Clerk there are 10 ayes. President yee ordinary. This ordinance is passed on First Reading with 100 vote. [gavel]. President yee madam clerk, please call the next item. [agenda item read]. President yee supervisor peskin or supervisor peskin ill defer to the maker. Supervisor safai so colleagues, this is a resolution related to a. D. U. S. We have had discussions for months in land use and transportation committee. Id like to thank supervisor peskin as well as members of the community that have waited patiently. This is a two phase program. One is a ministerial program, and one is ensuring that we have a local waiver program. It is making sure we have what is required at the state level. It is state law. Essentially, how the process works is if you want to put an a. D. U. In r. H. 1 through r. H. 3, you have to do it after the construction is done. This mirrors who at is allowedt the state level. We did this to look at new construction and ensuring that we would maximize a. D. U. S and new construction. We also were aware in some cases if there were demolitions or expansions that we would have to take into account the noticing of existing tenants, and that were some of the amendments that supervisor peskin and the tenants advocates worked with us on, and so essentially, we would notice the existing tenants that construction was going to happen, when it was going to happen, and how it was going to happen. We also fixed the zoning tables to ensure that it conformed with state law. We had this go through the Planning Commission and as i said multiple conversations at the land use and transportation committee. This will be a step forward in ensuring that we get more housing and more density in areas that have been low, to get more additional density. And then, we tried to take some additional steps where if we were allowing variances, and some of those variances were allowed to be captured under rent control. Essentially, this piece has had a lot of legislation, a lot of input, and a lot of support from the community and others that have waited patiently for it. Before i hand it over to supervisor peskin, we do have one piece of cleanup. We strike out the word offstreet parking on page 22. You all have a copy of that. Thats just to conform to the copies. Id like to thank staff for all of this and supervisor peskins office. And i will hand it over to supervisor peskin. President yee supervisor peskin . Supervisor peskin thank you, president yee. I want to thank supervisor safai for bringing this forward and be clear what this means for the city and county of San Francisco. As supervisor safai mentioned, i was an early supporter of a. D. U. Over a decade and a half ago. And then, in 2016, when i first got back on the board after being gone for seven years, i was proud to coauthor the expand of the citys a. D. U. Citywide. But in all of those iterations, the work that was done by my predecessor, as well as supervisor wiener, all were predicated on a. D. U. S being subject to rent control, and earlier today, supervisor mandelman and supervisor stefani talked about the ongoing trend in the state legislature about our preemption to do whats right for our constituents. The needs of San Francisco are very different, and the history of legislation in San Francisco is very different than in other places, whether its scooter legislation in a highly congested, crowded, dense city or whether its a. D. U. Legislation as it relates to rent control. So unfortunately, yet again, were being preempted. Lets talk about what this is. This is legislation, for all intents and purposes, means that singlefamily legislation in San Francisco no longer exists. And i absolutely support legislation that would densify singlefamily homes if that wou predicate them an a. D. U. Here, supervisor safai was more than willing, and in the coming weeks, i will continue to work with the state lemgislature an continue to try to recapture some of the that flexibility that we once enjoyed. So while i support the legislation, my support, unfortunately, because of that is qualified, but i will vote for it today. Supervisor safai through the president , supervisor peskin, can you just explain a little more for the listeners what happened because it would be interesting to hear so everyone understands exactly this has nothing to do with what we did why our legislation. This has something to do with the vote we took this past week. Supervisor peskin as the state legislature is trying to, over the past couple of sessions, carve out and they have not while we continue to be able to do it in multifamily, multiunit buildings, we are preempted. There is a bill in the state legislature. I have spoken as recently as a couple of hours ago to assembly man ting. Office is in conversation with the Mayors Office to some amendments that were made to Assembly Bill 68. I dont want to get down in the weeds with it, but im hoping well be able to come up with something. And by the way, i dont want to go down this path, but it is entirely possible if were not able to iron those out, i will ask president yee and supervisor stefani to oppose Assembly Bill 68 unless properly presented to this body. But i hope that we dont have to go down that path and can figure something out that our legislators will carry and will not be killed by the legislators in sacramento. President yee recognizing supervisor safai, supervisor mandelman . Supervisor mandelman thank you. What is this amendment . Supervisor safai this is to amend the tables we voted last year to remove the requirement for offstreet parking, so were just bringing it into conformity, through the chair. President yee okay. So supervisor safai i just want to add, did you want to Say Something . President