Good. Thank you, commissioner rosaless. I have a couple of questions. Just to clarify what you meant about the selection. That you have this list. Are you refering to the 5,000 something list that you mention. And kaord nating with mocd. Yeah. Exactly. Mocd obtains the list of c. O. P. Holders and they Work Together to identify c. O. P. Holders on the coordinated entry list. But it is ultimately the living daytoday manager of that coordinated entry list. And they are the organization that will select and that those with will qualify after the c. O. P. Holders receive the units, right . The remaining units will be from that list. Are they not on the dahlia list . No. A totally separate list . Yes. This is a totally separate list. Afternoon they and they have been work on this for a couple of years now. My understanding is they had 15 difference databases out there. And so everybody had a little bit of different information and it was very hard to track how well they were doing and whether what needs they were addressing and not addressing. So, their attempt has been to consolidate all of that information so they can track a persons history of using all the various city supported services. So when theyre coming in, staying at a shelter, if theyre coming through a Navigation Centre or coming in through some other referral clinic and what their history of homelessness has been and then allows them to work with them on housing readiness and make sure that the folks that theyre referring in are ready and then also prioritize folks by level of need and make sure that those permanent supportive units are going the folks who need them the most. And then sending others to properties where, you know, maybe they just need rapid rehousing and a little bit of a lift to get back quickly into housing if theyve not been on the street for a very long time. They have a number of interventions identified and theyve spelled these out in their recent framework. They will be the ones who manage that on a daytoday basis. And this is a city agency . It is, yes. And so this is the first time ive heard that, that they theres actually well i know about the agency. But this is the first time ive heard about the list that they have been maintaining and updating. Right. And that they will be we will be using the developer will be using the list to select who will qualify for this 141 units. Can you expand on the c. H. P. Services . What are the services that they offer . Sure. I can let c. H. P. Speak to that directly. But they will be book managing the property and then providing extensive Wraparound Services for folks who are there. But gail can probably speak much better than that. We have early evening support services on the site. It consist of folks who are certified licenses and clinicians and team leads. They will do everything from doing Group Activities at the site. Triggers for Mental Health to bingo night, movie night, gardening. They will do a range of activities on the site. Provide oneonone counseling, Case Management services. And nursing available since we anticipate the many of the individuals referred to us. As many do who are in our homeless community. That is just the service staffing. Well then have from a Property Management perspective, 24 7 Lobby Services, lobby Concierge Services by a doorman and they wont be able to access that property without going through that doorman first and well have an onsite manager and that manager wont physically be there 24 hours a day, seven days a week, there will be an additional layer of oncall coverage and someone whos living on site to support those Lobby Services sfr a security perspective. Well have janitorial and maintenance. At any given moment in time during normal business hour which is for us is 8 00 a. M. To about 8 00 p. M. , they will be anywhere from 3 00 to 7 00 site staff who work under Community Housing partnership. And who pays for these services . Well contract with the department of homelessness and supportive housing. Well also build medical because were a medical billing provider to be reimbursed for those services and then will be provided a subsidy yet to be determined by the Mayors Office of housing, either project based vouchers or the loft programme, the local operating subsidy programme. Well, great services. And you are you are also servicing renee actually, currently we are not. We have a bid in with the department of Public Health at the time that renee cosinov was done, we were not a medical biller and now we have for five years. We dont know the outcome of that bidding process will be, but our 17 propertis in San Francisco, two are where we dont currently provide services due to the fact that at the point in time of that bid for services we could not medicall bill. But we hope to change that eventually. And which of our properties are you servicing . Currently we are not servicing the ocii site. This will be the first time for ocii but we do have 15 properties under the per view of the Mayors Office of housing. Very good. Thank you. Thank you for your time, commissioners. Any other comments, questions . Yes, commissioner singh . One last question. I want to ask mr. Lee [laughter] what compliance, you know, was the developers have been very cooperative. Weve had a couple of meetings. Mariaable