People access the station and moving within the station. They have a study underway and theyve done counts within i think it was a week period. And then, preliminary studies show they dont see a lot of crowding from the entrance to the mezzanine, so theyre developing their final recommendations and cost estimates, and the hope is that some of these recommendations could be added and potentially funded with some of the impact fee money for the transit category. And the last study that ill mention is the community stablization strategy. Its an effort that the project that the department initiated in 2017 really recognizing that the city is in an Affordable Housing crisis. The department wanted to better understand what the citys doing with respect to the preservation and that protection with residential and commercial tenants. Its slated to come out later in the summer, and this is a citywide strategy that could be applied to neighborhoods such as that. So ill quickly walkthrough where we are in terms of recommendations. So this is our land use proposal. It hasnt changed significantly since it was before you last. The map on the left shows existi existing zoning and the map on the right shows the proposed zoning. So were proposing to rezone all the n. C. T. Parcels to c3g parcels, and all of that would be within the vanness market s. U. D. Were also planning to make a few tweaks so allowing a little bit more flexibility for nonresidential use dos, stricter parking uses, stricter parking requirements, providing some incentives for art uses, and some requirements for microretail to really ensure a mix of retail types. This is the height proposal. The mix on the left shows the towers that are allowed today ranging from between 250 feet to 400 feet, and the remaining parcels are usually about 85 or 120. And so were proposing to raise heights on 18 parcels. This is showing with the orange boundary on the map on the right, and towers between 250 and 690 feet would be allowed at the two intersections. Weve made two changes to the height map since we were here last, which includes 170 otis, and id just like to highlight that, you know, the biggest change that well see in this area really is built out under the existing zoning. Under the existing zoning, we anticipate its a little over 1800 units. So the third piece that we looked at is the public realm. So given all the increase in land use and the increase in the number of people that will be living here and moving here, this is really a plan to revision the alleys and sidewalks and streets. March of 2017 we released a design plan that included all of the sidewalks, streets, and alleys, and weve been working with a lot of departments and projects that front these streets to inform them of the design responsibility and implementation. So heres a level of design thats in the public realm plan. This is 12 street. Were proposing to repurpose the road way to make wider sidewalks, to make it greener and a little bit more pleasant. So with all this new development, there are fees associated that can help Fund Infrastructure projects, so weve calculated the amount that can be generated under the existing fees and existing requirement. Weve estimated about 720 million and with the rezoning of the particular sites, its a total of about 946 million. And ill just walkthrough our recommendations for each of these categories. So weve estimated about 670 million for new onsite affordable units and resources. All projects would be subject to the inclusionary requirements that exist today as well as the affordable marketing fees. So this we estimate about 2100 Affordable Housing units. The fees associated with the upzoning on those 18 sites translates to an additional 643 units which gets us to about 29 affordability overall for the plan area. We estimate about 116 million for transit improvements and thinking this would largely go to improving Transit Service and capacity at vanness station. We estimate 71 million for street and alley improvements and have identified three priorities for how this funding would be spent. The first on sort of the major streets in the area, the second adjacent on alleys in the major development, and the third for new streets and alleys to be determined. Weve estimated about 57 million for Child Care Centers and schools, about 20 million for child care and about 37 million for schools. And 32 million for new parks and enhancements to existing open spaces and weve identified the following priorities. So the First Priority would be the new park at 11 and natoma, improvements to some of the parks, and the last new open spaces in the hub. And because the hub is a relatively small area, many of the new open space opportunities fall adjacent to the plan area. So in order to use impact fee revenue to fund these open space improvements, we would need to expand the area in which impact fee money can be spent, and this is something that weve been getting public input on. So ill just conclude by our next steps. Were going to continue to advance the Environmental Review process. The draft e. I. R. Is anticipated to come out in about two weeks, and theres a hearing in august. Were going to further refine the public developments packages based on the information weve heard. Well be drafting the planning code and general plan amendments, and were expecting adoption in the winter of 2020. So that concludes my presentation. Im happy to hear your comments and answer any questions. Vice president koppel thank you. Like to open this up for Public Comment. Anyone like to speak on this item . Good afternoon, commissioners, peter papadopolous. Yeah we ive been meet with the department, weve been meeting with citywide allies. We have a lot of concerns about this, and just the simplest way to say it is from a