yee no, no. Supervisor safai im just going to close with all that being said by supervisor peskin, i think this was a good and thoughtful process. I think there were a lot of people involved in this process. I think we have the ability now to continue to add density, to add more housing and more a. D. U. S in multiple categories. I think this encourages new construction to think about adding a. D. U. S rather than coming back later and doing what we know actually happens in the construction process where they build the space in, and then, they do it without the requirement without the approval, without the proper documentation, and then, it comes after the fact and puts people in harms way. This allows for, in new construction, again, also for the spaces to be sprinklered. It allows for spaces to be thought of, both ingress and egress. So were thinking about the health and safety of the people that will be living in this property. The last thing i did not highlight is we talk about a minimum size of the a. D. U. S, so its not an afterthought, its a good balance of the people that would be living there. So all that said, colleagues, i ask for your support, and i think this would be a big step forward for the city of San Francisco, and as supervisor peskin said, hes been working on this for two decades, and i know theres other pieces of legislation in fact, we split the file, and supervisor peskin has some additional work that he is doing that will go back to the Planning Commission, so i ask for your support. Thank you. President yee so i have a question on this legislation, and i may supervisor safai, you may have the question or if i need to ask deputy City Attorney givner. Many of these legislations have a different impact in my district because we have so many associations in district 7, because they have their own bylaws, what we call cc rs. And when this was coming up, many individuals would contact my Office Asking what right do we have under the cc rs, and they could never get a straight answer. Im just wondering how this legislation if passed affects the cc rs today. Supervisor safai ill defer to City Attorney givner. Mr. Givner deputy City Attorney jon givner. The homeowners can agree to add additional restrictions in cc rs. The ordinance itself does not change the cc rs or allow uses that the homeowners agree to restrict in their private agreements. So in other words, the city proposes a zoning overlay, and homeowners associations can agree to restrict themselves more closely than city law restricts them. President yee supervisor safai . Supervisor safai just a clarification. If the cc r didnt contemplate something of that nature, then how is that dealt with . I think thats more the point of supervisor yees question. If they didnt contemplate the i dont know, whatever it may be that then comes down from the state as part of state law, and it then comes down as a local ordinance, if it didnt contemplate higher levels of density, how is that dealt with . Mr. Givner im im not entire leisure how to answer. I think it depends on the particular cc rs of the particular h. O. A. Were not regulating the content of the cc rs, so it sounds like a question the h. O. A. Would have to resolve among its own members. President yee i havent seen my h. O. A. Cc rs in 30 years. I think they allow an inlaw apartment, so if they sign on to the cc r if they bought the home, does this legislation give them the right to break the agreement . Mr. Givner this legislation does not change the terms of any private agreement, so it it changes the citys zoning rules but doesnt impact a private agreement between homeowners. President yee okay. I think thats helpful. Thank you very much. I believe we have to take theres theres a motion to make an amendment. Is there a second on that . Seconded by supervisor peskin. If theres no objection, then, the amendment is passed. [gavel]. President yee can we take roll on this item as amended. Clerk on item 18 as amended [roll call] clerk there are 11 ayes. President yee okay. Thank you. Madam clerk, please call the next item. Clerk item 19 is an ordinance to amend the administrative code to advise the controller to submit reports concerning the safe overnight Pilot Program and amending the police coded for participants to participating in the Pilot Program as a vehicle for principal habitation. President yee supervisor brown . Supervisor brown thank you, president yee. My office has worked collaboratively with h. S. H. And San FranciscoPolice Department to create a simple carveout. With this legislation, our Triage Center and overnight Safe Parking Program can operate and safely and securely. Program participants who have to resort to live in their vehicles while receiving services onsite will be protected. We will also have clarity with our Police Department. We learned from the 2019 pointintime count San FranciscoHomeless Population increased by 17 . Much of that was driven by individuals and families living in cars and r. V. S, and im asking my colleagues to support this so we can have a solid start on this program as soon as possible. This is a growing issue, and it needs to be addressed. Thank you. President yee okay. Thank you. Colleagues, can we take this item same house, same call . Without objection, this ordinance is passed on First Reading unanimously. Madam clerk, please call next item. Clerk item 20 is to appoint ike kwon to the Treasure Island board of directors to a determine ending april 30, 2022. President yee colleagues, can we take this same house, same call . Colleagues, this item is approved unanimously. Madam clerk, call the next item. [agenda item read]. President yee colleagues, can we take this same house, same call . Without objection, this item is approved unanimously. [gavel]. President yee madam clerk, can we go to Committee Reports . Clerk yes. Items 22 and 23 were considered by the budget and finance committee at a special meeting may 26. Item 22 is an item to declare that the public necessity require the seismic retrofitting of various safety Emergency Response centers in an amount not to exceed 628. 