ha assigned to the project and shes been having ongoing dialogue with the Development Time in terms of issuing a craftsman proposal for the initial services and we had meetings about modular as well and what some of that impact will be regarding Small Business so they have been very cooperative. Thank you. And just realised there is no parking in this facility. Except for two. Thats right. Just a couple of staff and delivery spaces. As we were preparing to issue this r. F. P. , we toured a number of existing facilities and spoke with Property Management staff and found that there just waunlt demand for resident parking. Those that did have parking lots, like bishop [inaudible] in soma found that the cars sat generally unused. We felt it was not the best use of resources or space to allocate resident park. Others than bike parking. Right. And how many bike Parking Spaces . I want to say we had them at a. 5 ratio so i think were at around 70 spaces or so. 70 . Yes. 70. Yeah. Thank you for your presentation. Very informative. Very thorough. So now we are going to be. Motion. Voting on this matter. So i need a motion. I move. Im sorry . [inaudible]. Weve closed Public Comments for this matter. So if you want to make a comments, we have another one on public another [inaudible]. Weve closed the Public Comments. But you can make a comment later. [inaudible]. No, after the presentation, we do the Public Comment. [inaudible]. Council, can we open this for Public Comments . Weve already closed it, right . Yeah. Sir, were you here earlier to submit a comment card when they call for Public Comment no, i was [inaudible]. Madame chair, i think to your discretion. Its to your discretion to reopen Public Comments, to receive an additional Public Comment. How many speaker card dos we have for this, if we open it . Four. Im sorry . This one, we already had four. No. No. If we reopen, how many pending speaker cards do we have . Just him . You are not required. It is to your discretion. And your comment, sir, is specific to this. And might impact our vote . It may. It very well may. I will open a Public Comment for this item and will you please fill out a speaker card . Ill identify myself and fill out a speaker card. Pardon me, im short of breath. I ran over here from my office a few blocks away as i was watching this on tv. My name is alex lanceberg. Im research and [inaudible]. Excuse me. Research and advocacy director for the local Electrical Construction industry. And as i was watching this, what really got me out of my chair and running over here was the discussion that this was going to be a modular project. Something that i didnt hear mention here, but its a growing issue here in San Francisco is the fact that there is an argument by the modular manufacturing industry, the local Building Code amendments do not apply to these projects. So, the minimum Safety Standards that weve established in San Francisco for our fire code, our plumbing code, our seismic code, within the structures of the buildings, within the buildings themselves, arent applicable. Theres effort, theres this item is being discussed in a variety of different forum. Back in november, the Building Inspection Commission took this on. My understanding is theyre going to be revisiting the item as well and theres been or there will soon be a request to actually define and delineate the differences between the local Building Code and whats happening and the california one that manufacturers arguing prevails. While that is happening, i think you should hold off on going whole hog with this type of project. A second issue, and this is something a little bit broader, i think more philosophical to how San Francisco approaches tooerable housing, for years, and weve seen it in mission bay, we have heard and i think san franciscans have generally agreed that Affordable Housing should not be of a lesser quality than not a great product. What we have with modular, if this interpretation does ultimately prevail, is that the Affordable Housing that were building for lower income people is actually not going to meet our local Safety Standards. And you as a Redevelopment Agency or the former Redevelopment Agency, should ask yourselves whether this is the type of policy you want to endorse and whether or not this is something well be doing moving forward. Basically saying that were going to put lesser Safety Standards on poor peoples housing than we are for Everything Else that gets built. So as you deliberate, hope you asker this. So, now we move on to take a vote . Do we have a motion . Motion by commissioner singh. Seconded by commissioner bustos. Will you please call the vote . [roll call] please announce your vote when i call your name. Madame chair, the vote is four ayes. Thank you. So, the motion carries. And madame secretary, please call the next item. The next order of business is agenda item 5e, workshop on the july through december 2017 reports on ocii Small Business enterprise and local hiring goal practices discussion. Madame director . Thank you, madame secretary. This item is the regularly scheduled item twice a year where the Contract Team presents on a workshop on a sixmonth period on ocii Small Business enterprise and local hiring goals policies and practices. With that, today, we have raymond here