framework perspective. This is partly because of the work done by the Planning Department and other strategies. We think when we havent done is take the last and clear next step which is to say what is the equity lens that things are coming out through. And in fact as many of us probably know, right down the hallway will be an office of race and equity hearing today as the supervisors propose to take exactly that step and in fact, i would suggest if it looks like this is going to be Going Forward, it would be a good idea to run this through that among many others. People in the neighborhood specifically, what can we expect instead of really hoping were going to catch up with mitigations because things like Affordable Housing and i say this from an Affordable Housing builder p builder perspective, and i think we should call them strategies. What we really want is a Community Cultural stablization ecosystem. That said, i just want to note a couple of other additional items. I think that one of the issues that frames this, too, is im worried about shifting from an n. C. T. To a c3g. N. C. T. Is specifically neighborhood serving community by definition. Thats what the point of it is. C3g said this is regional serving. Yes, this is a bit of a transit hub, but this issue of were going to up zone and now were going to regionalize is sort of gentrification. Theres no capacity to add fees beyond this, yet we know were transferring huge, huge amounts of wealth. And what does that do to our wealth inequality we already have in were worried about it. Were using the same metrics. If were transferring tens, hundreds of millions of dollars of wealth and we cant recapture that. Thank you. Vice president koppel thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Lisa petrucelli with our commission, no eviction. You think we would have learned the lessons from not having robust area plans and valuable captures for our communities. And to up zone adjacent to these vulnerable communities, are we not learning . 30 increase in homelessness, 40 increase in People Living in their cars . At 1801 mission and 1863 mission, as soon as they broke ground, weve lost 70 of our neighbors on minna, natoma, and 14. And director rahaim, you live in the neighborhood, and you see the conversion of these houses. Were talking about strategies that were going to be talking about at the end of this summer, but were just moving ahead without any of these things in place. Where we going to learn . We cant up zone until we have robust area plans and strategies to keep our communities impact and to stablize. We cant just continue at this pace until nobodys left. Thank you. Vice president koppel thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. First, i want to thank all of you for, you know, always taking in the Community Concerns on a number of different projects and lending your ear to some of the Community Concerns that were seeing play out on a daily basis. We do want to kind of look at this under the equity lens. This is a pretty big plan. To me, if you drop a rock in a pool of water, the ripple effects, they bubble out in the areas nearby there. I work at the edge of the market octavia plan. Were seeing businesses moving in that use the police to push their agenda of gentrification. I lives on lived on hayes, and the Property Information plan back then, you could see each building as it was being sold, so it was kind of interesting on watching it on one page for that to happen. I agree with the other speaker about fee recapture. Were seeing community benefits, were seeing land donations. I think this plan needs to look at some of the same ideas. Were getting hammered by these big rocks of density bonus just dropping and the ripples moving around. I live right next to a couple of blocks where 70 people are know out of place. A couple of them are even homeless. Its not on record where they had help with some of their forceful eviction. We need local business protections. Were seeing evictions for businesses, as well. The alleyway and treescapes, its a stuff one. They seem tough one. They seem to be progentrifying. A recent article in the atlantic, to be desirable is to be devoured, and thats what were seeing right now. A market stablization plan, that would be nice. Theres book stores on Market Street that are just barely hanging on. I didnt really see anything this may happen later, but addressing homelessness, Navigation Center sites. Can we actually id fee some parcels so we keep Navigation Centers in this area, too . Thank you. Vice president koppel thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. My name is andrew. I am a resident of d6. Just want to talk about this plan. We do not find that this plan is equitiable. There will be a hearing today about the new market of racial equality that will analyze with how they impact certain communities of color in San Francisco. The offices is to advance Racial Equity in the city, with Racial Disparity defined as where one group unfairly and disproportionately experiences discrimination more so than others. Indeed, that actually everyone would be worse off if immense private wealth were not created. This is mirrored in the hub plan while in the same breath attempting to justify this to the public through Public Benefits. The plan website states following the plans adoption in 2008, most of the housing imagined in the hub was stalled due to the recession. Now the area is receiving concentrated attention from the development community. The website continues that the plan will help create new and additional Affordable Housing, continuing to transit improvements, provide new open space opportunities and or enhance existing open spaces, improve streets and alleys and others as identified through the planning process. And if