview. It was observed that the buyer of the property, trans metro, providing Shuttle Bus Services is not acting as a good civic partner but perhaps taking advantage of opportunity and bad faith on the part of the railroad to secure land designated by the project and is in position to receive a better situated parcel in exchange. A realern and was raised by other lands identified. Potentially benefitting in the same way at the publics expense. A feeling was expressed that if it werent in the bayview neighborhood, this purchase would have gotten more attention and action and now the berm blocking the street will result in a final price tag to reconnect quint street which will be more than the long bridge for the train station not originally pursued because of the higher cost but that kept the street intact. Aut as a possible solution, the board of supervisors with imminent domain. A thorough fair connecting the community. The cac requested regular updates on the issue. Lastly, a report was heard about Transportation Network companies in california and nationwide. The cac echoed chief peskins concern that cal puc is not sharing information on fees and observed that the cpuc fees imposed were too low and if necessary to pursue legislation to allow local entities to levy fees as the communities most directed impacted by the vehicles. That concludes my report. Thank you. Supervisor peskin thank you mr. Larson and congratulations on becoming the chair of the cac. Any Public Comment on item 2 . Good morning commissioners. Im the district 10 representative on the cac. I would like to thank mr. Larson for his extensive rundown of the bridge comments that were made at our meeting. I look forward to two weeks from now at the Board Meeting and i would like to thank my constituents in district 10 and everybody on the board of cac for the last four years as chair. I dont step down lightly. I recently got a new job that requires i travel a lot, so took the took myself off of the election last month. And im extremely happy to see chair larson taking over. His the way he described the quint street bridge problem was far less emotional than the way i did at our cac meeting. The bridge replacement was the reason i applied for that position. It is it was a vital connecter from the bayview to other parts of the city and without it, and in the future without the phelp street, gerald, evans, plus all the new people moving in to the neighborhood, removing access for people in our Community Just irks me to no end and im restraining myself. So, again, i look forward to two weeks from now, and hearing what the ta staff bring to you. I hope that you bring some tough questions for them as to why its going to be double the cost of what it could have been with or not. We may not see it at all and lose access. I hope to learn a lot that day. Thank you. Supervisor peskin thank you for your four years of services as chair of the cac. Chair peskin and vice chair tang, members of the authority, im a member of the cac and i wanted to echo the comments you have heard and having served on the cac for a long time, i dont remember too many issues that had so much discussion and concern. So i hope that you take these comments seriously. Thank you. Supervisor peskin thank you peter. Any other members of the public for item 2, please come forward. Im a resident of bayview hunters point. I wasnt here for this but hearing chris over here, its something not just he has been concerned about for years. When the caltran project first came up, one of the consistent issues we hear over and over again in the neighborhood is that the bayview is isolated from the rest of the city through the citys own infrastructure decisions. Here we go with members of the public pushing hard to make sure this necessary Infrastructure Improvement didnt further seal our neighborhood off. We were made promises, a lot of happy talk would be the best way of putting it. When rubber hits the road, we end up with this sort of, what can we do. Its going to cost a lot more. This is a recuring pattern and something as Decision Makers and the people who run the agency and run so much of the city, you need to make sure the staff cant get away with this. Thank you very much. Supervisor peskin we are focused on it and have been having a number of conversations and youll see some progress here in the not too distant future. Seeing no other Public Comment on item 2, Public Comment is closed. Can you read the next item . Clerk approve the minutes of the january 23rd meeting. Supervisor peskin is there a motion to approve the minutes. Made by commissioner ronen and seconded by commissioner sheehy. We take it without objection. Roll call, okay, fine. On the agenda roll call, please. roll call supervisor peskin next item please. Clerk appoint one member to the citizens Advisory Committee. This is an action item. The Transportation Authority has an 11member Advisory Committee with each member serving a two year term. Transportation authority nor the cac make recommendations on appointments. To qualify, the applicants must be San Francisco residents and appear before the board at least once, the list of 46 applicants for the vacant position and details are in the enclosure. The vacancy is the result of the term explanation of peter tannen, seeking reappointment and is here today if you want to hear from him. Supervisor peskin mr. Tannen and then if there are other applicants, please come forward. Im peter tannen, i serve on the cac. I worked for mta parking and traffic for 20 years and someone who is always on my bicycle and muni and support complete streets and i think with my experience i have a lot of experience serving on the cac and understanding the current issues. If you have questions im happy to answer them. Supervisor