Provide it. We are looking for some input in terms of the impact. You can see some of the maps that have been shown to you, as to the massive notice of the projects, the building, the homeowners live is a four story condominium building. You can imagine the massive notice of this project coming up in the 40 story building. As mentioned, what we are looking for is some input we have been trying to follow the project. Sometimes we have gone online to see what has been done, we noticed that there have been things that have been changed in the plans. I know maybe there is some argument that there has been some community input. I can tell you there is a large number of people here that have not had the impotent that is what we are looking for. What were asking from you is a postponement in this Decision Just so we can meet and talk with the developer so that we can have some say in terms of the small impacts whether it be setbacks, that is kind of what we are looking for. At this point, you can look at the plans and notice again, for some instants, some of the members here architects and they mentioned there is a possibility of a setback. Small things that could possibly be incorporated into the projects. That is what we are asking for. In ending, the staff, in terms of objectives, indicated that i think its on page 32 of the report, section 8. 4, ensuring that the streets and alleyways maintain their intimacy and openness to this guy. I submit to you with this building, it doesnt really follow that objective. All we are asking for is again some input so that we could come up with some plants, at least to give us a little bit more air, and light to make again our lives a little bit easier living in this condominium. Understanding it is good for the city of San Francisco. Also understanding we are going to have to live through the construction, Everything Else that will go on as part of this project. I would just ask the commission to postpone their decision. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Thank you. My name is michael cruz. I have been a resident and owner of a unit at 6014th st. For over 30 years. The people who live at 601, we have been residents there, we are business owners. We support, as everyone has said, this building. However, there are things that we cant support simply because we have not had adequate input into a conversation as far as making some decisions that have been approved or have been in the final plan. My goal is here to share some reasons why we would ask for a delay of this decision. First off, can we have there, thank you. This is 6014th st. Right here. That is where the southeast facing lofts are that are effective. The first reason why we want to have this delay, is because the plans that were posted last night, or the plans that have been posted are incorrect. It drove the public to the wrong information. It was only updated last night. The link provided on the Planning Commission website directed the public to outdated package implants. They updated the evening of june 19, that was last night and it was updated for the final plans. Residents and neighbors have not been properly notified of the final plans. Weve only had one day to really look at this 401 page package. Our second reason is that the project does not meet the planning code. It does not meet the requirements of the planning code section 1324. Code section outline set bakes, and tower separation controls in the central somo as you d. For example, this area right here, there is no real setback on this area for here. Yes there is a plaza here that brings in light, and there is these towers that are tapered. As you know, the tower right here that juts up right against this building on the east lofts are directly against it. They are only 30 feet away from the area. What i am looking for the last reason is air. Air and light. Specifically the light. This is what it looks like today, on unit 210. That is with the light coming through. This is on the second floor. This is what would happen if the tower went up, that would be it. That would be the light coming in. It is very different than what it is. Thank you, sir. Your time is up. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, members of the public and the commission. I am also a owner, with my partner, two of the units facing the site. When we moved here, from our offices in union square. We are a design firm. We were very excited and we have been in this building for more than 25 years now. We have seen the area evolve. We have been well aware of this project, generally very supportive of this project for all of the reasons i will not elaborate. Here is the problem. As somebody who is very supportive of the project, i spent 1012 hours per day at my office here, in this building. I think i must have noticed the notices, they were amazingly large, by the way, ive never seen notices that large, six of them pasted all across. I could stand 10 feet away and see the link that was provided. I have a picture of it. I went there right away. We spent 10 days evaluating. Only to be told last night, at my home, that that was incorrect information. I see no reason, very unfortunate how this project can legally be even approved. The notice was so erroneous. When i say erroneous, it sent us two sketches that we were told later, were done in 2018 on the project. That aside, postponement seems to me to be the obvious solution, otherwise there would be legal jeopardy, this whole thing. In the sketches i do support some of the earlier speakers. It just seems a little unfortunate that for such an interesting, articulated project, the one side that did not articulate, at all, is the side that faces our building. It is the only site that has no setback. Its the only side the building is not articulated. It doesnt even step back after 85 feet which is what the zoning requires. It gives a bad taste, because it feels like we have been treated like a municipal yard. We are school buses parked at night, that is it. I really think the designers are certainly capable of designing all sides in away the building, our side as well as the other sites have been treated. I conclude. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Thank you for hearing us this late in the afternoon. My name is noel, i have owned a unit for the last 30 years at 6014th st. I agree with what a lot of the previous homeowners have said, as well. I think a postponement would be ideal of what is happening with the situation and the fact we did not get this information until last night. I am here to read a letter from a fellow homeowner, eric bultman who was unable to be here because of how late this meeting ended up going. Im just going to read what his statements were. Eric is a registered architect. I wanted to add that weight to his written words. Dear commissioners, i emailed you all yesterday after conversation with the planner. The web link for the documents you are being asked to vote on today was not added to the Planning Department notice website, until last night. Therefore, proper notification was not given and neighbors have not had time to review the updated documents. We are asking for a delay in the proceedings to review the package, and properly be prepared to review these documents before they are voted on. Also, of the greatest concern is that the project does not meet the setback requirements of the planning code. There is no justification for such gross exception. In particular, the Northwest Side of the proposed vertical 400 foot articulated wall is in my opinion, is better informed. The outward facing size of this project should all be treated similarly. We are asking you to please instruct the developer to meet all of the setback requirements, per the planning code. The planning code that outline setbacks and street documentation is a well studied document. 655, Fourth Street is a very large parcel project and gross exceptions to the setback requirements are not warranted here. Without the proper setbacks, the project will have a detrimental effect on our neighbors and property. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. He owned a unit in this building, since 1990. We are renting it out since 2003. That is almost 20 years. We have had Great Success with renting it out. The last four years, it was a little more problematic because of the light Rail Construction going on. Potential renters said, this does not look so pretty, we might have traffic issues here. We had to rent it out for the last four years with lower than market rent. The light rail project has not been done yet. There is still dust and noise. Now were going to add, next door, huge three years construction site without any real proper notice as my former speakers said. We had the information only last year, last night, 400 pages, you just cannot leave through them. I think we teed need to look properly at everything before we can something. Our loft is on the ground floor in the yard, we do not have any direct sunlight already. With 40 stories next to ours it is going to be a dark cave which will be very the set backs for neighbors on all sides and creating an ecosystem and this sort of new way of living and being communal. I desire the same. Ive committed to this building and ive loved to have it as my neighbor. In some ways im asking for the same. To also consider that the importance of light, the importance of having the same essence is what i desire. Again, im not opposed to this but im quite excited. Currently, in the space i live in, i will have obstructed, ill look directly into peoples faces and ill lose light and air. Thank you. Thank you. Members of the Planning Commission, for allowing me to speak today. My name is victor har get and i am a member of the carpenters of local 22. I live in San Francisco here and i am in favor of the 655 Fourth Street project. The project will allow a carpenter like me to continue living here in San Francisco. The project will help me continue my career as a carpenter working towards retirement. The project will provide me with the necessary benefits and income to provide for myself and my family. The project i am in full support of 655 Fourth Street project. And ask that you would pass this project and allow them the opportunity to have a responsible general contractor build this project. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening, president melgar. Fellow commissioner members. Thank you for the opportunity to speak. My name is timothy and im a field carpenter where i represent 4,000 Union Carpenters. Im also a re dent of san recein francisco. Im here to speak in favor of the project that will create hundreds of Union Carpenter jobs that will provide apprenticeship opportunities to members of our local communities. These opportunities will provide Health Benefits and retirement for these individuals. This project will provide over 960 units of desperately needed housing for San Francisco. They have been a great partner and has done a great job putting this development together. We are in complete support of this development and ask you move forward with this project and thank you for your time. Good evening, commissioners. My name is ryan hung. Im with h. D. Butter cup and were actually a tenant of tishman and we have a positive working relationship with them and with the past few years and they have been very easy to work with and transparent and very capable. We are in full support of this development. Its absolutely very exciting. Its definitely going to add more housing to help offset some of the growing demand inhousing and as well as adding official special space for mid sized businesses and ultimately it will be a positive impact for the central coma area. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. I want to express my strong support of the Housing Project at 655 Fourth Street. I am the owner and the manager of two establishments at the project site. The iron cactus and the creamery. Weve been a part of this neighborhood for a decade and weve seen the community we serve grow and expand from commuters and giants fans to start up and tech employees and lots of residents. S has the community has expanded, so have my businesses and other merchants in the area. Projects which brings more day and nighttime residents to the area have businesses like the iron cactus thrive. As a business owner, i believe strongly that we have a responsibility as a member of the community. We volunteer, we Welcome Community groups to use our back patio at no charge and we try to be good partners to our neighbors. Im confident this will be a good partner to its neighbors. The project itself provides new plazas and open spaces that we would all be able to use. It provides new retail that will meet neighborhood needs and activate the street cape and the interior of the site. As the operator of this site. They have management and aroundtheclock security that will ensure the spaces safe, especially in the evening hours. I worked with them and they have lands for this project and we have established a Strong Partnership that will allow the creamery to continue to live on in this vibrant neighborhood. We have both signed a letter of intent to allow the cream reto lease space on the ground floor of the new project and i believe it will be better than ever in its new home. This project will have address our dire need of a rental housing at a neighborhood level, it will support existing businesses like the creamery. I urge you to approve this project today. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, todd david on behalf of the Housing Action coalition. Very excited to support this project. Its not often that we get to come here and talk about 960 new units of housing in San Francisco. As weve discussed the central coma plan the last number of years, we were certainly, there were a lot of concerns about so much commercial property gowing into central soma and where is the housing so here is the housing so i think that as we look at commercial properties we can point to this project and its exciting that the mayor office of housing will receive 65 million from this project and we were recently at an announcement for a 100 affordable Housing Project thatt purchased by the city and funds like this are used to purchase those 100 Affordable Housing sites so its great to see that come along with 960 units of rental housing on top of that. Its my understanding the design of this project has not changed in many years so that it sounds like maybe there was a little flip in something around the noticing but the design has not changed so i dont see it as a reason to not approve this project today. So, thank you very much. Bye. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Sue hester. This project has had two week advance staff report requirement posting plans last night on the site doesnt meet the requirement that you expect or of the code. There is some concern about the changes being made as well as plans being available. That is a valid concern. One of the issues you have on this project is the building to the north is technically commercial, not the residential. And so, the Planning Department doesnt look at this as though there are people there. Thats one of the issues around the work. Im very well aware of the work. Theyre all approved as commercial developments and if the Planning Department is treating them like quasi residential, but not really looking at them as quasi residential when a building next door cuts off their light, this issue has come up before and this is not the first time. I think its a reasonable request for the people that live next door to have some time to meet because cutting off their light is a big thing to people who live in live and work and are very often used as places that people dont work. Youve heard a lot of people here talking about how they live and work in their studios. Architects and artists specifically need Southern Light or need northern light. They really need light. I think its a reasonable request that theyre making to have a little bit more time for in put, especially if the plans just came through last night that shouldnt have been available two weeks ago. My other point is two other points. This is really going to be high in rental housing because its convenient to Silicon Valley trains and if we have a price point for income of 200,000, which is kind of usual, were going to have that level of housing. My last point is this morning i read an article on in the Business Times and this is one of them. And the article on popeos in the Business Time was all about how you need access, credential you need to access. That is a continuing issue around theyre not real accessible spaces for low income people at all. And so, the fact it takes a Business Times article, they didnt even intentionally call it out. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hell oh my name is roman. Im a resident at 601 Fourth Street. Being a more recent resident, i was aware of the project when we moved in and excited about the project and the prospect for all the retail and park space it adds. However, being a resident and not just someone there that is there during business hours, i have concerns around the proximity of the building that will go up on the Property Line and would like those to be considered and by the Planning Commission. Thank you. Any other Public Comment on this item . Public comment is now closed. I just wanted to address a lot of the concerns regarding the notice and the access to the plans. We did affirm and checking to the issues and our standard notice includes a link to a external website that brings you to adopt plans that basically you can pull up the plans specifically. That document did have the incorrect