there is no upzoning, there is no additional benefits. The city gets wider, richer and more unequal as these places aided by the hub and central soma push out working class black and brown people. Appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you. Vice president koppel thank you. Next speaker, please. Sue hester. I am really wanting to commend my friends from the mission from what they just said. There is a lot of truth to what they said about this plan. What is on the overhead is the projects that were approved. And here, you have market and vanness, otherwise known as 1 oak. Here, you have the building right across from the Planning Department that was approved probably four years ago. Market and vanness got approved two years ago, and when there is a rezoning provision, theyre planning on approving the height limit for a project pardon me, for a parcel that has already been approved, and i just noticed it for the first time when she talked about it today. This is this is all right approved. Its going to go from its proposed from going to 400 to 450 feet. Why . People that sit on approvals are increasingly the norm in San Francisco, and this area is one of the areas that you can sit on a project approval and hope to get really rich from selling your approval. I went through the process at the board of supervisors because it was working with people from hayes valley on 1 oak. And it was a troubling process not at the Planning Commission but at the board of supervisors. Vanness and market is a concentration of transit lines and bikes systems, and yet, you have really dense housing going in here, and what no one says, its also the place where demand is dumped from Silicon Valley. Housing demand is dumped on San Francisco from Silicon Valley because of the buses that come right by the Planning Department may go through this intersection. And we have not factored into the fact that we are providing housing now for Silicon Valley, not for people who live here. This area of the city has traditionally been a working class area. People had jobs, and they were not high end. Now we are accommodating people that make 200,000 or 300,000 and up with luxury condos up to 400 feet. The one thing that was c3g zoning. There was industrial zoning entirely in the area. Regional, nonneighborhood. Thank you. Vice president koppel thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi. I was sitting here listening to i was thinking of a couple of things. One, since we had that earthquake in the mojave, i remember when i used to hear the pile drivers at the highrises in the 90s, i dont hear that anymore. For the salesforce tower, i didnt hear that anymore. Ive been told that the goodwill millennial tower, i dont hear that anymore. Ive been told that the goodwill tower is constructed the same way as the millennial tower. There are hundreds if not thousands of unoccupied condos in all the highrises that have been built throughout the city, and maybe even the things that have been converted to condos in the neighborhoods that are not occupied. So maybe we need to think about what kind of occupancy that were building because condos are a way for people to invest money and hide money. Maybe Affordable Housing would be a lot better. Thank you very much. Vice president koppel thank you. Anyone else for Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners . Commissioner john . Commissioner johnson thank you. Thank you to staff for the presentation, and thank you, thank you, thank you to all the speakers who spoke on this plan. You know, i think this department and we have had robust conversations around Racial Injustices. I remember there was one project that was brave enough to have a Racial Injustice analysis and then we havent had any hearings since then. I think when were going to have information about one of the largest projects that were going to see, its crucial that we that its not kind of just a slight of what our Community Plan is but that were really implementing the goals of the department and bringing that Racial Justice and Equity Analysis forward, and i know that there is a department that were going to have. Not many speakers spoke up, but i think we need to have a tool that we name that were at least having those conversations and that there are things that we can do now to begin to explore those issues. The other thing that i would say is i just really appreciated mr. Papadopolous comments around goals and strategies, and that Affordable Housing and some of the other things that were thinking around stablization and strategies, thats great, but explicitly saying the goals that we have for our communities. Making sure that people arent displaced, making sure that were placing more vulnerable populations, really stating the type of integrated community that were trying to build and making sure that were drawing that down to different strategies that were trying to place, and i think thats something within our power to do. So i just really encourage us to continue to work hard to really state clearly and explicitly our values and the ways in which those tie in the strategy, that every opportunity we are informing the community about massive changes for different communities in our neighborhood. Vice president koppel commissioner fung . Commissioner fung multiple questions for staff. I guess in the draft e. I. R. , we will see what the traffic patterns will be, and the impacts. Yes. So all of the street change designs will be represented and implemented in the draft e. I. R. Commissioner fung you know, when the freeway changed and then was demolished, it dumped everything on to the octavia plan based upon the urban design that was pushed forward. Now, that neighborhood is impacted because if you try to go through that in commute hours, its jus