peskin thank you. Any other applicants for the seat . Seeing none, well general Public Comment on the item . Seeing none, closing Public Comment. Is there a motion . Commissioner sheehy. Supervisor sheehy i move to reappoint mr. Tannen. Supervisor peskin and seconded by commissioner ronen, you are back on the cac, congratulations and thank you for your many years of service to the city and cac. Next item please. Clerk allocation of 5,806,422 in prop k and an action item. Supervisor peskin and if you want to address the issues with the lighting on the hair ball and fifth and market tracks. The project manager from public works will come up after my presentation if its all right. So the first request would help initiate replacement of 30 foot buses to issue a request for proposals, evaluate bids and negotiate a contract with the manufacturers, the oldest hybrid buses in the fleet and replacing will help with costs. The full cost of procuring them is 43 million. The funding plan is under development by sfmt a to be completed in april this year. They have about 19. 5 million in bridge toll funds identify and expects to fund the remaining with additional arm to propk of possibly Senate Bill One funds or sfmta funds. The buses are expected to be in Service Starting june 2020. The track replacement, federal funds to rehab at 15 locations and replace track at five locations as part of ongoing muni rail state of good repair program. Construction work on the earlier locations can start and later locations are being designed. The rehab work would be done by sfmta. There will be no Service Impacts for the rehab work, the track crews can perform the work between trains but there will be detours for vehicular traffic. And they will need to provide bus bridges during construction and car traffic detours required. It will be done under contract. Next is the alemany interchange phase 2. You may remember seeing a presentation in spring of 2017. This request is for district nine Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program for recommendations from the study, including a shared use path for bicycles and pedestrians that connects the Farmers Market. It would feature crossings and sidewalk improvements and fully fund the design phase of the work. The construction phase is currently unfunded however, moving forward with design will make the project a stronger candidate for funding such as the state active transportation program. If Construction Funds are identified, it could be open for use in spring 2020. Phase 1 that was funded separately has a buffered bike lane and other improvements and expected to go into construction later this spring. Next we worked with commissioner tangs office to bring improvements to the lower great highway as soon as possible. Planning to evaluate day lighting at intersections and informal trails, painting safety zones with illegal parking is an issue and other safety improvements to have the proposed improvements ready to present in april. After the meeting and based on the feedback, sfmta would work on medians, speed humps and angled traffic that could calm traffic and presented to the public and be implemented by spring 2019. Next, the hairball improvements, this request is for district nine and 10 and Capital Funds used to improve make improvements, recommended in an earlier funded study at bayshore boulevard, cesar chavez and potreto. The area between the gas station at cesar chavez and hampshire and the bridge to southbound bayshore boulevard designed for the segments known in the study f and g is complete and public works is working to obtain necessary permits from caltrans. I can take questions and we have public works here. Per commissioner yee. Supervisor yee thank you. My question is around the twin peek tunnel project that has been delayed at least a year. And basically this is the tunnel itself is celebrating their 100th Year Anniversary and from Budgeting Program my office in partnership with the sfmta is working to put a Community Event together. Im wondering, has notice gone out to the community about the delay and originally we thought the work was going to be done this summer and second part of that question, whats causing the delay itself . Is mta here . Lets see if dylan young is able to respond. There have been several hiccups with the contract for this process. Sfmta has awarded a new contract that would allow for construction to begin soon. Ill let dylan speak. I know theres an abbreviated schedule than what was originally anticipated in the other contracts that have not been executed or were cancelled, one of them was. Ill let dylan elaborate. Thank you. Through the chair, dylan young to commissioner yee, thank you for Deputy Director laforts introduction. Our project manager is not here at the moment, id be glad to follow up on the information provided to you afterwards. Supervisor yee can we make sure theres notice to the community about the delay. Absolutely. Thank you for the opportunity to provide more information. Supervisor peskin a frustrating pattern. All right. From public works with regard to the lighting and tracks. Good morning commissioners. Im project manager of public works. In terms of the lighting in the hairball, the cesar chavez east plan identified 15 segments in the hairball, segments a through o and during the planning phases, public works electrical engineers did a site inventory of the lighting of all 15 segments as part of the design for segments f and g, we looked at the evaluation and determined the lighting was adequate, although it could use upgrade. Our segments f and g have three existing lights, two are adjacent one is pointing directly on the path, one is an existing roadway light and two stairway lights that are where the end of segments f and g end. We