5 million and to adopt the appropriate findings. President yee colleagues, can we take this same house, same call . Without objection, this item is adopted unanimously. Madam clerk, please call the next item. Clerk item 23 was not forwarded and is not before the board. The next item is introductions. Supervisor safai. Okay. Refer. Supervise stefani . Supervisor stefani may i please rerefer, as well. Clerk supervisor call walton. Supervisor walton rerefer. Clerk okay. Supervisor yee . President yee colleagues, i am proposing legislation to assist our ageing population in San Francisco. By 2030, 26 of our preponderates will be seniors. Of our population will be seniors, and we need to invest and give thoughtful attention to places that seniors can age in with dignity. Seniors 60 and older makeup almost a quarter of the persons in San Francisco who are under the poverty line. The city has not planned for or built sufficient housing suitable for seniors today. In our citys pipeline of Affordable Housing units, only 12 are being proposed for affordable Senior Housing. Not only are we not building enough housing for seniors, when we do build them, they are clearly not affordable for seniors. Many seniors are surviving off of fixed income such as social security. Not even the most Affordable Housing units are fixed at 50 a. M. I. For one person, that income is roughly 41,000. Seniors makeup to three times less than that on their fixed incomes. This situation is untenable as more of our residents are retiring and relying on fixed incomes. Seniors who are housing insecure can be spending up to 150 , 150 of their income on rent. This is not a burden anyone should have to bear, especially those who have no safety nets. This is a life or death situation for many of our elders. The problem is clear, but with you need to start focusing on solutions. The Affordable Housing bond work group on Senior Housing provided recommendations that we can start and act upon it now to help provide a measure of stability. For the first time ever, they will propose dedicated funds to building new affordable Senior Housing. This is a start, but this only solves one part. The question is how can we make sure these units actually are affordable so that the seniors arent shut out of qualifying . This is why we are introducing s. O. S. , or senior operating Subsidies Program fund to meet the demand for truly affordable Senior Housing. This program will lower the cost of a unit to meet seniors where they are at. Instead of 50 of a. M. I. Units, units will be set at 15 and 20 a. M. I. So that seniors can actually qualify to enroll in these Affordable Housing units. This is hopefully the start to a more thoughtful strategy of how we can support our ageing population before it is too late. We will also be working through the budget process to ensure that this fund is able to support a Demonstration Program to start getting seniors into truly Affordable Housing units. I want to thank the seniors and advocates who have come out time and time again courageously sharing their stories and struggles. Colleagues, i hope i can count on your support when it comes up. The other thing i want to introduce is i want to urge the university of california San Francisco to introduce labor harmony as part of their negotiations with resident physicians at ucsf. In medicine, this is a doctor hierarchy that everyone who has had a visit at a hospital can be confused by. In a large Teaching Hospital such as ucsf, you can see medical students who are not licensed physicians, physicians in training, and then others who are fully trained and then supervising other physicians. A resident is somewhere in the middle of this doctor hierarchy. They are typically a physician who has graduated from medical school and is now pursuing 2 to 7 years of specialized training in an area such as internal medicine. Reside now resident physicians can be disciplined for different reasons, including not meeting the socalled professionalism standards. This can be very subjective determination and asking for a process by which a resident physician can appeal to a neutral party is a reasonable request, so right now, they dont have that. Especially given the consequences can be very serious, residents who are disciplined are up for termination in a residency program, which can result in the end of a medical career for an individual. The resolution that i am cosponsoring today urges ucsf to demonstrate a commitment to to labor harmony in their contract negotiations by including language that would allow resident physicians an opportunity to appeal discipline imposed on them that is alleged to meet professionalism standards. It does not mandate any outcome or overturn any decisions made, but it would afford dual process protection to resident physicians, provide thousands of hours of vital medical care to many of our San Francisco residents, visitors, and workers each day. So i want to thank my colleagues for their support, especially my cosponsors, supervisor mar, brown, peskin, safai, and haney, and ronen. So i appreciate your sponsorship. The rest i submit. Clerk thank you, president yee. Supervisor brown . Supervisor brown thank you, today im introducing amendments to the legislative code that affects our First Responders when they suffer from heart trouble or pneumonia. This will bring our ordinance in