as well as some of our partners in various project areas also striebl respond to questions. I expect that maria as part of this presentation could potentially introduce some of our representives here today. With that, ill turn it over to maria. Good afternoon, commissioners. My name is maria and ill be presenting the s. B. E. And local hiring goals for the period of july 1 through december 30, 2017. Adopted in november of 2004, the s. B. E. Programme seeks to increase opportunities for Small Businesses. Particularly San Franciscobased Small Businesses who compete for contracts on ocii assisted projects. Ocii implements this policy by requiring developers and contractors to give first consideration to s. B. E. S when awarding yts. The policy further requires that priority be given to Small Businesses in the following order. Promise areas s. B. E. S, local s. B. E. S or firms on ocii project areas, but with outside of ocii project areas but within San Francisco and all other s. B. E. S outside of San Francisco. Nonlocal s. B. E. S are allowed to satisfy participation goals only when they are significantly higher than nonSan Francisco s. B. E. S. The policy establishes an ambitious participation goal of 50 . Ocii staff works closely with developer and contractors to ensure that they are diligent in making goodfaith efforts in reaching contracting goals. Outreach is a critical component and contractors are routinely required to give l. B. S notice of contracting opportunities. Meanwhile, our procurement policy requires a minimum 30day advertisement period to ensure that Small Businesses have sufficient time to respond to available opportunities. Our joint venture and Association Programme offers incentives for partnerships between nons. B. E. S and s. B. Firms. Ocii encourages contractors and consultants to identify areas where Small Business can participate and break apart scopes of work, even where such work is normally selfperformed. The goal of the partnerships to foster mentorship and increase capacity for larger scopes of work. For professional services, staff is involved in the r. F. Q. And r. F. P. Process. This entails reviewing proposals, monitoring interviews, reviewing short lists and reviewing consultant selections. Similarly, for Construction Contracts, staff is involved in the solicitation process. Submittal meetings and tabulation of reviews and contract selection before contracts are awarded. These actives are conducted with the purpose of ensuring contractors are performing goodfaith efforts and considering San Francisco businesses first. For projects for s. B. S participation goals are not met, contractors must document efforts and provide ocii. It also sets revenue limits for s. C. S. They were implemented in july of 2015 in an effort to mitigate marketplace confusion and improve programme administration. Ociis adopted standards to conform to the city and county of San Franciscos local Business Enterprise programme. In order to qualify as a Small Business, a firms growth receipts averaged over three years must not exceed the following threshholds for the respective classfications. 20 million for Construction Contractors. 14 million for Specialty Construction contractors, 10 million for suppliers, 2. 5 million for professional services and 3. 5 million for trucking. Between the period of july 1 through to december 30, 2017, contract valued at more than 91 million were awarded for design and Construction Service on six major developments. These contracts support a variety of promise ranging from inclusionary housing, Public Information and commercial development and the shipyard and Candlestick Park project areas. They were awarded by developers and their contractors. Data was synthesized youing contract award information. Gathered from ociis elation webbased reporting tool. Overall, s. B. Credit granted for this project is valued at just over 50 . With actual s. B. Participation at just under 39 . The difference between the two figures can be explained in how they credit s. B. Participation. Mainly, nons. B. Firms. [please stand by] please stand by]. Which represents a decrease of 4. 9 of the prior reporting period. The percentage for professional Service Contracts remaining well above ociis goal of 50 , reaching nearly 60 , an increase of. 3 from the prior period. Meanwhile, the percentage achieving 27. 9 , a decrease of 4. 5 from the prior period. [ please stand by ]. Commonly found in apartment buildings and singlefamily homes. The advantage of type 5 is its accessible and easy to construction, as opposed to type 1 construction, which requires deep construction and structural cell trim frames. There are few, if any, sbs to independently perform these scopes of work. To demonstra the second diagram shows sc percentages on all types of project. Notwithstanding type 1 construction, as the chart demonstrates, removing this results in a. 6 increase of all types of Construction Contracts. When affecting the past three years of activity, professional Services Contracts have consistently surpassed the sb goal and hovered around 50 with a modest but steady increase. The note that the construction trim line began to decrease in november 2016, with a commencement of more than 1 billion in construction for several highrise apartment tower structure